One of the most interesting mysteries of history is the mystery of the young forests of Siberia, to which there is still no clear answer. This is one of the most weighty, in my opinion, arguments of the supporters of the theory that some large-scale event was erased from history, dividing history into before and after.
It is very difficult to find trees over 120 years old on the territory of Siberia, scientists agree that the forest is young. And put forward their own version of events.
The forest was not cut down everywhere, and relict trees are almost never found. Pines 100-120 years old, birches 50-60 years old, young oaks. And the same is in the photographs from the development of Siberia, where, in theory, there should be impassable taiga and a fabulous forest, with trees that are 500 years old, but in fact, young thin trees and fields. In old photographs, we do not see forests at all.
Photos of deep taiga, where the forest has recently been planted, are very common.
And in this photo, people decided to take a picture with a huge stump, apparently they considered it to be something unusual. Such a stump was 200-250 years old, it looks like either it was washed away, or some force pulled it out.
We have the fact that the forest rose at the same time over a huge area. And it turns out that until the 19th century there were no trees in this area? Or what could have happened to destroy so many forests.
Promotional video:
Let us recall the forests of America, sequoia trees, fabulous forests, through which one could walk 100 years ago, there are a lot of photos of these trees. These trees are probably a thousand years old. Thousand-year-old giants that grew up in their natural environment.
And this is where our mighty trees are hiding. We also have our long-livers, oak can live 1500 years, larch 900 years.
Eyewitnesses saw poplars and cedars of similar mighty sizes, about 7 meters in girth, which grew apart. We don't have hurricanes, there are no floods, there are no earthquakes. They come across very rarely.
Scientists say old trees are being removed by forest fires. Which arise in stages, periodically and are taiga orderlies. Therefore, isolated trees are not taken.
The version is good, but it also has drawbacks. There was no frequency of ignition. The whole forest is of the same age, and if the trees really burned, then at the same time. And if there was such a fire that happened not so long ago, then why is it unknown. And also in this version there is a minus, why then the American forests do not burn?
There are practically no trees over 200 years old. What happened about 200 years ago?
This phenomenon can be explained by severe climate change, as a result of which all flora died. Moreover, there is no evidence of age-old taiga forests. Then we return to the version of historians, supporters of a flood or other catastrophe, and think, what could have changed the climate?
There is other evidence that the area used to be warmer.