Evidence
Face-to-face and correspondence disputes about how much real facts are contained in the official version of human history do not subside. More and more followers of various alternative versions. They do not appear from scratch, but under the influence of regularly discovered archaeological finds that do not fit into the traditional vision of the past.
German Estok, 15th century.
Such is the sample * sharpening * from China.
Interesting photo from one of the European museums. What it shows - three very large swords and Cossack sabers in the lower right for proportion.
Weapons of gigantic proportions are often found. Both cold and firearms. Some swords are almost two meters long. Given that the normal height of a person in the Middle Ages rarely exceeded 1.7 meters. The situation is similar with guns. There are photographs dating back to the beginning of the last century, which capture 3-4 people with difficulty holding together the barrel of a gun with a stock.
Promotional video:
Anthropological evidence
This is how theories are born that the ancient inhabitants of planet Earth were by no means small people in the physical sense of the word. In support of this kind of statements from different parts of the planet, there are reports of excavations of human remains, the reconstruction of which suggests that during his lifetime this man was twice, or even three times larger than the modern one. With such dimensions, the facts about the mentioned weapon fit perfectly.
Perhaps it’s time to combine all the inexplicable into one explained and come to terms with the fact that the history of the emergence of human development requires a thorough scientific inventory and revision. The arguments for such a position have accumulated enough to be considered ridiculous accidents or even practical jokes.
