I was looking forward to the results of the expedition of independent researchers of the ASPIK channel to Sri Lanka, where I was interested in one amazing object - the nine-arch bridge between Ela and Demodara stations. Let me remind you that in January 2020, having watched in one of the videos on this channel, the announcement of the upcoming expedition to this country? I noticed a striking resemblance of this bridge to the famous "Roman" and other similar arched bridges of clearly antique construction. At the same time, the appearance of the bridge clearly testified to the high level of engineering skill of its builders. Naturally, I was interested in the question of who could have built such an amazing bridge, which is still not only the highest mountain, but also the largest bridge in this country, which is a real miracle of engineering.
But when I started researching the official history of its construction, to be honest, I almost laughed. Considering the technical education I received back in Soviet times and practical experience in solving some engineering problems, it was impossible to believe that such a bridge could be built by local peasants under the guidance of a local self-taught engineer Appukhi. The official version, voiced in the tourist brochures, looked very incredible. And even the British, who built many railway bridges in this country in the second half of the 19th century, prudently “disowned” their participation in its construction.
Although I discovered a slightly different version of its construction in the English-language segment of "Wikipedia" attributed the authorship of this project to the outstanding Ceylon inventor and engineer J. Vilamasurendra, who seemed to be "consulting with English engineers." So another of the designers of this project was a certain Harold Cuthbert Marwood from the Ceylon Railway Department of Railroad Construction. However, no documents confirming this version, in the form of design and construction drawings, and even photographs of not only the construction itself, but also the official opening ceremony of this largest bridge in the country in 1921, were not found by me. And this despite the fact that there were photos of the construction of other bridges by the British in the second half of the 19th century on the network.
I was also surprised by the ridiculousness of the explanation of that fact. that during the construction of this bridge in the period allegedly from 1913 to 1921, no metal parts were used, when other bridges built by the British had only the supports themselves, brick and concrete, and the rest of the bridge parts were metal. And what do you think, this very oddity was explained? First World War. Here are the terrible British, since they needed metal to conduct hostilities thousands of kilometers from Sri Lanka, they allegedly robbed the local residents, confiscating all the metal for the needs of the front, and so they had to build this bridge exclusively using the technologies of ancient civilization, without using metal parts and elements designs. In general, the entire official history of the construction of the nine-arch "bridge to heaven" clearly smacked of outright fables and absurdities.
Also, I drew attention to the strange black "soot" on the stone structures of the bridge arches and made some suggestions. that this bridge itself was built long before the construction of railways by the British in Sri Lanka and only later was adapted for these railways. All this was described in more detail by me in my posts titled "Who built the arch bridge in Sri Lanka?" and New Evidence for Ancient Technology in Bridge Construction in Sri Lanka, as well as in the videos Who Built the Arch Bridge in Sri Lanka? and “Who Built the Arch Bridge in Sri Lanka? part 2”, released in January 2020.
At the end of the same month, I gave links to my posts to O. Pavlyuchenko, asking him to take a closer look at this bridge during the planned expedition to Sri Lanka in order to confirm or refute the preliminary conclusions of my virtual study of the history of the construction of this unique structure. And now, finally, on March 21, 2020, a video appeared on the ASPIK channel with a slightly strange and rather screaming title “Antediluvian trains flew over the rails! Shock! The certificate is a nine-arch bridge. Sri Lanka”, which tells about the results of the study of the structures of this bridge directly on the spot by the participants of the expedition of this channel. I advise everyone to watch this video, but to get a more complete picture of this interesting object, I suggest you read my posts or watch videos on my channel on this topic.
So what did these independent researchers find out when examining the bridge structures and nearby tunnels?
1. The official version of the construction of the bridge does not correspond to reality. It was clearly built using ancient technologies, although some elements of the cladding of the structures are a later "remake" of the times of the colonial rule of Britain.
Promotional video:
2. Initially, this bridge and the roads leading to it were not intended for modern railways and in the ancient times of the Middle Ages were used by transport that moved on the basis of completely different technologies, such as, for example, high-speed magnetic levitation trains.
3. Similar transport routes of ancient civilization, restored after the disaster of the middle of the 19th century and adapted for steam-powered railways, including some bridges and tunnels, are also located in Russia and many other countries.
On the example of analyzing the appearance of the structures of the Didinsky tunnel in the Sverdlovsk region and studying the history of its official construction, I also came to the conclusion that it was built much earlier than the official version, and also after the disaster of the middle of the 19th century, it was restored and adapted for railway communication. I dedicated this topic to the post "Didino Tunnel - an Artifact of the Pre-Catastrophic World" published in December 2019 and the video "The Riddles of the Didin Tunnel Construction", released on my channel in early January 2020. By the way, my preliminary conclusions on this tunnel were confirmed by V. Sivokon, who visited the Didinsky tunnel in the same month with a group of Ural researchers. But there are many such tunnels on the territory of the Trans-Siberian Railway, and this topic has already been raised by many other independent researchers.
By the way, D. Kuznetsov from Yekaterinburg drew my attention to this tunnel, who gave a link to one of the videos, albeit little-known, but rather interesting channel on YouTube with a slightly strange name "RES - Russian Economic Service - Ural". And in this video entitled "Is there life on Mars?", Access to which, unfortunately, is limited, the Didino tunnel was just mentioned, as one of the proofs of the high technologies of civilizations of the past. Also, taking this opportunity, I want to express my gratitude to my old good friend D. Kotenko, who gave me many interesting links to historical sites in Yegoryevsk, which are clearly pre-catastrophic construction. And the appearance of a cycle of my posts and videos about the historical sites of Yegoryevsk near Moscow is entirely his merit.
Returning to the conclusions of the ASPIK channel expedition to study the unique antique nine-arch bridge in Sri Lanka, I would like to note that all of them, including the mention in the video about the antediluvian metro in many cities of the world, are also the result of the work of many independent studies of our past, contributing to one common cause of uncovering the truth about our history. Therefore, it would be nice for the authors of this channel not to forget about this, at least in general phrases.
For the sake of fairness, I want to mention at least a few other researchers outside the ASPIK expedition club, whose individual printed materials or videos on this vast topic I had to stumble upon in the vastness of the information network. These are A. Kadykchansky, V. Romanov, the creative duet of P. Lobanov and P. Snegopad, E. Makarov, S. Troshin, G. Konysheva, R. Kashtanov, as well as authors known under such pseudonyms as sibved, tech_dancer, lsvsx, Vsevolod, and yet unknown authors of the channels "History of Pi", "Tselnozero", "Historical Freethinker", "Descendants of the Atlanteans" and the blog "Another Look" Thank you all, associates and associates. Remember that despite some differences of opinion, we agree on one thing: the official version of the story is not accurate. And just,restoration of historical accuracy and lies at the heart of the activities of all those. who wants to know the truth about our true past.
michael101063 ©