In the summer of 1952, rumors spread throughout Europe that the Norwegians had found some strange disc-shaped apparatus on the island of Spitsbergen. The first to respond to the strange incident was the Saarbrucker Zeitung of June 28, 1952. It said that a Norwegian Air Force air patrol was interested in the source of the strange radio interference. The pilots spotted the bearing and reported this to their superiors.
The research group, which landed on Spitsbergen, followed the radio expert to the target detected by his equipment. Finally, they stumbled upon a bluish-white metal disk about 40 meters in diameter, smashed to smithereens, but not enough to recognize its original shape.
On the metal were embossed or painted with strange signs "similar to Russian letters." Nozzle-like holes ran along the edge of the disc. Of course, the Saarbrucker Zeitung assumed that the object was a new type of Russian aircraft, and that the mysterious radio interference was the work of an emergency radio beacon, a black box.
It was only incomprehensible why the Russians were not the first to get to their plane: the Soviet company "Arktikugol", based in the purely Russian mining towns of Barentsburg and Pyramida, operated in Svalbard. When a Soviet military plane crashed there in the seventies, ours did not hesitate to land a whole landing on Norwegian territory and cordon off the crash site long before the Norwegians appeared there.
Nevertheless, even today one can sometimes come across statements that “… the crash did take place, but it was not a flying saucer. In reality, it was rather a Soviet experimental discoplan, developed by German scientists, captured at the end of World War II ….
The newspaper "Volksblat Berlin" on July 9, 1952 clarified that the disc was 48.86 meters in diameter and consisted of some unknown metal. And the Russian-like symbols found on the instruments inside the disk had nothing to do with the Russian language. Other newspapers wrote that the Norwegians had failed to understand the design of the disc and had to invite British and American specialists.
The first thing these experts did was to advise the Norwegians to keep what was happening as carefully as possible. Only three years later, an official message escaped from the depths of the Norwegian General Staff, so shocking that it overshadowed even the wildest rumors. Note in "Stuttgarten Tagesblat", September 5, 1955.
Promotional video:
Oslo, Norway. 4 September. Only now the research department of the Norwegian General Staff is preparing the publication of a report on the study of the remains of the NAO, which suffered a catastrophe at Svalbard, presumably in early 1952."
The head of the department, Colonel G. Dornbil, during the briefing of the Air Force officers, said:
“The accident of the Svalbard disc was of great importance. Although the current level of scientific knowledge does not allow us to solve all the mysteries, I am sure that these fragments from Svalbard will be of great importance in this regard. Some time ago, some misunderstanding was the reason for the talk that this disc may have been of Soviet origin. But he - we state this categorically - was not built in any country on Earth. The materials used in its construction are completely unknown to all the experts who took part in the investigation."
According to Colonel Dornbil, the research department does not intend to publish a detailed report until some of the sensational facts have been discussed with American and British experts.
Contrary to information from American and other sources, Lieutenants Brow and Tullensen, assigned as special investigators to the Arctic after the events in Svalbard, reported that flying discs landed several times in the polar regions.
“I think the Arctic serves as a kind of base for unknown objects,” Lieutenant Tullensen said, “especially during snowstorms, when we have to return to our bases. I have seen landing and takeoff on three occasions. Very bright light, the intensity of which varies depending on the speed at the time of takeoff or landing, interferes with observation."
Since then, attempts to find out some details about the disc found have stumbled upon the cold silence of the Norwegians, who realized that they had said a lot too much. The American ufological organization NICAP sent a request to the Norwegian embassy regarding the Svalbard events and received a cryptic answer: they say, "the material on the UFOs of our Air Force is mainly highly classified and cannot be made available to you."
So there is something to hide. Otherwise, the answer would be formulated as something like "we do not know anything about any broken plate and we sincerely regret that you believe in such nonsense."
What are these "sensational facts" related to the Svalbard disc, which the Norwegians did not dare to disclose? Is there anything more sensational than the admission that the plate is of extraterrestrial origin?
Perhaps an intriguing note by American journalist Dorothy Kilgellen will help us to answer this question. Interested in rumors about the participation of British experts in the study of the Svalbard saucer, she directly asked about this "one high-ranking official" from the British government, who did not want to be "exposed" in the press. Soon the following lines appeared in her native journal:
“Today I can tell you about an otherworldly, shivering story. British scientists and pilots, after studying the remains of one mysterious flying ship, are convinced that these strange aerial objects are not optical illusions or Soviet inventions, but are flying saucers that come from other planets.
The source of my information is a British Cabinet official who prefers to remain anonymous.
There were small people in the saucer, probably less than 4 feet tall … I learned that the British government is refraining from publishing an official report on the inspection of the flying saucer at this time, perhaps because it does not want to frighten the public."
So that's it! And although it is not clear from the note whether the corpses of the Ulauts were recovered from the wreckage or such far-reaching conclusions were made by measuring the chairs or some kind of disk devices, it is clear that it was not made by people and not for people.
From the book by Vladimir Azhazhi "Under the Cap of a Different Mind"