Jack White, a photo analysis expert, exposed the NASA Lunar Scam, claiming that all photographs "from the surface of the moon" were fake.
I am in awe of many of NASA's achievements. I admire the courage, dedication and sacrifice made by astronauts who died in reaching the new frontiers announced by President John F. Kennedy in 1960, when he promised to send a man to the moon by the end of the decade.
I am saddened by the deaths of the Columbia and Challenger scientists who have entrusted their lives to NASA. In 1986, on television in my office, I saw the Challenger explosion live. And I watched in horror as the space shuttle Columbia fell apart in a smoky plume on that fine February morning in 2003 over my Texas home. I am saddened by the death in 1967 on the Florida launch pad of Apollo 1 astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee, who may have known too much to be safe.
I am amazed at the achievements of the Hubble Space Telescope, which shows us photographs of the dream world from the infinity of deep space. And images from Mars also help us understand our Universe.
But thousands of honest NASA employees will be shocked and saddened by the news of the dark secrets of forty years ago - the Apollo flights to the moon. Examination of NASA documents reveals a gruesome skeleton rotting in their own files - a massive hoax. Very few NASA employees were aware of this fraud, and to this day it is still hidden by some secret custodian of the "national security" keys. Most likely, it was a TOP SECRET political and military project.
This skeleton in a NASA closet is documented by the space agency itself. And the available facts are indisputable. As Shakespeare might say, the agency was “blown up by its own mine,” that is, blown up by them.
What is this dirty secret?
Promotional video:
There are serious doubts that the Apollo Moon missions were more than the most incredible hoax of all time. Did astronauts actually fly to the moon? I dont know. But NASA's own data shows that all of the photographs of Apollo's exploits must be fakes. Most likely, they were made in a secret photo studio on Earth as part of a top secret military project. And if all the "lunar photos" of all the "missions to the moon" were fakes, then the question arises "why?"
Real missions were supposed to bring real photographs.
To understand “why” the “man-made landings on the moon before the end of the decade”, which were promised by John F. Kennedy in his first speech to Congress, were forged, one must return to the Cold War with the USSR and the vaunted “space race”. In the early 1960s, the Soviets were ahead of the United States in space exploration. Sputnik and other Reds' successes caused a political crisis in the United States. But the Soviets probably knew that sending a man to the moon was an incredibly difficult task, and that Kennedy's rhetoric was empty promises.
However, after Lyndon Johnson managed to kill Kennedy, he most likely came up with a brilliant (and in my opinion, vicious) idea. He must have thought, "… the experts say we can't go to the moon like Kennedy promised, but I say we can! We can FALSE IT!" If Lyndon Johnson succeeded in doing this to simplify the very difficult situation of the Cold War, it would be a very successful propaganda move that would establish US superiority over communism. And my guess is that Johnson conspired with his successor, Richard Nixon and OTHERS, to carry out an elaborate plan to deceive the world with "flights to the moon." It was a brilliant plan, implemented in strict secrecy, and for over 40 years they managed to fool the world. But everything was ruined by their own intemperance,as it is now for the first time clear from the archives of NASA.
Anyone with even basic mathematical skills and common sense can look at the facts, do calculations and come to their own conclusions about the supposedly MASSIVE VOLUME of photographs from the lunar surface taken in such a LIMITED TIME PERIOD.
Here's my conclusion: IT COULD NOT BE DONE.
This does not only boil down to examining photographs for signs of forgery, although I have researched all available photographs of Apollo for over three years (and found many fakes). Quite simply - this study is known in many professions … timing of movements. An elementary question: was it possible to make a known number of images (from the NASA archive) in the available time interval (from the NASA archive)? But before you read my research to understand it, you need to know some basic facts about Apollo flights:
Of the seven Apollo missions to land "humans on the moon," six were declared "successful." (Apollo 13 was aborted)
Each of the six successful missions landed two astronauts "on the Moon" in a fragile craft that NASA originally called the Lunar Expeditionary Module (LEM, later abbreviated to LM) - an untested craft that never flew a test flight to the moon. But he sank and then took off; and so six times with remarkable "success" on the Apollo 11 and 12 missions, and from 14 to 17 … once even landing within 200 feet of the preselected target.
Each LEM was piloted by two astronauts to the lunar surface, while one remained in the command and service module (CSM) in orbit awaiting their return.
During extravehicular activities (EVA, exploration of the lunar surface), each of the two was dressed in a bulky, inflated spacesuit with clumsy gloves, which severely limited mobility. On their backs, they wore a huge and heavy life support system PSZHO (PLSS) - a backpack containing an oxygen cylinder and an air conditioning system with circulating water that pumped chilled water through a spacesuit to counteract + 100 ° / -130 ° C heat (and cold) of the lunar environment … The pumps pumped both chilled air and water into liquid-cooled underwear, as well as removing moisture, carbon dioxide, and all other functions necessary to survive in the harsh, confined space of a spacesuit.
The main purpose of all six missions was RESEARCH experiments carried out by two astronauts. Each expedition had about half a dozen experiments, and most of them were remarkably similar across all six missions. All of these scientific experiments involved unloading equipment from the cargo bay, assembling it, transporting it to its location, installing it, and then conducting experiments. As you can imagine, each of these studies required a significant investment of two people in each experiment.
In addition to working with packaged experimental equipment, another major project was geological research, which consisted of finding rock and soil samples in various places, documenting and collecting samples for delivery to Earth. This obviously took most of their TIME.
Considerable TIME was occupied by "household duties". After lunar landing, the LEM should be examined for damage. Equipment for communication with the Earth, including radio and television antennas and television cameras, must be switched on and tuned. On each expedition, the US flag was planted in the lunar soil. All this was done before any experiments began. Oh, and don't forget the "protocol" conversation with President Nixon during Apollo 11.
In the first three missions, astronauts had to walk to each experiment site. The last three missions have had lunar rovers (LRVs) to travel miles away from the LEM. The partially assembled LRV was attached to the outside of the LEM. The bottom of the rover served as a pallet, for which it was hinged to the outside of the LEM. The wheels were folded at the bottom. The "pallet" was manually lowered onto the lunar surface, and the wheels were turned into the required positions. After installing the wheels, the car must be equipped with a significant amount of equipment from different LEM cargo compartments. Oddly enough, there is not a single photograph (at least to date, I could not find) how astronauts assemble and equip rovers. Battery-powered rovers had a top speed of around 13 km / h - not much fasterthan walking … like a golf cart. During travels on rovers ("traverses"), both people rode and during the movement were not able to take pictures. In addition, the time taken to assemble the rover was not used for any photography. And while I couldn't find NASA-provided timing data, is it reasonable to assume that it took at least an hour to unload, assemble, outfit and inspect the rover?
PHOTOGRAPHY was practically a side activity compared to the main tasks of the astronauts. Each astronaut had his own camera. (Except for the Apollo 11 EVA) This was a specially designed Hasselblad with square-format film. For work, it was attached to the chest plate of the astronauts. The astronaut had to manually set shutter speed and aperture with bulky sealed gloves on his hands and not being able to see the setting. The cameras HAD NO VIEWFINDER, so the astronaut could only guess what was being filmed. Each camera had a voluminous film cassette with a capacity of more than a hundred frames. Film (mainly Ectachrom color film) had a very narrow exposure range and required PERFECT aperture and shutter speed settings because, according to NASA, the cameras did not have automatic exposure.
It is important to know that although everyone had their own camera, they ALWAYS NEVER USED THEM AT THE SAME TIME. Usually when one was taking pictures, the other was busy with some business. Therefore, the presence of two cameras DIDN'T MEAN TWICE TIME FOR PHOTOGRAPHY, as one might suppose. Now that you are familiar with expeditions, here is my exploration of NASA's overzealous zeal that has been successfully hidden so far.
CHRONOMETRY OF MOVEMENT
For more than three years, I have collected and analyzed almost every significant photograph of the Apollo missions. These official photos are readily available for download on numerous NASA websites. I recently noticed that they take up many gigabytes of memory on my computer's external hard drive, so I started organizing them and removing duplicates. I made a rough estimate of the number of Apollo photos and was amazed that I have thousands of them!
I visited several official NASA websites to find out HOW MANY PHOTOS WERE TAKEN on the lunar surface. Surprisingly, NASA AVOIDS THIS TOPIC almost completely. Two days of searching for documents and texts were fruitless. But one site, Lunar Diaries, lists each photo with its catalog number. Therefore, I started calculating the actual number of photos taken by astronauts DURING extra-spacecraft (EVA) - the time spent on the surface, outside the LEM.
Here are my calculations of the actual number of EVA photos of all six missions:
Apollo 11 … 121
Apollo 12 … 504
Apollo 14 … 374
Apollo 15 … 1021
Apollo 16 … 1765
Apollo 17 … 1986
It turned out that 12 astronauts, while on the lunar surface, took a total of 5771 photographs.
This seems like too much to me, given that their time on the lunar surface was limited and the astronauts had MANY OTHER BUSINESS BEYOND PHOTOGRAPHY. So I went back to the Lunar Diaries to find out how much TIME was required for all scientific tasks, as well as for photographing. Unlike the number of photos, this information is readily available:
Apollo 11 … 1 EVA … 2 hours, 31 minutes … (151 minutes)
Apollo 12 … 2nd EVA … 7 hours, 50 minutes … (470 minutes)
Apollo 14 … 2nd EVA … 9 hours, 25 minutes … (565 minutes)
Apollo 15 … 3 EVA … 18 hours, 30 minutes … (1110 minutes)
Apollo 16 … 3 EVA … 20 hours, 14 minutes … (1214 minutes)
Apollo 17 … 3 EVA … 22 hours, 04 minutes … (1324 minutes)
The total number of minutes on the moon is 4834 minutes.
The total number of photos taken is 5771 photos.
Hmmmm. This amounts to 1.19 photos every minute of being on the Moon, REGARDLESS OF OTHER ACTIVITY. (To do this, you need to take ONE SHOT EVERY 50 SECONDS!) Let's take a look at other activities to determine how much time to subtract from the available photo time:
Apollo 11 … Inspect the LEM for breakdowns, set a flag, unpack and connect radio and television equipment, work with a TV camera (pan 360 degrees), establish communication with the Earth (including a protocol conversation with President Nixon), unpack and connect numerous equipment for experiments, find, document and collect 21.6 kg of lunar soil samples, walk around the area, complete experiments, return to LEM.
Apollo 12 … Inspect the LEM for breakdowns, set a flag, unpack and connect radio and television equipment (spend time trying to repair a faulty TV camera), establish communication with the Earth, unpack and connect numerous equipment for experiments, walking around the area, inspect the unmanned Surveyor -3, which landed in April 1967 and retrieved parts from Surveyor. Install ALSEP hardware. Find, document and collect 34.3 kg of rocks, complete experiments, return to LEM.
Apollo-14… Inspect the LEM for breakdowns, set a flag, unpack and connect radio and television equipment, establish communication with the Earth, unpack and assemble a trolley for transporting soil, unpack and install numerous equipment for experiments, walking around the area. Find, document and collect 42.8 kg of rocks, complete experiments, return to LEM.
Apollo 15 … Inspect the LEM for breakdowns, set a flag, unpack and connect radio and television equipment, establish communication with the Earth, unpack, assemble, equip and test a 4-wheel electric car and drive 27 km on it, unpack and install numerous equipment for experiments (double the amount of scientific equipment compared to the first three missions). Find, document and collect 76.7 kg of rocks, complete experiments, return to LEM. (The rover speed is only 13 km / h *)
Apollo 16 … Inspect the LEM for breakdowns, set a flag, unpack and connect radio and television equipment, establish communication with the Earth, unpack, assemble, equip and test a 4-wheel electric car and drive 26 km on it, unpack and install numerous equipment for experiments (double the amount of scientific equipment compared to the first three missions, including a new ultraviolet camera, ultraviolet camera filming). Find, document and collect 94.5 kg of rocks, complete experiments, return to LEM. (The rover speed is only 13 km / h *)
Apollo 17 … Inspect the LEM for breakdowns, set a flag, unpack and connect radio and television equipment, establish communication with the Earth, unpack, assemble, equip and test a 4-wheel electric car and drive 49 km on it, unpack and install numerous equipment for experimentation. Find, document and collect 110.3 kg of rocks, complete experiments, return to LEM. (The rover speed is only 13 km / h *)
Let's roughly calculate the MINIMUM time to complete these tasks and subtract from the available photo time:
Apollo 11 … subtract 2 hours (120 minutes), 31 minutes left for filming
Apollo 12 … subtract 4 hours (240 minutes), 230 minutes left for filming
Apollo 14 … subtract 3 hours (180 minutes), 385 minutes left for filming
Apollo 15 … subtract 6 hours (360 minutes), 750 minutes remain for filming
Apollo 16 … subtract 6 hours (360 minutes), 854 minutes left for filming
Apollo 17 … subtract 8 hours (480 minutes), 844 minutes remain for filming
Let's count:
Apollo 11 … 121 photos in 31 minutes … 3.90 photos per minute
Apollo 12… 504 photos in 230 minutes… 2.19 photos per minute
Apollo 14… 374 photos in 385 minutes… 0.97 photos per minute
Apollo 15… 1021 photos in 750 minutes… 1.36 photos per minute
Apollo 16… 1765 photos in 854 minutes… 2.06 photos per minute
Apollo 17… 1986 photos in 844 minutes… 2.35 photos per minute
Or, more simply:
Apollo 11 … one photo every 15 seconds
Apollo 12 … one photo every 27 seconds
Apollo 14 … one photo every 62 seconds
Apollo 15 … one photo every 44 seconds
Apollo 16 … one photo every 29 seconds
Apollo 17 … one photo every 26 seconds
So it's up to you. All things considered, is it possible to take so many photos in such a short time?
Any professional photographer will tell you that this is not possible. Almost every photo is a different scene or other location that requires movement. Some locations had to be driven 48 km. Some stereopairs and panoramas had to be shot especially carefully. Each photo was taken without a viewfinder, using manual camera settings, without automatic measurements, while at the same time wearing a bulky spacesuit with stiff clumsy gloves.
The agency wants to make the whole world believe that 5771 photos were taken in 4834 minutes! IF THERE WOULD NOT HAVE DONE ANYTHING EXCEPT THE SHOOTING, then even then such a feat is obviously impossible … all the more perfect together with the rest of the documented activities of the astronauts. Imagine … 1.19 photos every minute when people are on the Moon - that's one shot every 50 SECONDS!
The secret that NASA was trying to hide was revealed: so many photographs allegedly depicting the Apollo lunar EVA could not have been taken on the Moon in such an impossibly short time. So why are all these photographs there? How were these images obtained? Has ANYONE ever flown to the moon? Or was it really the greatest deception in history?
Notes: * According to Andrew Chaikin, author of A Man on the Moon, the average rover speed is only 8 to 11 km / h, which will further reduce photography time.
About the author of the study:
Jack White (1927–2012) had a bachelor's degree in journalism, was interested in art and history, and had a successful career in the advertising business. A professional photographer for over half a century, Jack White was a specialist in all fields of photography, but his specialty was photoanalysis. Undoubtedly, Jack White was an expert on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and worked as a photo consultant for the US House of Representatives' Special Assassination Committee (HSCA) during the hearings. White produced two videotapes of his photographic research into the murder, and was also a consultant to Oliver Stone's John F. Kennedy: Shots in Dallas.
It was only natural that White followed the Apollo "fly or not" debate over the years. But it wasn't until 2001, after the Fox TV documentary Have We Fled to the Moon? he decided to conduct an in-depth study of the images of the lunar EVA and found that literally hundreds of them are anomalous, given the conditions under which they were allegedly taken. In other words, if the photos are to be taken on the lunar surface, they are fake.