A giant earthen pyramid was discovered by the Samara writer, Slavist-ethnographer and local historian Yevgeny Bazhanov in the Kinelsky district near the village of Alakayevka. An isosceles triangle with sides of 150 m and a base of 100 m is bounded by a rampart and a ditch. Inside there is an eye-shaped mound 40 m long and 20 m wide. The height of the mysterious object is about 3 m.
The researcher is sure: the find is part of the temple complexes of the ancient Aryan race. Such a symbol of the sun was created presumably in the 2nd - 3rd millennium BC.
- This is one of the main symbols that Freemasons use in their rituals. It is the triangle and the eye that we can see here as well, - says Evgeny Aleksandrovich. - Many different archaeological finds have been made on the territory of the Samara region. But we see such an image for the first time.
The image of the luminary is oriented to the parts of the world to within a degree. The base of the triangle is in the east, the top points strictly to the west. This, according to the author of the find, indicates the high development of the race of the creators of the figure.
Photo: kp.ru
Evgeny Bazhanov brought equipment to the mound - an indicator of geophysical anomalies - and made measurements. It turned out that at the top the energy level is 15-20 times higher than the background one. But towards the foot of the mound, it drops sharply, where the energy level exceeds the usual background value by only three times.
“When I myself entered the perimeter of this symbol, I felt a surge of energy,” says Evgeny Bazhanov. - Immediately you feel the influence of a powerful flow of energy. When we filmed an episode for a film in this place, during the staging of a round dance, crosses appeared in the sky throughout the day.
Promotional video:
However, historians were more than critical of the discovery.
- Evgeny Bazhanov does not have a specialized historical education, he is engaged in research as an amateur, - says the historian, guide, ethnographer Gleb Aleksushin. - Therefore, one should not consider him a specialist in local history. He is also not authorized to draw any conclusions and present his "discoveries" in the form of scientific sensations.
