- Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6 - Part 7 - Part 8 - Part 9 - Part 10 - Part 11 - Part 12 - Part 13 - Part 14 - Part 15 - Part 16 - Part 17 - Part 18 - Part 19 -
This topic does not end in any way. Material arrives in examples and accumulates faster than other topics. Therefore, I consider it my duty to continue publishing it. And let the reader draw his own conclusions. Either admit all this is an attraction of facts or some semblance of showing unknown pages of history. I think everyone will agree that in any topic they will be like supporters of the official history and a different story, about which, most likely, textbooks will not tell in the foreseeable future. I propose once again to look at a few examples from this topic of buildings covered with soil.
I'll start this part with analogies. I think the best way to understand something is to find and study analogies.
At one time, I showed an example of a town being covered by streams from a mud volcano (I gave analogies with sand-covered villages here)
In the eastern part of the Indonesian island of Java, a great tragedy occurred - mud began to pour onto the fields. A mud volcano appeared. The perpetrator of the eruption (nicknamed Lucy) was the Indonesian oil company PT Lapindo Brantas, who drilled a well.
Promotional video:
The analogy with the buildings covered with clay is understandable. The source of this clay could be found in modern lakes (especially in round and deep ones). Now we cannot even suspect of such a thing. And this assumption requires a comprehensive scientific study. But let it remain so for now. There will be a separate article on this topic with its examples.
Here is another analogy, where the source of the soil is the volcanic ash that fell out and passed like a mudflow:
In 1995, the Soufriere Hills volcano woke up on the island, which has been inactive since the 17th century. Dwellings of thousands of people found themselves in the path of incandescent pyroclastic flows of hot gas and stones. The capital Plymouth and 20 other villages were completely destroyed.
Besides singing, volcanic bombs, streams of mud flowed here. Perhaps from the subsequent rains.
Close-up of pyroclastic outflows.
View of Plymouth from a helicopter, May 24, 2012. The soil began to overgrow.
I was interested in this term:
And examples of other eruptions:
Karo, Indonesia, 11/9/2014
Sinabung volcano.
Blurred pyroclastic flows in Kamchatka.
Proceeding from this analogy, the question is: could these streams be from volcanoes that have long been asleep (especially on monovolcanoes - volcanoes that erupted only once) in densely populated regions of Europe and Asia? Suppose they could. And could wind erosion carry this ash further, turning it into clay after falling with rains? Think, especially after viewing this photo taken during excavations in Kostenki (Voronezh region):
As you can see, according to scientists, there is a layer of volcanic ash among the layers of clay. The versions are as follows: it fell in the intervals between the fallout of clay dust, or, as our colleague on the topic of alternative views on history suggested, vaduhan_08 - clay is a product of volcanic origin. It is possible that clay is one such example of pyroclastic flows.
Quite often, there is a layer of blue or gray clay under the layers of clay near the aquifer. The color is very similar to the color of ash.
misik75: chemical composition of clays: different layers (by color) for my city from top to bottom: iron oxide (red), zinc oxide (white), nickel oxide (blue gray). Word boundaries are clear with no transitions. According to the theory of sedimentary rocks, it turns out that sludge containing nickel oxides first settled, and then nickel.
Volcanic ash contains the same elements. It is not surprising that here and there - everything is from the bowels of the Earth. What do you think, is the version that clays is the ash of volcanoes reasonable?
***
With analogies finished, let's move on to examples of buildings entered by non-cultural layers:
Balakhna, Church of the Nativity of Christ, st. Engels, house. 23.
The old refectory was destroyed at the temple.
***
1890 Start of construction of the Upper Trading Rows (GUM).
Destroyed buildings are disassembled and a large stone or brick is stored for its use in further construction.
***
This print was published by the renowned English painter, miniaturist and publisher Robert Bower (1758-1834). In the 1810s. Bower prepared and published several views of Russian cities based on originals of various artists, which was explained by the interest in Russia in Europe in connection with the Napoleonic Wars. Bower prepared and published several types of Russian cities based on the originals of various artists who were in or from Russia.
Perhaps this is an earthen cellar. And if not? Didn't people understand what happened? Or were dust storms common? My opinion: the secondary buildings have not yet been dug out after the dust storm. After the flood, the clay was not yet covered with sod and vegetation - it was carried by winds and hurricanes. Those. first there was a flood that destroyed the ancient culture, and then the winds brought in the cities that were already being built.
***
svarozhich:
There is an interesting fact that I personally noticed from my own experience.
Before the ban in 2012 of searching for coins with a metal detector in the fields, he spent a sufficient amount of time doing this in many places in central Russia.
There is one point, I have already written about this, but I have not received a clear explanation.
The largest number of lost (and not buried) coins of the mid-late 19th century, in fields, forests, outskirts of cities and in places of former settlements, come across at the depth of a shovel bayonet, that is, almost on the surface. The next point is that all the finds of earlier periods clearly lie in the ground in layers at a greater depth, for example, coins from the 18th century lie on average at a depth of two bayonets of a shovel. Further, the losses of the times of the 16-17 centuries for two or three bayonets. Deeper losses are practically not found.
This is especially noticeable at the sites of former large fairs that have existed for centuries or at the sites of inns.
The coins are undoubtedly a witness and proof of the life and everyday life of people in the indicated periods of minting and circulation of this money in these places.
And there are no "meters" of clay and other "cultural layer" in these places.
Although in cities, a couple of dozen kilometers from the site of the finds, I personally saw the first floors of buildings filled up.
It seems that backfilling was carried out selectively and exclusively in cities.
Either the catastrophe occurred earlier than the 16th century
***
Objection to the argument that before in most cities there were no stones at all on the roads. Previously, there was either soil or wood everywhere. Stone is hyper elite roads, the most central ones and even then not always.
Reader's answer: Allegedly Catherine's paved roads. There was an example with the Tver region. The stone-paved road now starts in the village with 700 people. Previously, there were 40-50 houses in total. And it goes on through very small villages. And there are a lot of such roads. That is, the roads were paved on the intercity, and saved in the cities? I do not believe.
***
germanrus: Previously, basements were not built at all, … what is now called "basement" from the word "under the SHAFT" ie what FILLED !!!.. these are the first floors, and they are without waterproofing.
***
Why there is no mention of the flood:
Maybe this topic was censored?
I recently read: Nuclear Strikes of the Recent Past. It seems to me, in general, will be in the topic discussed here.
I would like to give one more argument in favor of what is described in this publication, as well as in many others.
Since the early 90s I have been studying radioecology. And he even created an accredited radiation monitoring laboratory on the basis of his company, which is successfully operating to this day. So, at one time he was very actively engaged in gamma-spectrometric measurements of natural radionuclides in soil samples taken at the building sites, mainly from the core of engineering-geological wells. And the core of these wells, in our conditions, with a depth of up to 6 meters, is represented mainly by loam and sandy loam.
Note: Most readers are probably not aware of the content (or rather specific activity) of which radionuclides are measured in gamma-spectrometric measurements. Of natural radionuclides (previously they were called natural radionuclides or ERN), these are K-40, Thorium-232 and Uranium-238. But the latter can be measured here only indirectly - by one of the elements in the chain of its natural decay. Earlier, during the years of my studies at the university, they said "uranium is measured by radium", although this is not accurate, since both uranium-238 and radium-228 are alpha emitters. Therefore, their activity cannot be directly measured on a gamma spectrometer. And the whole chain is measured by the gamma-emitting isotope bismuth-214, which is a product of the sequential decay of radium-228 into radon-222, then into polonium-218.
This is how everything seems to be confused here. Although this science is perhaps one of the most accurate and rigorous, thanks to the titanic efforts of real nuclear scientists, for whom it was vitally important to urgently do business, and not to imitate their socially useful activities for many decades, as it actually happens in many others industries.
So, returning to the topic, earlier in gamma spectrometry measurements were limited to only these three natural radionuclides. But once after Chernobyl, in the course of a more detailed study of this issue at that time, it turned out that in almost all soil samples there is another radionuclide in significant quantities. This is cesium-137, which is not a natural isotope, but is formed by the fission of uranium or plutonium nuclei in nuclear reactors, or during nuclear explosions. I had to introduce the fourth term and this element into the system of equations used in the program for processing measurement results. And now all gamma-spectrometers used to study soil samples or building materials give four indicators - specific activity of K-40 in them; Th-232; U-238 and Cs-137.
It was officially stated that the presence of cesium in the soil is the result of the testing of nuclear weapons in the atmosphere in 1947-1963. And I was always quite satisfied with this explanation. But the information that has been revealed in recent years makes us take a fresh look at this issue. Well, let the near-surface soil layer contain cesium-137 due to the fallout of nuclear test products during the above period. Although it is possible to strike a balance between the amount of cesium formed during these tests and the amount currently found only in the surface layer of the soil. I'm afraid the latter will prevail significantly! Well, the last argument, which puts the final end to this version of the origin of most of this radionuclide in the soil: so where did it come from in its deep layers? I'm afraidthat without a version of a nuclear war 200 years ago, there will be no other intelligible explanation for this fact.
Have any attempts been made to date the contamination of these subterranean strata based on cesium concentration and half-life data?
I suppose no one had such an idea yet. As I said above, we, the specialists, were explained in the relevant publications that the widespread contamination of the soil with cesium-137 occurred as a result of its fallout from the stratosphere, where it was taken out during the period of ground tests of nuclear weapons in 1947-1963 (then, according to the agreement, underground tests only). And for me personally, until recently, this explanation was fine. Before that, I was not alarmed by the fact that this artificial radioisotope is also recorded in those soil layers that formed earlier than the specified period. And he could not penetrate down evenly and everywhere to a depth of several meters. After Chernobyl, the depth of penetration of artificial radionuclides into the ground has been well studied. This is much less.
So, the version of A. Kungurov about the use of nuclear charges in the 19th century. - is not unfounded. Perhaps the cities were covered with clay to reduce the radiation background, so that one could live in them. Tell Alexey this information, who is in touch with him.
***
Drawdown of buildings
There is a drawdown in new buildings, but its maximum values are 3-6 cm. Very rarely is 15cm. And close attention to such houses. We are talking about uniform shrinkage in modern buildings on piles.
athanasiykaplya: Another counterargument for the doubters. For those who believe that the entered first floors are the result of precipitation, immersion in the ground of buildings over time. What happens to houses as a result of precipitation. Gaps in Bereznyaki:
***
There is such a concept in Christian buildings: a hermitage is a monastic settlement in the tradition of Orthodoxy, usually a skete remote from the main monastery, located in an uninhabited place. Here is a list of deserts
Perhaps this should be understood literally: desert = desert (wasteland). The place where the church was built, the monastic settlement after the devastation by the cataclysm?
I am often asked about the dates of the events that took place. And also about the reasons, the mechanism. About the possibility-impossibility of an event, for example, a flood in the recent past. Personally, I attribute the flood to the end of the 16th century. At the beginning of the 19th century. there was something less ambitious: local dust storms, hurricane winds that carried volumes of dried clay - this is an option. There must be a reason that the entire 19th century was a continuous war for the redistribution of territories. The swampiness is gone - it became possible to move.
Also in the 19th century. burned down many stone cities around the world at that time. It could only be in the presence of strong winds. The effect is like a forge.
But this is my opinion, so I do not impose it. Everyone draws their own conclusions. Or he does not, but discusses in the mainstream of official history, where there is no place for large-scale catastrophic events in the last several thousand years of this human history.
Continued: Part 21
Author: sibved