Recently, a lot has been written on this topic, videos and films have been shot dedicated to the different from the official interpretation of historical events and the role of the most prominent personalities in the history of the country, mainly in the period from the 10th to the 18th century.
The topic is fascinating, interesting and for people who think critically, clarifying the numerous inconsistencies and gaps in the official version. I will try to give a concise summary of the most important events that took place on the territory of modern Russia and links to primary sources for those who are interested and want to study the material in more detail.
Immediately I will make a reservation that this presentation is my vision, based on the materials of scientists and researchers, whose opinion most closely coincides with the historical ("naked") facts known to us and my personal understanding of the general historical, economic, geopolitical, statistical … and so on. during the period under discussion.
In general, in my humble opinion, the designation "alternative" is generally applicable to history, as to science in general. And which of the versions is the most correct or the most alternative depends on the subjective perception of the speaker.
Here is what the founder and popularizer of DNA genealogy, Doctor of Chemistry, Professor AA Klesov said about this: “Among the representatives of the natural science direction in science, a common place is the statement that history is not science. Usually, it is added that where there are no mathematical calculations, there is no science by definition. And it is no coincidence that the West has dealt with this long ago, there is science, and there is humanity. Historical sciences are humanity, that is, humanities. When I hear this, I usually (sluggishly) object that oh well, like be kinder, science, of course, because it is aimed at developing and systematizing objective knowledge about reality. To which they usually (fairly) answer me that without numbers, no objectivity will work, it will be "he said, she said." It is difficult to argue with this. Really,for me, as a student of the natural science school, it was unpleasant to learn that in the historical sciences the most frequently encountered argument is “opinion”. According to Ivanov …, Petrov believes that … Smith suggested … Williams is confident that … and so on. In natural sciences, such a format of "argumentation" is practically excluded. Few people are interested in the opinion of this or that specialist, this is the lot of research in the history of science. It is enough to give a formula or an equation, the results of calculations, and what anyone thinks about this becomes far from third-rate. I have repeatedly drawn the attention of historians to the fact that I am not interested in opinion, I need to know on what basis this opinion was formulated, what were the initial data. My experience suggests that there was more than one interpretation of the data. To this I received an answer,that "it is not accepted here". The situation from the point of view of natural scientists is completely unhealthy."
Doctor of Chemical Sciences, Professor A. A. Klesov.
Here is the question: is it necessary to delve into history, find out where the truth is and where not, figure out which kings were in fact and which exist only as a collective image, was there a substitution of Peter the Great….
Probably DNA genealogy can easily give answers to all these questions - however, I will repeat the question "is it necessary"? It is likely that we will find distortions and will be faced with the need to admit the centuries-old lie of the authorities about this. I would answer YES, but at the same time I would make a reservation that this must be done carefully: create a group of historians and genetic scientists, raise questions, think over a cover, do the job, find out the real state of affairs and, if deception is detected, immediately prepare the correct interpretation - a new official version.
Promotional video:
I hope that it will be so soon, our ancestors and descendants are worthy of the TRUTH.