I share the trad. historical material, under the review of the Russian Academy of Sciences, on the "invasion of the Tatar-Mongol" in Hungary.
Conscientiously compiled from several sources in Latin, which underlie historical theories and ideas about that time.
At the same time, the text in Latin is not about the invasion of the "Mongol-Tatars"; neither Mongols nor Tatars are mentioned there. Rather, the Tatars (natives of the Volga Bulgaria) are mentioned, only they are modestly called "Ishmaelites" …
In fact, we are talking about the activities of the state of Tartary. It also highlights the moment of granting Tartary citizenship, inclusion in the army, etc.
It is amazing how easily trad. historians falsify historical documents, arbitrarily substituting meaning in translations and constructing a historical reality approved by the top.
Great Hungary.
Promotional video:
Suspiciously on this map "Great Hungary" takes the place of other settlers, Khazaria.
It practically leaves them no chance, including both Chechnya and Dagestan))
However, it is worth remembering that the Hungarians took part of the Khazars to themselves, and they made up "the most combat-ready and evil part of their army", later being called hussars.
Thus, the Volga Hungarians, as an ally, participated in the war of Tartary with the countries to the west.
The Volga Bulgars (who today are called Tatars) did not participate in this war on the side of Tartaria, moreover, they attacked its troops (Subedei and Dzhebe), returning with booty.
Below, link # 7 shows us how the passage sounds in Latin; the state of Tartaria and the Tartars are written in black and white everywhere.
In fact, all medieval maps of Asia reflect either a certain number of kingdoms, including various Tartaria, or greater Tartary. Apparently, in different times the empire either gathered or disintegrated into separate volosts.
It's funny that people come up with good, meaningful cards like this and don't read them from the word "not at all."
Stupidly ignore what is written, including the description that goes to the cards. The level of blinking is simply amazing!
Khan of khans, king of kings - is familiar by the naming of Presbyter John in his letters.
On the one hand, the reaction to these documents of those who have heard enough tales about "a great advanced civilization in the state of Tartaria" is quite understandable. On the other hand, although these are documents of that time, and have a serious historical and scientific weight, they were still written by people, on order and with emotion. Only, as you can see, then the Mongol-Tatars "were not invented.
The Hungarians themselves ruined half of Europe, terrified all the surrounding countries - these are Attila's Huns who settled in Pannonia. Their name speaks about this - Hungaria. And when their brothers-Hungarians from the east, from the vicinity of Yoshkar-Ola, came to dispossess them, they began to cry and invent awful "Mongols". Since it was a shame to admit in retrospect that some Hungarians slaughtered others.
To be fair, there are only a lot of inconsistencies in the text. For example, in one place they claim that the Tartars returned flocks of sheep and tribute for a beautiful girl, and in another - that they killed indiscriminately. Obviously stupidity and artistic exaggeration.
Or about 300 noble ladies. The number is round and beautiful. I wonder where they got so many? This is so many nobility in all of Hungary! And the yard, as we are informed, quickly dumped into exile. It is very doubtful that there were so many "noble women" in one town.
