Read the first part here.
A very wonderful comment from Roman Grebenikov:
The man claims to have done some research in a village that is three hundred years old, where he found only evidence that there used to be poverty! Why is this comment important to me? This is very related to many personal notes - I also moved to the village, which celebrated its 300th anniversary this summer. Then he walked along it and looked for buildings, which are not that over three hundred, but at least one hundred years old! Naturally, I began to remember which villages I still visited, and I traveled half of Ukraine, I visited Voronezh and Kursk. In many villages, the picture is almost like a blueprint. This is in the center of shops, behind them or next to the former manager, which, as they say, were built already under the Soviets. Further, there is a building called the house of culture, which is just the same not Soviet and in the antique style, with columns,with high ceilings and antique decor, which cannot be called poverty - even with the Soviets, such expensive buildings were not built for the village. Already I am silent for today's time, where our elite in quotation marks laid on the villages from a high bell tower.
Also in the villages that are present from the old, these are buildings that I call churches. These churches are generally overgrown with such legends that do not fit any logic. For example, everywhere they say that in all the villages of Russia, the Germans predominantly built. Of course, what technologies and what culture in Russia, how many foreign historians hammered into us. But you count how many villages throughout Russia. Ukraine alone is already starting to laugh at the official version. But Russia is also Belarus, and Russia, and Moldova, and the Baltic states, and it went and went - IN GERMANY SO MANY RESIDENTS PROBABLY NOT, HOW MANY THESE SO-CALLED CHURCHES ARE LEFT! There were no technologies in Russia, but where did they get so many bricks, which are more technologically advanced than modern ones, from Germany? Who then built Germany itself, if their entire population,all of their specialists and builders only have a Sabbath with us? And that's just the village. And if you take the ancient cities? There, every building is a masterpiece! What do you need craftsmen need a level higher than modern and developed industry, getting used to today. For example, AdEssa - we are told that it was built from under itself, supposedly its catacombs, these are quarries of rukushnyak and limestone. Yes, there are such buildings. But when I stop by AdEssa, I observe exclusively brick buildings for an hour and a half. In the very center of Adessa, the same is where the plaster falls off, you can see that there is a brick behind it! How to find out which pre-revolutionary structure, and which after? This is for the quality of the brick itself. In the Union, although they strived for quality, we see that the brick buildings of the Union already look clumsy today, and the pre-revolutionary masonry still often looks like it was laid out recently. Plus brick decor on buildings - in the Soviet Union they already put lintels on window and door openings, in old buildings everything is pretty and made of brick. Even the floors of the floors are brick. And then you really break your head, what happened, that before the revolution it was better and more beautifully built, and then suddenly the quality fell and the beauty disappeared. This is not only a technological break from a high level to a more primitive one, but also a break in the ideological field, which replaced art by stereotyped. This is not only a technological break from a high level to a more primitive one, but also a break in the ideological field, which replaced art by stereotyped. This is not only a technological break from a high level to a more primitive one, but also a break in the ideological field, which replaced art by stereotyped.
But back to the churches. More often they were demolished in the post-revolutionary period. And, as everyone knows, with great difficulty - the cables on the tractors were torn! Some powerful structures were demolished with dynamite. Moreover, they had to blow up several times, where there were four charges, and in Baku, as the subscriber writes, and in general, whole vessels were fooled, how difficult it was to demolish the structure, volleys from the explosions shook the entire region. Secondly, all these churches were not built in the Christian style, but in the antique style. That is, it was built in that antiquity, which, according to official science, Christians destroyed in ancient Rome with shouts of "this is paganism."
Thirdly, summing up the results … what do we find in the villages pre-revolutionary? This is a house of culture, a church, a post office and some kind of management house - that's it! Firstly, these houses are not poor and testify to the spiritual and technological advancement at the time of their construction. Secondly, these houses are of an urban type, but in rural villages, in fact, there is nothing - everything is post-revolutionary. So maybe we didn't have, in the conventional understanding, any villages before the revolution?
In general, what is a "village"? The place where the houses are made of wood. This means that a good half of the villages can cease to be called villages. Say the word "village"? Let's rearrange the stress in this word and it will turn out - VILLAGE, SETTLEMENT, that is - a place that has drowned in the so-called cultural layer. It is clear that I find fault and exaggerate. But to the consideration of our Matrix from this side or side, everything is even very suitable.
Promotional video:
And now we look here:
This is Broad Street, Philadelphia. Photo of 1905, that is, temporary imperialism. The data of the skyscrapers of the ancient era, which was recently destroyed, what do they illustrate? How many floors did the ancient and ancient cities of Russia render under the ground? Crop the photo under these edges and you will see all the same ancient cities of Europe and Russia. By the way, those who have eyes see that these skyscrapers are already under the so-called "cultural layer".
The old building of the Metropolitan Opera. According to the official version, it was built in 1883 near Times Square. It was demolished in 1967 and the performances were moved to Lincoln Center.
The Life Building was built in 1870 in lower Manhattan. In 1912 it was destroyed by fire, which is quite curious - after all, the building is made of stone. It means that the ancient buildings, which were called churches, were blown up with dynamite and could not, but here, not only stone high-rise buildings burn like matches, but also many stone-antique cities. And they try to demolish everything that is inconvenient that has not burned out. For instance:
Vanamaker was a popular department store on Broadway and Ninth Street in the early 1900s. Also = the building itself was burned down.
The City Hall and the post office were first opened according to the official version in 1878. Demolished. The official reason is "the architecture was not very beautiful and the building was demolished in 1938." How ugly the house is - you can see for yourself.
We go on. to antique skyscrapers. Search engines sometimes give such a mysterious result for the query "America's first skyscraper"). All houses are in a beautiful antique style. For example, in the center, where the columns are at the very top, isn't it under such a “cultural layer”, for example, Isaac's “Christian” Cathedral? Put different buildings of Russia and Europe with columns next to the upper floors and get a one-to-one analogy.
Also noteworthy is the fantastic building on the left.
A gothic skyscraper called Tribune Tower, located in Chicago. According to official sources, Chicago is the birthplace of skyscrapers. Stone City was badly damaged after a fire in 1871, and actually began to rebuild again, because most of the stone skyscrapers burned down. As one site writes, in 1885, the world's first high-rise building was erected here.
Let's put Rouen Cathedral next to it. The Oil Tower (dating from the beginning of the 16th century) in the foreground.
And the Cathedral of Saint Ouen. Dating back to the 15th century).
We are looking at the following antique skyscrapers. Left New York World, dated 1890. Centered on the Tribune of 1875. and on the right is the 1889 New York Times. Dating is all natural that the official.
If cropped at the tops of buildings, what reminds us? Left New York World Temple, Library, or Eper Theater! In the center of the chapel or train station. The third building of some mayor's office. Two of the three skyscrapers were demolished.
And here is another antique skyscraper:
Once again we make the markup and see that we are one to one with Vinnytsia, Riga or Paris. And I am not exaggerating this. For example, we recall the buried Polytech in Moscow - we are told that it was built a little over a century ago. And what, historians do not hide anything, as some people like to say? Why did it end up on so many floors under the ground? It would seem that the fact that historians do not know history should have been a sensation for everyone and even for the historians themselves, but no, after watching a bunch of videos from central TV channels, there is silence about this! Only a modest mention that they do not have a single reliable source about the past.
For that they sell us bullshit about a tuff foundation - did you see it from the outside so that they dig it to it? And the question is asked. Why watch TV, if they constantly lie and clog with information from completely outsiders. displacing the important? They started digging for this and realized that they would have to dig for a very long time and gave up - after all, people will see by themselves! It's easier to lie about some kind of tuff foundation through the central canals, while the crowd swallows any lies from the central duroscope! And those who will not swallow and think that porridge in the head is much better than noodles on the ears, because worthy food for the mind, how many floors do you think the Polytech is buried, 10? We return to the American high-rise and count the floors:
How many did you count? And now we look at the windows, which also turned out to be in the ground.
The original building of the Walldorf-Astoria dates back to 1897. The ancient skyscraper was destroyed in 1929. We trim it again and once again notice this historical fantastysh naibakhtung oyaibul in one word! Excuse me that nothing draws attention to our bad Germanic better than our excellent ability to place phraseological errors.
Further, luxury apartments in the Navarro building near Central Park were built in 1882. In 1926 the building was sold and demolished. Cover it with a "cultural layer" on many floors and historians will willingly start shouting that this is a castle!
The Dime Savings Banks Union building was opened in 1906 near Bryant Park. Church traders, whom Jesus Christ once expelled from the temple with pennants, for begging the old women for money either for candles or for the restoration of the main patriarch of the estate with a view of the mountain range … in general, the traders of the church looked at the building for a long time, licking their lips like to appropriate … but the cultural layer did not grow for a suspiciously long time and it was decided to demolish it in 1956. By the way, have you noticed how our historians and religion do not contradict each other? Seemingly. different sects, but no - he washes his hand.
The Astor Hotel was built according to official legends in 1904 on Broadway and 44th Street. It was disassembled in 1967.
In Lower Manhattan, the Singer headquarters building was completed in 1908. It was disassembled in 1968.
The City Investment Tower, located near the Singer Tower, was an oddly shaped one that was demolished in 1986.
The Commodore Hotel was built in 1919 near Central Station. I do not know if this antique skyscraper exists, but it is taken from the publication of the missing antique houses in America. That is, demolished.
The St. Paul Building opened in 1899 on Lower Broadway and was named after the chapel across the street. The building was demolished in 1958.
The Savoie Plaza Hotel was built in 1927 on 5th Avenue between Fifty-eighth and Fifty-ninth Streets. It was demolished in 1964.
The John Wolfe building was built in 1895 in the financial district. It was disassembled in 1974. Please note that steam is not coming from the chimneys. We remember that Bulgakov, through the lips of Preobrazhensky, too much complained that because of the evolutionists, steam heating began to disappear and electricity was constantly being turned off, which, God forbid, all over Russia, before the revolution, was extinguished only twice. But what was steam heating before the revolution? Look at what steam is coming down - in winter we don't see such jets of steam on our roofs.
And in conclusion, I would like to recommend Olga Pro's wonderful channel. The girl's videos are absolutely wonderful and for some reason unfairly many untwisted resources such talented channels bypass. Looks like it's not such a noble deed, remembering how difficult it was to stomp from the bottom ourselves. It is much more noble to argue with each other whose video is cooler and who is more to the right. But, we are still far from their moral heights, from that we are happy to recommend you excellent channels. The girl often travels to interesting places and shoots a lot of great material. She, unlike historians, shows the World as it is. I want to pay special attention to her films about San Francisco. These films tell about the fact that under the city of burial there is a whole port with ships. It is clear that history writes its own writings on this subject,but as we have long understood - to believe them, not to respect ourselves. So we take only after the fact - it turns out not only ancient skyscrapers like ours. and the American ones, were under the ground, but also entire ports along with ships. Thank you very much Olya for these masterpieces. I wiped everyone's nose. Link to Olya's channel in the Description under the video.
Continued: Part 3
Bullets of Snowfall