Now there is a lot of talk about the culture of matriarchy, which was replaced in due time by patriarchy. However, few people talk about the reasons for such a change in human society. But there is a hypothesis that matriarchy and the power of women have been eliminated and are being eliminated on purpose, since women are by nature more spiritual, and this interferes with modern civilization.
It is no secret to anyone that the current wars and coups in the Middle East and North Africa are being waged by the United States and NATO. The reasons are different - oil, instilling democracy and freedom, strengthening their own influence. Probably, we can even talk about the totality of interests of different groups, but what have the libraries and museums of Egypt, Libya, Iraq to do with it? They are stolen and even burn, and not a hundred, and not a thousand years ago, but now, in our time.
One well-respected Russian publication writes: “Shortly before the new 2012, in the center of Cairo, during the street protests that erupted again in the Egyptian capital, invaluable ancient documents were destroyed, which testified that world“history did not develop at all the way it was invented and described. Jews in "Tanakh" (Old Testament) … The ancient library, called the Science Center, was part of the complex of buildings of the Egyptian parliament … Provocateurs directed the crowd to this very building, throwing Molotov cocktails at it."
And during the war in Libya, the archaeological collection "Treasures of Benghazi" from the National Bank of Libya, which consisted of 10,000 objects of art from ancient times, disappeared. The ancient antique cities of Leptis Magna and Sabrat were bombed, the values of which also disappeared.
In the first days of the occupation of the Iraqi capital, the National Museum of Baghdad was plundered by the Americans. At the same time, the National Library of Iraq was looted, where documents were kept since antiquity.
If someone, with such a list of events, begins to assert that all this is an accident, then let him continue to enjoy life in blissful ignorance. And those who understand that this is not an accident and not a simple looting (looting cannot explain purposeful fires in any way), should ask the question: who and what is trying to destroy, hide or change?
Let's start with the fact that a number of Israeli scientists, for example, professor of archeology Z. Herzog and historian Y. Kamaysky, believe that long-term excavations do not confirm biblical descriptions. Indeed, there is not a single unrecognized fake artifact to support the history of the Bible. Let's make an amendment, there is not a single such artifact that would be "found" in Israel and in the Middle East in general. Few people think that the Holy Land was never here, that they just tried to create it here. For what and who?
The Zionists are just the visible part of this iceberg. Moreover, the one that unfolded history against the Jews themselves, blaming them all the sins and achievements of the whole Europe. But history unfolded long before the Zionists, at the moment when the people of Europe took back Jerusalem in 1099. You, of course, thought that we are talking about the very Jerusalem, which can still be visited in the lands of Palestine. But of course not. We're talking about another city. Does anyone really believe that in the desert forgotten by God, where nothing grows by itself, lies the Promised Land, the land of paradise? But this is a direct contradiction! In 1947, there was only one tree for one and a half hectares. Do not be afraid to think so about paradise, about God and … Jews!
Promotional video:
Better look at the map. Imagine for a second that Gibraltar once was not, and its shores closed (there is enough information about this). Then we get that the Mediterranean is just an inland sea, and the peoples who lived on its shores could freely communicate with each other. Here a logical question arises, why did we decide that the Jews went from Egypt to the right to the Arabian deserts, and not to the left through Gibraltar - to Spain and Europe? Already the south of Europe is much more like paradise.
We deeply researched this issue and came to the unequivocal conclusion that almost the entire history of the Bible is the history of Europe, and has nothing to do with the Middle East.
In fact, the area inside the fortress wall of today's "Jerusalem" is only one square kilometer - as many as two thousand people could live here, and it looks like a village, and in no way looks like the great city of Solomon and David. Josephus Flavius mentions that three million people once met the consul here. Where, per square kilometer? But this is simply impossible, even if all the buildings are demolished …
It is impossible to imagine swamps, bears, oak groves, magi from oak groves, wheat, cold in the Middle East Palestine, which are mentioned in the Bible in connection with the places where events unfold. According to the Bible, Joshua captured 31 people. Where? In desert?
And he gave only 200 cities to the tribe of Judah, when there are fewer of them in all of Israel now, and here is only one tribe out of twelve? Modern historians should pick up calculators, because mathematics is an exact science, unlike modern history.
If this part of the reasoning seems to our contemporary to be little reliable, then the next one looks like complete nonsense, but this is consistent nonsense …
So, if the Jews settled in Europe, then Jerusalem should also be here. Is there evidence of this too? Sure!
In 1130, 31 years after the capture of Jerusalem, King Alfonso of Spain bequeathed his country to the Templars. He was not crazy, but quite a serious monarch, and the Vatican had to make a lot of efforts to keep his will from going into effect. Why did Alfonso do this? Few people know that the first mention of the Saracens is not associated with the Middle East at all, but with Spain. It was her in the 7-8 century A. D. e. captured by the Saracens, and all the time there was a war of liberation. Then there is nothing surprising in the fact that the king of Spain bequeathed the country to the young order of knights, who managed to prove themselves well in thirty years, defending the Jerusalem lands. It is no coincidence that this is why the first and main fortresses of the Templars are located in and around the Pyrenees. These fortresses were presented to the knights by the local nobility. It's not hard to guess why - to protect against the Saracens. But what does the Middle East have to do with it? And the truth has nothing to do with it. In the Middle East, they began to create "shrines" later, possibly by the same Templars, starting in 1191, when Richard the Lionheart made a treaty with Saladin. It should be noted that in other places no one gave fortresses to the Templars in large quantities. And, therefore, Jerusalem, the way to which the Templars guarded according to their Rule, must be sought here, in the Pyrenees. They could not protect the Spanish lands and the Middle East with nine.the way to which the Templars guarded according to their Charter must be sought here in the Pyrenees. They could not protect the Spanish lands and the Middle East with nine.the way to which the Templars guarded according to their Charter must be sought here in the Pyrenees. They could not protect the Spanish lands and the Middle East with nine.
Then you shouldn't be surprised that for three hundred years in Europe there were two parallel dynasties of Jerusalem kings - probably because there were two of them - one real, and the second fake.
Even more unexpected is the thought that since the Jews and Jerusalem are in Europe, then Christ was also born here! Where is "here? Not in Galilee - in Gaul, do you hear the consonance? It's obvious! And how else to explain that the graves of the apostles in Rome (Bishop Peter and the Apostle Paul in the holy of holies of the capital of the Empire under the Vatican Hill), Jacob in Spain, Magdalene in Marseilles, and there are none in the Middle East? Why is the oldest Bible and New Testament written in Greek and Latin, and not Hebrew? At the same time, the Hebrew languages - different Yiddish - are in Europe, and Hebrew was "recreated" by the efforts of the same Zionists? The Cathars, who lived in the south of present-day France, argued that their religion came directly from Christ, that it was they, and not the Vatican, which bases its power on the succession of the Throne from the Apostle Peter, - its direct followers and Christians, good people.
Now, with all this in mind, imagine the situation in which the Vatican found itself when the people took over the European Jerusalem, which for centuries was not accessible. By this time, the Vatican had gained quite serious power in Europe, crowning kings, entering into large political alliances and financial transactions, and even having the opportunity to create its own army. True, this power was based on a forged (recognized by the court) document - "Constantine's Gift", which wrote off the lands of Europe to the Vatican, but then no one knew this. And here the real Holy Land returns with its priesthood, shrines, and, most importantly, religion and history, which quite seriously contradicted what the Vatican preached. After all, even if you believe in the journey of Saint Helena, it is clear that it was to Europe, and not to the Arab desert, where she simply would not have survived. And now this whole Qatari story and "heresy"which already had its roots here, now that Jerusalem became accessible, it began to spread quite rapidly.
The result is clear. A hundred years later, the Vatican began to grind this land into powder, declaring an Albigensian (Qatari) crusade, then against Aragon, then against Byzantium. It is known that cities were destroyed with the population together, like Montsegur, for example. History was being destroyed everywhere. It was forbidden to read the Bible. Funny, huh? You cannot read the Holy Scriptures … What was so forbidden there that was written? Probably what the contemporaries of this writing perceived as their own, native, and this was superfluous.
And all these crusades against their own Christians took place at a time when the Saracens still occupied part of Europe. However, for some reason they did not really bother the Vatican, and moreover, it was beneficial for him that Europe was not available for the influence of Jerusalem, that is, for Jerusalem to become a foreign city again. This plan was later implemented: it ended up in the center of the Arab world.
Then there was the Inquisition - a subtle sweep compared to the war - and, oh! Is it really a coincidence again - most of all she raged again in Spain, and the fires all began with the same Cathars!
And, finally, when almost all those who knew the wrong thing were destroyed, it was necessary to fill the void - in the knowledge of history, culture, and so on … This period was called the Renaissance. Of course, we are used to thinking that this is a great era, but its greatness stood on the shoulders of the fires of the Inquisition. Moreover, it was created not only simultaneously with the Inquisition, but also by its order, because it is known that great frescoes were painted in churches, and great music was written by order of the church, which at the same time burned millions of people. Along with the creation of a new "culture", a new science was being carried out, when history was written almost from scratch the way the Vatican needed.
The last serious flaw remained - the carriers of a different religion and culture on a distant continent. For this, what we call the era of the great geographical discoveries was invented. As for discoveries, this is unlikely, otherwise how to explain the lands of the Amazons in America, where Caucasians lived for a long time, or the collection of Padre Crespi, in which there are images of Ahura Mazda - the ancient Persian God, or the presence of astrolabes even before our era, and other artifacts indicating for the connection of continents and advanced cartography. And then to say: Columbus sailed to the Amazon, and from here began a new round of genocide. Tens of millions of people were destroyed at the instigation of the same Vatican under the pretext of mortal sin.
What did they do that? Whom and why did the Vatican destroy and destroy? Who is the enemy?
The real answer is ridiculous, ridiculous and … the only one: they are afraid and destroy … women! Not those puffy ladies in boudoirs that the Renaissance drew to kill a woman's spirituality, and who are clearly not intended for spiritual religious practices, but those who actually have these spiritual practices: vestals, oracles, matrons, prophetesses, prophetesses, seers, witches (in charge), bab-yoginis, Amazons, priestesses living in sorrows at temples (on behalf of the God Horus), etc. No, I am not retelling fairy tales for you (what kind of fairy tales are there!): five million such women were burned in the fires of the Inquisition, one insane "Hammer of Witches", repeatedly published and praised, what is worth.
But there is something to be afraid of …
Moses' mother was called Yogaveda - who knows yoga - Yahweh, Ego, I, who knows I.
The oldest book of the Old Testament is the Song of Deborah, who was the chief judge and ruler of Israel, and, according to Shakespeare, Joan of Arc fought with her sword.
Christ was anointed by Mary Magdalene. They smear, in fact, on the kingdom, but smears on a person who has the highest spiritual power.
The Templars and knights of the Middle Ages worshiped Our Lady, and in France there is a huge number of churches dedicated to Mary Magdalene and Notre Dame. Dama - Ama - Ma, Amazons - Ama zone. The Cathars mention the ancient fire goddess Belissen.
The pyramids of Egypt were built by women!
Is it any wonder when you find out that the Amazons lived all over the world, and in Libya a couple of thousand years before the advent of Egypt - here is the women's battalion of Gaddafi. It is the Amazons who are credited with taming horses and dogs, inventing the bow and chain mail, and building a number of cities.
So what? It was yes, but what has it to do with the modern wars in the Middle East and in Harfik?
The answer is in the female way of knowing the world. I'm not talking about the fact that a woman is not able to analyze - recent studies even decide this question not in favor of men, we are talking about intuition - the ability to simply know, without calculations, without analysis, without intellectual reasoning. This is without a doubt an ability inherent in people with a developed right brain hemisphere. Consistently destroying knowledgeable women, the patriarchal church, and then the patriarchal states generated in alliance with it, created a left-hemispheric person who has lost his connection with God and is unable to think intuitively.
Who is more comfortable for you as a priest who can lead you to God, man or woman? But after all, male priests somehow do not lead to God, they do not know how, because God cannot be cognized by intellect, He does not fit there!
And the point here is not only in God, although everything is connected - with the loss of female influence on spiritual affairs, we have also lost God's concern for ourselves, because we do not hear him through women, through their rituals. Nor can we provide Ma (Mother of God) care for humanity as a whole.
This is another system of values, where the wealth of the Rothschilds simply does not matter, since this wealth should be for the children of the whole world, and not for the Rothschilds, this is a return of morality and religiosity, to which modern values have a very distant relationship. Such a change in society will mean the collapse of the goals and objectives of the United States and the Vatican. After all, the United States is also on the blood of female cults. Few people know that the overwhelming majority of the Indians, including the Iroquois, were matriarchal. This problem was solved by the genocide of the conquistadors, padres and other envoys of the Vatican - all the same crusades against the female principle that came with the era of geographical discoveries.
Now imagine that around the entire Mediterranean Sea there are traces of the Amazonian culture - another, but very correct culture, capable of living without wars, controlling the quantity and quality of fertility, where there is maternal care for people at the state level, where you can know the future and where there is a methodology connection with God. And that the true history of the Jews and Jerusalem is, in particular, history and matrimony. But it's not in vain, probably, matriarchy has survived in Spain and here the lowest crime rate in Europe.
Imagine also that the council of mothers decides whether to admit the current rulers to power or not, and it has the right to impose a taboo on their decisions. This is what the United States and the Vatican are trying to destroy, they do not need such a civilization. There is no place for their values in it.
Alexander Saversky