Some questions that change the view of the recent past of our planet and create an alternative historical reality.
Generalization, mother of learning
Good day everyone! I decided to summarize the information a little and systematize the data on the recent Flood, which took place in the very recent past, about 200-250 years ago. This Flood completely changed that world, and after it came the modern world we know. There will be a lot of bukaff below, so I apologize to the impatient comic book lovers.
There are already a lot of facts confirming this event, and contradicting the official ones. But most of them are either private in nature, or are considered separately from the rest, locally, and as a result, it is difficult to add up the whole picture of what happened.
In the Tretyakov Gallery there is a picture measuring 5.4 by 7.5 meters, which must be viewed at the maximum distance from the picture, so to speak in general. If we consider the particulars, then the whole idea of the picture is lost. Here is this picture….
So in our case, there was a very large-scale planetary event with a lot of details, these details are seen by observers, researchers, each in his own city or region, but it is impossible to see the whole picture as a whole. Let's try to fill this gap today.
Promotional video:
This event in history is known as the St. Petersburg Flood of 1777, the Patriotic War of 1812, the American War of Independence of 1812, the Year Without Summer, and many other historical events known to us from official history. But they all have nothing to do with reality, or are a special case of a common global planetary event.
So how does any investigator conduct a crime scene investigation?
From the general to the particular … from the particular to the general … First, facts are collected - traces, bullets, blood, drawing on the asphalt around the corpse, witnesses, prints, genetic material … Then laboratory studies are carried out, the trajectory of the bullet is calculated, the type of weapon is determined, possible places from where there was shooting, motives, interested parties, and so on.
What facts do we have:
1. The same type of architecture of existing buildings, all over the world, known as "antique", Europe, Russia, China, India, North and South America, Africa, Australia.
2. Destroyed buildings built in the same "antique" style, Greece, Italy, Egypt, France, Russia, America, Africa, Australia, Asia … The remains of which, there are now, and were in large numbers in the recent past, they were dug out and excavated by archaeologists. These destructions are reflected in the paintings of the "ruinists" who depicted on their canvases the ruins of all sorts of majestic buildings and structures of cities, clearly visible with their own eyes.
3. "Sagging into the cultural layer", to a depth of 4 meters and even more, buildings and structures built earlier than the 19th century. Moreover, everywhere the "cultural layer" consists, as a rule, of a homogeneous material of sedimentary origin (sand and clay), under which there is often a fertile layer.
4. Large scatter on the timescale of the same type of architecture, up to several thousand years, and the architectural style, in general and in details, structural elements, practically did not undergo any changes for thousands of years, as if some standards were invented thousands of years ago, which then did not change hundreds and thousands of years, nothing was invented, new technologies, materials, styles, etc. did not appear.
five. Remains of canals and hydraulic structures, sometimes technically very complex (dams, sluices, aqueducts), and in a volume that exceeds the technical, financial, human capabilities in their construction, in places where, by definition, their presence is at least strange, sometimes just unnecessary. Climatically completely unreasonable (for example, irrigation canals in the northern regions, in areas far from the present centers of concentration of settlements (Siberia, Arkhangelsk region, Karelia, the Caucasus, Kamchatka, etc.), aqueducts-water pipes in places where it is winter for six months and very low temperatures, at which the aqueducts will simply be destroyed). From a technical point of view, the finishing of these channels and structures, granite blocks, even in places that are far from the places where these granites are mined,their technical complexity (slopes of one or two degrees on tens and sometimes hundreds of kilometers, taking into account the difficult terrain, sometimes even mountainous regions).
6. Remains of vegetation, peat, sapropel, black soil, stained trees on the surface, in the ground, very shallow, and in areas where, according to the current climate, they should not be. (Severnaya Zemlya, New Siberian Islands, oak bogs in the northern regions). In areas of permafrost, which for the last hundred years have been retreating to the north, in the first year vegetation begins to grow, characteristic of more southern regions, and in the following years, this vegetation is replaced by the current one, characteristic of modern tundra, forest-tundra, etc. northern plants).
7. The presence of a large number of maps, with high accuracy of plotting settlements, longitude and latitude, vegetation (forests in the north), rivers, canals, roads, which, according to the OI, either do not exist, or were created or discovered much later (for example, land roads from Moscow to St. Petersburg, built only in the 19th century, canals connecting the Don and Oka in the region of Tula, the Volga-Don Canal, built only in the 20th century, in the Volgograd region, etc.). A large number of settlements in the North, along the Siberian rivers, in the region of Kamchatka, Chukotka, the coast of the Arctic Ocean. The relief of the coastline of Antarctica, which only in the 20th century could be seen with the help of satellites, and the coast of which is under a thick layer of ice.
8. The presence on the surface and a very shallow occurrence of homogeneous sedimentary rocks (sand, gravel, clay, limestone, boulders weighing up to tens of tons), the formation of their deposits in the amount of millions of cubic meters, in one place, oriented strictly from north to south in descending order, in strips along the current and dry, rivers, ravines. Blocked soils in a volume that does not allow agricultural work even in the 20th century, in the northern regions, especially in Karelia, Arkhangelsk, Leningrad, Pskov, Novgorod, Tver, Yaroslavl, Vladimir, Moscow, Vologda, Kostroma, Vyatka, and others). Moreover, in those areas where, according to the OI, intensive agricultural production has been carried out since ancient times, agricultural products were supplied, including for export), but at the same time, in the presence of a very poor vegetation layer, even in the 20th century (non-chernozem areas).
9. Total cleaning to the granite foundations of the entire northern coast, from Sweden to Kamchatka (North of the Leningrad Region, Karelia, Arkhangelsk Region, and further to the east). In the complete absence of sedimentary rocks - limestone, sand, clay, a vegetative layer of a couple of centimeters, and in the lowlands there are swamps full of peat, reservoirs with sapropel, in places of meter accumulations of vegetative soil. Explained by the rise of the northern plate (and where did the sedimentary rocks from the bottom of the sea go when they were raised - the same meters of limestone and sand?), While the slope from north to south is not observed, moreover, all Siberian rivers beyond the Urals flow to the North !!! Those. in the direction of raising the plate?
10. The presence of a large number of salt water bodies, underground sources, from the Arkhangelsk region to Turkmenistan, from the Urals and to Altai. And also a large number of salty soils.
11. Strange orientation of the Deserts, especially Africa and America. All the deserts there are on the West Coast side. Deserts in Asia - China, Mongolia, with salt lakes, Karakum and Kyzyl Kum in Western Asia. Highly saline lakes in the Middle East - for example, the Dead Sea, which, according to OI, come from precipitation or fresh rivers originating in the mountains (Aral Sea, Caspian Sea) Isolated from the Seas and Oceans, and in theory they could not become salty from these sources. The half-salt lake Balkhash, located in the foothills, certainly could not feed on salt water from the mountains.
12. The presence of the North Sea fauna in the South seas and lakes. North Sea seals (or rather their relatives), in Lake Onega, in the Caspian Sea, in Baikal! Fish species related to the North Sea species are flounder in the Black and Caspian Seas, herring in the Black and Caspian Seas, omul in Baikal, and many other species. Moreover, they all go to spawn in the rivers upstream, in the Don, Volga, Dnieper (i.e. to the north), as well as downstream from Baikal - to the Angara, but also to the north! Those. to the side where their relatives live in the Arctic Ocean! Which speaks of the unambiguous path where their ancestors came from - from the North.
13. The territory of permafrost, in a strange way to the Urals and beyond the Urals, is very different in latitude, by thousands (!) Km, which may indicate different reasons for its origin or its preservation. Moreover, the southern border of the permafrost is constantly retreating to the north, over the past 100 years, this border has shifted by hundreds of kilometers (from 250 to 500 km, to the north). Moreover, this fact applies to both Eurasia and North America. The absence of a permafrost zone at similar latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, which indicates different reasons for its occurrence and preservation, not related to the angle of incidence of sunlight on the surface. If the current climate is unchanged for thousands of years, then in 300-500 years, such a movement, the permafrost of the Northern Hemisphere should have reached the Arctic Circle, at least.
14. Suspicious drying up of water bodies over the past 100 years, rivers, lakes, swamps and other water bodies on land become very shallow, dry up, the amount of water is constantly decreasing, which leads to climate change. The rate of this drying up, if compared over the past 100 years, over hundreds of years would have led to the complete drying up of almost all closed water bodies, fed only by spring floods or precipitation.
15. False inflation of the hypothesis of global warming, which is globally in no way connected with either the content of CO2 in the atmosphere or with solar activity, but is associated with only one thing - the presence and amount on the surface of the land (including in its thickness) of a substance capable of accumulating and give off heat, namely water, in its various states of aggregation: liquid water and ice.
16. Rivers. Absolutely everything, from huge to small streams, rivers have gullies incommensurate with the current channel, the width exceeding the current one, from several times, to tens of times, larger than the current channel. The banks of these gullies are formed by the simultaneous flow of water, strictly along the course of the current rivers, the water level is much higher (in volume dozens of times), the current volume of water in the rivers, the level of the slopes of these rivers, their uniformity across the entire plane, a small number of ravines to the current river (insignificant destruction of slopes by ravines), their size (depth) indicate a small amount of time elapsed from the moment of their formation to the present day.
The presence of washed-out and swampy areas along rivers, the presence of oxbows (periodic changes in channels), at a great distance from the current channel, isolated reservoirs without external recharge (now drying up), along the rivers, suggests that in the very recent past the amount of water in all rivers it was immeasurably more. Judging by the water erosion of the surface of the slopes and adjacent territories, it was several hundred years, no more. Very often there are perfectly flat, tens of kilometers long, rivers on flat territories, which may indicate their artificial origin, once being canals. A strange formation of high banks with an opposite low bank, usually on the north or northwest side.
17. Rivers in settlements. In all settlements near the rivers, there are washed-out territories, even on a hill up to tens of meters from the current level of the river. Even with a low opposite bank! Now these territories are parks, reserves, wildlife sanctuaries, stadiums, vacant lots, industrial zones, building sites only in the 20th century. Moreover, they contain destroyed or heavily "sagging" historical buildings and structures, as a rule, rather large (Churches, Fortresses, Monasteries). Moreover, at a considerable distance from modern streets and even settlements, which suggests that they were once part of a denser building, or estates.
18. Ravines. On the plains, in places where there is insufficient water for their formation (small amount of precipitation, groundwater, reservoirs, etc.), there are a lot of ravines. Moreover, in terms of their structure and condition of the slopes, these ravines are very similar to the rivers that exist in the same area. The condition of their slopes and their structure are practically indistinguishable from the plain rivers and what is said about the rivers above.
nineteen. Fortresses, castles, kremlin. Until the 17th century, all over the world there was a huge number of fortresses, fortresses-stars, castles, monasteries, with high fortress walls, especially near rivers, reservoirs, kremlin (essentially the same fortresses), which in their structure were many times larger than their fortification purpose, according to the types of weapons used in those wars. Most of them are currently either completely destroyed, or according to the OI, in the 17-19th centuries they were destroyed by war (cannonballs), survived terrible fires that destroyed them in whole or in part. Moreover, most of them were known back in the 18th century, were plotted on maps, described in many later literary works. The costs for their construction, the presence in the 18th century, when already according to the OI there were no mass wars,remoteness from the theaters of military operations of those years (for example, in Siberia, in the Northern cities), suggest that their purpose was clearly not to protect against raids.
20. Mountain towns and monasteries. In many places in the mountains there are remnants of mountain towns that can accommodate thousands of inhabitants. Crimea, Caucasus, Turkey, Middle East, America, Kazakhstan, Carpathians, etc. The purpose of these cities, their time of use, logistical inaccessibility, labor costs for their construction and transport inconvenience of the location indicate that the reason for their appearance can only be the need to protect from something very destructive, the need to save a certain number of residents from some a cataclysm occurring or likely to occur below these cities, in the lowlands.
21. Sacred Mountains. All nations have sacred mountains. Moreover, it is very difficult to find an explanation of what is so sacred about them.
22. Holy springs. All over the world, especially in the highlands, there are ancient sacred sources, usually with religious overtones. Often these springs are located in the mountains or on hills, often in the territory of monasteries, also located on hills.
23. Kitchen. In many countries, the cuisine is replete with ingredients that do not match the growth possibilities of these crops in the region where it is located. Peppers and spices in fairly northern regions where these crops do not grow now. National cuisines are replete with plants that were either introduced at a fairly late time, according to OI. For example, corn is native to America, in Moldova. The age-old culture of growing, processing and storing plants originating thousands of kilometers south of or even from other continents, for example, American potatoes in Belarus, cucumbers, onions, cabbage, in European Russia (native to North Africa or Asia Minor). At the same time, there is a long tradition of cultivation culture, use in food, processing and storage.
It is not clear how southern onions or cucumbers with cabbage were able to adapt to the harsh northern regions, and northern varieties appeared. Moreover, these cultures have a very ancient history. About 80 (!) Varieties of pineapple grown everywhere in Russia in greenhouses, but still, where does such a variety, the ability to grow and such preferences of local northern residents come from?
Southern wheat, the northern varieties of which, cultivated north of the Voronezh region, appeared only in the second half of the 20th century, was known and used in the cuisine of our ancestors since ancient times, and so on until Arkhangelsk. The use of massive, back in the 17th century amaranth in Russia, originally from South America, which was discovered in the same century a century earlier, and which managed to conquer such expanses of the Northern Country?
Tea, coffee, tobacco? The cuisine of some peoples, now considered a delicacy, could have appeared only from a very terrible lack of food, for example, the use of frogs in food by the French and Vietnamese, snails, etc., speaks of times, moreover, long, when they may have been the only living creatures that can save you from hunger.
24. Architecture. Similarities in architecture, building materials and building technologies. Architectures on vast territories, at a distance of thousands of kilometers, and on different continents. Extreme technical difficulty in the design and construction of some buildings and structures with a complete (allegedly) absence of drawings, materials, technical documentation, technical and aesthetic perfection of the architecture of the 17-19th centuries.
In the northern latitudes, even until the 20th century, there were buildings and structures that were not designed for this climate. All of them, as a rule, hail not later than the 18th, early 19th centuries. Heating was not provided in these buildings. The so-called summer temples, huge places of worship, designed without taking into account cold and frost, in areas where even now up to 8 months a year, it is cold. Residential buildings with huge windows, having huge heat losses, also without heating (most of them were heated either by stoves attached in the 19th century, or during their reconstruction changes were made and heating systems were created.
Most of the buildings were designed and built with flat roofs, which is extremely impractical for the northern regions, because led to roof leakage due to melting snow, and lack of precipitation runoff. Moreover, the second half of the 19th century has already ruled out this short-sightedness. The buildings are designed taking into account the northern cold climate, with heating, with pitched roofs that slope for snow and rain, with windows smaller than a century earlier.
Almost all buildings built earlier than the 19th century have a deep "subsidence into the cultural layer", and it is very uniform, which did not lead, as in science, to the destruction of the entire structure of the building. As a result, the first floors of the buildings ended up in the ground, where the basements on which these buildings were built disappeared. The aesthetic and technical design was violated, there was an additional opportunity for moisture to penetrate from the ground into the building itself, its walls, which leads to a violation of waterproofing and a more rapid destruction of walls in northern latitudes with a greater depth of freezing.
Reconstruction of the Museum. Vrubel, Omsk, covered with windows and doors.
The loss of technology in building materials in the 19th century, a change in construction technology, the use of building materials (foundations and walls were previously built from limestone blocks, later from bricks; the brick was previously more durable, later less durable), the use of long products in the construction (obviously superior in characteristics to the rolling stock of the 19th and 20th centuries, for example, the metal structures of the base of the Dome of St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg - the structure did not give in to corrosion even after 300 years), etc.
25. Mega-settings of the 18-19th centuries. In the 18-19th centuries in Russia and in the World, a huge number of structures (canals, roads, railways, buildings and structures) were built, in terms of the volume of work performed, the quality and technology of construction, the places of their construction, the distance from the places of production of materials, the timing constructions that do not lend themselves to logical explanation, do not correspond to the level of the available and used building materials, the qualifications of the builders (according to the OI, either serfs or soldiers were built, under the guidance of an experienced European architect).
For example: The Nikolaev railway was built in the shortest possible time (less than 10 years, in places, even in the 20th century, very swampy, sparsely populated, in a climate with up to 9 months a year of cold, rain, snow and frost). Transsib - was built on time, about 10 years, in areas with a minimum population density, remoteness from places of production of rails, sleepers, etc.). At the same time, tens of thousands of kilometers of railways were built in the same period, surpassing similar works in the 20th century in terms of the volume of construction work.
26. Population. The main resource of any state is people. People are also the army that waged wars in the 18th and 19th centuries. This is the production of CX products for the army, builders, for sale within the country and abroad. These are workers in factories and factories, builders, service representatives, clergymen, doctors, teachers, etc. These are taxes for the treasury, from which government spending is again financed. And here's the problem.
According to more or less official data available, the population of the Russian Empire at the end of the 19th century was about 110-120 million people. Taking into account the population of Poland, Finland, Turkestan, the Caucasus. The official population growth is, as it were, about 2 percent a year, which is very strange and suspiciously small, given that the population of about 80% is a rural population, and families there were from 5 to 15 children, they also began to give birth very early. from 15 years old.
Those. For 20 years (even 35-40 years, the average life expectancy), two parents already had 3-4 heirs for each parent, and taking into account the fact that there were often grandchildren, by the death of the first parents, the increase for 40 years was at least 100%.
But even with a 2% increase, the calculation in the opposite direction gives no more than 15-20 million people for the entire Russian Empire. If you also count 100 years into the past, then even that is about 500 thousand - a million. The entire territory of the Russian Empire. Hence the question arises about the possibilities of building what is described above, and the next point.
27. Expansion. At the beginning of the 19th century, there was a populated area from Kaliningrad to Vladivostok, from Arkhangelsk to the Pamir. Siberia is inhabited, along the northern sea route, along the Siberian rivers. There are thousands of inhabited cities on the maps, throughout the territory. There are dozens of villages and villages around each city (otherwise the city will not survive and even not appear). Total: tens of thousands of settlements throughout the territory.
Question: Why? Why do we need such a complex, dangerous and unpredictable expansion from a rather comfortable region of Southern Europe? 10-20 million people can easily disperse across Central Russia, while 5 million will live by the sea, enjoying the southern sun and fruit and wine. What or who should force people to leave their homes and go hundreds or thousands of kilometers, in an unknown direction, to the taiga, to Siberia, to the North? And most importantly why?
Well, for example, the Stolypin reforms of the mass settlement of Siberia (and who then built the Transsib and for whom a dozen years before), and by whom were the cities of Siberia inhabited, which allegedly hundreds of years before that live there quietly and live there? And let me remind you that contemporaries considered the Stolypin resettlement to be unique! Does it mean that such operations were not carried out on such a scale before?
This means that it turns out that in the 19th century, the entire territory of Russia was already inhabited through natural expansion, the gradual settlement of new territories, when the previous ones have already been developed and the population size allows looking for new territories for agricultural activities, and only then a city appears there, which provides village with everything you need, and most importantly! People will not go north, in worse conditions, if the south allows them to settle without problems!
Then it turns out that either hundreds of years were needed for natural expansion, or settlement was forced (and apart from Voronezh with Peter 1, the OI does not present us with such events, and this is not the North) … Or the climate during this expansion was completely different. And most importantly, the number of people at the end of this expansion should not be 20 million people capable of dissolving in Central Russia. And at times, and maybe tens of times more.
* * *
This time 27 points, I think, will be enough to try to estimate the scale, and to put together most of the puzzles of the picture called "History". Later I will try to give a more detailed article on each of these points with examples, questions, answers, conclusions. And also gradually add this list of questions with other points.
Good luck and Reason to everyone!