Scientific Methods Refute The Traditional Chronology Of History - Alternative View

Scientific Methods Refute The Traditional Chronology Of History - Alternative View
Scientific Methods Refute The Traditional Chronology Of History - Alternative View

Video: Scientific Methods Refute The Traditional Chronology Of History - Alternative View

Video: Scientific Methods Refute The Traditional Chronology Of History - Alternative View
Video: History Theory 101 2024, October
Anonim

One of the scientists who seriously thought about whether the Scalliger chronology adopted in the official history is a priori "the ultimate truth" was the honorary academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences N. Morozov. With the help of scientific methods developed by him, and not unfounded statements, he was able to make the first scientific reconstruction of world history, substantiating the fallacy of traditional chronology.

The importance of the contribution that this talented scientist made to the genuine historical science is that he was the first to systematically and consistently involve the following natural scientific methods in the study of history:

- the astronomical method for determining the time of creation of ancient monuments containing sufficient astronomical indications;

- geophysical method for checking the possibility of historical facts in the given geographic, geological and climatic conditions;

- material and cultural method that studies the correspondence of historical messages to the state of the level of technology development;

- ethnopsychological method, studying the correspondence of literary and scientific works to the level of moral and mental evolution of society;

- statistical method for the comparison of repetitive numerical events and analysis by the method of probability theory;

- linguistic method that reveals the meanings of names and names mentioned in ancient history;

Promotional video:

- a material-physical method that studies the properties of building materials used in antiquity.

As the Russian historian K. Penzev rightly notes, thanks to the use of these natural scientific methods, N. Morozov came to several fundamental discoveries that have not lost their significance in our time. The essence of these discoveries is as follows:

1. The principle of continuous continuity of human culture was discovered.

2. The fundamental fallacy of traditional chronology was proved in relation to historical events that took place before the 3rd century AD.

3. The first dynastic duplicates were discovered with chronological shifts in traditional chronology in 330 years (between II and III Roman empires).

4. The principle of information dissemination was formulated - “every significant literary and scientific work was written shortly before its discovery”.

Academician N. Morozov devoted about ten thousand pages of his works to these historical studies, in which he outlined his personal observations and conclusions concerning the true history of mankind. However, history falsifiers and their servants met his works "with hostility", which is not surprising, given that their main task is precisely to keep ordinary people in the dark about the present past of their ancestors, feeding them as "the ultimate truth "A falsified version of historical-fantastic myths, which is the so-called" official history ". But the time will come when the works of this talented scientist will be appreciated by humanity.