The first capital, the city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC … The war against Russia has been going on for a very long time and very, very successfully. Of course, not on the battlefields, where we have always hit everyone and very painfully, but where the West has always won and continues to win - in information wars.
The main goal is to prove to the inhabitants of our country that they are a stupid brainless cattle, not even second-rate, but somewhere in the 6-7th category, without a past and future. And he has practically proved that even the authors of many patriotic articles agree with this approach entirely. Examples? You are welcome!
We have recently celebrated the 1000th anniversary of the baptism of Rus. And when did it actually appear?
The first capital (only the capital of a large country!), The city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC (3099 after the creation of the world); source of information - the chronicle of the Servant Monastery on the Mologa River, the chronograph of Academician M. N. Tikhomirov, "Notes on Muscovy" by S. Herberstein, "The Legend of Slovenia and Ruse", which has a wide circulation and was recorded by many ethnographers. It is believed that Novgorod was built on the site of Slovenska, and the leading archaeologists have already dug down to the Paleolithic sites.
It is generally accepted that somewhere in the 8th century, wild, brainless and worthless Slavs, wandering herds through the forests, called the Viking Rurik to themselves and said: “Take over us, oh great European superman, otherwise we, idiots, are nothing can not . (Free presentation of a history textbook).
And no one, or rather, almost no one comes up with a simple question. How could wild, uncivilized Euro-monkeys create a state for us much earlier than themselves?
Not so, it was not so at all.
When the first European monkey, scratching its belly, finally descended from the trees, Russia was already living, humming with tongues and dialects, praying to the gods and elements, pounding its borders.
Promotional video:
America and Europe are all - a knife in the balls, because how is it to admit that during these times the steppe people with their minds reached democracy, and then chewed it up and spat it out, because this is a fig state system.
Russian people in the days of the principalities had an indiscriminate written language (they found tablets on birch bark with the text about "Vasya will be late to the godfather"), in the Russian language there was a definition of numbers (and, unlike the Romans, there was 0), moreover, there were separate words to express degrees up to 49 inclusive (a separate word is used for frequently used concepts like we have a cube square), my question is what the Slavs thought, what was often used by 10 ^ 49, in Russian culture there was the concept of a single law (all physical laws are a manifestation of a common) …
In fact, Rurik is the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and one of the neighboring princes with the rank of priest - the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and
one of the neighboring princes of the lesser rank … He was called together with his brothers, since all 4 sons of Gostomysl died or perished in the wars. He was accepted by agreement with the elders, and worked hard to earn respect in Russia. Source: Joachim Chronicle, Russian history by Tatishchev, Brockhaus and Efron, etc.
The opinion is widely spread that almost the only civilization of the past was the Roman Empire, a model of legality and morality. In general, that the gladiatorial battles of Rome, that the modern "flood" of American and European murderers and marauders of Iraq and Afghanistan are phenomena of the same order.
The morale of the Western world has not changed much, and it still causes disgust among "savages" like the Russians. Official history: the great beautiful and mighty Roman civilization fell under the blows of smelly shaggy savages. In fact, those who were sick of everyone (like the Americans now) were rehabilitated by more decent neighbors.
The bare-footed, poorly armed Roman infantry (open the textbook on the history of the ancient world, and admire the legionnaires) was trampled by cataphraktarii, clad in steel from the tops of the heads to the horse's hooves. The main source of information is "Cataphracts and their role in the history of military art" A. M. Khazanov. (I don’t remember the rest, but those who wish can search the autosearch themselves. There is a lot of material - they just don’t let it into schools. "Harmful").
The most interesting thing is where did the Huns come from to "cleanse" Rome? Ob, Ugra, Volga region, Ural region, Azov region … Graves with partial armament of cataphracts were found in Dagestan. Have you, comrades patriots, looked at the map for a long time? So where did the Huns go to Rome from? Why was “wild Russia” in Europe called Gardarika - the Country of Cities? Now it doesn't matter, because we celebrate 1000 years of Russia with joyful faces, we consider Rurik to be the master who came from Norway, who founded Russia, and even, it seems, are proud of such a story.
In the 8th century, one of the Russian princes nailed a shield to the gates of Constantinople, and it is difficult to assert that Russia did not exist even then. Therefore, in the coming centuries, long-term slavery was planned for Russia. The invasion of the Mongol-Tatars and 3 centuries of obedience and humility. What marks this era in reality? We will not deny the Mongol yoke, but:
As soon as Russia became aware of the existence of the Golden Horde, young guys immediately went there to … rob the Mongols who came to Russia from rich China. The Russian raids of the 14th century are best described (if anyone has forgotten, the period from the 13th to the 15th century is considered a yoke).
In 1241 the Russian squads together (!) With the "yoke" walked through Europe heartily patting the crusaders. This is well described in Polish chronicles.
Poles are a vindictive people … now they remember and will not forget for another five centuries. The following year, the crusaders came "with a return visit." The purpose of the campaign is to seize and destroy the Russian lands. But having gotten in the teeth on Lake Peipsi, the knight-dogs for a long time lost their desire to meddle in Russian possessions.
This battle, together with the victories of Prince Alexander over the Swedes (July 15, 1240 on the Neva) and over the Lithuanians (in 1245 near Toropets, near Lake Zhiztsa and near Usvyat), was of great importance for Pskov and Novgorod, holding back the pressure of three serious enemies from west.
A century passed and in 1360 Novgorod lads fought along the Volga to the Kamsky mouth, and then took by storm the large Tatar city of Zhukotin (Djuketau near the modern city of Chistopol). Having seized untold riches, the ushkuyns returned back and began to "drink zipuns" in the city of Kostroma.
From 1360 to 1375, the Russians made eight major campaigns on the middle Volga, not counting small raids. In 1374 the Novgorodians took the town of Bolgar (not far from Kazan) for the third time, then they went down and took Sarai itself - the capital of the Great Khan.
In 1375, the Smolensk guys in seventy boats under the command of governors Prokop and Smolyanin moved down the Volga. Traditionally, they paid a "visit" to the towns of Bolgar and Saray. Moreover, the rulers of the Bolgar, taught by bitter experience, paid off with a large tribute, but the khan's capital Sarai was taken by storm and plundered.
In 1392, the ushkuyniks again took Zhukotin and Kazan. In 1409, voivode Anfal led 250 ushkues to the Volga and Kama. And in general, to beat the Tatars, in Russia, was considered not a feat, but a trade.
During the Tatar "yoke" Russians went to the Tatars every 2-3 years, Sarai was fired dozens of times, Tatar women were sold to Europe in hundreds.
What did the Tatars do in response? We wrote complaints! To Moscow, to Novgorod. The complaints persisted. The “enslavers” could not do anything else. The source of information on the mentioned campaigns - you will laugh, but this is a monograph by the Tatar historian Alfred Khasanovich Khalikov.
And at this time, and much later in "enlightened" Europe, bonfires were burning, on which tens of thousands of innocent "witches" were burned, the people were dying of hunger and plague.
They still cannot forgive us for these visits! And at school they still tell how Russian gray-lined peasants cried and gave their girls into slavery - because they were submissive cattle. And you, their descendants, also penetrate this thought. Do we have any doubts about the reality of the yoke?
In the 16th century, Ivan the Terrible came to power. During his reign in Russia:
- jury trial introduced
- free primary education (church schools)
- medical quarantine at borders
- local elected self-government, instead of the governor
- for the first time a regular army appeared (and the world's first military uniform - at the archers)
- stopped Tatar raids
- equality was established between all strata of the population (do you know that serfdom did not exist at all in Russia at that time? The peasant was obliged to sit on the land until he paid for its rent, and nothing more. And his children were considered free from birth, in any case!).
- slave labor is prohibited (source - Ivan the Terrible's code of law);
- the state monopoly on the fur trade, introduced by Grozny, was canceled only 10 (ten!) years ago.
- the territory of the country has been increased 30 times!
- the emigration of the population from Europe exceeded 30,000 families (those who settled along the Zasechnaya line were paid a lifting 5 rubles per family. Expense books were preserved).
- the growth of the welfare of the population (and the taxes paid) during the reign amounted to several thousand (!) percent.
- for the entire time of the reign there was not a single person executed without trial and investigation, the total number of "repressed" ranged from three to four thousand. (And the times were dashing - remember St. Bartholomew's Night) For the stupid, let me remind you - this is about "enlightened" France.
Ivan the Terrible By the way, Ivan the Terrible goes to the soap room (bathhouse), the palace is equipped with … sewerage system. and “civilized” European monarchs crush lice, go to the pot and pour liters of perfume on themselves to drown out the stench from the body that has not been washed for months … What can we say about the common people …
Now remember what you were told about Grozny at school? That he was a bloody tyrant and lost the Livonian War, while Russia was shaking in horror?
Already in the 16th century, many brochures were published in Europe for every mindless man in the street. There it was written that the Russian tsar was a drunkard and a debaucher, and all his subjects were the same savages. And in the instructions to the ambassadors it was indicated that the tsar is a teetotaler, unpleasantly clever, categorically cannot bear drunkenness, and even forbade drinking alcohol in Moscow, as a result of which one can only get drunk outside the city, in the so-called "liqueurs" (the place where they pour) …
Source - study "Ivan the Terrible" by Kazimir Walishevsky, France. Now guess three times - which of the two versions is set out in the textbooks?
In general, our textbooks proceed from the principle that everything that is said about the Russia of the abominable is true. Anything that is said good or intelligible is a lie.
One example. In 1569 Grozny came to Novgorod, which had approximately 40,000 inhabitants. There was an epidemic raging, and it smelled like a riot. According to the results of the sovereign's stay, completely preserved in the synodiks, memorial lists mark 2800 dead.
But Jerome Horsey in "Notes on Russia" indicates that the guardsmen massacred 700,000 people in Novgorod (seven hundred thousand (?) Forty thousand of the population and "cut out" seven hundred thousand - even the United Russia people did not learn to lie like that, and thank God …) people. Guess which of the two numbers is considered historically accurate?
Almost all historians point a finger at the stupidity, weakness and cowardice of the Russian rulers, who could not cope even with the spattered Crimea. And for some reason they “forget” that there was no Crimean Khanate - there was one of the provinces of the Ottoman Empire, in which there were Turkish garrisons and the Ottoman governor sat.
Who has no desire to reproach Castro for not being able to capture a tiny American base on his island? The Ottoman Empire, by this time, was actively expanding in all directions, conquering all Mediterranean lands, stretching from Iran (Persia) and advancing on Europe, approaching Venice and laying siege to Vienna.
In 1572, the Sultan decided to conquer at the same time the wild, as European brochures assured, Muscovy. 120 thousand troops moved from the Crimea to the north, supported by 20 thousand janissaries and 200 cannons. Near the village of Molody, the Ottomans encountered a 50-thousand-strong detachment of the voivode Mikhail Vorotynsky.
And the Turkish army was … No, not stopped - completely cut out !!! From that moment on, the Ottoman offensive on the neighbors stopped - but try to engage in conquests if your army was almost halved! God forbid you to fight off the neighbors yourself. What do you know about this battle? Nothing? That's it! Wait, in 20 years about the participation of Russians in the Second World War will also begin to be "forgotten" in textbooks.
After all, all "progressive humanity" has long and firmly known - Hitler was defeated by the Americans. And it is time to correct Russian textbooks that are “wrong” in this area. Information about the Battle of Molodi can generally be classified as closed. God forbid, the Russian cattle will find out that they can be proud of the deeds of their ancestors in the Middle Ages! He will develop a wrong self-awareness, love for the Fatherland, for her deeds. And this is wrong.
So, it is difficult to find data about the Battle of Molodi, but it is possible - in specialized reference books. For example, in the "Encyclopedia of Armaments" of the KiM three lines are written. ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bi%…%B4%D1%8F%D1%85
Stupid Russian bums. Remembering the Mongol invasion, I am always surprised - where did they manage to collect so many sabers?
Indeed, sabers were forged only starting from the 14th century, and only in Moscow and Dagestan, in Kubachi. Such is the strange fork - forever we and the Dagestanis suddenly turn out to be the same. Although, in all the textbooks, between us, there are always a couple of hostile states. Nowhere else in the world has they learned to forge - it is a much more complex art than it might seem. But progress was coming, the 17th century. The saber gave way to other weapons.
Until the birth of Peter 1, there was very little left. What was Russia like? If you believe the textbooks, approximately the same as in Tolstoy's novel "Peter the First" - patriarchal, ignorant, wild, drunk, inert …
Did you know that it was Russia that armed all of Europe with advanced weapons? Every year Russian monasteries and foundries sold hundreds of cannons, thousands of muskets, and edged weapons there. Source - here's a quote from the "Encyclopedia of Arms":
“It is interesting that the manufacturers of artillery pieces in the 16th-17th centuries were not only the sovereign's cannons, but also monasteries. For example, a fairly large production of cannons was carried out in the Solovetsky Monastery and in the Kirillovo-Belozersky Monastery.
They owned cannons and were very successfully used by the Don and Zaporozhye Cossacks. The first mention of the use of guns by the Zaporozhye Cossacks dates back to 1516.
In the XIX-XX centuries in Russia and abroad, the opinion was formed that the pre-Petrine artillery was technically backward. But here are the facts: in 1646 the Tula-Kamensk factories supplied the Netherlands with more than 600 guns, and in 1647 360 guns of 4,6 and 8 pounds. In 1675, the Tula-Kamensk factories shipped abroad 116 cast iron cannons, 43892 balls, 2934 grenades, 2356 musket barrels, 2700 swords and 9687 pounds of iron."
So much for the wild, backward Russia, which they talk about at school.
By the way, from time to time, there are Russophobes who argue that all this cannot be, because even “highly progressive and developed England and France” learned to cast iron … only in the 19th century. Yes, but let's go to the Artillery Museum in St. Petersburg. One of the cast-iron cannons cast by our ancestors in 1600 lies there cheekily on a stand for all to see. People do not believe that Russia, throughout its history and in all respects, has overtaken Europe by about two centuries. But …
Loser's conclusions. Starting from school years, we are told that our whole history is like a huge cesspool, in which there is not a single bright spot, not a single decent ruler.
There were either no military victories at all, or they led to something bad (the victory over the Ottomans is hidden like nuclear launch codes, and the victory over Napoleon is duplicated by the slogan Alexander - the gendarme of Europe).
Everything that was invented by the ancestors is either brought to us from Europe, or just a baseless myth. The Russian people did not make any discoveries, they did not release anyone, and if someone turned to us for help, it was turning into slavery. And the lot of all Russians is to repent, repent and repent.
A little more than a hundred years of information warfare - and a sense of our own inferiority has already been sown in all of us. We are more, like our ancestors, not sure of our own righteousness. Look what is happening with our politicians: they are constantly making excuses and repenting. The presidents also caught this bad disease.
Nobody demands to bring Lord Jad to justice for propaganda of terrorism and cooperation with bandits - he is persuaded that he is not quite right.
We threaten Georgia - and we do not carry out the threats. Denmark spits in our face - and they don't even impose sanctions against it. The Baltic states have established an apartheid regime - politicians shyly turn away. People demand permission to sell weapons for self-defense - they are openly called worthless cretins who, out of stupidity, will immediately interrupt each other.
Why should Russia make excuses? After all, she is always right! Nobody else dares to say this. You think - the current politicians are just so indecisive, but instead of them, just about, others will come. But this will never happen. Because the feeling of inferiority is not laid down in the post of foreign minister. They begin to be systematically brought up from childhood, when the child is told: our grandfathers were very stupid, stupid people, incapable of making the most elementary decisions.
But a kind and clever uncle Rurik came to them from Europe, began to OWN them and teach them. He created the state of Russia for them, in which we live.
The poison, drop by drop, pours into the soul, and when a person leaves school, he already gets used to looking at the West as a kind master, more intelligent and developed. And at the words "democracy" begins to reflexively stand on its hind legs.
What the Western world does best is to wage an information war. The blow was struck in the place that no one had thought to protect - according to the educational program. And the West won. It remains to show a little patience - and our children themselves will crawl on their knees in that direction and ask the lowest permission to lick the owners' shoes. Already crawling - a couple of days ago I managed to see a piece of the program "Why does Russia need its own currency?" Right. Then there will be: "Why do we need an army?" Then: "Why is statehood needed?"
What to do? If you do not want to make slaves out of children, you need not shout that we will fight when the time comes, but save them right now.
The hour has come, the war is almost over for the enemy's overwhelming advantage. There is an urgent need to break the course of teaching history, changing the emphasis of teaching to a positive one.
Prince Mikhailo Vorotynsky … Lawsuits for poor-quality teaching are guaranteed. If the historian does not teach children about who such an important person in history as Rurik was or does not know about the Molodinsky battle, then he must pay fines out of his own pocket. Better yet, file a lawsuit against the Ministry of Education for the dissemination of knowingly false information. Hire a good lawyer and it hurts and hurts to kick them - let them itch. Weak to chip in in the name of saving the honest name of the ancestors?
The second way to at least slightly strengthen the position on the fronts of the information war is to demand from the procurators the initiation of a criminal case on the fact of inciting ethnic hatred, by teaching false historical information.
There are a lot of examples. Let us recall the Tatar yoke. We are told that the Tatars oppressed the Russians, but they do not say that the Russians robbed the Tatars no less famously. As a result, Russians have racial resentment towards fellow citizens. Moreover, the insult is wrong. We are all good and behaved exactly the same. Or, for example, last year in Kazan they celebrated (or tried to celebrate) the day of remembrance of the Tatars who defended the city from Russian troops.
There is a clear confrontation on a national basis. Although, in fact, the city was taken not by Russians, but by Russian-Tatar (!) Troops. Shig-Alei's cavalry provided cover for the streltsy detachments - and if he is a German, then I am ready to recognize myself as Pope.
Russian-Tatar troops took Kazan, eliminating the influence of Istanbul on the Volga, and protecting civilians from predatory raids, freed tens of thousands of slaves. It is enough to recognize the participation of the Tatars in this noble cause - and the national question loses its acuteness.
“Kind” teachers are diligently sowing discord between the largest ethnic groups - Russians and Tatars. The entire course of history permeates with how the Tatars attacked, how the Russians attacked the Tatars, etc. But, nowhere is it indicated that the Tatars are our symbiote, our companion people.
The Tatar units were ALWAYS part of the Russian troops, participated in all Russian wars - both internecine and in battles with an external enemy. We can say that the Tatars are just Russian light cavalry. Or Russians - Tatar forged men.
The Tatars fought against Mamai on the Kulikovo field together with the Moscow army, the Tatars were the first to attack the enemy in the Swedish and Livonian wars; in 1410, near Grunwald, the combined Polish-Russian-Tatar army utterly defeated the crusaders, breaking the back of the Teutonic Order - moreover, it was the Tatars who took the first blow.
Sometimes I am asked why I do not mention the Lithuanians. So I mention - Russians. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was a Russian state, with a Russian population that spoke Russian, and even the office work was conducted in Russian.
Did you think that a small racist country on the Baltic coast was once a great state?
We lived side by side with the Tatars for four thousand years. We fought, made friends, became related. They crushed the Romans, Crusaders, Ottomans, Poles, French, Germans …
And now, our children open the textbook, and it drips from every page: enemies, enemies, enemies … Legally, this is called inciting ethnic hatred. But in reality it is an ordinary information war. The war continues …