Exposure to spoilage and evil eye
In one Moscow laboratory, a psychic, mentally acting on a frog, caused abrupt changes and changes in its cardiac activity. As a result, the cardiogram, which was carried out all the time during the experiment, stated that it was a heart attack.
But is it always, only a frog can be the object of this kind of influence?
“Once I worked in one organization. There was a girl working there; she was recently hired as the chief's secretary. I could not go to college, about seventeen years old, still a minor. She came to work every day bruised. Bruises on the face, bruises on the hands. I ask: - What is happening to you?
Is silent. I asked her every day, I wanted to find out who offends her. In the end, she tells me that her stepfather beats her. I ask: - For what?
- Mom got married, and my stepfather does not want me to live with them. And he chases me away: “Go wherever you want.” I ask: - Who is he?
As it turned out, the head of the police department. No more, no less. - And what about mom?
- Mom is crying. He told his mother: "Wherever you want, take your daughter there!"
Promotional video:
So she showed up at work, beaten every day. It was impossible to help and to do anything. One fine day I got tired of it and I tell her:
- Tanya, don't you cry anymore. Tomorrow he will die. Will not torment you anymore.
The next day Tanya was not at work. And she was not at work for three days. I went to the boss and asked:
- Alexander Ivanovich, what about Tanya? Why doesn't she come to work?
- So her stepfather died.
- And what happened to him? - Heart attack."
And, as if answering my unspoken question and words that I did not manage to utter, my interlocutor continued:
- And who should I feel sorry for in this situation? I am not doing evil. I find myself like a mirror on the path of some people. Their own evil is reflected back to them.
This is a situation of direct and, as it were, impulsive, emotional impact. But sometimes such an impact; in particular, the evil eye can occur as if without the participation of the will of the people themselves. So, at least, it seems to him. More precisely, the part of his personality that is presented in his daily, daytime consciousness does not take part in what is happening. How then can this happen?
In surgical practice, there have been cases when a person, whose two cerebral hemispheres were separated, behaved as if each of the hemispheres had its own consciousness. This discovery baffled doctors, psychologists and philosophers. Does this mean that in his usual, normal state, the individual consists, as it were, of two personalities? At the same time, at the level of behavior and everyday actions, the one that is presented in the left hemisphere, which is responsible for speech and logical thinking, dominates. At the same time, another person, a completely different "I" located in the right hemisphere and also endowed with its own consciousness, may probably have other judgments, likes and dislikes, not necessarily coinciding with those of the dominant one.
Perhaps, however, the structure of the individual is even more complex. Three brains are represented in the human cranium: the "old" (the paleocortex, which goes back to the reptile), the "middle" (the mesocortex, inherent in lower mammals), and the "new brain" (the neocortex, specific to higher mammals and humans). Does this mean that human consciousness is like a synthesis of three different consciousnesses? As Arthur Koestler figuratively puts it, a crocodile, a horse and a Homo sapiens are located side by side in the human skull.
Which of these different principles, which of the consciousnesses adjacent in a person, following their own phobias and antipathies, are letting the mad dogs of evil eye and corruption fall on their neighbor? The first two, more ancient creatures, Koestler believes, do not always obey their master, Homo sapiens. Often, on the contrary, they themselves turn him into their slave. And then verbal thinking is looking for rational motivations and justifications for actions performed under the impulsive influence of these two more ancient consciousnesses in a person.
These considerations, probably, can relate to involuntary evil eye and damage, in which everyday, daytime human consciousness does not participate. This is the difference between such evil eyes and damage from situations where harm is done deliberately, deliberately, when different magic techniques are used for "guidance".
In Novosibirsk, a 62-year-old woman was taken by ambulance to the nearest maternity hospital. Diagnosed with labor pains. The woman was not even pregnant. After her torment lasted for several hours and no medical supplies could help her, the doctors exchanged glances: - We are taking to the "grandma"? - Don't forget the alcohol.
Special driver of the ambulance minibus, the road to the grandma was well known. As the healer knew, they were not such unexpected visitors to her. She did not even ask who was brought with what ailment:
- We will help you now. Bring it into the house. - And when it was done, she continued: - Come back in three hours. Yes, the alcohol that they brought me, you'd better leave it now. And then you will drink everything yourself. I know you. She probably did, because this was not the first such visit. When, three hours later, an ambulance drove up to the house where the healer lived, the woman herself went to the car.
Researchers of paranormal phenomena from Novosibirsk managed to trace how this situation itself arose. As it turned out, on the same street that this woman lived, in a suburb of Novosibirsk, there were two friends. One of them was in love with a guy who was soon drafted into the army. For the long time he served in Afghanistan, she remained loyal to him, rejecting the slightest signs of attention from other applicants. And when he returned, he married not her, but her best friend, who was now expecting a child from him.
Every day, the happy couple passed under the windows of the house where the abandoned and rejected lived. It was a fatal insult that forced her to ask her mother, who knew how to do it, to “spoil” her ex-girlfriend. She did damage. A spoken piece of hay was thrown just in front of the gate, from which the young wife was about to come out. And it so happened that this unfortunate woman came out in front of her and walked over the hay, who went to her neighbor's house to her misfortune. It was she who took upon herself the "spoilage" that was supposed to lead to premature birth and miscarriage.
Influencing someone in this way, those who do it, meaningfully bring sickness, suffering, grief to another. In doing this, they often sincerely believe that they are repaying someone for evil and thereby, as it were, doing good. I will not undertake either to condemn or justify them. How can I not judge to what extent the sufferings and torments received by their victims atone for the evil once committed by them, if any. But since one thinks that suffering and illnesses "induced" on them are in reality a retribution that "burns" the evil they have committed, does it not turn out that those who do it themselves, in turn, do evil? Contact itself, participation in evil can be neither indifferent nor unpunished. Woe to those through whom it comes. Thus, it turns out, and there is no revelation in this, that when someone undertakes to repay evil for evil,this does not lead to the destruction of evil, but to the movement of all the same evil in a circle.
Two basic magical principles are known, following which, as a rule, such witchcraft actions are performed. One of them is the "law of similarity": various manipulations are performed with the image of a person, which must then go over, be transmitted to the original. The second principle is “the law of contact or infection”. In this case, an object that belonged to a person and, as it were, associated with him, is used.
The fact that there are some inexplicable connections in nature has now been scientifically confirmed. Academician of the Academy of Medical Sciences V. Kaznacheev placed two tissue cultures in hermetically isolated chambers, dividing them with a quartz partition. When one of the cultures was exposed to a fatal dose of suleima, infected with a virus or given a lethal dose of radiation, the second, isolated, immediately reacted to it, got sick and died with it. Another example of an equally inexplicable connection between two biological objects. This is an experience well known to gardeners and biologists. When cuttings are taken from a fruit tree, their survival and survival are very clearly related to what happens at that time to the mother tree from which they were cut. If during the period of adaptation of the cuttings it was cut down and died, the survival of the cuttings decreases markedly. And this despite the fact that the cuttings and the tree from which they were taken can be separated by large distances.
Doesn't the same principle exist in relations between oneself and other, more complex biological structures, in particular, people? Perhaps the well-known gospel postulate - honor your father and mother and the Lord will multiply your days - has another, not only moral, meaning.
Such a resonant inexplicable connection of biological objects with each other has relatively recently acquired an analogue in a seemingly extremely distant field - in quantum mechanics. Two independent objects that are taken there are two streams of elementary particles emanating from one beam, which is divided in two. It seems that neither one and the other are in any way connected with each other. And yet, the slightest change in the momentum, the coordinates of one of them - immediately causes the same mirror change in the other. Bell's theorem substantiates the mathematical side of what is happening: two systems that are together keep contact for some time and after that. In this case, this contact is carried out between them instantly, and regardless of the distance.
Doesn't this kind of contact also work when sorcerers and sorcerers try to influence a person through a portrait or things that belonged to him? So in a laboratory experiment, an operator, changing something on one beam of particles, causes an instantaneous and exactly the same change on another.
A. Gorbovsky