Prehistoric Artifacts. (Part 1) - Alternative View

Table of contents:

Prehistoric Artifacts. (Part 1) - Alternative View
Prehistoric Artifacts. (Part 1) - Alternative View

Video: Prehistoric Artifacts. (Part 1) - Alternative View

Video: Prehistoric Artifacts. (Part 1) - Alternative View
Video: Baffling Ancient Artefacts Found In Coal...Incredible, They Are Far Older Than We Thought 2024, July
Anonim

Carnation (Looks Like Railway)

Oopart (Out Of Place ARTifact) is an English term for dozens of prehistoric objects found in various parts of the globe. The level of technology used in their creation is poorly consistent with their age, determined by physical, chemical and / or geological parameters. These findings often undermine the faith of conservative scientists and delight daring researchers and people interested in alternative theories

In 1844, Sir David Brewster announced that an embedded nail had been found in a block of sandstone excavated from the Kingoodie quarries, Milnfield, Scotland. Dr A. Medd, of the British Geological Survey, wrote to the authors of this book in 1985 that it is a "Lower Devonian red sandstone" (ie, between 360 and 408 million years old) … It should be noted that Brewster was a famous Scottish physicist, founder of the British Association for Scientific Progress, the author of several important discoveries in the field of optics.

In his report to the British Association for Scientific Progress, Brewster wrote: “The rock in the Kingudi quarries consists of alternating layers of hard rock and soft clay matter known as til, or boulder clay, with rock strata ranging in thickness from six inches to six feet (15 cm-1, 8 m). The slab in which the nail was found was nine inches (22.5 cm) thick. When cleaning the rough surface of the slab for subsequent grinding, the tip of a nail (heavily rusty) was found, about half an inch (1.3 cm) penetrated into the layer of the thill. The nail itself was positioned horizontally on the stone surface, and its head protruded into the stone layer by about an inch (2.5 cm). Since it was the head that turned out to be embedded in the stone, it is excluded that the nail was driven into the slab after it was removed from the quarry.

Precambrian metal vase from Dorchestsra, Massachusetts:n

On June 5, 1852, Scientific American published the following information under the heading "A Relic of Bygone Times": … The powerful explosion led to the release of a huge amount of rock. Boulders - some of which weighed several tons - were scattered in different directions. A metal vessel was found among the fragments, torn in half by the explosion. Folded together, the halves made up a bell-shaped vessel 4.5 inches (11.3 cm) high, 6.5 inches (16.5 cm) at the base and 2.5 inches (6.3 cm) at the throat, with walls about an eighth thick part of an inch (0.3 cm).

Image
Image

The vessel was made of metal resembling zinc or some alloy with a significant proportion of silver in color. The walls of the vessel were decorated with six images of flowers in the form of a bouquet, magnificently inlaid with pure silver, and its lower part was encrusted, also inlaid with silver, a vine or a wreath. The carvings and inlays are so masterful that this object can be classified as one of the finest works of art. Thrown out by the explosion, the mysterious and extremely interesting vessel embedded in the rock was fifteen feet (4.5 meters) deep. The vessel is currently held by Mr. John Cattell. Dr. J. Smith, who recently traveled to the East where he examined and sketched hundreds of curious household items, says he has never seen anything like it.

He sketched the vessel and made accurate measurements of its dimensions in order to provide them to scientists for research. As already noted, there is no doubt that the vessel was thrown out by the explosion along with the rock, but maybe Professor Agassi or some other person of science will tell us how it ended up embedded in the stone? This subject deserves the most careful study, since in this case there can be no question of any mystification. The Scientific American publishers added an ironic comment to the note: “This information was published in Boston's Transcript. We will ask another question: why does Transcript believe that Professor Agassi is able to explain the origin of the vessel more competently than, for example, the blacksmith John Doyle? After all, this is not a problem related to zoology, botany or geology,but about an old metal vessel, apparently made by the first inhabitant of Dorchester, named Tubal Cane. According to a map of the Boston-Dorchester area recently compiled by the US Geological Survey, the local rock, now called the Roxbury clastic rock, dates back to the Precambrian era, i.e. its age is over 600 million years. According to the existing opinion, in the Precambrian era, life had just begun to form on planet Earth. However, the Dorchester vessel testifies to the existence in North America of the most skilled craftsmen who knew how to work with metal 600 million years ago.now called the Roxbury clastic rock, it belongs to the Precambrian era, i.e. its age is over 600 million years. According to the existing opinion, in the Precambrian era, life had just begun to form on planet Earth. However, the Dorchester vessel testifies to the existence in North America of the most skilled craftsmen who knew how to work with metal 600 million years ago.now called the Roxbury clastic rock, it belongs to the Precambrian era, i.e. its age is over 600 million years. According to the existing opinion, in the Precambrian era, life had just begun to form on planet Earth. However, the Dorchester vessel testifies to the existence in North America of the most skilled craftsmen who knew how to work with metal 600 million years ago.

Coin from Illinois:

Promotional video:

In 1871, William Dubois, an employee of the Smithsonian Institution, reported several man-made objects found at considerable depths in Illinois. One of these items was a round copper plate, similar to a coin (Figure 6.3), found at Lawn Ridge, Marshall County. In a letter sent to the Smithsonian Institution, JW Moffit said that in August 1870 he drilled a well with "a conventional soil drill" and at a depth of 125 feet (38 meters) "the drill came across" an object resembling a coin. The circular coin-like plate was reportedly recovered from a depth of about 114 feet while drilling a well in Lone Ridge, Illinois.

According to the Illinois Geological Survey, the age of the deposits in which the "coin" was found ranges from 200 to 400 thousand years (reconstruction). Before reaching a depth of 125 feet, Moffit drilled several layers: 3 feet of soil; 10 feet of yellow clay; 44 feet of blue clay; 4 feet of mixed clay, sand and gravel; 19 feet of purple clay; 10 feet of brown solid subsoil; 8.5 feet of green clay; 2 feet of vegetable humus; another 2.5 feet of yellow clay; 2 feet of yellow solid subsoil and finally 20.5 feet of mixed clay. In 1881 A. Winchell also gave a description of a coin-like item. In an excerpt from a letter from W. Wilmot, quoted by him, the bedding sequence is somewhat different from that indicated by Moffit. Besides,Wilmot claims the "coin" was found while drilling a well at a depth of 114 feet (35 meters), not 125. Based on Winchell's posting of the bedding sequence, the Illinois Exploration Agency estimated the age of 114 feet of sediments that formed during the Yarmouth Interglacial, i.e. "About 200-400 thousand years ago." According to W. Dubois, the "coin" was an "almost round rectangle" with roughly depicted figures and inscriptions on both sides. Dubois could not determine the language of the inscriptions. In appearance, this object was different from any known coin. Dubois concluded that the "coin" was made mechanically. Noting its uniform thickness over the entire area, he expressed the opinion that it “went through a mechanism like a rolling mill,and if the ancient Indians had such a device, then it must have a prehistoric origin."

Image
Image

Dubois also argues that the tapered edge of the "coin" indicates that it was cut using either metal scissors or a minting. From the foregoing, the conclusion suggests itself about the existence of a civilization in North America at least 200 thousand years ago. According to the generally accepted opinion, beings intelligent enough to make and use coins (Homo sapiens sapiens) did not appear on Earth until 100 thousand years ago, and the first metal coins entered circulation in Asia Minor in the 8th century BC. Moffitt also reports on other artifacts found in nearby Whiteside County, Illinois, where workers recovered from 120 feet (36.5 meters) “a large copper ring or hoop, such as is used today in shipbuilding … There was also found a certain object,like a boat hook or boat hook. " To this Mr. Moffitt adds: “Many ancient objects have been found at shallower depths. A harpoon-shaped iron cutter was removed from a layer of clay 40 feet (12 meters) from the surface. In many places, stone pipes and pottery have been found at depths ranging from 10 to 50 feet (3-15 meters). " In September 1984, the authors received a letter from the Illinois Geological Survey, which indicates that the age of the deposits at a depth of 120 feet in White Side County varies greatly: in some places it is less than 50 thousand years old, in others at these depths Silurian rock foundation, which is 410 million years old.was recovered from a layer of clay 40 feet (12 meters) from the surface. In many places, stone pipes and pottery have been found at depths ranging from 10 to 50 feet (3-15 meters). " In September 1984, the authors received a letter from the Illinois Geological Survey, which indicates that the age of the deposits at a depth of 120 feet in White Side County varies greatly: in some places it is less than 50 thousand years old, in others at these depths Silurian rock foundation, which is 410 million years old.was recovered from a layer of clay 40 feet (12 meters) from the surface. In many places, stone pipes and pottery have been found at depths ranging from 10 to 50 feet (3-15 meters). " In September 1984, the authors received a letter from the Illinois Geological Survey, which indicates that the age of the deposits at a depth of 120 feet in White Side County varies greatly: in some places it is less than 50 thousand years old, in others at these depths Silurian rock foundation, which is 410 million years old.that the age of deposits at a depth of 120 feet in White Side County varies greatly: in some places it is less than 50 thousand years old, while in others at these depths lies a Silurian rock base, which is 410 million years old.that the age of deposits at 120 feet deep in White Side County varies greatly, in some places it is less than 50 thousand years old, while in others at these depths lies a Silurian rock base, which is 410 million years old.

Image of a face on a seashell, England (1881):

In a report presented to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1881, H. Stopes, FGS (Fellow of the Geological Society) described a shell with a hole on its surface and an image of a human face. The shell was found in the host rocks of the Red Crag, which are 2.0 and 2.5 million years old….

Image
Image

Clay Figurine from Nampa, Idaho:

In 1889, an elaborate small clay figurine depicting a human was found in Nampa, Idaho (Figure 6.4). The figurine was recovered while drilling a well from a depth of 300 feet (90 meters). Here is what GFWright wrote in 1912: “According to the progress report, before reaching the stratum in which the figurine was found, the drillers went through about fifteen feet of soil, then about the same thickness of basalt, and then - several alternating layers of clay and quicksand …

Image
Image

When the well was about three hundred feet deep, the sand pump was pumping out a lot of clay balls covered with a dense layer of iron oxide; some were no more than two inches (5 cm) in diameter. At the bottom of this layer, signs of an underground soil layer with a small amount of humus appeared. It was from this depth of three hundred twenty feet (97.5 meters) that the figurine was recovered. A few feet below, there was already sandy rock. Here is how Wright describes the figurine: “It was made of the same substance as the aforementioned balls of clay, about an inch and a half (3.8 cm) high, and depicted a human figure with amazing perfection … The figure was clearly female, and its forms there, where the work was completed, would honor the most famous masters of classical art.

A figurine recovered from a well in Nampa, Idaho, dates from the Plio-Pleistocene era, i.e. it is about 2 million years old."

Iron "mug" in the Oklahoma coal mine:

On January 10, 1949, Robert Nordling sent Frank L. Marsh of Andrews University in Burryn Springs, Michigan, a photograph of an iron mug with the caption: “I recently visited the private museum of one of my friends in South Missouri. Among the rarities stored there was this iron mug, a photograph of which I am attaching."

Next to the mug on display in the museum was the text of an affidavit written under oath by one Frank J. Kenwood in Sulfur Springs, Arkansas, on November 27, 1948. Here's what it said: “In 1912, when I was working at the Thomas, Oklahoma Municipal Power Plant, I came across a massive block of coal.

Image
Image

It was too big and I had to break it with a hammer. This iron mug fell out of the block, leaving behind a notch in the coal. An employee of the company named Jim Stoll witnessed how I broke the block and how the mug fell out of it. I managed to find out the origin of coal - it was mined in the mines of Wilburton, Oklahoma. According to Robert O. Fay of the Oklahoma Geological Survey, coal from the Wilburton mines is 312 million years old. In 1966, Marsh sent a photograph of the mug and accompanying correspondence to Wilbert H. Rusch, a professor of biology at Concordia College in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Marsh wrote to him:

“I am sending you a letter and a photograph that I received from Robert Nordling 17 years ago. When a year or two later I became interested in this "mug" (by the way, its size can be judged by the chair on the seat of which it was photographed), all I was able to find out was that the friend mentioned by Nordling had already died, and the museum that belonged to him had been stolen. Nordling knew nothing about the whereabouts of the iron mug, and even the most sensitive bloodhound would hardly be able to find it now … But if all this evidence under oath is true, then the significance of such a find can hardly be overestimated."

It is with deep regret that we have to state that the people in whose hands the disappeared circle was, of course, did not realize its meaning.