The myth of the "Mongol-Tatar" or "Tatar-Mongol yoke", which was spelled out in domestic history textbooks with a "light hand" and the rich imagination of Polish historians who fought in the second half of the 19th century for the independence of the Polish principality from the Russian Empire, does not find any real trace, neither in the real history of Russia, nor in the real history of the nomadic people, now known to us under the name "Mongols". And this is becoming more and more obvious.
The absurdity and implausibility of the historical myth invented by the Vatican when the Jesuits rewrote the history of China and other states, even among many people, even far from history, is beyond doubt. Could primitive nomadic tribes, without cities and crafts, developed metallurgy and the production of armor and weapons, conquer many developed states of that time? Obviously not. Only a professional, trained and well-equipped and armed army could pass through China, Central Asia, Russia and Eastern Europe, which has nothing to do with the people known in antiquity as "Oirans" and now as "Mongols".
And guesses about this were set out in the little-known book by S. Robaten "Progress - a spiral of development or a vicious circle?", Where he writes, describing the features of the life of nomadic tribes and peoples, the following:
By the way, did you know that the Mongols have a real "taboo" not only on swimming in water bodies, but also on catching fish and eating it? But those peoples, whom the history books call "Tatar-Mongols" or "Mongolo-Tatars" not only successfully crossed rivers of any width, but also had a fairly powerful fleet. And how does this Mongolian "taboo" fit into the historical facts that the "Mongolian fleet", even having got into the strongest typhoon, was able to land a 30-thousandth landing in Japan? And although this military campaign itself was unsuccessful, however, all this raises a strong enough doubt that we are talking about the present Mongols-Oirans.
So, what state of that time did the Jesuits hide under the name of the "Mongol Empire" they invented? And the fact that the state, capable of having such a powerful army and navy, and conquering half the world, was by no means a union of nomadic tribes, but was built on a multi-structured society (nomadic pastoralists, farmers, artisans, warriors, merchants, etc.), there is no longer any doubt. S. Robaten also guessed this, who further writes:
And I must say that here he hit exactly the top ten. As many modern researchers have already guessed, the Aryans and the Rus were genetically identical, for they came from the common Arctic ancestral home. Only the Rus settled on the Central Russian Plain and were inclined just to an agricultural culture, and the Aryans - to a nomadic one. Nevertheless, both those and others adhered to a multi-structured management. Therefore, developed cities and crafts were not only between the Danube and the Volga, but also further in the Urals and Siberia up to the Pacific coast. And this country of the Siberian Aryans was later known as "Great Scythia", then as "The Kingdom of Presbyter John", and later on European maps began to designate it as "Great Tartary".
Before the cataclysm, which almost completely destroyed its cities and inhabitants, this country was the real "center of civilization" of the pre-catastrophic world. But after her death, the Vatican became the new "center of the world". Well, the new elites also needed a new story. That is why it was under the leadership of the Vatican that the total project of falsification of history took place. History is written by the winners, as a rule, attributing all the merits of previous civilizations to themselves. And that is precisely why this Siberian confederation of Scythians-Aryans, which was an ally of Vedic Russia, and was hidden by falsifiers behind the myth of the "Mongol Empire" invented by them. Well, in parallel, in the inter-catastrophic period, either by the Jesuits themselves or by their servants, the true history of Europe, China and Russia itself was rewritten.
And now, all these invented fantastic myths, to which G. Nosovsky and A. Fomenko were one of the first to draw attention, are beginning to "burst at the seams" more and more under the close and critical gaze of independent researchers, despite the strained diligence of hired chatterboxes of the parasitic system. And after them, the whole rotten fabric of official history and chronology, “sewn with white threads” of more than one generation of falsifiers, begins to creep apart.
michael101063 ©
