Many words have already been said, countless keys on computers have been erased about errors in the interpretation of historical facts, but this topic is apparently endless. Sorting out the rubble of history, you inevitably come across the same thing: Simple objects, events or statements can be interpreted distorted, due to a change in the way of thinking of descendants, due to the development of scientific and technological progress, customs, traditions, language of communication, uncleanness of researchers and many others dr.
When you fully realize the scale of the delusions caused by these factors, the reasons for global oblivion, the general loss of historical memory, become clear.
The most common of the above factors is the ambiguity of the assessment of the event by different actors. You all remember the joke that where two lawyers gather, three opinions arise. The way it is. Twenty years ago, I had no doubt that a fascist and a German are synonyms, and that every single fascist is nonhuman, beasts and bloodsuckers. Then came the realization that this is a stereotype. They are not animals at all, they considered themselves heroic liberators. They sincerely believed that they were going to the USSR to free the common people from the non-humans, the beasts of the Jewish communists, and were shocked to learn that no one was waiting for them here. However, let's leave this painful question. The essence of my thoughts, I think, is clear.
Everyone has their own assessment of events, and it is clear that each side will present its own interpretation, often diametrically opposite. But there is also such a factor as obsolescence, withdrawal from circulation, and as a result - a complete loss of information about widely known objects and events in the recent past. I remember how I laughed when I saw the expression on the face of my son, who accidentally found in the closet, at the very bottom, a 5.25-inch floppy disk that miraculously escaped the garbage can:
Despite the fact that in computer science lessons they were told the history of computer technology, and he himself mastered this subject perfectly, now he writes his own programs with enthusiasm, Zhenya could not guess about the purpose of the subject that he was holding in his hands! What do you want from a historian writing dissertations on the evolution of military uniforms, for example, if he himself has never served in the army himself! This is how absurdities are born, which quickly become overgrown with "meat", and now you already see in every movie how the delirium of the titled "scientist" multiplies with light speed. There is only one argument: "But Comrade Kostomolotsky, in his brochure" The Agony of Decaying Imperialism "says …" So one historian refers in his writings to Klyuchevsky, Klyuchevsky to Tatishchev, Tatishchev to Miller, and Miller in general to OBS (one grandmother said) …
As a result, we have what we have. A separate question for historical geography. Well, our "scientists" cannot understand that the medieval cartographers were not fools, and it was not at all due to their "medieval ignorance" that they did not indicate the boundaries of states. Well, our contemporary cannot believe in any way that states at one time could not exist, and only on the basis that Machiavelli wrote this way. And the fact that Machiavelli just made an assumption no longer worries anyone. His theory of the emergence of the state is accepted as a dogma, an unshakable law. Nobody can question his opinion. How! This is the great Machiavelli himself! And try to doubt, and you will hear the second "reinforced concrete" argument: - "Read the textbook, ignoramus! Another Fomenkovets … With a pork snout, but in a Kalash row … ".
However … Everyone reads what interests him, therefore those who consider it unacceptable to question the official historical science may not continue further, because the analysis of many facts, for the umpteenth time FORCE me to assert that yes … Fomenko are right and Nosovsky. Mr. Veliky Novgorod has nothing to do with Novgorod on Volkhov. The true Lord Veliky Novgorod is the current Yaroslavl.
Promotional video:
I hasten to share my thoughts. And I'll start, as strange as it may seem, with Atlantis.
Wherever they are not looking for it, and all to no avail. It is no coincidence that Atlantis is remembered in 90% as “legendary” or “mythical”. No wonder. Apart from folklore, not a single source gives information about her. Plato, Socrates, Timaeus, Diodorus the Sicilian, Pliny the Elder, they all described Atlantis, being themselves the same mythical animals as the unicorn and the chupacabra. Not a single sane person can now vouch that the "works" of the listed authors and that other than the work of collectives, in our opinion, literary blacks who collected folk tales in medieval anthologies. Taking them seriously is the same as considering the dissertation on the topic "The role of Buratino in the formation of the olive oil market in the Apennine Peninsula in the eighteenth century" at the scientific council.
All this to the same extent could be attributed to Hyperborea, if not for one thing … Real Hyperborea has actually been preserved on geographical maps, and it makes no sense to continue searching for it at the North Pole, the Kola Peninsula and Karelia. What was north of the inhabitants of modern Greece is for us in the south. And it is not surprising that the lands to the north of medieval Muscovy for the Hellenes were over-north, that is, HYPER-north.
I don’t know about you, but I, looking at the wind rose, cannot get rid of the obsessive thoughts that all this is not so much of ours. euRUS - Is it clear where the word "Europe" comes from? If my memory serves me, the first scientist who understood that the language of the Etruscans was Slavic Tadeusz Volansky said at the end of the nineteenth century that “Eurus” (Europe) in its pure form means “east”. The question is, then, for whom was it the east? For London, of course, for the Vatican. It was there that artificial synthetic languages were created: Latin and "Ancient Greek".
Zef (p) irus also suggests that it is no coincidence that a part of the word "RUS" is present here. Zepy (Zepy) this is the place in Russia, where the sun WANTS over the horizon.
Notus is what is known. It is clear that the one who invented the “rose” was a southerner. Boris (Boreas) was a mystery to him. There is absolutely nothing to think about Boris. Everyone knows that in the original the word sounded exactly like that: - BORIS. Whoever invented the pronunciation of "boreas", I think, clearly understood why he did it. So that no one has any thoughts that could prompt a search for the truth.
Boris (b) is one of the few truly Russian names that are used to this day. There were times when boys in Russia were named the Magi with their own name, upon reaching the age of twelve (adolescence). But this name remained a secret from others, therefore, in the everyday life of a teenager, they continued to be called a nickname, and these nicknames often seem to the modern Russian ear to be somehow not quite Russian, rather Tatar.
- Mamai (mama's son).
- Fight.
- Batu (father's favorite).
- A bunch of hit.
- Do not be afraid.
- Run away.
- Kick.
- Catch up.
- Come on.
- Tokhta mouse (the word tokhta meant: wait, wait). Etc.
Then, the given name was used openly by an adult man, but the servicemen continued to use the adolescent nickname. It is this custom, destroyed in the times of Peter the Great, that confuses modern historians. They just cannot understand why it is all of a sudden on the coins of Dmitry Donskoy on one side it says "Grand Duke Dmitry", and on the other in Arabic - "Khan Tokhtamysh". I think that the Arabic script in Russia was used exclusively by the military, and there are a lot of evidence of this, the medieval weapons and armor of Russian soldiers have inscriptions in Arabic script. Therefore, if one person performed two positions at the same time, the secular one - the prince, and the military one - the khan, then he bore two names in this case. And so it happened that Dmitry Donskoy is a secular princely name, and Tokhtamysh is the name of the governor, a nickname given to him in childhood.
Coin of Prince Dmitry Ivanovich. On the reverse, the Arabic inscription reads: - “Sultan Khan Tokhtamysh. May his life last."
The same can be said about the deliberate distortion of the name "Ottoman Empire". The whole world, which does not know what an "ataman" is, calmly uses the term "Ottoman Empire", and only the Slavs were imposed on the term "Ottoman Empire". What for? There is one suggestion! So that even at the subconscious level there is no desire to figure out what kind of connection there might be between the Cossack head and the Turks.
Those. it turns out that the clues are in the most conspicuous place, but the godfather is more interesting to look for one explanation more absurd than the other. With Atlantis, everything is clear. Apart from being in the Atlantic Ocean, there is no longer any reliable clue. But with Hyperborea everything is very clear, what to look for, here it is!
A fragment of the map by Sebastian Münster, published in Basel in 1544.
Pliny the Elder wrote: - “On the other side of Aquilon (aquilo (aquilonis) -“north wind”lat.), A happy people, which are called Hyperboreans, reaches a very advanced age and is glorified by wonderful legends. They believe that there are the loops of the world and the extreme limits of the circulation of the luminaries. The sun shines there for six months, and this is only one day when the sun does not hide (as the ignorant would think) from the spring equinox to the autumn, the luminaries there rise only once a year at the summer solstice, and set only at the winter. This country is all in the sun, with a favorable climate and devoid of any harmful wind. Homes for these residents are groves, forests; the cult of the Gods is managed by individuals and by the whole society; there is no discord or disease. Death comes there only from satiety with life. One cannot doubt the existence of this people."
What's so fantastic? That the Hyperboreans are immortal? Or maybe it’s a fantasy that “there are no discords and all kinds of diseases there”? So after all, it seems to foreigners fantastic that Russians eat roach and salted pork fat. All travelers of the Middle Ages wrote about the powerful health of Russians. Almost all my acquaintances speak about the powerful physique and high growth of great-grandfathers, in whose families the memory of great-grandfathers is preserved.
My mother visited her grandfather Fyodor Fedorovich Edemsky in the Arkhangelsk province in the mid-fifties. She told with admiration that at the age of 90 he was more than two meters tall, and in appearance you wouldn't even give 60. Sparse gray hairs appeared only on the temples and in the beard. To get drunk, he poured half a liter of vodka into a bowl, crumbled bread into it, and ate with a spoon. He died at 92 from an accident, fell out of the sleigh at full speed, returning from a wedding. He broke the kneecap and, after a short illness, departed to the world of the forefathers.
Photos of participants and eyewitnesses of the Patriotic War of 1812 at the celebration of the bicentennial of the House of Romanov.
How is it? Do you believe that centenarians are before your eyes?
Probably, quite recently, at the beginning of the twentieth century, such a venerable age was not surprising to anyone. So we have every right to assume that the description of Hyperborea and its inhabitants is not speculation at all. However, back to the map of Munster.
Here's Hyperborea, and Novgorod, please … Do you see where exactly it is? The connection to the area irrefutably indicates that this is the very city that we now call Yaroslavl. To the north of Cheremisia, which they tried to bypass, because this land was inhabited by robbers. to the south of Moscow, to the east of the fortress Orlov and Khlynov. South of Orlov - Kazan.
Excerpt from & quot; Notes on Muscovy & quot; Baron Herberstein.
Don't you believe that there were two Novgorods in Russia? We look at another map of Munster.
Fragment of the map of Muscovy by Sebastian Munster 1559.
Without any doubts. On the left - Lake Ilmen, and as expected - Novgorod. But there is also Novgorod on the Volga Ra too! Without a doubt, this is the current Yaroslavl. But the one who carefully looks at the map will discover an absolutely stunning discovery. Look what Kazan was called at that time!
Wassilgrod !
Those. Vasilgorod, City of Vasily. East Basel !!! Basel is also a VASIL, and the symbol of Basel is the same basilisk as in Kazan.
In the Middle Ages, it was believed that a basilisk is born from an egg laid by a rooster and hatched by a toad on a bed of dung. In the description of St. Hildegard of Bingen (XII century) it happened like this: “When one day the toad felt pregnant, she saw a snake's egg, sat on it for incubation, expecting that her own cubs would be born. The latter perished; however, she continued to sit on the serpent's egg, until life stirred in him, which was immediately affected by the power of the paradise serpent … The snake broke the shell, came out of it, but immediately exhaled like a strong stream of fire … he kills everything that occurs in him on the way."
Now let's look at the map through the eyes of a resident of medieval Muscovy.
Almost everything is clear to me with Moscow. Some hero, a brave leader defeated a country whose symbol was a basilisk (and we know that it was Tartary), for which he was honored to get on the city's coat of arms. Then, much later, someone heard about St. George, and they did not take advantage of this. They announced the unknown, to us now, the Muscovite - the winner of Tartary by the Jewish George, and everything is sewn - covered. Logic suggests that on the coat of arms of Moscow is the greatest of the greatest Muscovites of all times and peoples, who was able to destroy Great Tartary. His name is hidden, but it is definitely not George. It was not customary to honor some dude from some overseas country as a saint, nor is it customary here. In Vologda, for example, they do not erect monuments to New York firefighters who died in the aftermath of the explosion in Manhattan on September 11, 2001.
Kazan is the city of the basilisk, it is still on the coat of arms of the city.
Yaroslavl (Novgorod) received the symbol of a bear with an ax only after the renaming; earlier in the place of the bear there was a beast of an unknown breed - a dog with a tail made of plants and chicken legs. I don't even have options to make an assumption about what kind of character it might be. In Slavic mythology, I have not met such. unlike the basilisk - Zilant.
Pay attention to how the name of Yaroslavl was written in the Middle Ages.
De IERO SLAW Romanova
This inscription alone is enough to write an entire dissertation. The article "De", as well as the Russian, forgotten "Se", preserved, among other things, in the Ukrainian and Belarusian dialects as "tse", and in English "the", says that "Yaroslavl" is not a proper name … Nobody says "The London". But "The Capital" speaks! IERO Slav literally means CAPITAL. The main city, the oldest among the cities. It means that it is likely that Yaroslav the wise is either not in business, or he himself got his name from the status of his city. Hieroslav, like Ierusalim, is not the proper name of a particular city, it is a status.
And this status could "migrate" across the country in the course of time. Novgorod cannot remain Novgorod all the time. Over time, it inevitably becomes Stargorod, therefore, from the moment it acquired the status of the main city, the name is almost inevitably assigned to it.
That is why Alexander Nevsky - YAROSLAVOVICH, by the way, being the Prince of Novgorod, died in the town of Gorodets, Nizhny Novgorod region. Just three hundred kilometers from Yaroslavl - Veliky Novgorod.
Monument to A. Nevsky in Gorodets at the site of the first burial of the Prince's body. Subsequently, his ashes were reburied in St. Petersburg in the Alexander Nevsky Lavra
And scientists are still wondering how the Prince was carried so far from the city in which he reigned! It's simple, really. Not in that Novgorod, he was the head, as is commonly believed.
Now, one more wild nonsense associated with the history of the reign of Alexander Nevsky. Historians, without batting an eye, assert that Alexander, after the death of his father, went to MONGOLIA to the horde of Batu to receive a label. For some reason, not a single academician explains what flight Nevsky flew from Novgorod on Volkhov to Mongolia. I just want to bang my fist on the table and exclaim: - Seven thousand kilometers on horseback for a shortcut ??? !!! Are you out of your mind at all? Yes, as long as you go one way from your principality, they won't leave a stone unturned.
At that time, such a path could have been completed in at least seven months! There - over a year ago! What kind of fool would leave the country unattended for even a day? And what is the point? If Batu is sitting in the desert on the other side of the continent, then the news of the change of leadership in Novgorod will reach him with such a delay that five princes will have time to change there. There was not the slightest reason for Nevsky to travel to Mongolia to the Karakurum.
Most likely, the "Pile of Black Stones" (kara kurum) was not at all in Mongolia, but somewhere near Yaroslavl. Pushkin's lines "In the depths of Siberian ores …" immediately come to mind. This could be the name for various places inhabited by Turkic-speaking tribes, on the Volga, the Urals or Eastern Siberia. But even this does not seem entirely plausible. Sitting in the Urals, and collecting tribute on a continent that is fabulously rich. Can you imagine that nomads, for example the Khanty, would now take rent from Moscow? In principle, anything is possible. The Chechens now live on the tribute paid by the whole of Russia, but that is another topic.
It is also worth considering the question of where the north used to be.
Notice how Siberia was written in the Middle Ages. It is easy to guess that Siveria is a derivative of the name of the cardinal direction - NORTH. If so, Siberia should be at the top of the map. Maybe this is how it was once in fact? And the toponym itself brought to us only echoes of the geography of the Earth in the past, when the axis of rotation of the planet passed somewhere in modern China?
And Lukomorye was in the extreme north, and Muscovy in the subtropics. I have a question: Why is everyone so fixated on the fact that the curvature must necessarily be on the sea? MOR is also just a pestilence, death. The bow is undoubtedly something curved, shaped, but the "sea" is not necessarily associated with the seas-oceans. It is known that a mysterious tribe lived in Lukomorye, the existence of which the official history rejects a priori. Simply because this, they say, simply cannot be. We are talking about a tribe of white-eyed giants who, after St. George's Day, fell into hibernation, and woke up in the spring with the bears. I don't understand why the possibility of suspended animation in humans is so stubbornly denied? There are many examples in nature. After all, the bear sleeps all winter, and this does not surprise anyone. Why couldn't people adapt to such a rhythm of life, living in harmony with nature?
So I allowed myself to fantasize a little, and I turned the Pulkovo meridian into the equator. Well, historians fantasize about Nevsky's going to Mongolia for a shortcut, can't I?
Then everything becomes more logical than it was. It becomes clear why the rivers flow along the meridians, although if we take into account the direction of the Earth's rotation, it would be more correct that the direction of the rivers flow coincides with the direction of rotation of the planet. North - Siveria-Siberia is also becoming a real north. A reasonable explanation is emerging for the giant coal deposits in the Kolyma, Siberia, the Urals, and Sbitzbergen.
Now pay attention to the beige land areas. Does it conjure up anything? I have an unambiguous feeling that all of today's deserts are the ocean floor that was in the recent past.
Now remember how you described the location of Atlantis and remember the map of Mercator.
Place in your mind these four islands where they are supposed to be on the map above. It all fits, right? West of the Pillars of Hercules. It appears that Greenland is one of the four surviving islands that were once Atlantis.
Mercator says that 4 feet (120cm) dwarfs lived on this stretch of land, at the sight of which the gift of speech is lost. So much for the origins of the myths about elves and trolls.
As usual, in such cases, it will not be superfluous to remind you that what you have read is not a scientific theory. I only voice my own thoughts, in the hope that they will be able to start the process of collective discussion, joint search for answers to questions.
The road will be mastered by the walking!