Warning. Reading the following text can lead to a change in your thinking patterns and bring your consciousness out of its usual balance. And this is unlikely to make you happier, because knowledge multiplies sorrow …
In 1959, Louis Walders drew public attention that the Triangle Galaxy revolves around its center, violating generally accepted physical laws. Later, in the 70s, the American astronomer Vera Rubin and her assistant Kent Ford, after long observations and research, showed that ALL spiral-shaped galaxies violate the Keplerian dynamics generally accepted in astronomy.
The Ruby-Ford effect was so unexpected that many astronomers and physicists literally begged Vera Rubin to give up the results of her research.
There was only one way to explain this effect - that among galaxies, stars and planets there is "something" that makes up 90% of the mass of all matter in the Universe. And this "something" does not interact with EMP (electromagnetic radiation) in any way, that is, it does not emit, absorb, reflect or reject light, radio waves, infrared, ultraviolet, X-rays and all other ranges of electromagnetic radiation.
In general, it turned out that science knows nothing at all about 90% of the matter in the universe, and knows something about only a tenth. Apparently, the frightening thought that the remaining path (of knowledge of the laws of nature) was lengthened at least ten times, was embodied in the name given to this “something”. This invisible, imperceptible (at this stage of the development of science) matter was called "dark matter" (translated as "dark matter"). The adjectives "dark" and "dark" have similar meanings in our languages, except for the shade of color they also mean something dark, dangerous, secret or even evil.
But, in addition to the physicists frightened by such news, there were also scientists inspired by this discovery. They say, we are on the verge of a new era, colleagues!
One could be happy for them, if not for one "but". More than a hundred years ago, humanity has already "skewed its foot" over the same threshold, but it (humanity) was taken under white hands and taken away from the door - into the garden, everyone into the garden. And so we, scientists and ordinary people, wandered, walked, broke firewood, and again came to the same cherished door.
Promotional video:
The concept of ether, as being present everywhere and everywhere, and affecting our material world, but not perceived by the senses, has existed since ancient times: from concepts in Eastern teachings, for example, such as "akasha" in Ancient India or the energy of "qi" in Ancient China, to the philosophy of Ancient Greece ("apeiron" of the philosopher Anaximander and his followers). Already in later times, Rene Descartes (1596-1650) translated the concept of ether from the philosophical, ideological and religious plane into the scientific one.
And later, with the development of optics, it was experimentally found that light has a wave nature. That is, when light from several sources is superimposed (interference phenomenon) or light propagates through obstacles (diffraction phenomenon), light behaves like waves, for example, waves on the surface of water.
Video about the interference of waves propagated by river vessels in motion. Especially beautiful picture starting at 1:30.
And here is another part of an old Soviet physics educational film. To get to the bottom of the diffraction phenomenon, go to 2:48.
Optical physicists of the early 19th century reasonably assumed that since light is waves, then there must be a medium through which these waves propagate, well, in fact, there can be, for example, sea waves in the absence of the sea? This means that light waves must vibrate "something", luminiferous matter, ether. Later, other (except for light) ranges of electromagnetic radiation were discovered and investigated, and their wave nature turned out to be similar to the nature of visible light, which further confirmed physicists in their views on ether as an imperceptible and all-pervading matter. In general, the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century were the heyday of numerous theories and models of the ether.
For example, few people know that the periodic table originally had a slightly different look:
Inert gases in the primary source were in the zero column, and not in the eighth, which is familiar to us. In this (zero) column in the first row, before hydrogen, D. I. Mendeleev placed the element "y", which he proposed to call "corona" (he believed that the corona of stars, including the Sun, consists of this element). And also there is a zero row, in which Dmitry Ivanovich put the element "x", which he called "Newtonium". The great Russian scientist believed that Newtonium and Coronium are extremely light inert gases, therefore the atoms and molecules of the remaining elements practically do not interact with them in any way, and that these elements (Coronium and Newtonium) constitute the ether.
If you are interested in details, see his work "Attempt to Understand the Chemical World Ether". It is written, by the way, in a very easy and accessible language, in contrast to modern "scientific works", which can be understood only if you first study the dictionary of terms. Then our great compatriots knew how to express their thoughts! Not like now. In modern scientific works, there is simply an overabundance of terminology, and this is the best way to disguise weak competence in a question or to express banality through science.
Forgotten, by the way, is not only his work. Nobody even knows him as a scientist in most countries of the world. And in the name of the table (the periodic system of chemical elements) the name "Mendeleev" is completely absent. Well at least we Russians have not yet forgotten Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleev. And, I hope, contrary to the exam, we will not forget.
Another great scientist of the early twentieth century, Nikola Tesla, on the contrary, assumed that ether is a high-density matter, not gas, and that is why electromagnetic waves propagate through the ether at such a high speed. In his opinion, this matter has no electromagnetic characteristics at all and, therefore, does not interact with our ordinary (electrical) matter. Despite the fact that Nikola Tesla in scientific and public opinion appears to be almost a false scientist or even a charlatan, it was his activity that had the greatest (positive) impact on the development of modern science and technology. He received more than 100 patents for his inventions, including the first radio transmitter, schemes for using alternating electric current, an electric motor, three-phase electric current transmission systems, fluorescent lighting (fluorescent lamps),remote radio control, laser installation and much, much more. And this is not counting the fact that the famous "inventor" Edison managed to appropriate (and patent himself) from him, while Tesla worked for him in his youth. A unit of measurement of magnetic induction is named after him, Tesla - is this not a real recognition of his undoubted scientific merits?
“Again a conspiracy,” the skeptic will say, “And who could be disturbed by this broadcast of yours? It's just that it is outdated and has been discarded by science, like the philosopher's stone in its time. „
I must confess that I myself thought so myself. That the ether theory simply turned out to be untenable and was replaced by more modern scientific concepts. Everything happened by itself and gradually, no one forbade anything, and if “real physicists” are laughing at the “airmen” now, this is normal. Alchemy, for example, was taught at the universities of medieval Europe simultaneously with chemistry (a then new science) for almost a hundred years. After all, no one will offend old and honored professors with bans on what they believed in all their life, about which they wrote their scientific works, received honor, titles and positions. "Honored" had students with a similar worldview. Therefore, it was simply impossible to abolish the "old science" at once. But time put everything in its place,and the newer and less confused theory gradually replaced the outdated one. And chemists, naturally, made fun of alchemists (their university colleagues) and their worldview at the end of the century, when alchemy was quietly and slowly dying as a science.
Sometimes I saw the information that opponents of the ether concept fought with opponents (supporters of the ether) without disdaining different, sometimes very controversial, methods, but I attributed all this to inventions and "excuses" of retrogrades and pseudoscientists.
But there are people whose opinion you respect, and if they convey some information to you, then you inevitably throw away your stereotyped thinking and begin to study the issue more carefully, not brushing off inconvenient facts. (For example, on the site with the archive of publications of the esteemed journalist Yuri Mukhin there is a small note titled "RELATIVELY ETERNAL PROHIBITION ON CRITICISM REGARDING EINSTEIN'S SCIENTIFIC THEORY".)
And, as I gradually found out, the theory of ether did not die out by itself, but on the contrary, the followers of the theory of relativity (they are also called relativists) received powerful state and "patronage" support in the first half of the XX century, and, on the contrary, supporters of the theory of ether experienced serious pressure and even repression.
For example, back in 1922, on its 100th anniversary, the German scientific society Gesellschaft Duetscher Naturforscher und Arzte decided to exclude criticism of the theory of relativity in the official academic environment. As a result, Germany has banned criticism of relativism (theory of relativity) in the academic press and in the educational process. This prohibition, since then, and without interruption, is still in effect.
And the same position was confirmed by the Nazi (!) Government of Germany after the beginning of the Second World War (1940, Munich, the decree recognizing the theory of relativity as the foundation for the development of physical science), despite the nationality of the "father of relativism" A. Einstein. And the funny thing is that after the fall of Nazism in 1945, criticism of the theory of relativity was equated with denial of the Holocaust and anti-Semitism by Einstein personally. "A special form of anti-Semitism," he said. What is it, huh? Chutzpah, and only …
And what about the USSR? Perhaps the leadership of our country has done the most for the triumph of the theory of relativity in the scientific community. To do this, Einstein needed to join the German Communist Party in 1919 (six months later he left there, but he was silent about this) in order to get the support of official science in Soviet Russia and later in the USSR.
And since 1922 Einstein became a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and since 1926 an honorary foreign member of the USSR Academy of Sciences. And even such a prominent scientist of the USSR as A. K. Timiryazev, after a report at the 5th Congress of Physicists on the experiments of the American physicist D. K. Miller (they refuted Einstein's theories) was ostracized by supporters of the theory of relativity (namely, eminent Soviet scientists- relativists A. F. Ioffe, I. E. Tamm, Ya. I. Frenkel, G. S. Landsberg, L. I. Mandel'shtamm).
In 1930, Glavnauki closed the Physical Society (only the Association of Physicists, headed by A. F. Ioffe, remained). In 1934, a special resolution of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks was issued on the discussion of relativism, in which all opponents of the theory of relativity were classified either as "right deviators" or "Menshevik idealists". Since 1938, the Academy of Sciences of the USSR has not financed any scientific work that at least in some way contradicted relativism (the theory of relativity). And, as a culmination, “in 1964 the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences issued a closed resolution prohibiting all scientific councils, journals, scientific departments from accepting, considering, discussing and publishing works criticizing A. Einstein's theory”.
Someone A. Bronstein (interestingly, a relative or namesake of Comrade Trotsky?) In the book "Conversations on Space and Hypotheses" says: "… in 1966 alone, the Department of General and Applied Physics of the USSR Academy of Sciences helped doctors identify 24 paranoids." This is how scientists who disagreed with the theory of relativity were subjected to a compulsory psychiatric examination and prescribed "treatment", after which one could forget about a scientific career (but that's good, in the Middle Ages, heretics were simply burned).
When "totalitarianism" ended in 1991, such a pluralism of opinions began that the edifice of modern physics began to sway from the blows (from the side of "broken ethers") into the foundation of relativism. But the times are not the same, you can't shoot your opponent, and you can't even put you in a psychiatric hospital, and for the officialdom of science there is only one method left - to seek out and deprive of funding and titles, spoil a career and ridicule scientists who disagree with Einstein.
Thus, in 1998, the "Commission for Combating Pseudoscience and Falsification of Scientific Research" was established - a scientific coordination organization under the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences. And in 2013, this openly inquisitorial structure included very strange people far from science, for example, journalists, illusionists and even US citizens (in the structure of the Russian Academy of Sciences). Apparently, the "scientific" methods of struggle have been exhausted. Since "theologians have not coped with the heretics", then we call professional artists of the spoken genre. By the way, even our famous erector of crowns Khazanov was noted - he protected the bright name of Einstein from everyone there, bad …
In other countries, everything happened and is happening according to a similar pattern. Einstein is a genius, because his teaching is correct, and his teaching is correct, because Einstein is a genius …
Therefore, it turns out that a certain influential group redirected the development of science and technology along a different path of development. Instead of transmitting electricity over distances and obtaining clean and ecological energy, we received wires and oil pipes.
And why did the customers of the discrediting theories of the ether - the OP-cartel need all this? Where did they see the danger of ether technologies for themselves?
Let's imagine that we live in a world where everyone has generators of inexpensive electricity, or everyone can, by installing special equipment at home, receive electricity without any wires, choosing from a huge number of suppliers the cheapest and most convenient. In such conditions, only notorious extroverts would live in large cities in tenement buildings. And most people would choose a place to live according to their liking - a kind of modern Middle Ages would come, when each homeowner would be relatively independent from the rest (and even from the state), and, if desired, could have almost no contact with society, excluding rare communication or sharing the fruits of their labor.
Such "nezavisimovtsy" could be included in the general management system only by coercion, military punitive force. But, unlike the Middle Ages, the layman has a personal weapon (firearms), it is relatively cheap and learning how to control them is not as difficult as with a sword or a bow once. Now, if the stick of the state becomes much more weighty than the carrot, then in order to effectively protect oneself from the central machine of suppression, special skills are not needed. In general, revolts of citizens have become extremely dangerous for the elites - it is easier to fool the people through the media and keep them in multiple dependencies than to suppress by force.
Precisely in order to prevent the emergence of such a freeman, we were directed along this path, the paths of living in multi-apartment hives, using the central electricity, water and heat supply, gave us a web of road networks (flying on "oil" is very expensive - go along the roads, citizens) and other "benefits" of modern civilization.
& quot; Anthill, go ahead …"
In general, they made us very dependent both on each other and on the state infrastructure. The OP-cartel needed to hold the on-air technologies "by the throat" until total totalitarian control (chipping, that is, introducing a control and management system into the human body) - and they had it in their hat, then no ether was afraid. And they have almost achieved their goal (all greetings from comrade Chubais from RosNano).
The customers have been identified, and now it's time to talk about the main performer, about who is considered the greatest scientist of ALL times and ALL peoples. So let's get started.
I went to school back in Soviet times, and if in the lower grades we had one idol - this is “grandfather Lenin”, then when they started teaching physics, another one appeared - the Brilliant Scientist ALBERT EINSTEIN.
We had a history teacher in our school, deeply over 70, for whom worship of the image of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin replaced the usual religiosity for this age. My friends and I somehow counted in her class more than 80 images of the leader of the world proletariat and almost 30 sculptural forms on the same theme, plus in the corner there was a model (almost life-size) of Lenin's hut in Razliv, next to which there was a birch in a tub, and on the wall behind the hut were painted views of the lake (Sestroretsky Razliv). Pupils went out to answer the blackboard, standing behind a small rostrum with the Soviet emblem (just like at meetings of adult communists), and next to the blackboard in a frame behind glass hung a real copy of the pre-revolutionary newspaper Iskra. In general, a vivid example of how respect goes to worship, across all the edges of the absurd.
With the physics teacher, not everything was so neglected. She was quite sane, explained in an interesting way, showed experiments, conducted lessons clearly and interestingly - with jokes and jokes, in general, she tried her best to captivate us, young goofs, with her favorite physics. But as soon as the matter concerned Albert Einstein, she immediately became serious, no jokes to you with the "bright genius", "great scientist", "the best scientific mind" and the like.
And to the question, what is the achievement of the "enty genius", the answer followed: "E-emtse-square, this formula turned the world upside down!" and no details. Children are gullible, and I, like everyone else, believed in a kind and gray-haired, badly combed genius. In short, if not for him - we all live without electricity and in caves. Adults, after all, "know better," not without reason is the favorite phrase of teachers in response to the tricky question: "Why?" there was always: “There is no need to think. Here you have to remember …"
But the closer the 90s got, the more something ambiguous about Vladimir Ilyich came to light, they say, "Grandfather Lenin" is no longer a "cake". It turns out that he is not drawn to moral authority because of some of his actions. So our beloved GDP recently mentioned about its "bomb under the country" in the form of national division of territories …
But Einstein stood and stands on his shining pedestal. The "kind and wise" prankster shows us his language from the walls of school classes and offices of gray-haired scientists. (And whoever doubted in em-tse-square is an anti-Semite.)
But I have such a drawback, I like to look for what they hide from me, especially if they hide it in the most conspicuous place. Comrade (in the communists, he managed to note) Einstein has a well-known and often quoted biography, so let's take an unbiased and attentive look at it. I wonder what kind of person he was. What actions he performed, actions characterize people much more accurately than their speeches.
What his praises are silent about. Or who didn’t like him and why. In general, I will state what I learned, and you will already draw your own conclusions.
Albert Einstein was born on March 14, 1879 in Ulm.
I missed the publication a little, I missed the anniversary. By the way, are you aware that this day is celebrated in Israel as the day of science?
Little Albert developed with a great lag, he began to speak only at the age of three, and by the age of seven he had learned to repeat only short phrases. The servants (and biographers write to us "was born in a family of poor Jews …") in the Einstein house called him "stupid." Albertik did not like to play outdoor games with other children, and the children also did not like to play with him - for no apparent reason he could get angry and beat them. There is a known case when he threw a heavy bowling ball at the head of his sister Maya (she was two and a half years younger than him), which seriously injured her. It is believed that the headaches that tormented her all her life, and the paralysis that occurred seven years before her death, all this was the result of that injury and subsequent blows on the head with a garden spatula (from her beloved brother) during his rare active games with his sister. And in fact,Albertik preferred quiet games, such as solving puzzles or building houses of cards.
Albert's mother played music well and wished to instill a love for music and her children. She hired a music teacher who taught Albert for 7-8 years to play the violin. At first he hated these lessons and even sometimes threw pieces of children's furniture at the teacher in fits of rage. But by the end of his studies, he learned to play the viola quite well and even fell in love with music.
The people around him considered him an extremely religious child, at the age of 12 he knew by heart and sang in public some voluminous Jewish psalms, but, then, somehow it stopped at once. Apparently, they explained to him that some ideas of Judaism may not please the surrounding goyim, for example, fellow practitioners from the Christian school of Munich. Einstein himself later said that he became an atheist by virtue of his childish wisdom, they say, at the age of 12, he realized that religion is a lie. What a smart and independent little boy, isn't he?
“And what are the doubts? Again the OP-cartel influenced - you ask mockingly?
Sure. They always look after promising Jewish children (and not only them), so that there is always a choice of the right people-tools when the time comes to use them for one purpose or another.
The ability to work with young people is the main secret know-how of the OP-cartel. They somehow managed to overcome the age-old problem of fathers and children in their ranks and use the same problem among other people to their advantage.
This is how it happens in most cases: a person from the "dirt" crawls into "riches" (the need for invention is cunning), a difficult life path forges the future "prince" with a steel character and determination, he notices and uses every opportunity to get rich, gain power … And, as a result, at some point he becomes a very wealthy and influential person. And his children, in turn, grow up on everything ready, on the education of other people's nannies. The father is busy earning money, he has no time to raise children, and the beautiful mother (and who else would a businessman choose as his wife, if not "Miss-zadryuchinsk-shaggy-year" shopping, beauty salons and all that jazz. Yes, plus youthful maximalism, plus the eternal cold war of generations. And correspondingly,when daddy leaves for another world (and we are all not eternal) - in a few years the fortune has already been wasted by the heirs to zero, if the wife does not have time, then the children will definitely "manage".
But the OP-cartel has managed to build a system that has been working for a single goal for millennia. Once upon a time these guys started with the banal carving out of individual cities and their robbery (read about the biblical Jericho, the "business process" is well described), but now for them the chestnuts from the fire grab someone else's hands, and they just pull the strings. And they achieved all this by deeply studying the psychology of youth. The ability to motivate them (young), incite or extinguish their young riots - this is the main technology of the OP-cartel, which, together with the Old Testament cruelty and the ability to manipulate using base instincts, allowed the OP-cartel to occupy the position that it occupies now.
In general, if someone talks about what wise decisions he made in childhood himself, personally, it just means that someone wisely told him what to do …
In the gymnasium, Albert did well in mathematics, but there were serious problems with some other subjects. Einstein's parents moved from Munich to Italy (the town of Pavia near Milan) in 1894, leaving their son to live with relatives and finish his studies at the gymnasium. But a year later (at the age of 15), Albert dropped out of school without receiving a graduation certificate, and came to his parents and sister, telling his parents that he did not want to serve in the army (then in Germany 17 years was the extreme age for a young man to leave the country without being drafted), and therefore renounces German citizenship and in general, and he has a PLAN - he will prepare to enter the Zurich Polytechnic (Switzerland) on his own, and after entering and graduating from this university, he will certainly become a luminary of science … What a wonderful and independent young man! Conceived - implemented,that's what genius means. Since childhood I have been smart beyond my years without any prompts (hehe).
And now he is preparing, our Albert is preparing, and in October 1895 he successfully FUNDS the entrance exams at the Polytechnic of Zurich. And he would not shine in science, if not for the timely wise advice - to go to a special school in the canton of Aarau. This school is paid, but there is a nice bonus - if you graduate from it, you are enrolled in the Polytechnic University "automatically", without any entrance exams there.
Albert enters this PAID school, and settles in, renting a room from a certain Jost Winteller, who suddenly, in combination, turned out to be the director of this very school. That's what natural savvy means! What Albert Malades! Good insurance - you pay not only for tuition, but also personally in the hands of the school principal for living in his house - now they certainly won't be kicked out. Polytech is guaranteed.
And, now, after a year of intensive study, Albert still receives his certificate of maturity:
Please note that in Switzerland then the assessments were on a six-point scale, i.e. "Three" in our opinion is about two plus. But, nevertheless, now Albert is enrolled in the pedagogical faculty of the Zurich Polytechnic, and the Einstein family continues to keep in touch with the wonderful Jost Winteller (director of the school in Aarau), 15 years later, Einstein's sister marries Paul (Jost's son) Winteller. By the way, Einstein himself, while living with "Uncle Jost", had an affair with his daughter Marie Winteller, but he could not marry, he had to take care of himself for science (more precisely, for more scientific girls).
Young Albert, as an obvious manipulator, is characterized by the fact that when their romance with Winteller was already over (on the initiative of Einstein), he still sent Marie his dirty laundry by mail, and she washed and sent him back (apparently still hoping for a renewal relations), naive.
And Albert meets the "more scientific" girl already within the walls of the University. She turned out to be Mileva Maric, a Serb from Novi Sad (then it was the territory of the Austro-Hungarian Empire), who successfully passed the entrance exams and was enrolled in a group of students, where Albert Einstein was also enrolled without exams. She was already 21 years old (by the standards of that time - an old maid), and he was only 17. At that time they were not yet close, so during this period there are no joint photographs of them.
But to compare the types, here's a collage of two photos from 1896:
Mileva from childhood showed remarkable intellectual abilities, and her father, Milos Maric, possessing modern views, encouraged her craving for a good education, although at that time the girls of Austria-Hungary rarely studied not only in universities, but even in secondary schools (gymnasiums). Mileva was easy on both mathematics and physics and foreign languages. She became one of four women who ever studied at the Zurich Polytechnic until 1896. Mileva was not a standard of beauty, and besides, she limped badly when walking (due to bone disease), but despite the ridicule of fellow students, young and cute Albert stubbornly sat down at lectures next to her …
The generally accepted view of their subsequent relationship is as follows: the genius Einstein and "a little clever" Marich, who helped him (A little bit. At first. Only by his condescension). Some "court" biographers generally describe her as stupid, dirty in everyday life, crazy, etc., in general, only preventing the "champion of everything in the world of all times and peoples" from creating in full force.
There is also an opposite point of view (feminists adore it) - Albert Einstein deceived the naive woman scientist Mileva Mari, who was in love with him, who wrote all the articles for him and developed all theories, and he, having appropriated her works for himself, as a result threw her out of his life, divorced her and took away the laurels of genius, although in fact he did not understand anything in science. Mileva, on the other hand, is a pure angel, the mother of the theory of relativity (and Einstein, accordingly, is not a father, but just a gigolo of the theory of relativity), a genius woman scientist, deceived and morally trampled by her beloved husband …
Feminists aren't mistaken about Einstein's personality, but is Mileva an angel? At first it seems - yes, an undoubted angel. She wrote scientific works, raised children, tolerated her cheating husband and, moreover, did not complain. But there are some facts that cast doubt on the high moral qualities of Einstein's wife (I'll tell you a little later). And then you understand that Mileva was anyone, just not a gullible and in love fool. I would even say they were standing each other. Young Einstein, confident in his masculine irresistibility, thought that he had found in her a smart and free assistant for his scientific career. The less young Mileva, I think, understood this perfectly, but, in turn, wanted to use it as a showcase for her scientific activities. The times then were far from emancipation, and Mileva, possessing outstanding mental abilities,she was well aware that it would be extremely difficult for her, as a woman, to engage in science directly, scientific journals would not publish articles of a woman scientist, she would not be invited to seminars and lectures, treating her ideas condescendingly and disrespectfully. Therefore, she needed a male "talking head", which could be taught to connect a few words on the topic of the report, but which could not do without her intellectual support. And … THAT - LADIES! Their interests coincided.but which cannot do without its intellectual support. And … THAT - LADIES! Their interests coincided.but which cannot do without its intellectual support. And … THAT - LADIES! Their interests coincided.
Although later Mileva, perhaps, even fell in love with Albert, her numerous scenes of jealousy are portrayed about this (and our "handsome" constantly gave a reason), which means he became not indifferent to her, like a man. But at first, she treats the young man condescendingly, teasing, engages in physics with him, trying to tighten his knowledge to the necessary level planned for her. Albert wrote similar letters to her at that time (1899):
“Along with this, I also studied beautiful passages from Helmholtz about atmospheric movements - from fear of you and, by the way, to my own pleasure. I will add right away that I would like to look through the whole history of [physics] with you … When I read Helmholtz for the first time, I could not understand anything, I could not believe, as I still cannot, that you are not sitting next to me … I find working together with you wonderful and useful, the work is much calmer and seems less boring to me"
In 1900, Einstein defends his thesis, but, unlike his classmates, he is not offered to remain an assistant at the department. Mileva Marich was offered (by Professor Weber) to become his assistant, but she refuses out of solidarity when Weber does not agree to take Einstein to her as well (considering him a completely hopeless graduate). Albert and Mileva wanted to get married immediately after graduation, but his parents (especially his mother, Paulina Einstein) were strongly against it. Not only is Mileva a goy, she is also a Slav! (The Slavs, as an inferior race, were treated in Germany long before Hitler). Paulina Einstein hated Mileva with her spinal cord, always insulting her at every personal meeting.
"Bookworm" - the evil nickname that Einstein's mother gave to Mileva
In January 1902, a girl was born to Mileva, who was named Lieserl. The birth of an illegitimate child in those days was an incident on the verge of a scandal, and therefore it is not surprising that Mileva left her with her parents in Novi Sad and did not bring her to Switzerland, but another surprising thing is that the “young parents” practically did not visit their daughter, and then they told their close circle (the rest of the others did not even know about Lieserl's existence) that the child had died of an illness.
More than 30 years later, a woman came to the home of Dr. Janusz Plesch, who was caring for the sick Paulina Einstein (at the same time he was writing a biography of her son), a woman appeared with a boy by the hand. The boy looked very much like young Albert, and the woman claimed that she was Einstein's illegitimate daughter Lieserl, who was given to be raised in a strange family. Plesch wrote a letter about this to Einstein and was extremely surprised when the latter did not show any paternal interest in this message, and even wrote obscene rhymes about this: “And it would be nice to hear that I blurted out an egg to the left”.
Lieserl never mentioned either Milev or Albert in their letters or conversations with witnesses - as if she did not exist at all. Later, after their wedding, in 1904 their eldest son Hans Albert and in 1910 the younger Edward were born, and both grew up in some kind of family, and Lieserl was deleted from family history only because she was born out of wedlock … It was here that the first “bell” for me sounded - this is me about the “angel” (according to the feminists) Mileva Marich.
In January 1903, Albert Einstein and Mileva Mari were married, almost as soon as Einstein's father blessed them before his sudden death in December 1902. Mileva's parents were very happy that she was finally getting married, and later (in 1904) her father Milos Marich, having visited them to see his grandson, gave Albert a large sum of money as a dowry (the equivalent of THEN US $ 25,000, which is almost a million of today's dollars).
The next fact that breaks the conclusion of feminists about the in love and defenseless Mileva is that one of the points of the marriage (!) Contract was Albert Einstein's obligation to give the Nobel Prize to Mileva. This contract is undoubtedly proof of her authorship of their "joint" scientific works. For her, it was insurance in case Albert decides to cross her out of the co-authors. But this insurance, however, did not work. Although she had to give the money as a result (even after their divorce) to Einstein - a contract, there is a contract. But the media and court biographers carefully blotted out the name of Mileva Marich from the history of science, it is useless for any Slavs to cling to the great Jewish thinker.
That is, back in 1903, Mileva was confident that her future work would be evaluated at least for the Nobel Prize. So there is a big question with whom the emissaries of the OP-cartel worked more closely - with their wife or husband …
But back in 1902, six months before the wedding, Einstein finally got the long-awaited job (before that he interrupted himself with rare tutoring) in the Berne Patent Office, albeit in the lowest paid position of a 4th class expert. So he sits there for almost four years before being promoted to a 2nd grade expert. But he did not come to the bureau for a position and not for a salary. The fact is that in those days patent offices received not only applications for registration of inventions, but also advanced scientific works. And Switzerland was then one of the main scientific centers in Europe. Einstein, working in the bureau, could consider the most modern scientific theories and pass them on to Mileva, who, passing information through her energetic mind, starting in 1905, began to issue scientific articles on physics “up the hill”.
The presentation in these articles differed from the articles of other authors in a very "unusual" manner - the ideas, results and research borrowed from the works of other scientists were not indicated, the conclusions were not compared with earlier attempts to solve a particular scientific problem. The articles practically did not contain literary references, which gave the impression of the complete originality of the ideas and the first discovery of the results presented in them. This is another bell - Mileva was engaged in plagiarism, at least not less than her husband Albert, and even more. The articles came out of her pen. "Albert is tyriting at the bureau, and I am taking him away …"
That is, the "ideas" of "Marich-Einstein" are a compilation of the works of other scientists, and if, for example, Lorenz derived his formula based on references to other authors and on the results of experiments with the Michelson-Morley interferometer (which were later rechecked and refuted by the American physicist Miller, but this did not affect the scientific world in any way), then Marich-Einstein JUST “postulated” them. Moreover, the name of Lorentz was at least mentioned ("Lorentz transformation"), while the name of the mathematician Henri Poincaré, whose ideas were the basis for the work on the theory of relativity, did not sound at all. P. Langevin, D. Hilbert, F. Gasenörl, O. Heaviside, J. J. Thomson - this is who else our sweet couple Marich-Einstein "forgot" to mention. And even the famous "Einstein's" formula em-tse-square, it turns out, was introduced as a hypothesis back in 1971 by the Austrian physicist G. Schramm,and in 1873 it was proved by Nikolai Umov, and O. Heaviside put an end to it in 1889, giving it a modern look (Umov had a coefficient of 'ka' before 'em').
In those days, science was an aristocratic affair, being branded as a deceiver and a plagiarist meant forever crossing out your own career in the field of science. And to behave the way the Einstein spouses behaved, without receiving a black mark from the scientific community, it was possible only with very serious patrons. The octopus of the OP cartel even then extended its tentacles to almost all countries of the world, but these tentacles were not yet as strong and total as they are now. Immediately after the publication of scientific "works", Einstein's name began to be promoted by newspapers and magazines, which already then were almost completely under Jewish control, and, accordingly, under the influence of the OP-cartel. This helps to popularize the young scientist among the common people, but the then scientific elite is still aristocratic - they are mostly proud and incorruptible people.
In 1908, Einstein was first nominated for the famous Nobel Prize, which he could only receive in 1922. It took the OP-cartel almost a decade and a half to break the resistance of the "retrograde" scientists! And still I had to go for a trick - the Nobel Prize was awarded not for the theory of relativity (!), Which they could not "push through" (too many scientists still knew this scandalous story firsthand), but for "the discovery of the photoelectric effect." "Fortunately" Stoletov, who described the three laws of the photoelectric effect, had already died long ago by that time, and stealing a Slav for the representatives of the Western scientific community is a nice thing, they are always ready for this. Yes, and Marconi already in 1909 paved the way - he received the Nobel Prize for the radio "posited" by Popov and Tesla.
By the way, Einstein did not come to the ceremony, apparently decided that he would avoid unnecessary attention and unnecessary questions …
Einstein's career did not stand still while waiting for the Nobel Prize, it grew very confidently: in 1908 he was already an associate professor at the University of Bern, in 1909 he received the position of a “wedding” professor (without a department and a place in the academic council) at the University of Zurich, in the same year left the patent office (the job is done, it’s time to put it down), in 1911 he became a real professor at the Polytechnic in Prague, in 1913 he became a member of the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin, and in 1917 he became the founder and director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physical Research.
The higher Einstein climbed the career ladder, the less he needed a wife who, by her appearance alone, reminded him of who had earned him honor and regalia - the couple's relationship was getting worse. In 1909, Mileva wrote to her friend: "… Fame does not leave much time for his wife … it may happen that one receives a pearl, the other only an empty shell from her."
They divorced in 1919, but even five years earlier, Albert Einstein would draw up a rather humiliating list of requirements for his wife Mileva, which she would have to comply with if she did not want a divorce. Here he is:
“ 1. You will ensure that
- my underwear and bedding were clean and well-kept;
- I was served food three times a day in my office;
- my bedroom and study were kept clean and tidy, and so that no one but me touched my desk.
2. You will refuse any connection with me, except for the one that needs to be maintained in public. In particular, you will not pretend that I
- stayed at home with you;
- accompanied you on trips.
3. You will have to solemnly promise that
- you will not wait for any feelings on my part and will not reproach me for their absence;
- you will answer me as soon as I turn to you;
- you will unquestioningly leave both my bedroom and my office at my first request;
- you will not denigrate me in front of children by word or deed"
The documents of the divorce proceedings between Einstein and Marich are now kept in Israel and are classified, while witnesses to this divorce recalled that very unpleasant facts were raised during the process, including repeated assaults by Einstein.
Well, a little later, our "genius" married his cousin (old Jewish fun - kindred marriages) Elsa, he now considered her daughters to be his own, and ignored his own children for the rest of his life - goys. True, the Nobel money had to be given to Mileva. Maric with a marriage contract, of course, did not go wrong financially, but in all other respects it flew like plywood over Paris. She received neither fame nor recognition for her labors.
The Soviet academician Ioffe recalled that he personally saw the originals of the articles of 1905, where there were two names - Mileva and Albert, but, as usual, the originals were not preserved, and Mileva could not prove anything, and she did not really try. Apparently, the OP-cartel persistently did not advise her. Their youngest son (already in his adult years) Eduard actively tried to defend the truth about the real "creator" of the theory of relativity, as a result of which he ended his life in a psychiatric hospital. And Mileva herself in the last years of her life (apparently, having decided that she had nothing more to lose) began to remember her "authorship" - and was also recognized as crazy. Like, she was dying, in a crazy delirium - and chatted all sorts of nonsense. The eldest son, Hans Albert, was smarter and did not pedal this topic, as a result of which he managed to make some kind of career in science. By the way,Despite the good behavior of Hans Albert, after the death of Albert Einstein, he inherited mere pennies from the rather big fortune of his father, almost everything was received by “adoptive relatives” and mistresses of different periods of the life of the “luminary”.
Albert Einstein was the main, but not the only member of the aether theories funeral team. The OP cartel never puts everything on one horse, there should always be options in stock - therefore, many "scientists" -relativists (supporters of the theory of relativity) were prepared, Einstein was chosen as the main genius, and the career ladder of all others from the "support team" suddenly turned out to be unexpectedly easy to climb - well, then: whoever we need - we pull by the ears, whoever we don’t - we bury alive …
As a result, in a very short time, the development of our civilization was sent along a dead-end path. Ways of dealing with nature, instead of mutually beneficial symbiosis. Ways of exploitation and degradation of the environment, instead of a respectful and frugal approach to the home planet.
By the way, after the breakup between Einstein and Marich, that “for some reason” ceased to get “namesake” references, but this is what started: “the Einstein-Brillouin-Keller method”, “Bose-Einstein statistics”, “Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox” etc. Our "genius", without clinging to real scientists, could not do anything on his own. Although I tried. Having heard praises from the press and believing in his own genius, he struggled with his "Unified Field Theory" for more than thirty years, until his death, but never "gave birth" as a result.
The layman had the opinion that thanks to the "works" of Einstein, all the modern achievements of science and technology arose. "Televisions, campers and iPhones zhy Enstein invented!" - this is how our VKontakte frequenter thinks, for example. And even more educated people also try to give something similar, only in cleverer words. And when you begin to clarify with them what kind of practical contribution to our civilization with you was received from the theory of relativity, you get a deep thoughtfulness of your opponent, which sometimes smoothly turns into bursts of aggression. The picture of the world is crumbling - well, how can you not rage here.
When from electric motors, multiphase alternating current systems, ignition coils and other Tesla's electrical equipment to Zvorykin's TV, and, even more so, to the Fermi nuclear reactor, there is nowhere a trace of the influence of the theory of relativity.
A case that happened in 1964 is indicative here. Then scientists decided to determine the exact distance from Earth to Venus using radar.
The meaning of the experiment was as follows: send a powerful radio signal to Venus, then catch its reflection and calculate the signal travel time. The speed of light (and other EMP), according to the theory of relativity, is constant and equal to c = 299 792 458 m / s, i.e. the calculated part of the experiment is very simple and powerful for any student with a calculator in his hands.
In addition to two American observatories (the Massachusetts station and the station in Puerto Rico), it was decided to invite Soviet scientists from the Crimean Observatory of the USSR Academy of Sciences to participate. And suddenly it turned out that the signal delay in the Crimea was always less than in the US observatories. The difference exceeded the possible measurement errors by five or more times! And the casket opened simply - the speed of the Earth's rotation was superimposed on the speed of the radio signal, during the experiments, the territory of the United States was moving away from Venus, and the territory of the USSR was approaching, in general, one of Einstein's main postulates about the constancy of the speed of light was in question, that is, the relative speed light in space is "c + v" or "cv", not "c"!But … the Crimean Observatory refused to participate in further work and none of the Soviet scientists put signatures in the measurement results. For some reason, nobody wanted to go into a fool (for denying the principles of relativism).
However, NASA made its conclusions and after several failures with automatic interplanetary stations still returned from relativistic formulas to good old Isaac Newton. In the USSR they continued (and now in Russia they continue) to calculate flights of spacecraft according to Einstein. The result is obvious. It is still possible to fly close (until the difference in the results of different calculation methods becomes significant), but with long-distance expeditions "everything is complicated."
In general, the direction of development of modern science seems to be wrong to any thinking person. Well, judge for yourself, when you don't know the subject, you have to make a lot of unproven assumptions (postulates), but later, we increase our knowledge about this subject and the number of postulates decreases, many axioms (statements that do not require proof) turn into theorems that can already be proved. In modern science, from year to year, the postulates become more and more, and there is less common sense. And this is a clear sign that at one of the turns of the path of knowledge we turned the wrong way, and we do not want to admit this to ourselves, we persist in our mistakes, instead of returning to the old “road junction” and thinking a little …
For those who wish to understand in more detail the problems of modern physics, I suggest watching a video from Doctor of Technical Sciences Atsukovsky V. A. - try to refute his devastating criticism of relativism. And yes. He is, after all, a Jew. I specially chose him, there are many critics of TO, but this particular scientist cannot be accused of "a special form of anti-Semitism".
Watch about the theory of relativity from 24 minutes, but I propose to look at everything (at least this part in full) - it is very informative and interesting. Especially about the intricacy of modern scientific concepts. And to this topic I will also throw in my "five cents".
Even in physics lessons at school, and later at university, when we were taught electrical engineering and systems engineering, personally I was haunted by the generally accepted definition of electric current, they say, this is the ordered movement of charged particles, and the direction of movement of POSITIVE charges is chosen for the direction of current movement.
Is it okay that only electrons (negatively charged particles) can move in metals (wires), and a flux of electrons, not protons, is emitted in vacuum lamps (including CRTs)? Well, there is no movement of positively charged particles, and there cannot be! Where is the logic?
"Smart" people say, they say, it happened so historically, they say, what's the difference - let the "electron holes" move, ie lack of electrons, i.e. gaps in between. Let the electrons move to the right, and we will assume that the current goes to the left … And so, according to their logic, "holes" begin to jump through the semiconductor barrier, and electrons, you know, towards them …
In my opinion, this is just some kind of mockery, and not science, it's like giving the rain the following "logically correct" definition: "Rain is the process of moving holes between raindrops from earth to sky."
"But after all, all electrical engineering works in practice!" - our scientist beats himself in the chest with his heel - "So everything is correct with the definitions - it is possible this way, but it is possible that way." Well, then I will say that the shape of the umbrella was invented with a personalized one so that it would be more convenient to keep the dry-anti-rain (gaps between drops) near the ground, so that this dry land would not fly to the sky. If you object - and I will say, well, the umbrellas work as long as you hold them - the dry land is kept close to the ground, just folded it, all the dryness flies to the sky, and drops start to drip on your head … I just want to say “molten tin”. Do you know this anecdote?
The head of the kindergarten was on good terms with the commander of a nearby military unit. In the kindergarten, the wiring deteriorated, and the electrician was in a binge. So the manager asked her friend to send her a couple of soldiers so that they could solve the problem with electricity.
The soldiers fixed all the breakdowns and left, but the next day the teachers began to complain that the children were swearing at the three-story.
The commander of the unit called the soldiers for a showdown and decided to listen to their version of the incident. One of the soldiers spoke like this:
Soldier: I'm standing, which means I'm holding a stepladder. And Vasya solders the wires at the top. Then he take it and drop some solder on my head!
Commander: And what did you tell him about that?
Soldier: And I told him: "Vasily, can't you see that drops of molten tin are falling on your comrade's forehead …"
Well, why are you so annoyed, you say, what's the difference - "holes" there are running along the wires to the right or electrons to the left? And here is the difference. There is a danger in such unnatural logical quirks - people, having created an incorrect picture of the process in their brain, block their thoughts in separate details, cannot notice something important. This is why strange effects arise, it turns out that "dry land" does not concentrate around the circumference of the umbrella and does not fly away into the sky, but, on the contrary, the rain stream forms a water dome, flowing down around the person holding the umbrella … An inexplicable effect in the concept of land anti-rain …
But this is all theory and reasoning, the skeptic will say, but where are the practical results? Where are the on-air installations? Who at the moment (except for the not very effective attempts of the commission for combating pseudoscience and relativist snobs) really slows down the development of ether technologies, because now they don't shoot for this and put them in a psychiatric hospital?
I have already analyzed (albeit in a comic style) in my text "Oh, and I see you!" (in the form of an idea for the plot of a science fiction series) why states, to put it mildly, do not welcome the uncontrolled development of new technologies. This is due to a banal sense of self-preservation, or, if you prefer, responsibility to its citizens.
Here the calculation of the OP-cartel was fully justified - our civilization has already become a civilization of oil and cables to such an extent that any abrupt changes in the cost of obtaining or transferring energy will lead to extremely strong socio-economic shocks, up to revolutions and civil wars.
By the way, the web project zaryad.com mentioned in that article really exists. There are indeed many "fakes" and "freaks" on it, but there are also rational seeds - very interesting diagrams and videos on the practical implementation of devices, the so-called free energy. Moreover, some of the materials are educational in nature, i.e. with their help, everyone can try to assemble any of the presented types of devices personally and experiment with it (such a device).
This is all extremely interesting! I have such a dream - to engage in the design and assembly of such devices myself, but the lack of free time and appropriate premises hinders, it is unsafe to do such things at home (at least for a family).
Hence the second reason for the slow development of etheric technologies.
An inventor who is distinguished not only by his mind, inclined to forecasts, but also by his conscience, CAM will not push his ideas if he sees that they can cause any global or even local harm to others.
Here is indicative of the story of one of the experiments of Nikola Tesla, who conceived to create an increased energy potential by sending a pulse of average power from his laboratory, creating resonant oscillations between the electrostatic fields of the Earth and the Moon, and then directing this increased potential to the surface of our planet. The result of this experiment was the famous Tunguska "meteorite". Someone will say that this is just a coincidence of the date and time of his experiment, June 30, 1908, with the "meteorite fall." But the facts are such that records have been preserved in the journal of the US Library of Congress, where Tesla requested maps of the "least populated parts of Siberia" before his experiment. And also not a single fragment of the "meteorite" was found, and eyewitnesses claimed that the "meteorite" looked like a giant ball lightning. And the effect of the explosion was also similar to the explosions of ball lightning, only on a huge scale.
Well, one way or another, the main thing is that Tesla himself believed that it was HIS experiment that caused the Tunguska catastrophe. Apparently he did not expect that the scale of destruction would be so extensive. After this incident, Tesla decided not to develop this direction of his research and also not to share the details of his research with anyone. He even began to publicly support Einstein's theories, although he understood that they were incorrect, but believed that etheric technologies were too dangerous - and it would be better for humanity to believe relativists that ether does not exist at all.
But, as we know, even without ether, scientists were able to create an equally destructive weapon - nuclear. So Tesla was mistaken in supporting Einstein and hiding his achievements - no matter what road the development of science took, scientists, by order of politicians, will always create some kind of weapon of enormous destructive power and mass destruction …
The third reason for the poor practical results of ether technologies is the lack of a theoretical foundation. Everyone invents, who knows what, based on personal feelings, and not on elaborated laws and formulas. It happens that a low-power experimental device works, and when they try to assemble the same, but larger, nothing happens. Sometimes even enthusiasts fail to repeat the experimental device itself, this happens either because of the desire of the author of the invention to keep some secrets for future earnings (we are all people), or the conditions of functioning have become different (different time and place), and the instruments for measuring such conditions (ethereal) yet. Such failures arouse suspicion of the charlatanism of the "etherists", and disappointment in the "ethereal" ideas on the part of the indifferent "Kulibins" who were initially carried away by these ideas.
Therefore, practitioners need theory no less than theoreticians need practical experience.
There are many modern theories of the ether, with varying degrees of elaboration. I would like to highlight some of them.
"Vacuum and the Matter of the Universe" by A. V. Rykov is not a book for an unprepared reader; there are a lot of formulas and concepts from modern, relativistic physics. The author tried to refute relativistic views, using the conceptual apparatus of the very same supporters of the theory of relativity. And, in my opinion, he should have gone beyond the circle of their views and beliefs. He seems to be trying to convince relativists of the fallacy of their approaches, to open their eyes. Perhaps I will surprise the author - but thinking relativists understand everything perfectly well, it is a waste of effort to "open their eyes".
"The theory of primordial matter", VP Dugin (not a Eurasian philosopher, but a namesake) - the author's main idea is that an electron (or positron) is not a substance, but a clot of magnetic field, and therefore it behaves like a wave. But the author forgot that the electron ALSO behaves like a particle.
"Inhomogeneous Universe", NV Levashov - this author does not have the above contradiction. And in general, in my opinion, this is the best and most complete theory of dark matter - ether (in the author's terminology - non-physical matter).
He claims that there are many types of matter, and calls them primary matters and hybrid matters. For example, our physical substance is one of the hybrid matters (consisting of several primary ones). The author's electron is like a flickering substance, it is either a particle or a wave (it changes properties with the frequency of the relict radiation, that is, with a very high frequency) - therefore it has the properties of both waves and particles "simultaneously". Nikolai Viktorovich Levashov also described the similarity of the configuration of the orbits of atoms and the orbits of planets around stars.
In general, a very beautiful and logical theory. The illustrations in the book are of a very high quality, which facilitates the process of understanding (and it is not easy to understand some things, the author's conclusions do not fit into the generally accepted theory of the universe at all. This is what I really call “going beyond the established”). By the way, the drawings in the book are copyright:
The main drawback of the work, in my opinion, is some incompleteness. Despite a completely new view of the world, a new worldview, the book is like the alphabet of new knowledge. Well, or arithmetic. The author either did not have time, or deliberately did not begin to give "higher mathematics", which is necessary in order to move qualitatively to the practice of constructing devices for new energy.
But, perhaps, this is at the same time the dignity of this work - it can be perceived even without deep scientific knowledge, the level of an eleventh grader is enough, well, at least a Soviet 11 grader. There are not many formulas, but, I want to warn you, I have a paper book "Inhomogeneous Universe", so many formulas there are distorted-twisted in comparison with pdfs from the network, and besides, I saw some intentionally spoiled versions of this book on the Internet, be attentive - download only from official sites.
And on Levashov himself (who has already left our mortal world), there is a lot of compromising evidence on the Internet. When I read his works, I understood why all these efforts to distort and denigrate. If his books go to the masses, it will change the course of development of modern physics, biology, psychology, medicine, history and many other sciences. And all this is not to the liking of "our" OP-cartel.
The book will be interesting not only for "physicists", but also for "lyricists". The preface and the first chapter are devoted to an overview of the views of all notable philosophers in the history of mankind - just not a review, but a masterpiece! The meaning and main ideas of tens and hundreds of books are presented in several pages.
I definitely recommend reading it.
"General ether dynamics" Atsukovsky V. A. - according to this hypothesis, the ether has all the properties of an ordinary real viscous compressible gas, of which all material formations are composed. Based on this assumption, models of all stable particles are described - proton, neutron, electron, etc. The author gives a very well-developed criticism of relativism, but again his ideas do not go beyond the circle of modern physics, trying to stay within the conceptual "framework".
There is also a lot of mathematics in the work. The untrained reader will have a tricky one. The book is more for scientists who see the shortcomings of scientific models based on the theory of relativity and need a more logical alternative.
Thank you for attention. Goodbye, see you again …
Author: chef