On one of the megalithic blocks of the famous "fortress" of Sacsayhuaman in Peru, a trace of an unknown impact was found. And the trace is not from chipping with a chisel, but from some high-tech tool.
The rock was "walked" with an instrument that literally melted it. Upon closer examination of the images, it can be seen that the rock has even changed its structure in the affected areas.
Judging by the nature of the footprint, we can talk about the impact on the stone with the help of high temperature. Although it is possible to imagine the option that the block was in a plastic state.
But the outer grooves are still more reminiscent of the use of an instrument, like a modern high-power laser.
Well, let's move on to the most interesting point of this article.
Promotional video:
Historians assure us that Sacsayhuaman was built by the Inca civilization. As ordinary people, we believe in the words of authoritative experts.
But if the fortress was built by the Incas, where did the trace from such an instrument come from? In our time, they definitely could not leave it, because to maintain the operation of a laser with such a power, too much energy would be needed, and I do not see a sound goal in this.
Did the Incas have some kind of laser technology? In such a case, the various colonists would have quickly left America with great disappointment, rather than swiftly taken over.
As a result, we get a strange picture. On the one hand, historians tell us one thing, but on the other hand, there is a clear fact that contradicts their words. This is where doubts begin.
How accurate is the story of modern scholars?
Why do they simply ignore or suppress facts that do not fit into their generally accepted theories? For this particular occasion, the following version can be put forward.
In fact, Sacsayhuaman was not built at all by the Incas, but by some ancient civilization with high technologies. This mark could have been left by a builder, simply by checking the tool, as for example, do welders in our time.
Although this version contradicts the generally accepted history, it sounds logical and reasonable. If you collect all the controversial facts, then you still need to think about which version should be considered official, and which alternative.