Hello everyone, today I will briefly tell you about an interesting reason that played a large role in my belief in alternative versions of history.
This reason can be called the main one in the emergence of alternative versions. It all started with the fact that historians could not provide intelligible answers to complex questions that require explanation.
There are a lot of similar examples and they can be listed for a long time, but let me show you one little-known one for clarity.
He clearly shows why alternative versions of history are now more accurate in some respects than the official ones.
In 1985, an underwater megalithic complex was discovered near the Japanese island of Yonaguni. Even from several photographs, one can understand that it is of artificial origin.
In other words, this object was created by an unknown civilization and by now managed to sink without any mention. So, the official scientists said that this is a natural formation.
I will show you some photos, and you can make a conclusion about it yourself, and then evaluate the conclusion of official scientists.
Object schema.
Promotional video:
I was especially surprised by the photo of the head above. Probably nature itself did it too, well, it's just ridiculous.
You can raise this head and ask about logic and common sense from scientists who prove his natural formation.
Although I cannot make a reservation that even among the official scientists there are honest people. These include Maasaki Kimura.
It was this professor who went against everyone, and took the side of the man-made version of the origin of this complex.
As you can see from this example, in this day and age, it pays to think carefully about which version of history to believe. Time will tell which of them will ultimately turn out to be alternative and which will be true.