We present to your attention the article “Several examples of incorrect dating of known historical events. Historical and political research.
Introduction
The state of modern historical science has become especially clear this year - 2012 was declared by the President of Russia Dmitry Medvedev "The Year of Russian History". As of July 15 (exactly half a year has passed), no results of this Year have been presented to the public. None of the specialized institutes of history of the Russian Academy of Sciences has given neither the Russian people nor the Russian president any work, the results of which in some way shed light on at least some controversial moments of Russian history. And there are many such moments. Suffice it to say that we "officially" do not know anything from the history of our people, which clearly took place even earlier than the 9-10th centuries of our era. To this day, the "official" historical science forces us to teach our children using historical materials formed in the 18-19 centuries. And besides,that such materials were openly concocted by persons who in those years took an openly criminal position towards Russia. We do not specifically name any historical names here, because this article is intended for historians who, of course, must independently recognize the characters described in it.
Political aspects of falsifying history
For example, what achievements in the history of the Russian language have recently been issued by specialized institutes for the study of the Russian language? Almost none. We still do not know the time of the emergence of the Russian language, nor the place, nor the trajectory of its development. All data about our native language is still generated within the walls of foreign intelligence services and the academies and universities under their control. And in these conditions, still some "scientists" of the corresponding origin give out fables about the fact that the Russian language, allegedly, was formed in the Middle East. Other "scientists" sing along with them and lead the "ancestral home" of the Russian language beyond the lands occupied by the Russian state today.
This is done in order to form in the minds of Russians the confidence that the Russian people are newcomers to Russian territory. The calculations of such “scientists”, controlled and directed by the special services of states hostile to Russia, have the following final goal: “The Russian people must become convinced that they are a stranger on Russian soil, that the Asians have given them their language, and now the time has come for the Russian people to return all territories to peoples that are much more ancient than Russian."
Promotional video:
Thus, historical linguistics and history are in the hands of skilled executioners a weapon of mass destruction, capable of clearing the Russian expanses of the Russian people, who are so intractable and so invincible with conventional weapons. And if such a - historical - victory over the consciousness of the Russian people takes place, then foreign companies and foreign conquerors, formed from peoples exclusively "friendly" to us, will only have to persistently ask to free "their" "historical" homelands from our presence.
Tatar falsification of Russian history
Let us give just one example of the conduct of real combat operations by means of a historical war. We are talking about an invented people - "Tatars" - and about their "homeland" invented by historians, which today is criminally identified with the territories of the Russian Volga region. Today, the Tatars are expelling the Russian people from this territory, switching to the Tatar language, in general, engaging in illegal activities that violate the Russian Constitution and aimed at segregating the Central Russian lands. This is how it all happened and is happening.
In 2005, the Tatar diaspora summed up the historical "evidence" to date "their" capital - Kazan. As a result, the Tatars officially celebrated the millennium of this Russian city. That is, the Russian city of Kazan, according to the "new historical" data obtained by the Tatars, was founded in 1005. This fact does not particularly disturb us. We are outraged that the Russian city of Kazan is now presented with the status of a 1000-year-old city as the capital of the Tatar ethnos.
But back in the 19th century Tatars were called “a number of peoples of Turkic origin, with an admixture of Mongolian elements speaking the Turkic language … In the 5th century. under the name Tata or Tatana (hence, probably, the word Tatars comes from) the Chinese meant a Mongol tribe that lived in the northeastern part of Mongolia and partly in Manchuria, between the rivers Khalkha, Karulen and Sungari. In the XI century. the Tatars were conquered by the Tungus and partly moved to southwestern Mongolia. " In the XII century. Genghis Khan formed in Central Asia a powerful kingdom of many Turkic peoples, who became known as Tatars, and the Mongolian element and language were absorbed by the Turkic. In 1223 one of the detachments of Genghis Khan penetrated the Caucasus. Another part of the Tatars defeated the Polovtsian and Russian princes at the Kalka River. Genghis Khan's successor sent his nephew Batu to conquer the Western countries; 1237 Tatars conquered Russia, defeated Hungary and Poland; but further movement to the west was blocked by the militia of the Czech king and the dukes of Austria and Carinthia. The Tatars turned back and founded the Golden Horde on the Volga, from which the Crimean, Astrakhan and Kazan khanates emerged. In the XVI century. in Siberia, an independent khanate was founded by the Tatars who lived along the Ob, Irtysh, Tavda, Ingul and their tributaries; it was conquered by Yermak "[Brockhaus and Efron, 1909].in Siberia, an independent khanate was founded by the Tatars who lived along the Ob, Irtysh, Tavda, Ingul and their tributaries; it was conquered by Yermak "[Brockhaus and Efron, 1909].in Siberia, an independent khanate was founded by the Tatars who lived along the Ob, Irtysh, Tavda, Ingul and their tributaries; it was conquered by Yermak "[Brockhaus and Efron, 1909].
We naturally understand that in the 19th century historians were specialists capable of understanding the scientific component of the historical sources available to them. Therefore, there can be no doubt about the fairness of the above. And this means that the Tatars appeared on the Volga and began to establish something only in the 13th century. In this regard, it becomes obvious that for three centuries the Tatars attributed Kazan to “their” Kazan unnecessarily, although more precisely, for the first three centuries Kazan was not a Tatar city, and Kazan was not founded by Tatars.
After the gift of the Soviet government, which handed out the primordially Russian lands left and right, outstanding specialists in the history of the Tatars R. G. Mukhamedov and A. Kh. Khalikov wrote the following: “Tatars, the main population of the Tatar ASSR (1536 thousand people. 1970, census). The language of the Turkic group of the Altai family of languages. For the first time the ethnonym "Tatars" appeared among the Mongol tribes who roamed in the 6-9 centuries. southeast of Lake Baikal. In the 13th century. with the Mongol-Tatar invasion the name “Tatars” became known in Europe. In the 13-14 centuries. it was extended to some of the peoples of Eurasia that were part of the Golden Horde. In the 16-19 centuries. In Russian sources, many Turkic-speaking and some other peoples who lived on the outskirts of the Russian state (Azerbaijanis, a number of peoples of the North Caucasus, Central Asia, the Volga region, etc.) began to be called Tatars. For some of them, the name of the Tatars became an ethnonym … In the 15-16 centuries, during the existence of separate feudal states (Kazan, Astrakhan, Crimean, Siberian and other khanates), separate groups of Tatars were formed - the Middle Volga region and the Urals (Kazan Tatars, Mishars), Astrakhan, Siberian, Crimean, etc. " [TSB].
We see that for more than a century the position of historians has not changed: the Tatars are a Mongoloid Chinese tribe that illegally settled on Russian lands in the late Middle Ages.
But after another, successful attempt to disintegrate Russia (disintegration of the USSR), the peripheral peoples snatched for themselves solid chunks of "their ancestral" Russian lands. But the Tatars have not been lucky in this matter so far. Therefore, in order to make “their” history dated, they even went for a complete rejection of their own national identity - “the Tatars are direct descendants not so much of the Golden Horde as the indigenous inhabitants of Volga Bulgaria, conquered by the Mongols at the same time as Russia”. And this is not an April Fool's joke. On this basis, the president of the Bulgarian National Congress (Republic of Tatarstan) Gusman Khalilov appealed to the European Court of Human Rights and demanded that the Tatars be renamed into Bulgars [Kommersant-Idiatullin, 2000]. The court did not support the Tatar joke.
It was an example of active expansion of various peoples aimed at re-shaping their history and the history of Russia. And the criminal intent here consists in falsifying the history of the Tatars to form the Tatars the right on the territory of another people - the Russian.
Falsification of the history of the Russian city of Kazan
The fact that the Tatar diaspora "set" the date of foundation of Kazan at the level of 1005 speaks not only of falsification of the age of this Russian city. This action reveals all the cynicism of the "official" historians with which they approach the purity of their subject. If in newspapers, on television and on radio "official" historians choke with indignation at the "unprofessional" study of history, then at gatherings paid for by national criminal gangs these same "official" historians blow into the same pipe, in common with criminals who really falsify history. Again, we will not name the names, they can be found from the official collection of the conference, the one at which the age of the Russian city of Kazan was established.
But there would have been no Kazan falsification if at least one of several dozen professional historians who attended that conference stood up and simply read a quote from the Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary: “The foundation of Kazan is attributed to the second half of the 12th century; in our chronicles the city is mentioned for the first time at the end of the 14th century. The old town was previously located near the place where the village of Knyaz-Kamaev is now; the ancient settlement preserved here still bears the name of Old Kazan; in its present place the city has existed since the 15th century. " [Brockhaus and Efron, 1907].
Moreover, at the location of Old Kazan, there is a state museum - the Iske-Kazan State Historical, Cultural and Natural Museum-Reserve, which employs 14 employees, including 4 researchers. The average number of visitors per year is 6,600 [IKGMZ, 2012]. Old Kazan is located "45 km north-east of modern Kazan, near the villages of Tatarskaya Aisha, Kamaevo, Russian Urmat, Vysokogorsky district of the Republic of Tatarstan." Here, “on a sacred place in the whole Zakazan, there is a whole complex of unique historical, cultural, archaeological and natural objects that are now part of the protected zone of the Iske-Kazan State Museum-Reserve. “Iske Kazan” in Russian means “Old Kazan””[IKGMZ, 2012].
Professional historians could not help but know such "trifles". But, for political reasons, they kept silent. And this is understandable. But the fact that all their graduated staff at that unfortunate conference made an attempt to falsify Russian history, the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation should give a legal assessment.
Falsification of the existence of the Kazan Khanate
Another invention of historians is the "Kazan Khanate", which allegedly appeared after the collapse of the Golden Horde. In dictionary entries about this "khanate" the authors enthusiastically exaggerate "historical accuracy". For example, Kazan, allegedly, since 1438 (1553) becomes the center of the “Kazan Khanate”, and, allegedly, the layout of Kazan's streets was confusing and concentrated towards the Kremlin.
However, there is no written evidence of the rise of the Kremlin. And only in 1556, that is, after the disappearance of the fictional “Kazan Khanate” from the historical arena, 200 Pskov stonemasons, headed by Postnik Yakovlev and Ivan Shiryay, arrived in Kazan, and only by 1568 13 stone towers and a significant part of the Kremlin walls were built. Nowadays the white-stone Kremlin, the southernmost example of the Pskov architectural style in Russia.
It is believed that only in 1552 Tsar Ivan IV captured Kazan and annexed the territory of the Khanate to the Moscow state. However, no "Kazan khanates" and other khanates are shown on the maps of that time and earlier (see, for example, Fig. 3 and 5). On all maps of the existence of the "Kazan Khanate", "his" territories are included in Muscovy or the Moscow Empire. Moreover, all the toponyms on the same maps are Russian - there are no Turkic-language names.
And, naturally, they could not have existed in those days, since no Tatar language existed then. “Tatar languages are an outdated term for some Turkic languages. The word "Tatars" is a Mongolian tribal name that historically denoted the Mongolian commanders of various tribal troops during the so-called "invasion of the Tatars" to Russia. At the same time, apparently, this term was transferred to the Turkic people, which were part of these troops and settled in the Middle and Lower Volga regions …”[LE].
If we continue to research the "Tatar" language, we find that it is a language of only the Islamic religion (like Arabic today), which was formed only by the 19th century, and significant literature on it began to form only after the revolution [LE].
And yet, as the main population of the “Kazan Khanate”, only “Tatars” and “Chuvashs” are usually called. We have already shown above that the Tatars are a Chinese tribe that illegally settled on Russian lands only in the 13th century. But the Chuvash are the same. “Significant groups of Chuvashes live in Tataria and Bashkiria, where they moved back in the 17th and 18th centuries …” [TSB]. That is, the Chuvash did not live in Kazan during the “Kazan Khanate”, before their arrival there were still 3-4 centuries.
If you systematically process all the data, as well as study the ancient maps, which are now very widely available, then a picture emerges that shows the full scope of the "official" historical falsification. This whole series of "khanates", which national "outstanding" "scientists" are rooting in the primordially Russian territories, has taken on such a scale that it is no longer difficult to place a fictitious "khanate" in the very center of Russia. "Official" scientists are not interested in such subtleties as the distance of 45 kilometers between the old and the new Kremlin and the city, "scientists" are not even interested in the absence of language and the people themselves, to whom the creation of this or that "khanate" is attributed. "Scientists" are only interested in one thing - to sow as much as possible on the territory of Russia "ancient states",who would then generously pay for their secession from Russia with these very "honest" "official" scientists.
Falsification of the founding date of the city of Tyumen
Imagine the Russian side of history, which demonstrates the scientific impotence of "official" schools and institutions and thereby allows entire nations to cheat both with historical dates and with the political consequences of changing dates. "Traditional" history tells us that the conquest of Siberia by the Russians is a process that took place in the second half of the 16th - 19th centuries.
In this context, supposedly, it is “traditionally” considered that its beginning falls on 1580 and coincides with the campaign of Ermak Timofeevich with the Cossacks (1581-1585) against a certain “Siberian Khanate”. In 1586, a certain Vasily Sukin founded Tyumen, which is supposedly the first Russian city in Siberia and is supposedly on the site of the former capital of the "Siberian Khanate". In 1587 Tobolsk was allegedly founded on the Irtysh.
The map of Muscovy by Sigismund von Herberstein was compiled in 1549. It is based on the material of his trips to Russia during the reign of Vasily III. As you know, Vasily III Ivanovich was born in 1479 and died in 1533. He was the Grand Duke of Vladimir and Moscow in 1505-1533. Baron Sigismund von Herberstein (German Siegmund Freiherr von Herberstein) was born in 1486 and died in 1566. He gained the greatest fame in Russia and abroad for his extensive works on geography, history and the internal structure of the Moscow Grand Duchy and Kingdom. The visit (second) of Herberstein to Muscovy took place in 1526.
Thus, the date of the visit (1526), the years of life of the Russian Tsar Vasily III (1479-1533) and Sigismund Herberstein (1486-1566), as well as the dating of the map of Moscow made by him (1549) - everything is in full accord. So, on the map of Herberstein (see Fig. 3) there is already the city of Tyumen, although according to the "official" version, there were still 37 years before its foundation. In addition to this city, there are three more cities on this fragment of the map - these are Obelkas, Terom and Kumbalak, and there is also Lake China.
It turns out that the "official" version that Tyumen is allegedly the first Russian city in Siberia and was founded in 1586 by a certain Vasily Sukin is false.
Falsification of the date of foundation of the city of Perm
A similar false situation developed not only with Tyumen, but also with several ancient Russian cities.
This is how the Great Soviet Encyclopedia says about the founding of the city of Perm: “In 1723, on the site of the village of Yagoshikha (arose at the beginning of the 17th century) at the confluence of the river. Yagoshikha, a copper smelter was built in Kama with a village renamed in 1781 into a city. Since 1781 Perm has been the center of the Perm governorship, since 1796 it has been a provincial city”[TSB, Art. Permian]. On the map of the Moscow Empire made in 1600 (see fig. 4), the city of Perm is already present. Moreover, the Perm province is also designated, which clearly indicates the importance of the city. And this is 123 years before its alleged appearance!
We see the city of Perm and the Perm province even earlier - on the map of Tartary (Scythia) by Sebastian Munster (see Fig. 5), which he made in 1544 based on the materials of Sigismund Herberstein [Map, 1544].
Perm is also indicated on the map of the Asian part of 1593 [Map, 1593], as well as on the world map of Herbert Northern (Habrecht Northern) in 1628 [Map, 1628]. Perm and the Perm province are also indicated in the above-mentioned Gerber-stein map of 1549 [Map, 1549]. Perm is indicated on the map of Europe by Mercator, created in 1595 [Map, 1595], as well as on the map of Muscovy compiled by Gerard Gessel in 1614 [Map, 1614] and on many other maps of different compilers from different countries.
On the map of 1562 "Location of Russian Muscovy and Tartary" by Antoni Jenkinson (see Fig. 6) Perm (Permvelikaya) and Tyumen are also indicated. And all this before the "official" dates. It turns out that the city of Perm and the Perm province existed at least 196 years before the "official" foundation of the city of Perm, and all geographers of Europe knew about it, they put both the city of Perm and the province of the same name on the correct place of the maps, as a stable and large city, so large, that it had to be indicated even on world maps.
But the Soviet and Russian "official" historians, apparently taught by someone, were able with their insignificant attempts to find only the date of the "foundation" of Perm, dating back to the 18th century.
Is this a shame on Russian and Soviet historical science? Or is it deliberate sabotage of the "official" historians of the correct presentation of Russian history?
Falsification with the opening date of the Bering Strait and Alaska
A similar situation developed with the "opening" of the Bering Strait and Russian Alaska. Again, the Great Soviet Encyclopedia contains the following phrase: "By the time Alaska was discovered by Russian explorers in the 17th century." However, what exactly this phrase means is not clear. If the fact that in the 17th century Russian explorers discovered Alaska, then this is at odds with the following sentences from the same TSB article:
“By the mid-30s. 18th century, thanks to the expeditions of P. Nagibin, V. Bering, A. Melnikov, I. Fedorov, M. Gvozdev, the first surveys of Alaska were carried out, but only with the expedition of A. Chirikov in 1741 it is customary to associate the discovery of Alaska … " [TSB].
Another encyclopedia gives more accurate data:
“The first separate information about Alaska was received by Russian explorers at the end of the 17th century. On the map of S. Remezov (1701) based on the data of V. Atlasov and others. Alaska is depicted as an island. Practical results on the survey of Alaska were achieved in 1732 (I. Fedorov and M. Gvozdev). As a result of the expeditions of V. Bering and A. Chirikov (1728, 1729, 1741), the most important data on the nature and population of a part of the coast of Alaska were obtained. It is accepted to associate the discovery of Alaska with the 1741 expedition”[SEI].
According to the Western version, it is "customary" to believe that the first white man to set foot on the land of Alaska was GV Steller, a naturalist from the ship of V. Bering (1728) [Alaska, 1993]. However, "in fact" the first representatives of Western civilization who visited Alaska on August 21, 1732 were Russian sailors - members of the team of the St. Gabriel "under the supervision of the geodesist M. S. Gvozdyov and navigator I. Fyodorov during the expedition A. F. Shestakov and D. I. Pavlutsky, 1729-1735 [Aronov, 2000; Vakhrin, 1993]. In 1778, James Cook undertook an expedition to the coast of Alaska.
It is believed that the Russian navigator Se-myon Dezhnev, in his 1648 expedition, was the first to round the Chukotka Peninsula, i.e. 80 years before Bering discovered the strait separating Asia from America. In early October, the Dezh-nev ship moored to the coast south of the mouth of the Anadyr. Dezhnev drew up a drawing of the Anadyr River and part of the Anyuya River (a tributary of the Kolyma) and in petitions (4 of them are known) he described his voyage and the nature of the Anadyr Territory [SIE]. There is fragmentary information about Russian people visiting America in the 17th century [Sverdlov, 1992].
In fig. 7 shows a fragment of a map of Asia issued in Amsterdam in 1632. The dating is indicated on the fragment. The Bering Strait itself and the American land, that is, the coast of Alaska, were also recorded. The eastern bank is correctly given: the lands of Sina, the Chinese Wall, Japan, Korea are shown. This map was in use for 16 years before Dezhnev's mission.
On the map of the Tartar Empire, issued in Padua in 1621 (see Fig. 8), the strait is also indicated, both banks - Russian and American. Japan is shown below. That is, the main guidelines are given correctly. And this is 27 years before Dezhnev. The atlas of Abraham Ortelius in 1570 [Map, 1570] shows the lands of Alaska and the lands of the Far East, and the strait between them.
The modern "face" of Russian historical science
In the article, we did not specifically name a single scientist from that galaxy of "remarkable" "official" researchers, with the help of which national groups falsify Russian history. However, we will make one exception - for example purposes.
This is a teacher from Bryansk Arthur Chu-bur. To begin with, in 1991, he graduated from the faculty of ufology of a certain "all-Union school" "Basis". And after that he immediately became an "official" "academic" "scientist".
“But the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation withdrew his last dissertation from consideration due to the falsification of approbation documents by the applicant. I dug the Byki site in the vicinity of Kurchatov. The Kurchatov period of his work ended in a conflict with the city museum of local lore, part of the funds of which he arbitrarily took to Bryansk, roughly speaking, stole. For the activities of A. A. Chubura is characterized by a bizarre combination of extraordinary energy and dubious methods of field and office work, unfortunately, indicative for a number of representatives of the latest generations of Kursk historians and archaeologists”[Shchavelev, 2009].
In this regard, the journalists nicknamed Chu-Bura “Bryansk Mavrodi” [Gorny, 2012].
So it turns out that under the cover of the "official science" signboard, such chuburs rotate Russian history, yelling with joy: "Rashka in flight" (Chubur). But real conscientious researchers have to disentangle themselves later - and that is if the authorities hear them in time.
Discussion
We have presented only a few examples of incorrect dating of famous historical events - those that are studied in school. You are surprised to discover that the faith of the "official" historians is akin to religious faith.
However, if religious faith allows pastors to manipulate the most uneducated and gullible "sheep", then faith in the unclean "official" historians' hands allows the forces behind their backs to manipulate entire countries and their property. And these manipulations already concern not only ancient history, but also modern history.
In such conditions, experts in political wars, armed with "reliable" "historical" data, can snatch a piece of the territory of an entire country, evict its people, and seize entire areas with minerals.
And if someone thinks that this problem - the problem of falsifying history - is far-fetched and not entirely related to modernity, then he is deeply mistaken. The squandering of Russian lands under fictitious "historical" pretexts continues to this day. Let's remember the events.
Just a few days ago, on July 12, 2012, Russia presented Ukraine with the Russian island of Tuzla [Tuzla, 2012]. If the document on the transfer of Russian land is ratified by the State Duma of the Russian Federation, then this gift will take its legal form. Meanwhile, Tuzla Island was formed from the Tuzla Spit, which, in turn, was a continuation of the Taman Peninsula. The spit was eroded in 1925, but the Taman Peninsula itself, together with the Tuzlino Spit, was always located east of the Kerch Strait, that is, it belonged to Asia, and, therefore, to Russia.
And on September 15, 2010, Russia presented Norway with 90 thousand square kilometers (an area approximately equal to the size of Portugal) of Russia's maritime possessions. The State Duma of the Russian Federation criminally ratified the transfer document. In 2004, Russia presented China with several Russian islands on the Amur River with a total area of 337 square meters. km. And this "deal" was ratified by the State Duma of the Russian Federation.
But, perhaps, the most inhuman act from all points of view took place in September 2010, when Russia presented Azerbaijan with half of the water intake of the Samur River and two Dagestani villages along with 600 Russian citizens living there.
The worst thing is that no state recognized any borders of Azerbaijan, therefore the transfer of lands and people that took place is a doubly monstrous act. But even more monstrous is the explanation given by Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin, who presented the document to the Duma. He just scoffed: "This is how history ordered, we will maintain contacts with them."
Conclusion
As it should be in science, new data does not always confirm old theories. Let us recall at least the epic with the Earth and the Sun: even after the Christian Inquisition burned the bearer of the new theory, the Sun did not begin to revolve around the Earth.
So it is in today's history - the influx of national falsifications is literally tearing apart the territory of Russia, and all this is presented from an "official" position.
But truly wise people see that behind such clarifications of history there is only a criminal intention of individuals or groups, conditioned by the seizure of Russian lands, under which the “new masters” are trying to provide an “official” “historical” basis.
Andrey Tyunyaev