“The cultural layer is a layer of earth at the place of human settlement, which preserves traces of human activity. Depending on the life expectancy of people in the settlement and their activities, the thickness of the layer varies from several centimeters to 30-35 meters.
It is believed that the thickness of the cultural layer is proportional to the volume of vital activity in the areas where the layer was deposited. The cultural layer extends deep into the continent - strata that do not bear traces of human activity”- definition.
How can you imagine such human activity, as a result of which a “cultural layer” of 35 meters is formed ?!
To this "historians" will cheerfully answer us, this layer can be formed as a result of the fact that the population, for some reason, left the settlement and it was brought in by winds, rains, floods.
Now we will consider several examples that will show that the "cultural layer" is not a person's vital activity, but always the result of a catastrophe.
To refer to the fact that people have left the center of Moscow, the Kremlin, and even the most stubborn "historian" will not dare to cover it.
Archaeological excavations in the Kremlin.
Those same log cabins are not covered with the “ Cultural layer ”.
Promotional video:
From Meyerberg's Album (1622-1688). That is, what do we see? In the previous photo, did you dig up the house of Peter I? - these are his times, no "cultural layers" are observed.
Well, the walls, around these log cabins were surrounded by another wall, on which now stands the new Kremlin, built at the end of the next, 18th century:
When people left the Kremlin, what was it that brought it on top and new walls had to be built, relying on the old ones, as on the foundation?
Along the way, let's pay attention to the story that the Tsar Bell was taken out of the pit under Nicholas I. Interestingly: this pit was dug during the time of log cabins? How deep was it if it was dug from the level at which the log cabins stood and why is nothing known about the Bell's excavations?
In the very center of Moscow, near the walls of the Kremlin, the city's archeology museum has been opened. The antediluvian stones of old Moscow leave no stone unturned from the mythological version of the story that we were told at school.
These bridges, like those log cabins, were covered with a "cultural layer".
On the Palace Square of St. Petersburg, for the anniversary of the city, earthworks were carried out, in front of the royal palace there was also a solid "cultural layer":
The red arrow indicates, allegedly, Catherine's level of the pavement. Yes, only the lazy didn’t talk about it: the first floor of the Winter Palace was half covered with a “cultural layer”.
An underground museum, similar to the Moscow one, was opened in Polish Krakow. Here are the bedding sections:
How could the townspeople manage to litter the city in this way: for several generations they littered with clay, other generations with sand. How can this be explained?
In nature, this occurs:
I am not interested in how nature achieves this, it is obvious that she can do it, but here is how people can create something like that in the middle of a living city - only "historians" can explain this:
Even the chronology of the formation of layers is painted. Sucked from the finger, like their entire chronology of the "ancient world" and other Potemkin villages.
But this is from the city, which, allegedly. was not even completed - construction was abandoned, tk. the king died. That is, in an abandoned city, a "cultural layer" has accumulated above the roof in the literal sense:
Assyria, Khorsabad, Sargon's palace Dur-Sharrukin, 721-705 BC, The cultural layer is such that it is impossible to get through the gate.
Well, the Sphinx is an excuse that sand was blown there, at least it looks believable, but how could so much clay be blown up - science is silent, such a thing.
But the fact that the Great Sphinx was brought in for millennia, if you dig, this version is also bursting at all seams. Here is the Sphinx, covered with sand up to its ears:
But just a few years later:
It turns out that removing the “cultural layer” is not a problem, even in the desert, and now explain to me how this layer accumulated in Krakow, in the Kremlin and in front of the royal palace in St. Petersburg!
No, you understand that this whole story with Peter the Great, and Catherine the Great, who could not hire a janitor to clean under her nose, is sheer bullshit, a blatant lie!
So back to the Sphinx. So, the wind blew the sand?
Here is a map of Peter's times (Cartographer Guillaume Delisle. Carte d'Afrique. Paris: 1722):
Here is north Africa from this map:
Rivers, lakes, cities. Where did the sand inflate in less than a hundred years? Where did this "cultural layer" come from?
In fifty or sixty years, Napoleon will be sent here. What for? Fight? With whom - with this country? Arrived, guns on top, but what about this? Yes, in fact in Europe itself it was no better - look at the museums of Moscow and Krakow.
So the Suvorovs, the princes of Italy, the princes of Sardinians were running around in Eurasia, not at all for the reasons that they are pushing us.
Don't you believe these cards? And then what to believe then? Popular "chronicles" - "our land is abundant, go and Volodite"?
All that we see here are artifacts that can be “touched with our hands”, let naive Chukchi youths - Fomenko and Nosovsky and their followers - deal with the “chronicles”.
It is pointless to process completely dubious materials by methods of mathematical statistics. Taking into account such a concept as "wars" or "battles", we cannot determine whether the Napoleonic or Suvorov campaigns refer to them - these, most likely, were expeditions to take inventory of what remained after the disasters.
In 1814, Lieutenant Governor Stamford Raffles discovered a monument on the island of Java during the British occupation of the island during the Anglo-Dutch War.
They began to clean up (again the war, and the same years that Napoleon went first to Egypt, then to Moscow) - during the war, it is clear that there is nothing more to do than to clean the "cultural layer" - during peace this layer even grows in front of the royal palaces, but like a war - there is nothing more to do and nothing.
Much earlier than in Moscow or Krakow, the archaeological museum "Brestye" was opened in Belarus, not far from the Brest Fortress, where excavations have been carried out since 1968.
We found this under a multi-meter “cultural layer”:
Not bad preservation for centuries, isn't it?
But similar items were used by my grandfather and grandmother, found in the same place, in Brestye:
Shears, similar to those on the edges - I saw myself - they were shearing sheep with them.
So, excavation of the dominant version of history is buried in the grave.