Our artificial society uses techniques and techniques, thanks to which people have illusions in their minds that everything that happens to us is as it should be. The system of official knowledge about the world does not allow an ordinary citizen to solve problems in an unambiguous manner, which gives rise to work duties in an endless amount. My main task is to systematize everything and point out the direction for further discoveries. I want to share my point of view and clarify the situation a little.
First, I want to make a remark on the air. From ancient treatises and descriptions that have survived to this day, we know that there is a spiritual and material world, in which we live. According to the descriptions, the spiritual world is the primary cause. Everything that happens in the material world is a consequence of the events of the spiritual world. And today it is not clear to us what the spiritual world is. We associate it with something inexplicable. But we can still define the boundaries where one world ends and another begins.
Everyone will be able to understand this if they figure out the question: where does energy come from in our material world? For example, one man came up and hit another man and he fell. The energy of interaction is, so to speak, on the face. It can be calculated, measured and compared. What happens when smaller objects interact? When do deuterium and tritium collide? It turns out a thermonuclear fusion reaction, the result of which is the release of a huge amount of energy (17 MeV) and the birth of a new substance - helium. So, if we compare the interaction energies at the macro and micro levels, we will see that with a decrease in the dimension of space, the interaction energy increases. And the smaller the dimension we take, the more energy-intensive the interaction processes will be.
Actually, that's what I'm talking about. There is also a mention of the same ether in ancient legends. Ether, according to the scriptures, is a kind of borderline substance that delimits, separates the spiritual world from the material. Something that has the smallest spatial dimension for our material world. The most interesting thing is that this something, with its properties and interactions, determines, from the very initial stage, all physical laws, the diversity of matter and sets all the necessary basis for our world. And all the energy available to us today or in the future appears in our world straight from the spiritual world. By evaluating the energies of interaction, we can conclude that the spiritual world, in which, by the way, the true creator god or creator resides, is where the smallest dimension of the material universe ends. It is for this reason that one cannot fly to the spirit world on a rocket, call there, and so on. It is clearly separated by the dimension of space from our world. All the energy of our world, all those forces that keep matter from decay, all this comes from the spiritual world. And for example, it turns out that if the true god, for any reason, gets tired of supporting our world and feeding it, he will simply stop supplying energy here and the whole universe will disintegrate into nothing. There will be a quantum death of the universe. In the meantime, it has not come to this, we will understand the pressing issues and look for answers to our questions.that if the true god for any reason gets tired of supporting our world and feeding it, he will simply stop supplying energy here and the whole universe will disintegrate into nothing. There will be a quantum death of the universe. In the meantime, it has not come to this, we will understand the pressing issues and look for answers to our questions.that if the true god for any reason gets tired of supporting our world and feeding it, he will simply stop supplying energy here and the whole universe will disintegrate into nothing. There will be a quantum death of the universe. In the meantime, it has not come to this, we will understand the pressing issues and look for answers to our questions.
Ether is a mysterious proto-matter with various properties. And one of the most interesting properties for us now are electromagnetic properties.
You've probably heard of torsion fields? Scientists say that torsion fields travel at speeds much faster than the speed of light. Have you ever wondered: how can scientists know about the propagation of torsion fields at speeds exceeding the speed of light, if there are simply no instruments to measure such speeds? And they know this due to the fact that torsion fields are the cause of the birth of electromagnetic oscillations or electric current.
This is a visual speculative model that conveys the essence of the present process. The torsion field forms an electromagnetic wave when interacting with the medium or ether. And these interactions show the nature of the electromagnetic properties of the ether. The very fact that torsion fields create an electromagnetic wave means that these fields unambiguously propagate faster than the speed of propagation of an electromagnetic wave, that is, faster than the speed of light. In addition, in many places the term "Tesla's longitudinal wave" is used, it also denotes a torsion field. All alternatives talk about this wave, but for some reason they do not find it.
Promotional video:
What a complex and magically incomprehensible setup for working with torsion fields.
At the dawn of the development of science and technology
Tesla's main task was to lead humanity towards the technogenic, or rather the demonic path of development. One of the main directions was the implementation of the transition from DC machines to alternating current. This raises a logical question: "What's wrong with alternating current?" It's not about the alternating current, but what hides the alternating current compared to the direct current? To understand this and go further in your development, you first need to take a few steps back and remember where it all began.
Technogenic development is directly related to automation and machine labor. Various machines and mechanisms have always been received with a bang. In the 19th century, mechanical machines were already available to people using the driving force of water, steam and wind. Heat engineering and steam engines also developed. All of these machines were far behind the new electromechanical machines. Official science, namely physics, quickly began to study electrical and magnetic interactions. And laws and principles appeared, and most importantly, the calculations of forces in electromechanical installations for various purposes. Sections of physics appeared - statics and electrodynamics. Not much has survived about those times. For example, almost everyone knows such a device as an electrophoretic machine.
The work of an electrophore machine is very entertaining, and upon a detailed examination, one can also find knowledge about the world order ahead of that era. By the way, most of us have seen the operation of this device at least once, are familiar with the principle of its operation. But access to this machine is almost always difficult. You can look at her work, but the ordinary person somehow does not succeed in researching and experimenting. And actually and why? The principle of operation was explained, why should you double-check and question it? Moreover, the high potential difference of such a machine is very dangerous.
Nevertheless, the electrophoretic machine is one of the first demonstration machines showing the visualization of a new type of energy - electricity. Why did I ask myself about the need to check and recheck the 19th century demonstration equipment? Well, at least because in our beloved physics there has already been a case when, due to the excessive gullibility and inattention of the responsible persons, we received a whole law, which is not confirmed experimentally at all. This is the law of gravitational interaction, which we, by the way, study at school and solve problems using it, but it is not fulfilled in the real world. And there was just an experimental demonstration setup with attracting balls. Today we know for sure that this does not work and now let Viktor Katyuschik decide the issue of gravity.
Despite the fact that the Electrophoric Machine, in principle, does not belong to the topic of this article, I want to consider it, since we have touched on the 19th century and the topic of electricity.
The Electrophoric Machine (1865, 1880-1883) is 50 years younger than the same Stirling, and accordingly refers to the era when at the stage of the birth of science the foundations were falsified and the true nature of interactions was concealed. The first thing that catches your eye when considering an electrophoretic machine is 2 discs that rotate in the opposite direction. Rotation of one disk in one direction creates a high voltage charge of one sign, and rotation of the second disk in the opposite direction gives a high voltage charge of the opposite sign. That is, in this machine there is such a moment as the designation of opposite charges. The essence of this designation is in accordance with the following: rotation of the disc in one direction generates a high-voltage current in one direction, and if the disc rotates in the opposite direction, we have a current in the opposite direction."+" And "-" are just designations of the direction of the current and no longer carry any functional meaning. The second and most important point of interest in the electrophone machine is that it works on the principle that a variable electrical capacitance is formed between the disks, like the familiar variable capacitor. Actually from there the capacitor appeared. Meanwhile, the official explanation of the operation of this machine comes down to the principle of a broom - most are convinced that an electrophore machine with its brushes drives electrons, like in a comb, due to friction forces.like the familiar variable capacitor. Actually from there the capacitor appeared. Meanwhile, the official explanation of the operation of this machine comes down to the principle of a broom - most are convinced that an electrophore machine with its brushes drives electrons, like in a comb, due to friction forces.like the familiar variable capacitor. Actually from there the capacitor appeared. Meanwhile, the official explanation of the operation of this machine comes down to the principle of a broom - the majority is convinced that an electrophore machine with its brushes drives electrons, like in a comb, due to friction forces.
Have you personally ever or somewhere heard that it turns out you can get electromotive force by changing the electrical capacity? But Paul Baumann began to understand these issues and built his own machine - Testatica, which is a BTG based on an electrophoretic machine. Testatika has been energizing the Swiss inventor community since the 1980s. And today we see that there is an electrophore machine, but few people know the principle on which it works, and this principle is not used in technology. With the exception of a variable capacitor in radio business (I went through all the main radio components in my articles).
And this is how the fake scheme of this Testatika device looks like. The network is full of kulibins and, so that they do not succeed, they drew such a diagram.
We have deviated a bit from the real topic of this article. This serious incident with the demonstration of a gravitational installation that does not work in reality clearly shows the very artificial side of our society and, most importantly, official science. The essence of the science of an artificial society lies in a plausible explanation of the mechanism of circular employment of the population and public voluntary acceptance of this obligation. With this employment, a person is forced to work without results and opportunities to develop. That is, work in a circle, without a quality transition, without solving problems in an unambiguous order.
Back EMF and DC machines
I put forward the simple assumption that the back-EMF is artificially introduced as a result of obscuring the basic fundamental principle of the interaction between a magnetic field and a conductor. This falsification took place exactly at the time when the transition from DC machines to AC machines was carried out.
Let's take a look at the design of a DC generator.
A direct current generator of this design is already a finished design of a finished machine, in which nothing is visible and the design is not entirely simple. There are no transitional stages or simpler primitive devices before this construction. What I'm talking about is that there is no initial device that shows basic interaction and specifies what is technically feasible and what is not. Well, that is, such a generator is not essential.
The fact is that the direct current generator is designed in such a way that it does not change the poles of the magnetic field, as it happens in alternators. In this design, the windings rotate in the rotor and the magnetic field is generated by the stationary stator. In alternating current generators, on the contrary, the windings are stationary and located in the stator, and the source of the magnetic field is in the rotor. But obtaining direct current in a well-known direct current generator is achieved not due to the unambiguous interaction of the magnetic field and the conductor, but due to intermediate switching, thanks to tricky contact half rings. These ingenious generator contact half rings were used to convince humanity that there is no other way to get direct current.
Where is the most original, simplest model of the interaction of the magnetic field, which creates a direct current? Where is the design of a DC generator with stationary windings when a magnetic field moves? But she is not! Only the statement is used that a magnetic field produces an alternating current. There is an alternator of this design, but there is no direct current generator of this design. Really curious. What does the theory tell us? She says that when the magnetic field moves relative to the conductor, only alternating current is always created. And that this happens at any position of the magnetic field relative to the conductor. Let's try to repair the missing machine based on known interactions.
What we know about basic interactions for direct current
I want to speculate a little and see where this will lead us.
1) For the first model of a magnetic field formed by a direct current, it can be concluded that, for example, a looped magnetic field is capable of generating a direct current when moving, for a single conductor.
2) For the model with a coil, it can also be concluded that the magnetic field, oriented by the poles along the axis of the coil, should also give a constant current when moving along the coil.
Let's now deal with the back EMF. Modern electromechanical machines, namely motors and generators, are prevented from being more economical and efficient by such a phenomenon as back-EMF. This is the phenomenon of self-braking of electric motors and generators as a result of changes in the magnetic field and the appearance of a parasitic EMF, which generates a current or a magnetic field opposite to the primary action of the machine and increases the resistance on the shaft. back-EMF in simple terms, it is the braking force that occurs when an electromechanical machine, motor or generator is operating. In simple terms, back-EMF is a phenomenon that ensures the principle of efficiency <100%. The output is always less than the input. In the era of alternating current, back-EMF has long become commonplace, and no one has succeeded in defeating it. In official science, exhaustive evidence has been made that nothing is possible in principle, and you always give more than you receive, as official calculations showed.
Back EMF is also present in DC machines. Is it possible to defeat the counter-EMF? It can and should be defeated so that the input is always less than the output of the machine. And this is feasible at the level of an ordinary technical problem, BUT ONLY IN THE CASE WITH A DIRECT CURRENT! In the case of alternating current, the back-EMF is invincible.
To defeat the back-EMF, it is necessary to restore the original appearance and design of the simplest DC machines - a motor and a generator, about which there is no information, let's try.
In physics, there is no description of the conditions for the best operation of a motor or generator, as there are no initial models of interaction, there are only judgments arising from experiments on alternating current machines, which appeared after the main initial falsification. However, we will look at the best conditions for a motor and DC generator to show that in these machines it is not difficult to defeat the back EMF.
So. Let's define the conditions under which the motor and generator will be most efficient. What is the fundamental difference between a motor and a generator? In the motor, we create a magnetic field using current. It spins the rotor by repulsion or attraction relative to the stator windings. For the motor, it is the magnitude of the magnetic field that is important to accelerate the rotor. The magnetic field is provided by the ampere-turns of the coil. Either large currents or a large number of turns can be given there. And for the specific task of the motor, it is determined which is more efficient - a large current or many turns. The more turns of the coil, the higher the electrical resistance and the required voltage value for operation.
For a generator, the most important parameter is to obtain exactly the maximum voltage. The greater the value of the current, the greater the resistance to rotation of the rotor due to the emerging magnetic field of this current. Therefore, the problem of providing the highest voltage and lowest current is solved for the generator. This achieves the condition of the smallest back-EMF for the generator.
With the motor, everything is somewhat more complicated. We do not have original motor designs in which direct current generates rotation without pole reversal or any current switching. How to be in this case? And here observations of a very interesting phenomenon will help us. The phenomenon of obtaining DC rotation, which is noticed by ordinary people in everyday life. Science does not understand this matter.
And with a little reflection on these observations, you can also get the very desired design of the simplest DC motor. The gimlet's rule seems to be of much more importance than simply determining the direction of the lines of force in the current.
We have a condition for ensuring the maximum output voltage for all generators and a condition for a maximum magnetic field for all motors (direct current) with a minimum back-EMF.
If we now return to the electrophoretic machine, we can see that it just fulfills the condition for the best generation of electricity - high voltage and a minimum value of direct current - defined above.
Now let's depict a motor and a generator of a new design, we can rebuild them under the conditions of the best work in accordance with the given model of the interaction of a magnetic field and a conductor. Here is my point of view on the original design of the simplest motor and DC generator, which I believe were removed from the field of knowledge of our society in the past. It is important for me to show that you can get much simpler designs than those given by the official point of view. And these simple designs, not the fact that they are the best, but they clearly demonstrate the very principle of interaction. When the principle of operation is clear, further refinement is just a matter of time.
In the figure I give the basic design of the stator and rotor of the simplest DC motor (the rotor and stator can be interchanged): 1- spiral magnetic circuit made of soft magnetic iron; 2- Motor winding in one direction.
Since the maximum number of amperes - turns at maximum current is selected - the minimum back-EMF is achieved. The number of turns is not enough for a significant back-EMF to appear. Nevertheless, it is extremely difficult to completely get rid of the counter-EMF, but it is possible to reduce its influence, to make it tend to zero. In this design, there are no current switching and there is no reversal of the magnetic field poles. Moreover, the design is fundamentally simple.
DC generator with minimum back-EMF. The winding is made on an annular magnetic circuit so that there is no mutual repulsion between the layers in the multilayer coil. The output voltage is kilovolts at minimum current, which provides minimum resistance for rotor rotation.
Ha, if we continue and go a little further, and get rid of the mechanical movement in this generator design, we get a completely stationary DC generator. But this will already be a device that is known to everyone as a superunit transformer, and this is a completely different topic.
This design is very close to Stephen Mark's generator.
If the influence of the back-EMF is reduced to a certain moment, we will get a machine in which the ratio at which the rotor power tends to or is equal to the stator power will no longer be fulfilled. Such a machine will provide enough energy to spin itself. It is just that for direct current it is possible to shift the equilibrium point either towards the electric field, or towards the magnetic field, to solve this problem.
All these constructions are necessary to show that the interactions of the magnetic field and direct current are basic for the scientific method and only thanks to these interactions we can operate with the qualitative indicators of any electromagnetic machine. Change its back-EMF, efficiency, and any parameters we need. And in the case of AC machines, we drive ourselves into certain restrictions, frames. And these artificial frames do not allow us to improve our technology, they only provide use and maintenance. Meanwhile, electric vehicles, the generation of large electrical power or research - all this is associated exclusively with direct current. Even in power lines, direct current serves to transfer energy.
Thus, the counter-EMF phenomenon is artificially introduced to humanity through the official science and marketing of Nikola Tesla. This was done intentionally to control and calculate the results of human labor and the economy as a whole. Systematic removal of knowledge from a person through falsification and substitution of fundamental principles of interactions. A person is constantly forced upon a society of meaningless life. This circumstance must be taken into account, otherwise, inadvertently, through ignorance, one can accept the doctrine of one's own self-destruction. The energy crisis is fiction, the economic crisis is fiction. The system of economics is no longer a science of economic management, but is engaged in solving the problem of how to make a person a debtor, ensuring the maximum mode of exploitation. This article clearly shows that modern society and even official science,- artificial and have a bias towards humans. That a man is a slave and always owes everyone. Neither politics, nor science, nor economics have ever set themselves the goal of a person's success in society. On the contrary, a person is deceived, a person is manipulated in their interests. And these interests are anti-human.
P S: Under the condition of an equitable society, knowledge about the world order cannot belong to someone alone, but can be the property of everyone.
Author: GELEZNODOROGNIY