Cheating and treachery are the tricks of fools,
who do not have the intelligence to live honestly. - B. Franklin.
Children play in the sandbox. The kid growls in concentration, imitating the sound of a motor, pushing a plastic truck across the sand dunes. The little girl imagines herself as a mother or grandmother, and diligently "bakes" from sand for Nastya's doll "kulichiki". Suddenly, a neighbor's buttz comes with a huge toy tank and begins to plow the roads built before it and doll "pies" with plastic caterpillars.
- What are you doing? - Asks the kid with the typewriter.
- I’m EVERYTHING! - The alien declares with aplomb.
- You broke everything for us, go to another sandbox!
- Go to another sandbox yourself, and this one is mine.
- Why is this? We've been playing here for a long time.
Promotional video:
- And I played here a hundred years ago.
- Yes, we were here a thousand years ago!
- And I played here a thousand billion years ago! In general, my great-great-great-great-grandfather built this sandbox!
A familiar picture, isn't it? But it reflects the main stereotype of behavior of adults. In the above scene - the meaning and motivation of the falsifiers of history. People are so arranged that they do not even see what is right in front of their noses. Most need to literally poke a pointer into an object that is in a prominent place, so that this object is finally taken into account.
It makes no sense to write on the post “Don't get in. Kill!”, There is at least one who will definitely fit in.
But if a person from childhood is told that there is nothing superfluous and accidental in the world, he begins to relate differently to the world around him and the events in it. He no longer needs to point out the obvious. He himself begins to ask questions, and look for answers. He independently penetrates into the essence of things and events and, as a rule, searches for their driving motives.
The above example with a sandbox was needed in order to more clearly show how exactly the distortion of history occurs, and what motives are driving the falsifiers. Having proved their antiquity, people can earn very good money, and literally, in monetary terms. Take "Old Britain" for example. It clearly shows that the more a person boasts of his ancient origin, the louder he shouts about the purity of his blue aristocratic blood, the more true that all this is a myth that has given rise to delusion.
A modern lord, peer, mayor, or sir is ready to fight in blood, defending his belonging to the most ancient aristocratic family. He is sure that he is right, dad told him, grandfather told him, maybe great-grandfather managed to convey something, besides, there are ancient letters, correspondence, all sorts of church books, where there are references to his great glorious ancestors. But if everyone was glorious and great, then where did the bandits and pirates go?
And often, it was much more profitable to steal not the gold sovereigns, but the name! He put on a wig and a great-grandfather's costume, and for one hundred and fifty years the thief's descendants boast of the antiquity of their kind, and they do not know that there is not even a drop of blue aristocratic blood in their blood. DNA tests of the British have confirmed that their islands are inhabited by representatives of a huge number of tribes and peoples from all over Europe. Therefore, there is no need to talk about the antiquity and purity of childbirth. The vast majority of aristocratic families have no roots older than the nineteenth century.
It's that simple. But the antiquity of the family gives so many advantages! A peer will not count pounds from paycheck to paycheck, this is not a peerage business. For the same reasons, Europe artificially "ages" its history. How does it age? Yes, thousands of proven methods. One of them is to just take and burn all the books, and write new ones instead. The second way is to take and correct in the books what is needed in accordance with the "terms of reference". The third way is not to burn or transport anything, but to present the existing as desired. It's very simple, just take it and declare to everyone that the beech "I" is not "I", as it might seem to someone, but the number "1". To the question: - “What then does the letter“J”mean, you already have the answer. Feel free to lie that this is also the figure "ONCE". The people still believe in scientists, they love to be mistaken, they prefer to believe rather than know. While,when he is concerned with his own survival, it is easier to just believe. And shepherds use this.
Now the mechanism and reasons for the emergence of the “dark Middle Ages” paradox are becoming clear. Explain clearly how it could happen that after a person created perfect painting, sculpture, architecture, medicine, and even mechanics and steam engines, and then fell into a primitive state for a whole thousand years, and “forgot everything”, he cannot nobody. And assumptions that epidemics and war are to blame do not seem convincing. Everything falls into place, if we assume that this millennium was simply attributed. It did not exist in history.
And this hypothesis was confirmed by mathematical calculations and astronomical data by Academician Nikolai Morozov:
Nikolai Alexandrovich Morozov (1854-1946).
American astronomer Robert Newton:
Robert Russell Newton (1918-1991).
And the Soviet academician Anatoly Fomenko:
Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko.
But what about documents that do not have traces of forgery and do not raise doubts about their authenticity? - Very simple. Change the interpretation of what is available. And there are plenty of such facts. It is even possible to identify the most likely moment of the forgery in the historical chronology. Whom to thank?
Joseph Justus (Joseph Justus) Scaliger (1540-1609).
Who was he during his lifetime? Judging by the coat of arms in the upper left corner, he is a member of the Masonic lodge. Doesn't agree with the dating of Scaliger's life and the emergence of Freemasonry? Right. Doesn't fit. Especially when you consider that the double-headed eagle at the top of the stairs is the emblem of the Jacobins, about whom nothing was known until the French Revolution.
Further, it is worth paying attention to the list of Joseph Scaliger's merits to world science and European culture. One gets the feeling that this is generally a fictional character, to whom literally everything that comes to hand is attributed. Be that as it may, the history of Scaliger himself is very vague and mysterious, and the history of the appearance of works attributed to his genius is generally a mystery covered in darkness.
It appears that Western civilization owes its greatness to Scaliger. It was he who first introduced the concept of historical chronology in the 16th century (or was it at the end of the 18th century?). Previously, history existed as a collection of fairy tales, without any dates, just like the Bible. It was Joseph who for some reason decided that Jesus was born in the zero or in the first year, and this year was exactly when it is customary to count to this day.
Dionysius Petavius (Petavius, Denis Peto) (1583-1652).
Dionysius Petavius is considered the successor of Scaliger's works, and very little is known about him. But enough to know one thing: - he was a Jesuit. And the Jesuit order, as you know, is considered the "special forces" of the Catholic Church, which is known for its active interference in the internal affairs of other countries and churches, and for falsifying the historical annals of many peoples. This is how the history of ancient China was systematized and recorded by the Jesuits, who, by the way, came to the court of the Emperor of China from the Sinai Peninsula, from where they were expelled for their trickery and irrepressible enthusiasm in preaching the ideas of Jesus.
Therefore, we have every reason to suspect these scientists of deliberate, deliberate historical forgery. During their lifetime, people were still very well aware of exactly when Jesus was born. And the tradition of calendar counting was strictly observed literally in the literal sense, forgive the tautology. People specifically wrote "From the Birth of Jesus 463."
An enlarged fragment of a 15th century engraving.
Look carefully at the letter "I" in the word "DNI" (by the way, do Russian-speaking readers need to translate this word?), And compare it with the supposedly number "1". In my opinion, it is obvious that "I" is not the number "one", it is a letter, and the capital letter of the name Jesus. So, we get: From the birth of Jesus, 463 years.
engraving by the German artist Johans Baldung Green. Allegedly 1515.
The content of the picture does not require comments. This does not fit into the framework of our moral standards, but the date on the engraving is very curious:
Enlarged fragment with date.
Here it is already difficult to assert that the first sign in the inscription is a number. It is possible to compare with the real number "one", which is written between two "fives". The first sign is undoubtedly the Latin "I". This means "From Jesus the year 515". But today the date is interpreted as "1515". So, the sixth century was turned into the sixteenth.
The title page of the book by Adam Olearius “ Description of the journey to Muscovy. ”
In addition to the fact that the costumes of Russian noblemen do not really fit into modern ideas about the culture and religions of pre-Petrine Russia, the writing of the publication date of the book also attracts attention:
Can you really find the courage to say that the first character in the date is the number "one"? Then let's take a look at the completely disarming fragment:
Here we see two "i" at once, written identically with, supposedly "1". So what does it do? Where it is necessary, we believe in the number, and where it is not necessary - in the letter?
And here is an illustration from the same book. The number one in the date is absolutely identical to the letter "i" in the text, only without a dot above. Moreover, this is not a letter print, this is a lithography, therefore, the assumption of economy, and the substitution of letters with similar letters instead of numbers, is completely inappropriate here. And the absence of a dot above the i only means that not all dots have been placed yet.
Enlarged fragment.
With a large increase in the fragment, it becomes clear that this is not even a lithographic inscription. It is made by hand. Moreover, the date itself differs sharply from the text. The handwriting, ink, the preservation of the date, everything suggests that it was written much later than the book was published. It does not even require an expert opinion, such a crude forgery in front of us …
And after all, each artist has his own handwriting! Everyone writes this "I" in his own way. Here's a look at this:
Portrait of Maria Mnishovna (Marina Mnishek).
two moments. We are all represented as the wife of False Dmitry I by a certain Marina Mnishek. But Adam Olearius claims that he knew a lady named MARIA MNISHOVNA ZONADEM. But I'm more interested in writing the date:
Only a frantic dreamer can manage to make out the number "one" to the left of the number 609. This is anything but a number.
Coat of arms of the city of Nuremberg.
If, in accordance with the well-known method of identifying etymology, omit the vowels in the word "Nuremberg", you get "NRNRG". This gives me an association with "NoRy na BeReGu":
Nesting swifts in the river bank.
And in Nuremberg, in fact, the Pegnitz River flows, on the steep banks of which coastal swallows nest. Their nest-holes are very similar to the holes left by sharp stakes. It is probably no coincidence that "Peg" from German means "peg".
Why do I rely on Russian? Yes, because Nuremberg is located in the lands where the tribes of the Slavs of the Lusatians previously lived. Look at the center of the coat of arms! Double-headed eagle. Nuremberg was part of the Holy Roman Empire. Like St. Petersburg. And this fact is another confirmation of the fact that back in the seventh (according to the official chronology - in the seventeenth) century, most of modern Germany was part of one single political space, instead of with Russia. Therefore, the Romanov tsars were not foreigners, they are ours, relatives. From the South Baltic Slavs - the Prussians, Pomeranians, Bodrichs, Lusatians and Holshtins.
Is this the number "one"? No, it's J. From Jesus.
ANNO means DATE from J Jesus - "Jesus". Everything is clear without a translator 658 from the date of birth of Jesus Christ.
A fresco of the Swiss castle of Chillien, near the city of Montreux, on the shores of the Geneva Sea.
Russian Cossack in a red caftan with "conversations" on his chest, with symbols of supposedly Judaism, and supposedly Mohammedanism, what is doing there, in the heart of Europe? Now it is clear why so much effort and money was spent on distorting history. The entire "era of reformation", all these crusades, wars and revolutions are a chain of interrelated events, the purpose of which is the same: - a quiet "creeping" occupation of the outlying lands.
Enlarged fragment of the inscription One Thousand six hundred and ninety-seven.
Maria Miloslavskaya.
Well, who would dare to call it "one"? Here all the dots above the "i" are placed. It is clearly written: - "Date from" I "662". And it doesn't matter what the date is from, from Jesus or someone else, but not "a thousand", but simply 662.
So, everything can be extremely simple, and there is no need to listen to lengthy interpretations of scientists about the reasons for the onset of "millennial medieval barbarism." There was no him, that's all. And since it was not, then the whole story becomes simple, logical and understandable.
Author: kadykchanskiy