Fake "proof" Of Darwinists - Alternative View

Fake "proof" Of Darwinists - Alternative View
Fake "proof" Of Darwinists - Alternative View

Video: Fake "proof" Of Darwinists - Alternative View

Video: Fake
Video: Uncovering our Origins: Monkeys, Apes and 'Primitive Man' - and how Darwin got it wrong 2024, May
Anonim

Almost all paleontological "evidence" of the adherents of the religion of Darwinism is in fact the most real falsifications. And one of these most famous falsifications was the so-called "Piltdown man", which was used for a long time as "proof" of the existence of a "transitional link" between man and ape and the fidelity of the so-called "theory of the evolution of species" by Charles Darwin.

For many decades, this proof was used in school textbooks, many scientists blindly believed in it, not allowing even the thought that in fact all this could turn out to be the most real falsification and the main scientific fraud of the twentieth century (except for the NASA lunar scam). And how well it all started for Darwinists.

In 1912, amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson discovered in a gravel pit near the English city of Piltdown a jawbone with the characteristic features of a monkey's jaw and part of a skull that was clearly human. Darwinian scientists happily accepted this find, calling it "Piltdown Man" and this exhibit has been exhibited in major museums in the world for more than 40 years as irrefutable proof of the evolution of man from ape.

This fossil had very remarkable features: the volume of the skull was quite large, while its jaw was similar to that of an orangutan. This jaw had two incisor teeth resembling human ones. It is not surprising that this find made a real sensation in the entire scientific world. The age of the find was dated by scientists at 500 thousand years.

After this discovery, there was a real euphoria among evolutionary scientists. For more than 40 years, numerous scientific articles, comments and drawings in various scientific works have been devoted to this discovery. And at least 500 scientists around the world have defended doctoral dissertations on this topic.

However, in 1949, the English anthropologist Kenneth Oakley decided to try a new method for determining the age of paleontological finds. And a series of tests based on reanalysis have unequivocally proved that the jawbone does not contain fluoride, and therefore it has lain underground for no more than a few years. The skull, on the other hand, contained a small amount of fluorine, corresponding to an age of several hundred years.

When other scientists joined in more thorough studies of the "Piltdown Man", it was possible to find out that the skull and jaw belonged to completely different species - man and orangutan. At the same time, the human skull turned out to be about 500 years old, but the jaw belonged to a modern orangutan, who died not so long ago.

In 1953, Joseph Weiner and Wilfried le Gros Clarke of the University of Oxford conducted an even more detailed analysis of the Piltdown man. They found that the teeth were specially selected and subsequently mounted in polished dental sockets in order to make them human. Then, using potassium dichromate, dark spots were applied to all parts to give the find an ancient look.

Promotional video:

Thus, we are not talking about an error or scientific delusion, but about the very falsification and deliberate scientific fraud. Well, the blind faith of Darwinists in the dogmas of their religion for a long time did not allow scientists to take a closer look at this "find". And, as you know, no real "transitional link" between man and ape has yet been found, which casts doubt on the unfounded chatter of Darwinists that monkeys are supposedly the ancestors of modern people.

Recommended: