“As a child, I often composed deliberate nonsense and, moreover, always only in order to surprise others. Once, for example, I plucked many excellent fruits from the trees that belonged to my father, hid them in the bushes, and then ran headlong to spread the news that I had found a warehouse of stolen fruit.”- Charles Darwin.
It is believed that one of the founders of the theory of evolution is Charles Darwin, who expressed his views and the results of scientific activity in the work “The Origin of Species”. The model of the development of living beings proposed by Darwin contradicted the basic dogma of biblical civilization about the creation of the world and life on Earth. A necessary condition for the emergence of evolutionary theory was a significant weakening of the influence of the church on the life and culture of society. What happened to Darwin, for example, at the height of the Inquisition during the Middle Ages? This article will not address the criticism of the work done by the English naturalist. The purpose of the article is to show on the basis of biography and well-known facts: who and how promoted the Charles Darwin brand. Marx, Freud, Haeckel are the trendsetters in the life of world society, who formed their worldview on the basis of Darwin's work. Those,who promoted Charles Darwin and his theory received a powerful tool for managing the historical process in the 19-20 centuries.
“Since most of the people of the Middle Ages believed in God, and the Christian Church occupied a leading position in the life of many European countries, members of various secret societies directed their arrows against God and the Church. To destroy the universal belief in God, it was necessary to scientifically prove that the world appeared without the participation of a creator, and the Bible is not God's revelation at all, but a collection of myths. Then, through intermediate atheism, it will be possible to introduce our own religion, universal for all mankind. This is what the Illuminati and others like them "enlighteners" aspired to."
“To achieve such a goal, it was necessary to write a convincing work in a scientific style that would explain the emergence of the world without the participation of God. And such a work was created. Its first, trial part was published by Charles Darwin's grandfather, Erasmus (1682-1754), a member of the Freemason. But the presence of Masons in the relationship is not proof of Darwin's involvement in the conspiracies or goals of Masons and other structures. But this fact will still come in handy when considering Darwin's diary.
Charles Darwin's father, Dr. Robert Darwin, was a staunch adherent of deism, which denied Christianity, but did not deny the creator god. According to deists, although God created the world, he retired from his affairs, leaving people and nature to develop on their own. As a rule, supporters of deism, persecuted by the official church, organized secret societies.
Darwin's father was a Freemason. “My father told me about two old cases of bleeding. One of these happened to him when, as a very young man, he became a Freemason. A Freemason friend of his, pretending to be unaware of the intense excitement that the sight of blood causes in his father, unintentionally said to him as they headed to the [Masonic Lodge] meeting: “I suppose you won't be bothered by the loss of several drops of blood? " When the father was accepted as a member of the [lodge], he was blindfolded and the sleeves of his jacket were turned upwards,”wrote Charles Darwin in his diary.
Young Darwin was not distinguished by any ability and could hardly write anything like "the origin of species". After studying for seven years, he never finished school. He was then sent to the University of Edinburgh so that he could follow in his father's footsteps. After two years of study, due to poor academic performance, his father took Charles from medical university and sent him to a prestigious theological institution. Darwin explained his poor progress in his personal diary by the fact that the lectures he gave were boring and uninteresting. “The three years I spent in Cambridge were as completely wasted in terms of academic pursuits as the years I spent in Edinburgh and at school,” Darwin would later write about his education sincerely.
The Charles Darwin brand was created to introduce new ideological bombs into the consciousness of the world community. Most likely, Darwin's work was created by a group of scientists, and the name of Charles was used only as a trademark. There is circumstantial evidence for this.
Promotional video:
On June 30, 1860, the "Great Debate" took place in the building of the Natural History Museum of Oxford University, which made the theory of evolution not only scientific, but also a social event. The situation was fueled by rumors about the bishop's desire to "smear Darwin." Darwin, as always, was absent! As a result, the audience crammed up to a thousand spectators, ready to watch as "Darwin's Bulldog" (Huxley) will rip apart "Slippery Sam" (Wilberforce). The public was dominated by theological students and priests, who seemed to almost guarantee support for whatever the bishop said. In practice, however, Huxley's caustic remarks made no less impression on the audience.
Often during public speeches, Darwin did not remember certain moments of his own work. He referred to poor memory and opened the book for citation. Apparently, the "author" not only did not write, but also did not read these atheistic works concocted by technologists from science very well. Most likely, the real Darwin exists only in his autobiography, which has been written in abundance all over the world.
Who is Huxley, who spoke instead of Darwin, zealously defending the theory of evolution? "Darwin's Bulldog" Huxley is the founder of the secret club "X-club", to which Darwin and many other scientists were invited as guests. The club also had a neighbor, friend and one of the first to read Darwin's manuscript - the influential banker, MP John Lubbock. With such powerful club members and bankers' money, it was not difficult to spread Darwin's theory. All members of the X-club, except Spencer, were members of the Royal Society.
To implement their ideas, X-club members purchased the weekly Reader, with the help of Lubbock, Rolleston, Busk and Carpenter. The magazine was pro-Darwinian. The X-club's influence peaked in 1873-85, when Hooker, Spottishwood and Huxley were alternately presidents of the Royal Society.
Let's go back to the history of the creation of Darwin's theory. In order to promote Darwin's authority as a scientist, he was credited with some discoveries in the field of various sciences. Then, for reliable material confirmation of the high research, Charles was sent on a long voyage around the world in the Beagle. Although Darwin's work could have been successfully written while sitting in London, this journey added scientific weight to him. And to refute it, someone would have to repeat a similar journey. Returning from a trip on October 2, 1836, Darwin began to process the material he had collected. His collections have been processed by Owen (fossil mammals), Waterhaus (modern mammals), Gould (birds), Bellem (reptiles and amphibians), and Jennins (insects); this general work has been published under the title The Zoology of Travel. Darwin himself took over the processing of the geological material.
Now attention! During the trip in the Beagle, Darwin made an entry in his diary: “Towards the end of the trip, when we were on Ascension Island, I received a letter from the sisters, in which they said that Sedgwick had visited his father and said that I would take a place among distinguished people. science. Then I could not understand how he managed to find out anything about my works, but I heard (but it seems, later) that Hensloh reported some of my letters to him in the Cambridge Philosophical Society and printed them for distribution to a limited circle of people . What can be added here? Father-Mason agreed!
Not surprisingly, the distribution of Darwin's book progressed at a tremendous pace. From Charles' diary: “From the first moment she was extremely successful. The first small edition of 1,250 copies sold out on the day it was published, and shortly thereafter, the second edition of 3,000 copies. Until now (1876) sixteen thousand copies have been sold in England, and given how difficult this book is to read, it must be admitted that this is a large number. It has been translated into almost all European languages, even into Spanish, Czech, Polish and Russian. According to Miss Byrd, it has also been translated into Japanese and is being widely studied in Japan. Even in the Hebrew language, an essay appeared about her, proving that my theory is contained in the Old Testament! Downright a bestseller. And tell me:is this possible without attracting huge capital and a large-scale PR company?
In Russia, Darwin's new book appeared even earlier than in England. An amazing fact, isn't it? But as soon as the church censorship got acquainted with the work on the origin of man, the already published copies were confiscated. Fifteen years later, censorship thwarted an attempt by the editorial board of the Nauchnoye Obozreniye journal to publish Charles Darwin's book "The Origin of Man and Sexual Selection" as an appendix to the journal. The rest of biology lovers had to either read the book in the original, or look for references to it in illegal literature. Darwin's theory had tremendous ideological significance in preparing Russian society for the liquidation of the monarchy, for atheism, Marxism and, as a consequence, the great [Jewish] October Revolution.
The ideologist of the world socialist revolution Karl Marx admitted that he owes his main ideas to Darwin: “Darwin's book is very important; it serves as the basis for my idea of natural selection in class struggle throughout history … it [Darwin's book] not only dealt the death blow to 'teleology' in natural science, but also empirically explained its rational meaning. Both Marx and Darwin saw struggle as the driving force of progress.
For Adolf Hitler, evolution was the most important criterion of contemporary science, and his "views on history, politics, religion, Christianity, nature, eugenics, science, art and evolution … mostly coincided with the views of the Darwinist Ernst Haeckel." In Darwin's biological theory, Hitler found the most powerful weapon against traditional values. Evidence for these claims can be found in Adolf Hitler's famous book Mein Kampf (My Struggle), which emphasizes Darwinian “struggle for existence” and “survival of the fittest”.
PR instantly made Charles Darwin, as they say now, a "star" - in a short time he was known as the greatest scientist of all times and peoples. His unqualified observations began to be considered a scientific standard, and moreover, a new religious dogma, apostasy from which was declared heresy, and methods much more sophisticated than just burning at the stake began to be applied to heretics. They stopped looking for the truth - they began to create it.
Marx, Freud, Haeckel - grew their ideas on the basis of pseudoscientific work by Charles Darwin. Darwin's theory has become a powerful tool in achieving global goals. Who paid for the order and promoted Darwin: Masons, bankers, world government - it is hardly possible to find out. But they managed to get on the trail and show the purposeful advancement of evolutionary theory.
***
Darwin's theory of the development of organic forms appeared at the time of the heyday of capitalism. The many-sided owner of the means of production and the accumulator banker saw in the Englishman and navigator Darwin the commodity messiah. From their point of view, the scientist proposed a life-giving seed from which the ideology of the modern Western world sprouted. It turned out that the initial capital, earned by the robbery of colonies, piracy, the slave trade, the genocide of backward peoples and outright crime, was removed from the blow by Darwin's theory.
