Many physicists, dreamers and inventors are looking for the very technology that will allow the effect of anti-gravity flight. But the attempts are still in vain. As a curious researcher of gravity, I am also trying to find this "holy grail" in the field of physics.
We live in a world where something is always happening: flies, falls, hits, rotates, etc. We are used to ordinary things. For example, a motorcyclist is driving. It is usual for us that when making a turn, a motorcyclist bends his iron horse so as not to fall. Or we will take a bucket with a tied rope, and early in the morning, in shorts and a T-shirt, in rubber boots on bare feet, we will stand in the middle of the garden and we will twist it around us. It is logical to assume that while the orderlies are driving, some unknown force, which physicists called centrifugal, will pull the rope with a bucket.
It seems to us a common thing, but we did not wonder why this is happening, what is the reason for this behavior of objects.
Let's describe this situation more abstractly. Let our man be object A, and the bucket is object B. We replace the rope with a spring. Let's place our objects in empty space, and fix the frame of reference for our objects. So what do we get.
At rest, the spring connecting the objects will not be stressed, that is, no force will act on the spring (gravitational forces are small, we will not take them into account). An external observer, not connected with the reference system of objects, will slowly spin them around a common center of mass. Obviously, the spring will begin to stretch. An observer in the reference frame of objects will find that for some reason, the objects will start repelling each other.
Let's return to our vegetable garden, where the man is still spinning the bucket on the rope. According to my hypothesis, all the forces that exist in nature are the result of the curvature of space, its stretching, compression or twisting.
In the case of rotating objects, space is curved due to the fact that we are forced to change the direction of the likely propagation of particles of matter in space. And since the particles themselves, according to the hypothesis, are local distortions of space itself, then a change in the direction of motion of these particles leads to the appearance of temporary stretching of the cells of space in which these particles will try to stay.
Promotional video:
Analyzing my reflections in terms of inertia, I came to the conclusion that each elementary particle in the form of a local distortion of the space-time structure should be associated with some asymmetric shape, like a drop, which will show the direction of its propagation. For example, let's take an electron.
As an illustration, the shapes of elementary particles, which represent a local simultaneously compressed and stretched state of a spatial grid, which can flow over it without loss.
Maybe this comparison is trite, and everything looks somehow different, but the essence of the idea is that if you take a snapshot of a moving particle, then by its shape you can determine not only its type (quark, lepton or boson), but also the speed and direction of distribution.
Every time the direction of propagation of a particle changes, it changes its shape. As a result, in rotating bodies, a forced small transformation of the forms of each particle and its direction constantly occurs, which leads to the appearance of a gradient of the stretched-compressed state of space around the object of rotation, which forces the particles of the body to rush into the outer regions.
In the case of uniform rotation, the work is not performed, because in the rotating object, in one half, there is a reserve of energy, and in the other half, it is expended, as a result of which the balance of energies is zero and no external work is performed.
To summarize, regarding anti-gravity, we can say that every day we are faced with additional forces that could be used to our advantage. However, the problem is that these forces are always born in pairs: in different directions and in the same ratio. This is evidenced by Newton's Third Law, which does not allow us to break this rule. Hopefully someday we will find a loophole to learn how to fly without wings and jet engines.
Newton's third law for jet propulsion.
Hopefully it was clear what I mean by describing inertia and centrifugal force and what stops us from using them as lift.
In any case, you can ask a question, I will try to answer, or maybe you have your own ideas on how to outwit Newton's Third Law.
Mikhail N. Brovkin.