On July 18, 2020, at about 8 a.m. local time in the French city of Nantes, the Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul caught fire:
According to the French media, the cathedral received much less damage than the Notre-Dame-de-Paris, which burned down in April 2019, nevertheless, the damage to the internal structure turned out to be colossal and the cathedral will stop working for many years.
If this were an isolated incident, it would not have attracted much attention, however, in the last year alone, 877 churches have been attacked in France. And the map of churches heavily destroyed for one reason or another over the past four years looks like this:
Based on the scale of what is happening, one can think that in France and in Europe in general, some kind of massive campaign is underway to destroy the ancient heritage of countries. But what is the reason behind this is not yet fully clear.
Promotional video:
So, first of all, one can think that we are talking about preparing France for a single multinational global world, where there will be a common religion for all with single churches and a single “people”.
The global trend is already obvious and in historical films we more and more often see some Asians and Africans who are appointed to the roles of Vikings, Musketeers, European nobles and even kings. For the older generation, all this at first caused laughter, then indignation, however, the older generation leaves, and the new one was raised completely brainless, and many are absolutely sure that it was exactly the way everything is shown in the cinema and it really was. But films are films, and with historical monuments, you also need to do something so that they do not become an eyesore. So they do it.
You can also dig even deeper. And if you dig even deeper, then the just kind of indignation of the elderly Europeans over what they are shown in the cinema is not entirely justified, since a more or less real story begins somewhere in the middle of the 19th century - and maybe even later. During this period, many antediluvian cities were still under a layer of silt, and teams of court historians and linguists hired by the kings invented some peoples and their stories.
In particular, the future Finns, as a small group of the population, received their invaluable "heritage" only as early as 1835, when the first edition of "Kalevala" was published. But why the Finnish language is similar to Tatar and has nothing to do with the languages of its neighbors, "Kalevala" does not mention.
And in Russia, Vladimir Ivanovich Dahl was engaged in similar creativity, whose dad was Johan Christian Dahl, and his mother's surname was Freytag. Nevertheless, the tsars entrusted this foreign citizen with compiling a dictionary of the Russian language, which became a dictionary of the language only in the second edition, and before that was called an explanatory dictionary of some “Russian dialect”.
Although, of course, the Mongols, who first heard about Genghis Khan sometime at the beginning of the last century, were the most behind the times, and their historians are still puzzling over how half a million horses wandered, breaking their legs along the hills and through the taiga? Moreover, back in the 19th century there was no taiga at all, and even pine needles could not devour horses.
Others, the modern world with its stories and geographies is a complete fiction, created under the leadership of the ruling dynasties of the 19th century, who ruled Europe and represented one continuous friendly family. And on the throne they were most likely planted by some sufferers from the antediluvian world, who crawled out of the dungeons somewhere in Switzerland and started to create civilization from scratch.
Naturally, all this has not yet been strongly proven and only kind of a theory, but if the theory is correct, then who prevents the inhabitants of the dungeons from slightly reformatting the world in anticipation of another Flood? Mostly young people will survive, that is, people who have a minimum of information about the past, therefore, after the Flood, this biomass will be used to mold a new Europe, and old artifacts will greatly interfere with this process.
So, already now people are asking questions: where did the star-fortresses come from in the Siberian taiga, in Brazil and even in Alaska? That is, the building of modern "history" is already crumbling. And if a new historical paradigm is erected on such a shaky foundation, and some Gothic cathedrals stick out of the mud around the construction site in post-Flood Europe, the construction will raise questions. Here are architects proactively and bury the ends.
To top it off, they will also walk through Europe with nuclear weapons, so that nothing remains at all. After that, it will be possible to say that Africans have always lived in this area and hunted antelopes in the savannah, whose bones were then piled in the dungeons of Paris.
Thus, if we consider the destruction of churches in Europe as a whole, then the speech, most likely, comes from the cleaning of artifacts to prepare the rise of new historical paradigms of the post-Flood world or the world of the New World Order.
However, the Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul in Nantes is still a special phenomenon, since the cathedral is only slightly smaller than Notre Dame de Paris and not much younger. Therefore, its arson can be an element of some kind of occult ritual - just as Notre Dame de Paris was set on fire for ritual purposes.
But what kind of ritual was it and what can we expect in the near future? It is difficult to answer this question, since the conspiracy theorists have just started analyzing the problem and the search will not be fast. It is possible that in France something will happen even before all the facts fall into place, so we are following the development of events.