Who Is Setting Fire To Wuhan? - Alternative View

Who Is Setting Fire To Wuhan? - Alternative View
Who Is Setting Fire To Wuhan? - Alternative View

Video: Who Is Setting Fire To Wuhan? - Alternative View

Video: Who Is Setting Fire To Wuhan? - Alternative View
Video: Canadian scientist sent deadly viruses to Wuhan lab months before RCMP asked to investigate 2024, May
Anonim

With the beginning of the events in Wuhan, many videos came from the city, in which something often burned: skyscrapers, car parks, mountains of garbage and so on were burning.

Image
Image

As a rule, the reason for the fires was an attempt to self-disinfect the premises, in which people used alcohol aerosols. Sometimes this led to dire consequences:

Image
Image

However, it seems that either these fires are not so simple, or something has changed dramatically in the city. Follower account @IsChinar cites the following video package on February 13:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Promotional video:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

As @IsChinar writes, there are actually many more fires, but it takes a lot of time to check each video: when it was made, where, and so on. But even from this relatively small sequence, it is clear that something is wrong in the city with fires.

Whether this is due to massive violations of fire safety rules, to the inaction of firefighters, who are either sick or mobilized to fight the epidemic, @IsChinar does not know. And the worst thing is that everything is complicated by such incidents:

Image
Image

In the fight against the epidemic, the Chinese have come up with a very strange method of blocking entrances. As a result, when a building starts to feel bitter, people can only either jump from balconies, or suffocate from smoke, or burn in a fire.

In general, this blocking of entrances raises more and more questions today.

If we were talking, say, about an outbreak of plague or anthrax, which was found in a certain building, in this situation it would be perfectly correct to block both this building and the entire adjacent quarter, not letting anyone in either there or from there. But under these circumstances, we are not talking about some kind of bacteria that dies in the open air, but about a virus that spreads through the air for hundreds of meters. That is, a man came out onto the balcony, coughed, and the aerosol flew over the whole city.

In addition, they began to fight the epidemic very late, when the infected have dispersed not just across China, but around the world. What will blocking buildings give now? It will not give anything, and the most correct thing would be to blockade the city itself, and then - come what may.

Let people live a normal life in peace, go, who can, to work or to shop. Sooner or later, everyone will get the virus, so let everyone get infected at once. Someone will have immunity, someone will have a mild form, someone can and will recover on their own. There are no other options.

If someone is blocked somewhere, then HEALTHY people in the most important and responsible places: the personnel of the nuclear power plant, the military at the base station, some important workshops that cannot be stopped - like a blast furnace, for example. It doesn't take a lot of resources, it doesn't quarantine 400 million people. But instead of this, for some reason, people are locked up in buildings - as if the Chinese authorities have a task not to fight the epidemic, but some other.

For example, hiding the victims of the epidemic - so that people die in their apartments and no one sees it. Or even worse: the task of the Communist Party is to inflict the greatest possible suffering on people, and now invisible “Martians” are hanging over Wuhan and collecting some kind of exotic energy. And in order to have more energy - the pepelats decided to set the city on fire a little more.

Or maybe even this is the initiative of Comrade Xi, who decided to burn Wuhan - like Nero in his time Rome and, thus, eliminate the center of the epidemic and cover all traces?