The English painter, printmaker and illustrator John Martin (1789-1854) is well known for his biblical and apocalyptic paintings. But few people know that among his paintings there are, for example, landscapes of his native England. Also, he did not bypass his attention and the era of ancient civilization.
Of course, G. Martin was not, like G. Piranesi and some other artists, a representative of the trend that is now called "ruinism" - landscapes with images of destroyed ancient cities. And, nevertheless, he also has a picture painted in this style. And it is called just "The ruins of the ancient city." Probably, before the last disaster of the middle of the 19th century, there were many such ruins of the dead cities of ancient civilization in Europe. But the catastrophe, which covered the first floors of buildings with strange "red clay" and other sedimentary rocks, buried most of these ruins under this layer.
That is why, already in the XX century, during the time of B. Mussolini, during large-scale excavations, many ancient buildings of Rome were dug up anew. But many other cities were less fortunate. They were either destroyed by a series of wars inspired by the entire planet by the new "masters of the world", or they still remain buried under layers of such sedimentary rocks.
Moreover, the new and once again rewritten by the winners "official history" outside the territory of the so-called "Roman Empire" and "Ancient Greece" explains any antique buildings and statues "by the rulers' fashion for antiquity", i.e. to imitate Greece and Rome. At the same time, the data from the reference books of the durability of building and finishing materials are absolutely hushed up, which clearly indicates that not only structures and statues made of marble and limestone, but even structures made of granite are not capable of not being destroyed for thousands of years.
So it turns out that there was no "Ancient Greece" and "Ancient Rome" in the real past. They were the provinces of a single Vedic ancient world, whose civilization existed not thousands, but only hundreds of years ago. That is why the works of the Ruinists are by no means an invention of their imagination, but the transmission of information "from nature." The above-mentioned painting by J. Martin, who started out as a landscape painter, is exactly the same.
By the way, note that in addition to the ruins of ancient buildings and the characteristic pointed ancient pyramids, like the pyramid of Cestius, in the picture you can see the characteristic "bowls-jugs" installed on the stone railing near the ruins of the nearest antique building with colonnades. Anyone who has studied in more detail the topic of ancient technologies for obtaining atmospheric electricity and ether energy, knows what it is. I will not repeat myself, because I also mentioned this more than once. But the conclusion that can be drawn from this picture is that the installation of such devices on similar railings and on the roofs of buildings has its roots precisely in the times of ancient civilization, which actually existed not so long ago.
By the way, one of the main characters of this ancient civilization was undoubtedly the famous military leader and ancient king Alexander the Great. It is no coincidence that it is his statue in the city, on the Neva, now called St. Petersburg, that is given as a statue of allegedly Peter I. But only this famous ancient commander taught the war horse Bucephalus to use his front hooves as a weapon in battle. That is why only A. Makedonsky was always depicted on a horse with two raised front hooves.
Promotional video:
And think for yourself, how much you need to have a blinkered vision and blind faith in the tales of official history, so as not to see that the "bronze horseman" does not correspond at all to the inter-flood civilization of the Romanov era. You may not be aware that the false Peter always rode only on his beloved mare and wore European dress and sword, but one cannot fail to see that a person sitting on a horse has not only antique vestments and weapons, but is still bare and without stirrups. Can you imagine the false Peter like this? Personally, I can't. And confirmation that there is not a single picture of his contemporaries where he would be depicted in this way.
You know, John Martin did not pass over the topic of the ancient warrior king. In one of the paintings, the official name of which is called "Battle Scene", we see the image of one of the horsemen, which is characteristic of A. Macedonsky. Therefore, I think that in fact the real name of the painting by J. Martin was different. And it could not but have to do with Alexander the Great. But why is it hidden from us?
Yes, so that we do not get to the bottom of the historical truth about a single ancient Vedic civilization and about the true outstanding role in it of A. Macedonian, who founded the city of Elabuga on the territory of our country, and possibly not only it. After all, it was not for nothing that a statue was erected for him in the ancient city on the Neva. And once, I have already expressed a hypothesis that St. Petersburg is not “Northern Palmyra”, but “Northern Alexandria”. It is not by chance that it is located on the same meridian with the Egyptian Alexandria, and it was precisely this meridian that was the center of the entire ancient world.
This is perfectly visible on all real antique maps. And in our country, this same meridian, known as "Pulkovskiy", has long been the center of geographical coordinates. And only after the catastrophe of the middle of the XIX century, the new world "elites", who carried out the redivision of the world, made their own center of the world - the "Greenwich" meridian. And, of course, it is not beneficial for these new "elites" that we learn the truth about the civilizations of previous eras and about the true history of the world and our country. Well, after the typical example with the "bronze horseman", thinking people should understand that they need to treat the fantastic myths from the textbooks of official history critically and without blind fanatical faith. And more often include your own brains.