Back in the 1960s, Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov from the USSR Academy of Sciences put forward a hypothesis that in reality our satellite was created by artificial means. This hypothesis has eight main postulates, popularly called "riddles", which analyze some of the most surprising moments regarding the satellite.
Is the moon an artificial satellite?
The first riddle of the moon: artificial moon or space exchange
In fact, the orbit of motion and the magnitude of the moon's satellite are physically almost impossible. If this were natural, one could argue that this is an extremely strange "whim" of space. This is due to the fact that the size of the moon is equal to a quarter of the size of the Earth, and the ratio of the sizes of the satellite and the planet is always many times less. The distance from the Moon to the Earth is such that the sizes of the Sun and the Moon are visually the same. This allows us to observe such a rare event as a total solar eclipse, when the Moon completely covers the Sun. The same mathematical impossibility takes place in relation to the masses of both celestial bodies. If the Moon were a body that at a certain moment was attracted by the Earth and took on a natural orbit, then it would be expected that this orbit should have been elliptical. Instead, it is strikingly round.
The second mystery of the moon: the unlikely curvature of the moon
The implausible curvature that the surface of the Moon possesses is inexplicable. The moon is not a round body. The results of geological studies lead to the conclusion that this planetoid is actually a hollow sphere. Although it is, scientists still fail to explain how the moon can have such a strange structure without succumbing to destruction. One of the explanations suggested by the aforementioned scientists is that the lunar crust was made of a solid titanium frame. Indeed, the lunar crust and rocks have been shown to have extraordinary titanium levels. According to the estimates of Russian scientists Vasin and Shcherbakov, the thickness of the titanium layer is 30 km.
Promotional video:
The third mystery of the moon: lunar craters
The explanation for the presence of a huge number of meteorite craters on the lunar surface is widely known - the absence of an atmosphere. Most of the cosmic bodies that try to penetrate the Earth meet kilometers of the atmosphere on their way, and all ends with the "aggressor" disintegrating. The moon does not have the ability to protect its surface from the scars left by all meteorites crashing into it - craters of all sizes. What remains unexplained is the shallow depth that the aforementioned bodies were able to penetrate. Indeed, it looks as if a layer of extremely durable material did not allow meteorites to penetrate the center of the satellite. Even craters with a diameter of 150 kilometers do not exceed 4 kilometers deep into the moon. This feature is inexplicable from the point of view of normal observation thatthat there would have to be craters at least 50 kilometers deep.
The fourth riddle of the moon: "lunar seas"
How did the so-called "lunar seas" come about? These gigantic areas of solid lava that originate from the interior of the Moon could easily be explained if the Moon were a hot planet with a liquid interior, where they could arise after meteor impacts. But physically it is much more likely that the Moon, judging by its size, has always been a cold body. Another mystery is the location of the "lunar seas". Why 80% of them are on the visible side of the moon?
The fifth riddle of the moon: mascons
The gravitational pull on the lunar surface is not uniform. This effect was already noted by the crew of Apollo VIII when it flew around the zones of the lunar seas. Mascons (from "Mass Concentration" - mass concentration) are places where a substance of higher density or in large quantities is believed to exist. This phenomenon is closely related to the lunar seas, as the mascons are located below them.
The sixth riddle of the moon: geographic asymmetry
A rather shocking fact in science, which still cannot be explained, is the geographic asymmetry of the moon's surface. The famous "dark" side of the moon has many more craters, mountains and landforms. In addition, as we already mentioned, most of the seas, on the contrary, are located on the side that we can see.
Seventh riddle of the Moon: low density of the Moon
The density of our satellite is 60% of the density of the Earth. This fact, together with various studies, proves that the Moon is a hollow object. Moreover, several scientists have ventured to suggest that the aforementioned cavity is artificial. In fact, given the location of the surface layers that have been identified, scientists argue that the moon looks like a planet that formed "in reverse", and some use this as an argument in favor of the theory of "fake casting".
Eighth riddle of the moon: origins
In the last century, for a long time, three theories of the origin of the moon were conventionally accepted. Currently, most of the scientific community has accepted the hypothesis of the artificial origin of the Moon's planetoid as no less reasonable than others.
One theory suggests that the Moon is a fragment of the Earth. But the huge differences in the nature of these two bodies make this theory practically untenable.
Another theory is that this celestial body was formed at the same time as the Earth, from the same cloud of cosmic gas. But the previous conclusion is also valid in relation to this judgment, since the Earth and the Moon should have at least a similar structure.
The third theory suggests that, while wandering through space, the Moon fell into gravity, which caught and turned her into her "captive". The big drawback of this explanation is that the Moon's orbit is nearly circular and cyclical. With such a phenomenon (when the satellite is "caught" by the planet), the orbit would be far enough from the center, or, at least, would be a kind of ellipsoid.
The fourth assumption is the most incredible of all, but, in any case, it can explain the various anomalies that are associated with the Earth's satellite, since if the moon was designed by intelligent beings, then the physical laws to which it is subject would not equally apply to other celestial bodies.
The riddles of the moon put forward by scientists Vasin and Shcherbakov are just some real physical estimates of the anomalies of the moon. In addition, there are many other video, photographic evidence and research that inspires confidence in those who think about the possibility that our "natural" satellite is not.
Recently, a controversial video appeared on the network, which will be interesting within the framework of the topic under consideration:
Description for the video:
This video was made from Germany and was filmed over 4 days starting from July 7, 2014. It is clearly seen how waves "run through" the surface of the Moon, or rather a strip, and this is similar to how the image of the lunar surface that we see from the Earth is updated.
As crazy as it may sound, these stripes have been noticed more than once when filming with various video cameras and telescopes. I think anyone with a good zoom camcorder can see the same thing.
And how may I ask you, can I explain this? In my opinion, several explanations are possible, and all of them will not please the adherents of the generally accepted picture of the world.
1. There is no Moon at all in the Earth's orbit, but there is only a flat projection (hologram) that creates the appearance of its presence. Moreover, this projection is technically rather primitive, judging by the fact that its creators were forced to create a flat projection and that is why the moon is turned to us on one side. It's just saving resources to maintain the visible part of the moon.
2. In the orbit of the Earth there is indeed a certain object whose dimensions correspond to the "Moon" visible to us from the Earth, but in fact what we see is only a hologram - a camouflage created over the object. This, incidentally, explains why no one flies to the Moon. I think all the states that have sent their devices to the "Moon" are well aware that under the guise of what we see from the Earth, there is something completely different.
In favor of these versions fit those facts that have long been surprising for their illogicality:
- Why does humanity send spacecraft to deep space, but completely ignores the planet closest to us?
- Why are all the photos of the moon transmitted by earth satellites are of such disgusting quality.
- Why astronomers with perfect telescopes can not take pictures of the lunar surface in quality comparable to at least pictures from Mars or from earth satellites. Why do satellites fly in the Earth's orbit that can take a photograph of the surface on which the license plate is visible, and the lunar satellites shoot the surface in such a resolution that the language cannot be called photography?