Is it true why? I also understand when serious financial institutions are located in one or another economically central and powerful country. it is clear when the governing bodies of the EU are located in some EU country. But an organization that actually makes sure that in international politics all over the world everything is equal and justly cannot be in any one country, especially in the United States. It would be fair to hold meetings of such organizations in turn in different countries of the world.
And that's why…
The US Embassy denied a visa to a Russian chemical weapons expert who was supposed to speak at a meeting of the UN Security Council in New York with a report on Syria, a source in the Russian government told Interfax on Friday.
"The US Embassy denied a visa to the expert consultant of the UN Secretary General from Russia, Doctor of Biological Sciences Dmitry Poklonsky," said the agency's source.
According to the source, it was planned that on April 25 in New York, Poklonsky will speak at a special briefing during a meeting of the UN Security Council.
"It was expected that Dmitry Poklonsky will announce the results of the analysis by Russian experts of the report of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Fact-Finding Mission in connection with the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria in the city of Duma on April 7, 2018," the source said.
Those. if you do not want your international position on any issue to be challenged, do not let the representative of the country attend the meeting. It's simple. This is used more than once.
P. S. and yes, my long-standing conviction is that the UN is an absolutely useless and even harmful organization in this form for international stability.
Promotional video: