Part 1
The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by New York banker David Rockefeller, then chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank, and Harvard University professor Zbigniew Brzezinski, who later became President Jimmy Carter's national security aide.
“The Trilateral Commission, by definition, was founded in 1973 by private citizens from Western Europe, Japan and North America with the aim of fostering closer cooperation between the three regions on common issues. It seeks to improve public understanding of such problems, support proposals for joint solutions and establish a common practice of working together in these regions."
However, in populist political circles, the Trilateral Commission is seen as an overt vehicle for achieving a New World Order.
From this point of view, the "tripartite" are enemies of freedom and serve to establish a monopoly on world political power in their own interests.
Several years ago, the Trilateral Commission had a very short history and its intentions were difficult to detect.
Today, one can look at the history of the Trilateral Commission and more accurately assess its goals in the light of past political actions.
Promotional video:
Initially, in 1972, Rockefeller and Brzezinski selected 200 of its members around the world, including about one third of North Americans, one third of Europeans, and one third of Japanese.
In 1993, this figure in the world increased to about 325 members, called by the Trilateral Commission "outstanding citizens", but in fact reflecting an extremely narrow spectrum of world opinion and culture, a layer of absolutely no one elected and representing nothing but the personal views of David Rockefeller.
From the outset, the commission was called “private” and “informal” with the stated purpose of “bringing together an informal group at the highest level to jointly address the common challenges facing our three regions” and “to strengthen cooperation”.
In all Trilateral reports, one can find a confusion between “private” and “public”.
The Commission is approved as a private group, founded by a private citizen - David Rockefeller. However, its goals and operations are oriented towards public policy.
From the Trilateral Commission documents:
“The entire Commission meets once every year.
In addition to special thematic sessions and reviews of current events in our regions, a significant part of each annual meeting is devoted to the consideration of draft reports submitted to the Commission.
These reports are generally a joint product of authors from each of the three regions, who are collected at the consultant level in the course of their work. Publication follows the discussion at the Commission's annual meeting.
The authors are responsible for their final text. A separate publication is presented at the annual meeting. As a result of regional activities, informal works sometimes appear.
Each regional group has a chairperson and one deputy who jointly form the leadership of the Commission. The Executive Committee of the total number of members includes another 36 people."
In short, this group of private citizens is organized in such a way as to provide its collective views with significant influence on public policy. They meet, they consider, they discuss, they report and then publish their recommendations.
For what purpose? The Trilateral Commission is unlikely to spend so much energy and funds for academic exercises … The goal should be to set public policy guidelines for all governments in the world.
Further. Members are not elected - they are selected. The chairman of the executive committee, the committee that selects members, was David Rockefeller, who is also the founder and chairman of the entire Trilateral Commission. The whole structure reflects Rockefeller's choices, not impartial or representative choices.
This phenomenon has not escaped the attention of observers.
On July 27, 1979, KMG Radio, Blaforce Municipality, Iowa, interviewed George Franklin, then Trilateral Coordinator.
This author was a guest of the program. Here is a transcript of Franklin's response to the Rockefeller influence question.
Part 2
Depicted externally as a high-level discussion group, the Trilateral Commission is dedicated to the New World Order.
The most comprehensive concept of the New World Order can be found in Trilateral Co-founder Brzezinski's book Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technotronic Era, published just before the Trilateral Commission was founded.
Senators and Congressmen are members of the Trilateral Commission, which, given the negative understatement of the Trilateral's views on Congress, is somewhat unexpected.
Trilateral members also hold key positions in the White House, namely as chairman of the White House Republican Confederation, party organizer of the majority in the White House, chairman of the Democratic Confederation, and chairman of the Democratic caucus in the White House.
As a result, Trilateral members are at the helm of the legislative process.
The importance of this influence on the legislative process is revealed when we turn to the political ideology of the Trilateral Commission, as expressed by Crozier, Huntington, and Waisciuky in The Crisis of Democracy:
❗- the democratic system no longer meets the requirements of the time;
❗- the concepts of equality and individualism create problems for the authorities;
❗- The media are not subordinate enough to the elite;
❗- democracy needs to be balanced (i.e. limited);
❗- The authority and power of the central government of the democratic majority must be strengthened.
The highest administrative posts - Republicans and Democrats - are filled from a pool of talent under the Trilateral Commission.
This electoral process of filling top executive vacancies by Trilateral members was deliberate.
Before President Carter officially took office, many members of the Trilateral Commission were appointed, namely:
Zbigniew Brzezinski - National Security Assistant to the President; Cyrus Vance - Secretary of State Harold Brown - Secretary of Defense W. Michael Blumenthal - Minister of Finance; Andrew Young - US Representative to the UN; Warren Christopher - Deputy. the secretary of state; Lucy Wilson Benson - Assistant Secretary of State for Security Richard Cooper - Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Affairs; Richard Holbrooke - Deputy. the Secretary of State for East Asia and the Pacific; W. Anthony Lake - Deputy. the Secretary of State for Political Planning; Sol Linowitz - Member of the Panama Canal Treaty Negotiation Delegation; Gerald Smith is an ambassador-at-large to the nuclear energy talks.
All administrations since Carter have had a particularly large number of Trilateral members.
They nominally leave the Trilateral Commission when joining the government, but immediately return to the Trilateral Commission, leaving the government, the "resignation" is a farce - part of the revolving door "government-private sector" that retains influence in the small, like-minded, most elite group.
This is how Bill Clinton became "a former member of the Commission in the Public Service" when Clinton became president but returned later.
The Trilateral Commission invites only members with the views and goals of the New World Order.
Back then, President Bill Clinton was the ideal Trilateral Commissioner, especially as his entire career was formed under the tutelage and leadership of the New World Order (GBS Bulletin, October 1992).
In 1968, Clinton received a Bachelor of Science in International Affairs from Georgetown University. He studied there under Carroll Quigley, whose famous book, Tragedy and Hope, was published in 1966.
Quigley told the story of England's most elite group, funded by the Rothschilds and Cecil Rhodes, whose goal was to rule the world.
Rhodes established his own scholarships at Oxford University and Clinton, a devoted student of the New World Order mission, was given a Rhodes Fellowship at Oxford University.
There is another little-known side to Quigley's story.
Quigley truly believed in the New World Order, but was unaware of the dark side of the globalists until they refused to reprint his book; Quigley has drawn the attention of too many honest scientists and citizens to the shadowy side of the New World Order.
It is not hard to guess that Bill's wife, who recently lost the election, adheres to the same ideas. The very fact that the second candidate with the surname Clinton has run for the presidency of the United States over the past few years suggests that the electoral process in the Democratic Party is quite fixated and revolves around the same clans. The situation is no better in the Republican Party. Suffice it to recall the presidency of the two Bushes - members of the Order of the Skull and Bones, from which the history of the Trilateral Commission comes through David Rockefeller. In addition, Bush's brother ran in the last election.
What does this mean? This suggests that both parties somehow draw their candidates from the Trilateral Commission. In this regard, one should not flatter ourselves strongly about the figure of Donald Trump. Trump's business is not huge enough to believe that he won the election solely with his staff and funds. Surely both the Republicans and the Trilateral Commission gave him the green light to win. Any confrontation that we can now observe in the media that sympathized with Clinton is only part of the dialectical process that was described in the "Order" cycle. There is one indisputable argument - until Donald Trump is killed like Kennedy, he will in no way reiterate the plans of the Trilateral Commission and the Rockefeller circle.
The Rockefeller clan sits above the executive committee, and therefore above the Trilateral Commission itself.
However, it is naive to regard Rockefeller as an omnipotent dictator or the Rockefeller family as an omnipotent monarchy. This is a trap for the reckless.
The world is much more complex. The collective of those in power can number several thousand members who collectively seek to turn the world, and not just the United States, to achieve their own collective goals (we published articles about these people earlier under the hashtag Masons).
Specifically, the Trilateral Commission was David Rockefeller's idea and implemented with David's funds.
Here is an interview with George S. Franklin, former Commissioner of the Commission, by Michael Lloyd Chadwick, editor of the Trean Digest, published in Provo, Utah:
“Mr. Chadwick: Mr. Franklin, you were a member of the Trilateral Commission with Mr. David Rockefeller, Robert Bowie, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Owen. Can you tell us briefly how this happened?
Mr. Franklin: David Rockefeller gave several speeches in the winter and fall of 1972 at the Chase Bank forums in London, Brussels, Montreal and Paris. He recommended the creation of an international commission on peace and prosperity, which is now practically the Trilateral Commission. At these meetings, he did not receive an enthusiastic response and abandoned the idea. He thought, "If the Chase Bank forums are not responding favorably to my proposal, this is probably a rotten business."
Then he went to a meeting with Bilderberger. Mike Blumenthal was there, and Rockefeller said, “You know, I'm very worried … Cooperation between these three regions - Japan, the US and Western Europe - is really breaking down, and I foresee all kinds of disaster for the world if this continues. Is there anything you can do about it?” David then thought, "I will present this idea again," which he did and this caused a lot of enthusiasm. The next eight speakers said it was a great idea; we will realize it by all means.
And he took Zbig Brzezinski with him on the plane on the way home.
Zbig thought it was a very good idea and wrote something about it. Bob Bowie also wrote something. Upon returning home, David asked me if I would go back to Europe and talk to some people, more at my leisure, and see if they really thought it was a good idea. It turned out that they sincerely believed so.
David and I went to Japan in June 1972 and he spoke to a lot of people there. They thought it was a good idea, and we, of 13-15 people, gathered at his place in Tarrytown (New York). It was decided to go forward."
There is no reason to doubt that the process happened in any other way - at least we have no evidence that Franklin is hiding something.
But note that the way the Trilateral Commission is founded is more of a loose coalition of power, acting in rivalry and in cooperation, rather than a small, tight group of conspirators, gripped by an iron fist, led by the Rockefellers."
But even the Washington Post establishment newspaper has found alarming signs in the seemingly uninteresting Trilateral Commission packaging.
Actually, it is not surprising that the goals of the Trilateral Commission are not shouted from the rooftops, but they are implied from political statements, newspapers and positions, as well as the personal philosophy of those who are elected members of the Trilateral Commission.
Here are the Washington Post quotes:
“Members of the Trilateral Commission are not Trilateral People. They are members of a private, albeit not secret, international organization cobbled together by wealthy banker David Rockefeller to stimulate establishment dialogue between Western Europe, Japan and the United States.
But here's the worrying moment with the Trilateral Commission.
President-elect - Member of the Trilateral Commission. So is the Vice President-elect. As well as the new secretary of state, defense and finance ministers, Cyrus R. Vance, Harold Brown and Michael Blumenthal.
Also a member of the Trilateral Commission is Zbigniew Brzezinski, former Trilateral Director and Carter's national security adviser, and a bunch of others who will shape international policy for the United States over the next four years."
Undoubtedly, this statement was brought to the attention of David Rockefeller by the Washington Post, for by the 1990s, newspaper editor Catherine Graham (chairman of the Washington Post's board of companies) was appointed to the Trilateral Commission!
Although Trilateral control continued, the Washington Post made no further comments about “worrying” points.
This was the alignment in the White House in the early 70s. It has remained the same today.
The position of the members of the Trilateral Commission on the New World Order is known from their speeches and letters written by them.
When the Trilateral Commission met in Tokyo in January 1977, Carter and Brzezinski sent personal letters to the assembly, which were reprinted in the Trialogue.
The key phrase in both letters is "a fairer world order."
Does this underline that there is something wrong with our modern world order, that is, with national structures?
According to Brzezinski, yes; and since the modern structure is unable to solve the world's problems, it must be eliminated and replaced by a world government.
In the era of Brzezinski's technotronics, "the nation-state, as a fundamental unit of organized human life, has ceased to be the main creative force: international banks and multinational corporations act and plan in terms far ahead of the political concepts of nation-states."
Understanding and overseeing the philosophy of the Trilateral Commission is the only way we can reconcile the myriad of apparent contradictions in the information leaked to us in the national press.
Actually, the Trilateral Commission, it must be admitted, makes no secret either from its essence or from the goals of the New World Order.
In 1978, in an earlier radio interview with George Franklin Jr., then chief executive of the Trilateral Commission, these goals surfaced after questions from the author:
Sutton: Time-Life's Mr. Donovan has just been appointed special assistant to President Carter. Mr. Donovan is a member of your commission.
Franklin: That's right.
Sutton: Doesn't that confirm the fact that people from an extremely narrow circle are getting into the Carter administration. In other words, from the Trilateral Commission?
Franklin: I don't think this requires any confirmation. It is a fact that he chose most of his top foreign policy figures, I would say, from the people he met when he was on the Trilateral Commission.
Sutton: Well, then I can only say that every sane person is left with the impression that the Carter administration is dominated by a Trilateral Commission with specific ideas that many disagree with.
Franklin: Well, I certainly agree that former commissioners are in preferred positions in the foreign policy aspects of the Carter administration. They are members of the Commission controlled by us in every sense.
I really think that they share a common belief that it is very important that we work with Europe and Japan in particular, otherwise we will all be in trouble.
Sutton: But this shared faith may not reflect the faith of the American people. How do you know that this is not the case?
Franklin: I'm not sure if that's not the case. I am not someone who can interpret people's thoughts.
Sutton: In other words, are you determined to continue with the creation of the Commission, which, as you say, does not necessarily reflect the views of the people in the United States? It seems to me that you have seized political power.
Franklin: I don't think that's right at all. Anyone who creates a group for a specific purpose naturally strives to achieve these goals. We truly believe this is important when Europe, Japan and the United States go together. This is what we believe in.
We also selected the best people we could find as members of the Commission. Fortunately, almost all are accepted. The President was one of them and it so happened that he considered them really very capable people and asked them to be in his government, that's the whole answer.
If you are going to ask me if I am very unhappy about this, the answer is no. I think they are good people."
This was an interview with Franklin.
Part 3
Trilateral politics is global power and influence, politics best achieved through financial control.
The interest of the Rockefeller family and international bankers in establishing a world order, world planning, in solving global problems is a sure indicator of what they mean by political control, which can be translated into dollars and cents.
One of the most elite organizations fighting for global control, the Trilateral Commission has organized small companies of influence led by its peers. They facilitate more or less legal progress between contracts - government and corporate.
Anti-lobbying laws are so cleverly written and so easily circumvented that they are practically the only ones to convince the public that perceives government contracts as free of any influence.
The reality is that the revolving doors are largely controlled by Trilateral members.
That is, they are under the complete control of an elite, including such organizations as the Council on Foreign Relations (long-term chairman was David Rockefeller) and Yale's Skull and Bones (which included George W. Bush, Averell Harriman and other authors and pushers of ideas in government).
One well-known channel from within is Kissinger Associates, Trilateral Commissioner Kissinger and its founder and chairman is a former Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and a former US Secretary of State.
In this role, Kissinger was able to apply his solid knowledge in establishing and further using the necessary contacts in the business world.
Kissinger Associates takes significant money from multinational corporations to act on its behalf within the United States.
Kissinger uses his influence to advance his clients' affairs.
Another example of influence is the Carlisle group. The Carlisle Group was founded by David Rubinstein, a former minor league merchant banker, and is named after the Carlisle Hotel in New York.
The Carlisle Hotel is a long-standing corporate meeting place. The Carlisle Group holds most of the shares in firms that do business with the US government.
Day-to-day operations are conducted by former Defense Secretary Frank Carlucci of the Trilateral Commission.
Members of the Carlisle Group include former Secretary of State James Baker, a close friend of George W. Bush, former budget director Richard Darman, Treasury Secretary Donald Regan, Bush campaign chairman Fred Malek, George W. Bush, former CIA director Robert Gates, chairman of the Valuables Commission securities and exchanges (SEK) Arthur Levitt, deputy. Clinton's transition team director, Vernoy Jordan; and politician Bob Strause.
These are former cabinet-level politicians who have nothing to sell except their access to the government, that is, their personal phone books. All are directly or indirectly related to the Trilateral Commission.
Frank Carlucci openly identifies himself in Trilateral biographies as "Vice Chairman, Carlisle Group, Former US Secretary of State." Faithful Jordan passes as “Partner Aikin, Gump, Strause, Hauer and Feld.
Carlisle has great experience in enabling firms to buy government property cheaply - and Carlucci has spent billions of dollars in taxes on contracts with large military-industrial firms.
Carlucci, worked in all administrations from Kennedy to Bush, in many departments.
The Trilateral Commissioners want a monopoly, a world monopoly.
Therefore, a key fundamental statement should be kept in mind: Trilaterals are not interested in which monetary system works best or most equitably, or if gold is a more efficient monetary mechanism than paper, or which monetary system supports a higher standard of living for the poor at all times. the world.
The main aspiration of the members of the Trilateral Commission is the desire to rule the world economy (it should be noted that the Trilateral Commission is only the common tip of several icebergs. There are several such icebergs, and not only in the United States, but throughout the "Western world", which has already been written about in articles about freemasons and globalism).
This control is carried out through the so-called coordination of macroeconomic policy.
It is argued that the main purpose of this control mechanism is to preserve world peace.
The historical fact is nowhere recognized that such control always led to conflict; that the denial of national ethnic independence is a sure way to fight and bloodshed.
In Trilateral dogma, you will not find rational consideration of alternatives or weighting of options.
But you can expect an irrational struggle, no matter what happens, for control of the world in the name of globalism and the New World Order.
TC 14 report “Towards a Renewed International System” concludes that the 1944 Breton Woods system had already “come under increasing tension … and events triggered traumatic changes, namely periodic attacks on the dollar and floating exchange rates”.
The current goal of the Trilateral Commission is to build an international system, a world order based on cooperation and focusing on two aspects that require such cooperation: international lending; creation of international reserves.
The Trilateral Commission proposes to involve 5 to 10 core countries in the establishment of the new system.
The rest of the world will have to get along as well as possible.
Some ideas in this regard have already been implemented: for example, a new artificial international money, Special Drawing Rights (SDR.s), has been created for central banks.
The link can be traced between the international bankers of New York, the Trilateral Commission and the proposals of the Trilateral Commission in Bancor.
The profits generated by major banks from abroad are worthy of public scrutiny and are indicative of the division between their domestic interests in the United States and the global economy.
The degree of internal control over the economy by international banks is reflected in a report published by the late Senator Lee Metcalf, entitled Voter Rights in Major Corporations.
Noteworthy are the names of international bankers who are members of the Trilateral Commission. If we combine these three kinds of statistics:
a) the source of bank profits;
b) control over national companies and
c) membership in the Trilateral Commission, - we will find a critical relationship between international banks and the Commission's drive to influence the global economy.
Chase Manhattan Bank has the highest percentage of profits from overseas, with a surprising 78 percent, up from 22 percent in 1970.
David Rockefeller's international trade made Chase the world bank.
At the same time, Chase has a very low rating on the Metcalf index. As the largest, the bank is included in 8 out of 122 companies studied by the subcommittee (compared to 25 by Citibank and 56 by J. P. Morgan).
At least six directors of Chase Manhattan (Kissinger is on the bank's international advisory board) were represented in 1976 on the Trilateral Commission.
As a result, Chase is almost totally oriented outside the United States. His financial interest in creating the New World Order is more than obvious.
Compare Chase to J. P. Morgan, where 53 percent of the income comes from abroad (up from 25 percent in 1970), with only one Trilateral representative.
Banks such as Charter New York (formerly Irving Trust) and Chemical Bank do not appear in the Metcalf index at all and do not have Trilateral representation, that is, they are not involved in the creation of the New World Order.
In a few words: The Trilateral Commission reports to very few international banks, essentially the Chase Manhattan Bank, and is an institution outside the United States.
At the same time, the Trilateral Commission oversees its US executive branch.
However, SDRs were not a match for gold. Attempts to keep the price of gold at the artificially low "official price" proved to be difficult and ultimately showed that even the power of the Trilateral Commission is subject to the action of world market forces, and world market forces are the sum of individual market decisions.
The challenge for the world's Trilateral rulers is to integrate these monopoly ideas into the global monetary system and make them work.
The immediate and most pressing challenge is to operate a floating rate system to dampen volatile changes in exchange rates, which of course harm international trade.
Such volatile changes do not occur in fixed exchange rates pegged to gold. But gold separates the world from the "cooperative" international arrangements required by Trilaterals, and gold is therefore more of a problem than the mess of floating rates.
This is followed by the task of managing world reserves. Trilateral members want "greater cooperation, for the key to managing the world's reserves is the limited addition of gold and, naturally, currencies such as the US dollar, deutsche mark, British pound and French franc to central bank deposits."
The falling dollar is also an unforeseen problem, especially because it inevitably leads to less use of the dollar as the world's reserve unit.
The Treasury Department's views on gold (overseen by the Trilateral Commission) are well illustrated in a letter from Gene E. Gaudin, deputy. Secretary of Law at the Treasury Department, to Congressman J. Kenneth Robinson.
Part 4. Conclusions
The Trilateral Commission is not the only organization working for the New World Order.
The concept that gave birth to the Trilateral Commission derives from earlier ideas put forward by Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner, who had funds from South African gold and diamond mines.
Rhodes established the Rhodes Fellowships to enable Americans of outstanding personal qualities to attend Oxford University for a year.
B. Clinton became a Rhodes Fellow after studying with Carroll Quigley at Georgetown University.
Carroll Quigley wrote the voluminous Tragedy and Hope, which outlines the plans for the New World Order.
Quigley was not a renegade; he agreed with the objectives of the Anglo-American New World Order.
His disagreement with this company was that he believed that the common cause should be an open goal, and not a secret conspiracy.
So the Rhodes organization and the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London were essential parts of the New World Order.
The Royal Institution spawned the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the United States on a broader but still limited organization with the same missions.
CMO has a wider range of views among its members (some even against the New World Order) than the Trilateral Commission or the Royal Institution.
An interesting aspect is that the founder of the Trilateral Commission, David Rockefeller, was its chairman for a long time, and then he was the honored chairman in retirement.
Another more limited part of the New World Order is the parent society Skull and Bones at Yale University.
Historian Anthony Sutton was able to deeply analyze the influence of Skull and Bones and its infiltration into the US government.
His book was titled America's Secret Establishment.
Almost every supporter of the New World Order from the earliest days of their activity has a vague past that does not correspond to the declared high ideals.
Cecile Rhodes himself was accused of deception and fraud in the struggle for control of the gold and diamond mines of South Africa.
His partner Lord Milner was the author of the infamous Milner Telegram that sparked the Boer War in 1899.
The Rhodes diamond mines became the core of the De Beers monopoly and today still exercises monopoly control over the global diamond market - a model for the New World Order.
Cecil Rhodes's views on the New World Order would hardly have inspired anyone other than the Anglo-Americans.
And the past of individual Trilateral members and Trilateral-affiliated corporations is hardly comforting.
Take, for example, Prudential Securities Company. Its chairman, Robert C. Winters, is a member of the Trilateral Commission.
If you look at the press, Prudential is being screened on many charges (New York Times, 2/28/94).
Prudensiel is at the center of an expanding criminal investigation into how customers were treated when the firm suffered huge losses.
A few years ago, Wall Street brokerage firms could maintain accounts with zero balances, money was deposited only after a call from the bank. This is also known as receiving money against a bogus bill.
Brokerage firms got away with it and made millions in this practice in a year. The main player in this swindle was E. F. Hatton.
Kissinger Associates, an influential body founded by G. Kissinger to raise capital for its "public services", has repeatedly come under fire from unfavorable criticism, but reports carefully concealed the fact that its founder was a member of the Trilateral Commission.
The firm, for example, had a memorable day at the bankruptcy of the LTV corporation, when $ 144 million went to consultants for professional services in connection with the bankruptcy and the lion's share was received by Kissinger Associates. Nobody investigated gross exaggerations.
Likewise, the United States avoided an investigation into the BBCI, a worldwide scandal involving Kissinger Associates.
In England, where many thousands lost their deposits, only a low-ranking manager was imprisoned.
Although the Trilateral Commission was initially presented as a "research group" of interested citizens engaged in world affairs, we find that it is anything but this.
The first discovery is that from the very beginning, the Trilateral Commission represented extremely narrow segments of the population in each individual country.
The dominant influence in it has always been with David Rockefeller and bankers of his level abroad. The dominant influence is exercised by international bankers, those who exercise largely control over the direction of world events through financial control.
Moreover, David Rockefeller was long chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank in this private system. The Federal Reserve System is not a public organization, but a private one, and this fact must be borne in mind.
The distance between the federal reserve and the current dominant government is deliberately kept in order to control the financial system in the interests of those who hold the federal reserve.
Rockefeller has a small executive committee that invites prominent citizens to join the Trilateral Commission. This perpetuates Rockefeller's influence, for the new members at least sympathize with Rockefeller's objectives in their private judgments.
This in itself would not be objectionable if the Trilateral Commission were indeed a "study group" and if the Trilateral Commission showed the same interest in disqualifying the federal government from appointments as it does in the work of the federal reserve.
But the Trilateral Commission is not a "research group." Her research is at the mercy of theorists, who may also reflect the views of the Trilateral Commission.
These studies are then the basis for discussion in the TC, and the agreed policy becomes the political views of individual members.
When they are appointed to the federal government, and usually about one third of the members are always in the current administration, then they put this policy into practice.
The conclusion is that the Trilateral Commission is a politically oriented group that has the ability to translate policy into action regardless of the wishes of the entire population.
We will not find anywhere political aspirations in favor of personal free enterprise and personal freedom.
But we will find many claims that the world is "uncontrollable" and that government action is required to align citizens' goals with the ambitions of the Trilateral Commission.
Examples of how they try to solve social problems through wars clearly demonstrate such ambitions.
Whatever the Trilateral members say, we conclude that their goal is a New World Order under the control of the Trilateral members.
The so-called problem wars are designed to shape problem solving that would lead to the goals of the New World Order and for nothing else. Well, the Trilateral Commission itself, as it was written earlier, is only one of the cells of the world network of such "discussion platforms".
By the way, the Russian Federation was represented in the 90s at the Commission's seminars as speaker-experts by Anatoly Chubais (seminar on the global economy) and Grigory Yavlinsky (on the future of "Russia"). Chubais was also first introduced at the Bilderberg convention.
It is worth mentioning another "Russian", Sergei Karaganov, a member of the International Advisory Council at the CMO.
At the ISS, he was introduced as “Chairman of the Council for Defense and Foreign Policy; Deputy Director of the Institute of Europe at the Russian Academy of Sciences.
The ISS was founded by the CMO Board of Directors in 1995 under the chairmanship of David Rockefeller, CMO Honorary Chairman. He holds his annual meeting during the October meeting of the CMO Board of Directors in order to present his views on a number of issues of interest to the CMO. Members of the ICS are given the opportunity to comment on various programs and strategic directions, as well as on real opportunities for cooperation between the CFR and agencies outside the United States. They also provide valuable international assessments of US foreign policy - from the need for new strategies and organizations in the 21st century to the value of multilateral approaches to solving world problems and ways to advance democratization.