Who Are They - The True Masters Of The Far East? - Alternative View

Table of contents:

Who Are They - The True Masters Of The Far East? - Alternative View
Who Are They - The True Masters Of The Far East? - Alternative View

Video: Who Are They - The True Masters Of The Far East? - Alternative View

Video: Who Are They - The True Masters Of The Far East? - Alternative View
Video: Baird Spalding's "The Life and Teaching of the Master's of the Far East" (Vol. 1-5) *Excerpts* 2024, April
Anonim

Recently, in connection with the scandal about the content of the history textbook (it said that the Amur region was captured by Russia from China), the historical past of the Far East is being actively discussed. How bizarre life is! For years, not indifferent people, historians and even some regional officials, tried to reason with the federal authorities - not to distort the history of this region. Not supporting the Chinese lies about China's historical claim to these lands … all in vain.

And now, lo and behold - one letter from an indignant parent of a schoolboy was enough for the Ministry of Education to amend the ill-fated chapter! The history of the Far East began to be widely discussed and the formation of the Russian version of the history of the region began. If there was no letter from an indignant and vigilant parent, it would be worth inventing!

The map of Chinese Tartary in 1787 - the border of Russian Tartary is indicated on top (after Pugachev, already Romanovskaya) - this configuration raises questions …
The map of Chinese Tartary in 1787 - the border of Russian Tartary is indicated on top (after Pugachev, already Romanovskaya) - this configuration raises questions …

The map of Chinese Tartary in 1787 - the border of Russian Tartary is indicated on top (after Pugachev, already Romanovskaya) - this configuration raises questions …

Official version

Until the 17th century, the Far East and Primorye were practically uninhabited territory. Formally belonging to various eastern kingdoms (Bohai, Jin and Eastern Xia), in fact, this huge colossus remained useless and was not populated. Since the 13th century, these lands were considered to belong to Genghis Khan and his descendants. Local residents joined the ranks of the Mongol army, or were resettled to other regions. Primorye fell into complete desolation for centuries.

So far, archaeologists have managed to find in the entire Primorye only one Chzhurzhen-type fortress (please remember this name), erected in the 16th century in the Posiet Bay area.

Russian Cossacks began to penetrate into the Amur region and the Far East in the 17th century. Around the same time when the Russians first appeared in those parts, power in China passed to the Qing dynasty. This dynasty is from Manchuria (another name for the Chzhurzhen kingdom), which is just next door to the Amur region.

Promotional video:

Irkutsk province map
Irkutsk province map

Irkutsk province map.

The creation of the Russian voivodeship provoked the outrage of the Chinese (from the Manchu / Jurzhen dynasty) Emperor Xuanye (Kangxi). His empire was at the peak of its power, expanded and had certain views on these lands. In 1652, a sluggish ongoing hostilities began, which were conducted with varying success until 1688.

It was in that year, in the city of Nerchinsk (with a garrison of 600 people), surrounded by thousands of Chinese troops, that an agreement of the same name was signed, according to which Russia refused from the Amur region (at the same time it was possible to seriously moderate the appetites of the Chinese and prescribe a ban on the establishment of settlements for them - this played in the subsequent role).

Sagittarius (reconstruction)
Sagittarius (reconstruction)

Sagittarius (reconstruction).

Almost 200 years later, taking advantage of the fact that China, weakened by wars with European powers and internal troubles, needs outside support, the Governor-General of Eastern Siberia Nikolai Muravyov and the representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Pyotr Petrovsky in 1858 signed an agreement in the city of Aigun stating that that the border between Russia and China is drawn along the Amur, and the Ussuri region temporarily remains in common possession, and its fate will be decided separately.

The ratification of the Aigun Treaty in Beijing and the final removal of all controversial issues was entrusted to the brilliant diplomat, Count Nikolai Ignatiev. Just at this time, England and France began another intervention in China (the second Opium War) and would not mind to profit from the Far East as well. Acting on contradictions and actively using disinformation, Ignatiev managed to save Beijing from being plundered by the allies, and the Far East from the European invasion.

Chinese cavalry (reconstruction)
Chinese cavalry (reconstruction)

Chinese cavalry (reconstruction).

China was grateful to the Russian diplomat for the assistance provided. As a result of his efforts, Beijing not only recognized the terms of the Aigun Treaty, but two years later signed another one - the Beijing Treaty, which expanded Russia also at the expense of Primorye.

Subsequently, the Chinese have repeatedly tried to play history back and to some extent they succeeded (they made territorial concessions during the Soviet period and in 2012).

Map of the Independent and Chinese Tartary
Map of the Independent and Chinese Tartary

Map of the Independent and Chinese Tartary.

Alternative version

From numerous foreign sources, we now know that on the territory of Eastern Siberia and the Far East, the metropolis of the huge Eurasian empire - Great Tartaria, the kingdom of Katai was located.

About the history of Tartaria ("Tartaria-the first great empire", the most famous ruler - Genghis Khan (Mongul and Tartarus-the union of two kingdoms.), As well as her death as a result of a natural disaster (Mongul and Tartarus. Fell into the "tartarars".).

Some of the inhabitants of this great and rich country, fleeing the cataclysm, moved to the south, to Chinese Tartary (including the Chzhurzhen kingdom) and southwest, founding Mongolia Blondins (modern Mongolia) as part of Independent Tartary.

Some of the inhabitants of this great and rich country, fleeing the cataclysm, moved to the south, to Chinese Tartary (including the Chzhurzhen kingdom) and southwest, founding Mongolia Blondins (modern Mongolia) as part of Independent Tartary.

Chzhurzheni Golden Empire map - compare with the map above
Chzhurzheni Golden Empire map - compare with the map above

Chzhurzheni Golden Empire map - compare with the map above.

The existence of the Golden Empire of the Jurchens in the Middle Ages in the Far East, in the 50s of the 20th century was discovered by Academician A. P. Okladnikov. It occupied the territory of modern Primorsky and Khabarovsk Territories, Amur Region, eastern regions of Mongolia, northern regions of Korea and the entire northern part of China. For a long time, the capital of this huge empire was Yanqing (now Beijing). The empire consisted of 72 tribes, the population was, according to various estimates, from 36 to 50 million people. The empire had 1200 cities.

The first Jurchen emperor Taizu, Wanyan Aguda (1115-1123)
The first Jurchen emperor Taizu, Wanyan Aguda (1115-1123)

The first Jurchen emperor Taizu, Wanyan Aguda (1115-1123).

The Jurchen empire rested on the basis of the most ancient civilizations that existed long before "Great China" and possessed the highest technologies for those times: they knew how to produce porcelain, paper, bronze mirrors and gunpowder, and also possessed mysterious occult knowledge. Bronze mirrors, which were made in the Jurchen empire, are found by archaeologists in the territory from the Pacific Ocean to the Caspian Sea. In other words, the Jurchens used these achievements much earlier than the Chinese "discovered" it. In addition, the inhabitants of the empire used runic writing, which the orthodox science is unable to decipher.

The second Jurchen emperor Tai-zong, Wanyan Utsimai (1123-1135)
The second Jurchen emperor Tai-zong, Wanyan Utsimai (1123-1135)

The second Jurchen emperor Tai-zong, Wanyan Utsimai (1123-1135).

However, the empire received all these technological advances from the previous states that were located on its territory much earlier. The most mysterious of these is the Shubi state, which is believed to have existed in the 1st-2nd millennium BC.

The military topographer and ethnographer V. K. Arseniev, who explored Primorye in 1902-1910, found and excavated numerous regular-shaped cities and stone roads in the taiga on the Dadyanshan plateau. All this eloquently testifies to the scale of the bygone (what?) Civilization. Remains of stone roads are still preserved in the coastal taiga.

The fourth Jurchen emperor Hai Ling Wang, Wanyan Liang (1149-1161)
The fourth Jurchen emperor Hai Ling Wang, Wanyan Liang (1149-1161)

The fourth Jurchen emperor Hai Ling Wang, Wanyan Liang (1149-1161).

What were the ancestors of the Tartarians and Jurchens, we no longer know, but we have the opportunity to see the busts of the first emperors of the Jurchens, whose descendants later conquered China (present-day China) and became the founders of the Qing imperial dynasty (the very one referred to in the official part) … Pay attention to the racial traits of the emperors (photo of the busts from the museum of the Chinese city of Harbin - above). These are people of the white race, as well as their relatives, the Tartarians and Scythians.

Thus, the claims of the emperor of the Chzhurzhen (Manchu) Qing dynasty to the Romanovs, in relation to the Far East in general and the Amur region in particular, were based on the continuity of Chinese Tartary to the territory of the dead metropolis of Great Tartary - the kingdom of Katai.

The ethnic Chinese (han) have NO such RIGHT and never had!

Map of China (China) in 1655 from the Atlas Blau - and does not belong to the Amur …
Map of China (China) in 1655 from the Atlas Blau - and does not belong to the Amur …

Map of China (China) in 1655 from the Atlas Blau - and does not belong to the Amur …

Too radical, not familiar to the ear? Am I "wishful thinking"? Let's turn to the works of recognized scientists.

A word to archaeologists

The Soviet archaeologist and anthropologist Valery Pavlovich Alekseev noted that the famous Tagar culture, which left behind tens of thousands of mounds in southern Siberia, was created by Caucasians: “Hundreds of skulls were measured from Tagar kurgans - and in the overwhelming majority these are the skulls of Caucasians …”

And here are the words of Mikhail Mikhailovich Gerasimov, the largest anthropologist, the creator of the technology of face reconstruction from the skull, who examined the skulls from the copper age burials found near Krasnoyarsk. He emphasized: “people with the features of typical Caucasians lived on the Yenisei”.

Another scientist, Nicholas Roerich, during his Central Asian expedition of 1923-1928, found evidence that all of Central Asia was originally inhabited by a Slavic ethnic group.

Her ancestors came from Siberia
Her ancestors came from Siberia

Her ancestors came from Siberia.

No less striking archaeological evidence of the presence of the white race in the heart of Eurasia are the finds of mummies of white people in China (False antiquity of China. White Gods.) These and other evidences that do not fit into the falsified historical picture of the world are hushed up and destroyed. We are persistently told that Siberia and the Far East were inhabited by Mongoloids, and everything that contradicts this version is immediately closed (False history of China. Black soldiers of the Vatican.).

For example, immediately after the underwater archaeologist Genrikh Petrovich Kostin from Vladivostok discovered irrefutable evidence of the existence of a powerful Slavic civilization with a developed culture of navigation in Primorye, the South Koreans, following the North Koreans and Chinese, classified archaeological research on the Korean Peninsula.

Output

Instead of studying and popularizing this data, we are drummed into the antiquity of Chinese history ("Fake antiquity of China"). Thousands of academic papers, doctoral and candidate dissertations are being written on this topic … which are subsequently referred to by the adherents of official history.

Map from an atlas for Chinese schoolchildren, with temporarily occupied but historically Chinese land - compare with the map from 1655 (above)
Map from an atlas for Chinese schoolchildren, with temporarily occupied but historically Chinese land - compare with the map from 1655 (above)

Map from an atlas for Chinese schoolchildren, with temporarily occupied but historically Chinese land - compare with the map from 1655 (above).

And on which, among other things, China's territorial claims to Russia are based! Nowadays, one can observe how groups of tourists from China who come to Vladivostok regularly hold small rallies at the Primorsky State Museum. They exclaim: “Look! The Russians themselves admit that Primorye once belonged to us, the Chinese! Russians are invaders!"

This is what unbridled tolerance and fear of recognizing the historical role of the white race leads to….

I have presented to your attention two short versions of the history of belonging to the Far East and Primorye - choose which is more to your liking, only you!

Personally, I believe more in the (so-called) alternative version - it explains more fully and logically the facts known to me, but this is my opinion and I do not impose it.

Recommended: