- Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6 - Part 7 - Part 8 -
Buried buildings were also found in Kazan. With a layer from one to one and a half meters thick, the Tatarskaya Sloboda, where the al-Marjani mosque, built in 1767-1770, is located. The courtyard of the mosque was then dug out, but perhaps not to the full depth, and a retaining wall with stairs was built. This is how the mosque looks from the street.
And this is a view of the courtyard, retaining wall and stairs to descend from street level.
In my opinion, it is obvious that it is not the architect's intention to bury the mosque a meter down from street level. This happened after the construction of the building.
But at the building of the Islamic College, which is part of the complex of buildings of the mosque, but was built in 1880, there is no backfill, no one dug it out and no retaining walls were built near it.
Promotional video:
A similar picture is observed on the street itself. Old buildings stand up to the windows in the ground.
But if you walk a little further down the street, then there are houses that were built in the mid-late 19th century, in which no filling is observed.
Backfilling of buildings and structures is observed on the territory of the Kazan Kremlin. This is a view of the main building of the Cannon Yard.
At first glance, it seems that the building is one-story with a two-story central part. But in fact, this is not so, because when you go inside, you can see from the design that the building was originally two-story. Here is a rear view of the same building, where the first floor is already visible.
When we were on an excursion in the Kazan Kremlin, we went to this building to dine in the cafe "Pushechny Dvor". The three-storey central part has an entrance that is just below the current level of the courtyard, about a meter below the floor level of the first floor. But when you go there, there is a full-fledged first floor inside, and not some kind of basement.
This is a view of the main building of the "Cannon Dvor", behind which is the building of the Junker School, built in the middle of the 19th century.
It is clearly seen that the new building is much higher than the old one. The question is, what prevented the architect and builders from making the main building of the "Cannon Yard" higher?
This is the southern building of the "Cannon Dvor", the building dates back to the 18th century, but under it the remains of stone structures of the 12-16th centuries were allegedly found.
When the territory of the Kremlin was being reconstructed during the construction of the new ceremonial mosque Kul-Sharif, this building was also dug up, a platform was laid out in front of it and a retaining wall with a descent was made. But in the foreground we see ruins and a staircase to nowhere. According to the guide, these are the ruins of one of the buildings of the cannon yard, which was destroyed during a strong fire in 1815, which was then not restored. When I was collecting materials for this article, it turned out that we were already being told a lie. Here is a photograph of the late 19th - early 20th centuries, in which this building is very clearly visible. This is to the question of how real history is distorted and myths arise.
This is a view of the northern building of the Cannon Yard, which was thoroughly rebuilt in the middle of the 19th century. It now houses the administration of the President of the Republic of Tatarstan. Everything is fine here, in the process of restructuring, the site in front of the building was leveled, excess soil and uneven relief were removed. But in this photo we are interested in the left turret, which refers not to the northern one, but to the main building. It allows you to see how the lower floor of the main building initially looked like before it was filled up.
There are no signs of backfilling at the Governor's Palace, built in 1845-1848. Everything is harmonious, the foundation and porches are in place.
Now let's look at the walls of the Kremlin. Several photos of the lower exit through the Taynitskaya tower. They clearly show that the passage through the gate had to be deepened in relation to the general level of the relief by more than one and a half meters.
I deliberately made a fragment of the gate with a changed contrast, so that the size of the door in the gate, which is slightly higher than the height of a person, and the lines on the tower could be estimated by the height of the gate.
But maybe this is just a feature of the relief only for this particular tower? You never know, well, they decided to dig it into the ground from this side in order to get out normally from the other side of the wall. Still, the Kazan Kremlin stands on a hill with a rather difficult relief and sharp changes in altitude.
Alas, about the same level of backfill is observed along many walls, especially along those that have not yet been reconstructed and restored. This is how a fragment of the wall looks like after reconstruction in the area of the new Kul-Sharif mosque.
We see practically the same picture that was previously observed in the Peter and Paul Fortress and Yaroslavl. The wall was dug up, a path and a retaining wall were made along it so that the remaining soil would not crumble. In this photo, you should pay attention to the semicircular niches in the wall, where souvenir shops are now organized, more precisely, on their size. Now let's look at a fragment of the wall where the work has not yet been carried out.
Judging by the size of the semicircular niches in the wall, they are filled from the base by almost two meters. And this is another fragment of the wall. On the right you can see the white corner of the Taynitskaya tower, and on the left you can see the corner of the northern building of the Cannon Yard. Note the two semicircular niches in the wall. The right one was dug up in the process of reconstruction and a path was laid to it, but the left one, the edge of which can be seen behind a bush, was not dug up.
Another interesting fact was discovered in Kazan, which was later confirmed in other places. Falling asleep of buildings built before the beginning of the 19th century is observed not throughout the territory of Kazan, but only in some areas! The central part is full of old buildings with no backfill.
It turned out that buildings and structures are not covered in all cities. For example, there is no excess soil in the same suburbs of St. Petersburg. In Peterhof with its complex system of fountains and canals, there is no backfill!
Excess soil is not observed in large quantities in Veliky Novgorod. Here are some photos of old objects in the Kremlin of Veliky Novgorod. Throughout the territory of the Kremlin, we observe a flat relief without any traces of excavation. At the same time, there is no giant "cultural layer" there, which should have accumulated, if you follow the official myth, as well as the fact that the construction of St. Sophia Cathedral (2 and 3 photos) dates back to the 12th century.
Based on all the above facts, the following conclusions can be drawn:
1. In some cities there is a fairly thick layer of soil, mainly consisting of clay and loam, with a thickness of 30-40 centimeters to 2.5 meters, with an average thickness of 1 to 1.5 meters.
2. This layer lies on top of the cultural layer and the soil preserved under it, including black soil, or the same pavements in cities.
3. The coverage of the territory is not continuous, but is observed in some, rather local areas.
4. These processes have been going on for some time, as evidenced by the complex structure of layers in Staraya Russa. At the same time, judging by the date 1820 on the lead seal, they took place after 1820, but until the 1830s, when buildings were already under construction, in which filling is not observed, although there are old filled buildings nearby. At the same time, there are no facts that indicate that in all places the process took place simultaneously. By the way, according to the find in Staraya Russa, it would be nice to clarify at what level the seal with the date 1820 was found. At the very bottom or in the middle layers of clay?
5. Judging by the fact that under the clay layer there are traces that were not destroyed by the water flow, such as traces of arable land or wooden pavements in Staraya Russa, this soil was not brought in during the flood.
6. Moreover, the observed footprints are not a consequence of a hypothetical giant wave of "global flood", which should have occurred when the earth's crust turned during the change of the rotation poles. People who say such things do not understand the scale of such an event and its consequences. Especially you can look at the result of the floods in Kita, when the flood sweeps away not only the traces of soil development, but also all buildings to be clean.
This is to the question of whether something should remain from the cities or, for example, from the same Kazan Kremlin, if this soil remained from a severe flood. The next photo shows very clearly the profile of the relief of the hill on which the Kazan Kremlin stands. If we have a layer about a meter thick at the top of the hill, where the main building of the "Cannon Yard" is located, and about two meters inside the walls, then in order for such sediments to remain from flooding, the water must go not just above the level of the walls, but above the level of the top of the hill, which can be seen above the walls to the left of the Taynitskaya tower, which is in the center. If you had such a stream of water here, then almost nothing should have remained from Kazan!
The locality of such drifts also explains the fact that there were no problems with nutrition, since the main cultivated areas were not affected.
From all this, only one conclusion follows. All this soil fell from above! At the same time, it did not fall across the entire territory, but about the same as it rains. Somewhere there, somewhere not, somewhere downpour, somewhere a little bit overgrown. And judging by the dates, these events are directly related to the catastrophe in Western Siberia.
Firstly, when such a meteorite field fell, not only large meteorites should have been present in it, which reached the surface and left traces that we see in the images. Medium and small meteorites should have collapsed in the upper atmosphere, creating a large amount of dust. It is also highly probable that if this meteorite field was part of the fragments of one of the destroyed planets of the solar system, then the dust could be present by itself. But, unlike meteorites, it will not immediately fall to the surface, but will form dust clouds in the upper layers of the atmosphere, which can hang in the air for quite a long time until conditions are favorable for its fall to the surface. For example, the air humidity in these layers will increase, which will lead to the formation of larger,and hence heavy particles. As a result, we will get not ordinary rain, but mud. If at the same time there is not a lot of moisture, we will not have streams of water with dust dissolved in them, but a sufficiently thick mass that will not flow down the surface like water, but will stick together and remain in place, like plaster.
Secondly, part of the soil from the Earth's surface had to be lifted by the fall of large ice meteorites, which left the furrows of the "ribbon boars". Due to the friction of a huge block on the surface of the earth, a huge amount of energy will be released and intense ice melting and water evaporation will occur. The vapor will rise upward, trapping soil particles from the surface. This is another source of dust in the atmosphere.
But the most important thing, in my opinion, will happen after the catastrophe, during which vegetation will be destroyed and the topsoil will be damaged over a fairly large area. The approximate area of damage during this disaster is about 1.5 million square meters. km. While the vegetation cover of the upper soil layer is restored, a lot of time will pass, tens of years. And all this time, due to the action of the Sun, water and wind, there will be soil erosion, which will ultimately lead to the formation of a huge amount of dust and dust storms. This dust will rise into the upper atmosphere and be carried thousands of kilometers from the crash site.
In Europe, there are references to dust storms with the loss of clay soil up to 1847.
It is also interesting that this phenomenon was reflected in the literature of that time, and this work is known to almost everyone. This is "The Wizard of Oz", where there is such a character as the witch Bastinda, who sent flying monkeys, who arranged dust storms, covered everything with sand and turned the earth into a desert.
Looks like, doesn't it?
Continued: Part 10