How They Destroyed The True History Of Russia. Part 2 - Alternative View

Table of contents:

How They Destroyed The True History Of Russia. Part 2 - Alternative View
How They Destroyed The True History Of Russia. Part 2 - Alternative View

Video: How They Destroyed The True History Of Russia. Part 2 - Alternative View

Video: How They Destroyed The True History Of Russia. Part 2 - Alternative View
Video: The Animated History of Russia | Part 2 | The U.S.S.R. 2024, May
Anonim

Continuation, beginning in the article here.

History of the Rus and Slavs

For many centuries, the full history of the Slavs was either not written at all, or was destroyed! Mavro Orbini's book "The Slavic Kingdom" (in more detail: "Mavro Orbini, the first Slavic historian") was preserved miraculously. All that is - thousands of falsifications about "wild Slavs … forest animals … born for slavery … herd animals."

Even the very first Russian "Chronograph on a Great Exposition" of 1512 was compiled on the basis of Western data (Byzantine chronographs). Then the lies of the 17th century began … In 1617 and 1620, the Chronograph was heavily edited (second and third editions) - the history of Russia was inscribed in the western framework of general history and Scaliger's chronology. To create an official lie in 1657, a "Note Order" was even created (more: Comrade, believe: the history of the past is the door to the future!).

They created a literary work "Correspondence between Grozny and Prince Kurbsky" (written by S. Shakhovsky) and a fake speech by I. Grozny in 1550 at Execution Ground (archivist V. N. Avtokratov proved it was fabricated). They wrote a panegyric "The History of the Tsars and Grand Dukes of the Russian Land" (aka "The Book of Degrees of the Noble and Pious House of the Romanovs"), the author is the clerk of the Kazan Palace order Fyodor Griboyedov.

A still from the film Ivan Vasilievich changes his profession
A still from the film Ivan Vasilievich changes his profession

A still from the film Ivan Vasilievich changes his profession.

With the advent of the Romanovs to the throne, orders are given to monasteries to collect documents and books with the aim of correcting and destroying them. Active work is underway to revise libraries, book depositories, archives. Even on Athos at this time old Russian books are being burned.

The founders of the new version of Russian history (modern) are the Germans (!). The task of the Germans is to prove that the Eastern Slavs were real savages, saved from the darkness of ignorance by the West; there was no Tartary and the Eurasian empire. In 1674, the "Synopsis" by the German I. Gisel was published, the first official pro-Western textbook on the history of Russia, which was reprinted many times and survived until the middle of the 19th century.

Promotional video:

A still from the cartoon Alyosha Popovich I Tugarin
A still from the cartoon Alyosha Popovich I Tugarin

A still from the cartoon Alyosha Popovich I Tugarin.

At the same time, the German G. Bayer came up with a Norman theory: a handful of Normans who arrived in Russia in a few years turned the "wild country" into a powerful state.

The 12-volume "History of the Russian State" by the writer Karamzin is generally a rendition of the German "Synopsis" in an artistic style with the addition of slander of defectors, Western chronicles and fiction.

V. N. Tatishchev is a Russian historian
V. N. Tatishchev is a Russian historian

V. N. Tatishchev is a Russian historian.

Honesty is still not held in high esteem

The Russian historian Vasily Tatishchev wrote the book "Russian History from the Most Ancient Times", but did not manage to publish it (there was only a manuscript). The works of Tatishchev were already published by the (Germans) Schletser and Miller, and they were so "edited" that after that nothing remained of the original in his works. Tatishchev himself wrote about the huge distortions of history by the Romanovs, his students used the term "Romano-Germanic yoke." The original manuscript of Tatishchev's "History of Russia" after Miller disappeared without a trace, and some "drafts" (Miller used them according to the official version) are now also unknown.

M. Lomonosov in his letters scared with Miller about his false history and emphasized the antiquity of the Slavic empires and their constant movement from east to west. Mikhail Vasilyevich wrote his "Ancient Russian History", but thanks to the efforts of the Germans, the manuscript was never published.

Moreover, for the fight against the Germans and their falsification of history, by the decision of the Senate Commission M. Lomonosov "for repeated disrespectful, dishonorable and disgusting acts … in relation to German soil is subject to the death penalty, or … punishment with lashes and deprivation of rights and fortunes" (ashamed to read such obscenity about our sycophants …).

MV Lomonosov is a Russian scientist
MV Lomonosov is a Russian scientist

MV Lomonosov is a Russian scientist.

Lomonosov spent almost seven months in custody awaiting the approval of the verdict! By the decree of Elizabeth he was found guilty, but "released" from punishment. His salary was reduced by half, and he had to apologize to the German professors "for the prejudices he had committed". Scum Miller made a mocking "repentance", which Lomonosov was forced to publicly pronounce and sign …

In addition to V. Tatishchev and M. Lomonosov, pro-Western lies in different years were opposed by such Russian people as the historian and translator A. I. Lyzlov (author of "Scythian history"), historian IN Boltin, historian and poet NS Artsybashev, Polish archaeologist F. Volansky (author of "Description of monuments explaining Slavic-Russian history"), archaeologist and historian A. Chertkov (author of "On the resettlement of the Thracian tribes beyond the Danube and further north, to the Baltic Sea, and to us in Russia"), State Councilor E. I., philosopher A. Khomyakov, diplomat and historian A. I. Mankiev (ambassador to Sweden, author of seven books "The Core of Russian History"), whose names and works are undeservedly forgotten today. But if the "pro-Western", official historiography,always (and today including) the “green light” was given (and is considered a priori correct), the real facts from the patriots were considered dissent and, at best, were hushed up.

Do you still believe the official (German version) of Russian history?

Recommended: