Read the beginning here.
In this material, we will continue to study the evidence that Peter I did not build the great northern capital, but simply appropriated the already existing buildings that remained at the mouth of the Neva River from time immemorial.
Let's take a look at drawings by a 19th century artist who illustrates the development of "Peter" in reverse chronological order.
Now the story is ready and you can tell that it was. But fortunately, not all primary sources have been destroyed (we will talk about this in great detail later). For example, a drawn map by Eric Nilsson dated 1643 shows a completely different picture.
Promotional video:
And if we turn to the Scandinavian and Old Russian written sources up to 1323, then as many as 42 settlements are noted in the Neva region. Moreover, 32 cities belonged to Novgorodians, 6 cities "in Chudi", one city of Latgallia, one on the territory of the Livs and one German. When the Treaty of Orekhovets was concluded, the border between Sweden and the Novgorod region was moved to the Sestra River.
These historical data allow us to assert that on the territory that is now occupied by St. Petersburg, at different times, there were about 1,000 settlements. Which were connected by more than one dozen kilometers of roads.
And this is another map showing the Nieshants fortress, which is dated 1643.
And this picture shows the mouth of the Neva, the city of Nyen with its surrounding environs, the map dates from the late 17th century.
If we turn to the Swedish historians, according to their information, in 1691 there was a severe flood in this area, which covered Nyen more than eight meters above the ordinary. This flood devastated a huge number of coastal settlements that never recovered from the disaster.
Now attention, this is an image of the Peter and Paul Fortress dating from 1703. Let us remind you that it was officially built only in 1780. Amazing, don't you think?
The logic of the removal of the main city of the Russian State practically outside of its borders is also incomprehensible. After all, road connections are extremely important, and with Peter they were practically absent. The main transport arteries were rivers, as well as small land areas, along which boats were dragged - "drags". At that time, Smolensk was the key city, because it was he who connected the most important trade routes. And the stable and direct water "highways" that connected St. Petersburg with the rest of the Empire began to be built only at the beginning of the 19th century. It was then that the Mariinsky and Tikhvin water systems were built and the Vyshnevolotsk water system was restored.
From all this, the following conclusion simply suggests itself: St. Petersburg is not the city of Peter I.
And historians continue to "prove" to us that the city of Petra was built in literally two decades, without access roads, in a swamp, with a modern layout, wide avenues, sewers, canals lined with granite, as well as simply with an uncountable number of columns. Just like in the ancient Lebanese Baalbek, the Greek Parthenon, the Egyptian Giza.
St. Petersburg:
Baalbek:
The city on the Neva was designed and built according to the classical canons of Antiquity. And here from Christianity only temples. It is noteworthy that during the reign of Peter I, only the Peter and Paul Cathedral was built in "his" city, but there are simply countless antique buildings.
Now, for comparison, take a look at the image of Athens, which dates from the 19th century.
To consolidate the feeling of similarity, let's look at the map of St. Petersburg.
See the map of the ancient city of Athens.
They are very similar!
Let's summarize a preliminary summary of our research.
Strange is the fact that modern technologies still fall short of the art of stone processing in ancient cities of our planet, such as Baalbek, Parthenon, Mantheon or the Great Wall of China. And then the newly formed states simply appropriate the buildings that they inherited.
The same happened with our Northern capital, Peter I simply appropriated the found city for himself. And in order for no one to have doubts, he performed a whole range of measures:
Destruction of the discoverers. Literally all the first “builders” of St. Petersburg disappeared without a trace, leaving no records or even their heirs.
Peter initiated the practically forcible removal of all existing manuscripts from the monasteries, allegedly for their reproduction and further wide distribution. The books were taken away but not returned.
He also made the transition to a new chronology, since January 1, 7208 "from the creation of the world" was replaced by January 1, 1700 from the birth of Christ.
For a more complete understanding of the entire scale of the falsification of our history with you, be sure to read the first part of this investigation. The link will be at the end of this article.
All this made it possible to completely rewrite history and appropriate the ancient antique city of St. Petersburg. We will continue to search for evidence of the falsification of our history.