Few people know that even before Darwin, they began to collect the theory of evolution of Darwin in pieces, taking some facts and ignoring others.
Recently, a Japanese professor from the Kyoto Institute for Primate Research Tetsuro Matsuzawa shocked the scientific world by speaking the language of apes.
Over the past ten years, Matsuzawa has conducted a series of unique experiments with a chimpanzee named Ayumu. This primate learned to memorize on the screen a random arrangement of numbers from 1 to 10 and then play them back in order from memory.
The problem is that a person, and it has been proven, cannot do this. That is, the monkey is ahead of us in the test for visual memory and intelligence. Attempts to teach monkeys to speak have been successful before. But before that, they were taught only intermediary languages - communication systems where words are indicated by gestures or symbols.
Scientists say that complex communication systems are a sign of intelligence. And in this regard, they put forward a shocking hypothesis. Perhaps not humans descended from monkeys, but some monkeys from humans.
At the same time, some researchers believe that monkeys come from a parallel, once more developed civilization that was exterminated and gradually degraded.
Scientists include Bigfoot as one example of a parallel branch of development. It is believed that the Yeti is a Neanderthal descendant who has survived to this day. This theory was based on the fact that the Neanderthal is the ancestor of modern man.
But new scientific evidence suggests that we and the Neanderthals are parallel branches of evolution. This means that Bigfoot can also be another subspecies of Homo sapiens.
Promotional video:
Recently, Swiss and American researchers have extracted DNA from the Neanderthal elbow and compared it with the DNA of modern humans. It turned out that the similarity is only 2%. But in general, these are completely different genes, a different sequence of nucleotides.
Then the scientists wondered who the Cro-Magnons came from, if they do not have obvious ancestors on this earth. It is also unclear on what step of the evolutionary ladder, in this case, to place the giants.
Few people know that even before Darwin, they began to collect the theory of evolution of Darwin in pieces, taking some facts and ignoring others.
Darwin asked many new questions, which have not yet been answered. He believed that there must be some common source, that connecting link, in the existence of which, perhaps, the answer to all questions is hidden. Was he even this common ancestor, or could there be several? There is still no definite answer. Suffice it to say that the five previous candidates for this role, who appeared in different years, lived in parallel at about the same time.
In the middle of the 19th century, it was assumed that the common ancestor of man was the Tertiary Dryopithecus, a fossil apes found in France in 1856. She was immediately appointed the predecessor of humans, gorillas and chimpanzees. This was later refuted, but the Darwinists could no longer be stopped. For one and a half hundred years, classifications and theories have been rewritten many times, with each new discovery there were new applicants for this role. The finds multiplied until they began to contradict themselves.
New modern discoveries cause fierce controversy, because they do not fit into well-established concepts. In 2003, in Indonesia on the island of Flores, the remains of people were discovered, who at first were immediately called hobbits. Their size is estimated within a meter, and the volume of the brain is three times less than that of modern humans at the level of great apes.
In 2015, a new species of human fossil was officially presented to the world, found two years earlier in South Africa at Rising Star Cave near Johannesburg. He received the name Homo ice, which in translation from the local dialect means a man a star. Lee Berger, a professor at the Witwatersrand University of Johannesburg, said that "it is amazing to see a primitive human species with such a small brain." Since the age of the find has not yet been determined, the official science recorded it as one of the next human ancestors. However, everything can be quite the opposite - this is just a transitional link from man to monkey.
The main problem of the theory of evolution lies not even in the fact that we live in the era of universal victorious Darwinism, but in the fact that there is no answer to the question: how could living things arise from non-living things?
This again leads scientists to seditious thought: the mechanism of the origin of life is not only in the combinations of amino acid molecules, but possibly lies far beyond the boundaries of science. And if the chance in the origin of life is excluded, then for the fact that we are just like that - we need to thank not a blind chance, but a certain mind, the essence of whose intentions we cannot even imagine.