In May 2015, the German company ROSCH INNOVATIONS launched mass production of a fuel-free generator that generates electricity without consuming fuel. The generator circuit is astonishingly simple and has been tested more than once in the 19th and 20th centuries, but its predecessors did not achieve success. But the Germans from ROSCH INNOVATIONS turned out to be luckier. Or smarter.
The generator consists of a column filled with water, inside which an endless chain with buckets rotates. By supplying air under the buckets of one half of the chain, the Germans ensured that the chain began to move and began to transmit the impulse of movement to the electric generator connected to it. At the same time, the amount of generated energy turned out to be almost 30 times higher than the energy consumption of the compressor. For three years now, distrustful skeptics have come to the office of the company and the company's management has not refused anyone to measure, check and even disassemble the generator. However, until now, no one has discovered hidden wires, batteries or sources of magnetic field. But according to all the canons of physics, the power consumption of the compressor in the ideal case should be equal to the amount of generated energy, and taking into account the inevitable losses and friction, they should be higher. How did the Germans manage to circumvent the laws of physics?
At first glance, the ROSH generator converts the energy of the planet's gravitational field into electricity (the buckets are lifted under the action of the buoyancy force of Archimedes, which is generated by gravitational forces), but the conditions under which such generation can take place are not met. That is, in theory, the generator cannot work, but in practice it works. A scam from manufacturers or are we missing something in the laws of nature? I'll start with these very laws.
In the middle of the 19th century, the German physicist and mathematician Karl Gauss theoretically deduced the impossibility of extracting energy from a potential field. The position sounds as follows: no matter how entangled and complex trajectory we move the object in the potential field, but when the object returns to the starting point, here its energy is exactly equal to the initial energy, and the total change in the field energy is zero, therefore, extract energy from the potential fields are impossible. The gravitational field is a kind of potential and, at first glance, the Gaussian position should be fulfilled for it. But it turned out that in the case of a gravitational field, some peculiarities arise that Gauss did not take into account and which can change the result to the opposite. I mean the buoyancy force of Archimedes. Let this force be very small (especially if the object is in the air), its presence allows you to bypass the prohibition of the German physicist. Let's show this with numbers.
The work performed is calculated by the formula A = INT (P + F) dh, where INT is the integral sign, P is the gravity force, F is the buoyancy force of Archimedes, dh is the displacement differential. Since the integral of the sum is equal to the sum of the integrals, we can decompose our expression into components A = INT (P) dh + INT (F) dh. The first component is equal to zero in full accordance with the Gauss rule and can be discarded. And the second component can, in turn, be divided into components up the contour (denoted by the index 1) and down along the contour (index 2): A = INT (F1) dh + INT (F2) dh. Now let's analyze the resulting expression. Forces F1 and F2 are always directed upwards. And the integral of displacement will be directed upwards on the ascending half of the contour and down on the descending half. Thus, in one case, the product of the force and the differential will give a positive value,otherwise negative. As a result, the two integrals neutralize each other and give zero. And zero work means that no energy is extracted from the field.
But such a result will be obtained only if the Archimedean forces F1 and F2 are exactly equal to each other. And if they are different? And if they are different, then the overall result will become nonzero, which means the possibility of extracting energy from the field. The Archimedes force can be changed by phase transformations (solid / liquid or liquid / vapor). This is how we get the condition for extracting energy from the gravitational field: it is necessary that on one part of the contour the working body moves in the form of vapor (or liquid), and on the other part of it in the form of a liquid (or solid). If there are no phase changes in the working body, you can experiment even before the Last Judgment, but there will be no success.
Returning to the ROSH generator, what do we see? We will see that the working medium (in this case, air) does not change its phase state: just as the gas was at the moment of injection under the ladles, it remains gas at the moment it is in the atmosphere. Therefore, no energy of the gravitational field in this generator is converted. And the fact that the generator still produces electricity is explained not by the work of the gravitational field, but by the work of another source of energy.
For a long time I could not solve this riddle. But once he saw the air nozzle of the generator, he immediately found the answer: the secret lies in the spiral twisting of the air before it is fed under the buckets. We should start with the phenomenon of inertia.
Promotional video:
Academic science does not provide at least some answer to the nature of inertia. Most likely, this happens for the reason that inertia is a manifestation of the forces of the physical vacuum, but academic science rejects the presence of energy and forces inside the physical vacuum. This is how I define inertia: inertia is the reaction of a physical vacuum to deformations introduced into it. The physical vacuum is not emptiness, as many think. This is a very complex structure that forms the space of the Universe, it just seems to us to be emptiness. Physvacuum interacts not with material objects, but with fields: gravitational, magnetic, electric. And it interacts only with uneven motion, such are the laws of physics.
When we press the gas pedal while sitting in the car, we deform the surrounding physical vacuum by the accelerated movement of the gravitational field of our body, and it reacts to this by creating inertial forces that pull us back to eliminate the deformation introduced into it. To overcome the resistance of the physical vacuum, you have to spend a lot of energy, which translates into increased fuel consumption. Uniform motion does not deform the physical vacuum and it does not create inertial forces. Further braking again deforms the physical vacuum and it again reacts to this by creating inertial forces that pull us back in order to leave us in a state of uniform rectilinear motion and eliminate new deformation. But this time, the physical vacuum is already working on us and gives us the previously received energy, which is converted into heat in the brake pads. Such accelerated-uniformly-slowed motion is nothing but a single beat of oscillatory motion of huge amplitude and low frequency: at the stage of acceleration we impart energy to the physical vacuum, at the stage of deceleration it gives us this energy. And he can give more, since he himself has tremendous energy.
Circular motion is also a kind of uneven motion, since in this case the position of the velocity vector in space is constantly changing. Therefore, the physical vacuum is deformed again and in response creates a centrifugal force, which is always directed so as to straighten the trajectory of rotation and make it rectilinear when the deformation of the vacuum does not occur. According to the third law of mechanics, not only the vacuum acts on a rotating object with a centrifugal force, but the object also acts on a vacuum with a centripetal force. Under the action of centripetal forces, the vacuum moves inside a rotating object from its periphery to the axis of rotation, here individual flows of vacuum collide, turn 90 degrees, and then fly out along the axis in both directions.
Now let's make a simple design. On a flat disk we put the same disk with a smaller radius, then a third disk with an even smaller radius, and so on. And we will twist the structure around the axis of symmetry. In the largest disk (let it be the lowest one), everything happens as I just described: the physical vacuum flies out from both sides along the axis of rotation. But the next disc will be different. The flow of vacuum, which enters it from below from the lowest disc, turns all flows in its direction. And so it will be in all other drives. As a result, we have only 1% of the vacuum flies down from the base, but 99% will fly up from the top (of course, the numbers are approximate). And since the vacuum moves unevenly here, it will pull the entire structure along with it.
And now let's move on to the device of the air nozzle of the ROSH generator. It is made in the form of an inverted horn or cone, into which air enters tangentially to the lateral surface and, twisting in a spiral, moves to the tapering outlet. The air volume inside the nozzle has the shape of that very cone, made up of separate flat disks of variable radius, which I have just written about. And while it rotates. Therefore, the same processes are going on in it. That is, in such an air flow, an additional driving force arises, creating an additional pressure. This means that the head of the compressor itself can be reduced. And along with a decrease in the pressure generated by the compressor, energy consumption will decrease. As a result, the power consumption of the compressor will become less than the generated energy and we will get an almost "perpetual motion machine".
For more than a century, the phenomenon of a decrease in the aerodynamic / hydraulic resistance of a pipe in the case of a spiral swirl of a gas / liquid in a pipe has been known (unfortunately, it is little known, therefore it is used extremely rarely). This effect is especially pronounced for a narrowing flow, that is, when the pipe is narrowed. In some modes, the resistance drops to almost zero or even to negative values. A negative resistance value means the appearance of an additional force acting in the direction of flow and accelerating the flow. But there is no explanation for this phenomenon yet. Officially no. And unofficially, I just gave this explanation. It is this effect that works in the air nozzle of the ROSH generator: the additional pressure developed in the nozzle is so great that it overcomes the hydrostatic weight of the liquid column. In other words,in the nozzle, the energy of the physical vacuum is converted into the force of aerodynamic pressure, which makes the entire system efficient. But if the air is not twisted before being fed into the column with water, then the structure will not work. More precisely, it will spin and generate something, but the amount of generated energy will be less than the amount of energy consumed by the compressor for its own needs. That is why those who do not pay attention to the twist (Bachevich, Markelov, etc.) cannot have success.consumed by the compressor for their needs. That is why those who do not pay attention to the twist (Bachevich, Markelov, etc.) cannot have success.consumed by the compressor for their needs. That is why those who do not pay attention to the twist (Bachevich, Markelov, etc.) cannot have success.
Author: Igor Prokhorov