The death of Dmitry Hvorostovsky has stirred up an acute topic - stem cell treatment.
How to explain that a great singer, a very handsome, athletic and healthy person, burned out from cancer, having lived only to 55 years old? And why couldn't the doctors of the best clinics help him?
There was information that treatment with embryonic stem cells played a negative role. On the Internet, they are discussing that Hvorostovsky could have resorted to such therapy.
Are idols haunted by the consequences of "youth injections"?
Surprisingly, the trace of such treatment can be traced in many other tragic deaths of famous actors - Lyubov Polishchuk in 2006, Alexander Abdulov in 2008, Oleg Yankovsky in 2009, Anna Samokhina in 2010, Zhanna Friske in 2015 … The list goes on, there are athletes, politicians and other public people. All of them were successful, beautiful, far from old. And if anyone was aged, then shortly before his death he seemed to flourish, look younger. And suddenly cancer or some other inexplicable and strange disease appeared, which became the cause of death.
Are these side effects of stem cell therapy or are we just falling into conspiracy theories? It is clear that there is a concept of medical secrecy and doctors will be silent. Relatives and relatives could tell everything. But all the years that have passed since the death of many actors, they are also silent. This means that we cannot be 100% sure that the whole thing is in rejuvenating cells, until no one disclosed this information to us.
However, a few years ago, there was a leak that the cause of many deaths is actually related to embryonic stem cell therapy. Moreover, in many cases all this concerns one particular clinic.
Promotional video:
This was told by a nurse working in this clinic. It seems that she was so shocked by the string of actor's deaths that she broke a professional secret. In this capital clinic, it seemed to him that Alexander Abdulov was successfully treated. Then he persuaded his friend Oleg Yankovsky to this. In the beginning, everything was fine with him, he seemed to have acquired a second youth. For him, this was probably even more surprising, because he was 9 years older than Abdulov. Analyzes and studies have shown that both actors have actually become younger. Surely people around you noticed it. They say that famous actors even advised their colleagues in the theater to undergo treatment in this clinic too.
Damn questions
Why doesn't it seem strange to us that folk favorites could be treated in such an exotic way? After all, its effectiveness and safety is a big question. From an ethical point of view, he is also compromised by many scandals around the collection of embryonic stem cells from abortive material. Today there are ways to obtain stem cells without abortion, from the patient's own cells. But it's hard to believe that this complicated method is used in clinics like the one where the actors were treated.
“In fact, there is nothing strange in the choice of such treatment methods and clinics by our actors and public figures,” says psychologist Yulia Gurevich. “These people are the elite, the cream of society, and they need elite methods of treatment. Fashionable, expensive, and not trivial therapy for "three kopecks". This is normal, this is how society functions. Naturally, seeing an improvement in health, other colleagues in the shop also willingly agreed to the same treatment. Why didn't they think about the possible consequences? To understand this, you need to have a special education and a penchant for analysis. These are very difficult questions. Talk to doctors and you will understand that even they do not have a consensus on the safety of stem cell treatment."
At the same time, there are many artists who are reasonably credited with stem cell treatment and who only benefited from it. Sophia Rotaru, Valery Leontyev, Lev Leshchenko, Alexander Buinov and some others are named among these lucky ones (to be honest, their appearance does not contradict the fact that they were treated with stem cells). How can all this be explained? Why are some stem cells treated and others crippled? In fact, there are many such cases in medicine, and they even have an explanation (see by the way). The only trouble is that doctors themselves have not yet learned to understand who will benefit from such therapy and who will not.
By the way
Can stem cells cause cancer?
This topic is actively discussed in the scientific press, but practically does not go beyond its limits. The latest research on this topic was published recently in the well-known journal "Stem cells and translational medicine" (STEM CELLS Translational Medicine). The title of the article says: "Cancer cells, cancer stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells: their impact on the development of cancer." The latter type of cells (MSC) appears to have opposite properties. In some cases, these cells prevent the development of cancer, in others, they contribute: MSCs can degenerate into the so-called cancer stem cell, which gives rise to the development of a tumor. Moreover, it is usually the most malignant and tenacious. The latter property is one of the most important for stem cells. And in this they are very similar to cancer cells.
How will MSCs behave - will they cause cancer or not? It depends on many conditions, and the authors of the article are trying to make out them. So far, there is a lot of unclear on these issues. That is why stem cell treatment can sometimes be compared to a fork in the road: if you go to the right, you will be cured, you will go to the left … Further scientific research is needed to be able to manage the treatment process.