Why Did The Russians Attack The Swedes Near Poltava? - Alternative View

Why Did The Russians Attack The Swedes Near Poltava? - Alternative View
Why Did The Russians Attack The Swedes Near Poltava? - Alternative View

Video: Why Did The Russians Attack The Swedes Near Poltava? - Alternative View

Video: Why Did The Russians Attack The Swedes Near Poltava? - Alternative View
Video: When Sweden Was an Empire - Baltic Delights 2024, September
Anonim

The famous Russian humorist M. Zadornov did not bypass in his work the rather serious topic of falsification of ancient Russian history, which is obvious to any sane person. It is known that the Jesuit monks, commissioned by the Vatican, re-composed the history of China, at the same time inventing the history of the "Mongol Empire", about which the Mongols themselves have no written sources, and most importantly, a folk epic rich in tales and epics, legends and myths. In the same way, there is no evidence that Rurik was related to the Normans, and the Byzantine monks brought the first writing to Russia.

Perhaps it is the history of Ancient Rus that has undergone the greatest falsification in favor of the pro-Western Russophobic forces, which are still continuing their "myth-making", distorting the events of recent history that are not so distant from us and interpreting them from completely ridiculous positions. It already comes to the point that some such "historians" assert that it was the USSR that attacked Hitler's Germany, and that the USSR or China dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Just not in vain in Russia there was from ancient times such a concept as "reality", which determines the degree of reliability of tales and myths. It just turns out that all this "official history" is much more like a collection of obvious fables with a poorly concealed Russophobic bias.

For example, what M. Zadornov himself said about this:

As you can see, it is pathological Russophobia that breeds the next historical fables, of which the entire pro-Western version of the "official history" consists. And it was not by chance that German “historians” were entrusted with writing the “official version” of Old Russian history, most of whom did not even know the Russian language and the cultural traditions of the Russian people. And blindly believe in everything that these "experts" on ancient Russian history wrote can only be those who have no brains of their own, but sycophancing before the western "masters" is the true essence of nature.

michael101063 ©

Promotional video: