Evgeny Podkletnov, in collaboration with the Italian Giovanni Modanese, in 2001 published an extremely interesting article on the successful experimental demonstration of the antigravity effect.
This work describes a "generator of gravitational impulses" - a device that, on the basis of a source of a strong electric discharge and a superconducting "emitter", generates a "short-term gravitational impulse, which propagates with tremendous speed (almost instantly) along the discharge line, passing through various objects without slipping. any noticeable loss of energy. " The result of the impulse is the repulsive force acting on the object in proportion to its mass. In combination with a laser pointing device, according to Podkletnov's testimony, his laboratory setup leads to deflection of pendulums in vacuum flasks located at a distance of hundreds of meters. In simple terms, an anti-gravity engine was described, which, although it could not send aircraft into space,but demonstrated the reality of such a phenomenon as antigravity.
In July 2002, Jane's Defense Weekly published data on the GRASP "anti-gravity" project launched by Boeing, the largest US aerospace company. According to an official Boeing document, the goal of GRASP is to create real-life equipment based on the Podkletnov-Modanese "gravitational pulse generator". The document reproduces Podkletnov's estimates, according to which his generator at a two-megavolt discharge shows a "maximum target acceleration" of the order of one thousand G. Work on the gravitational pulse generator will be carried out at Phantom Works, Boeing's secret facility in Seattle. It is also noteworthy that at the last air show in Farnborough (Great Britain), the head of Phantom Works, George Mulner, confirmed his company's interest in Podkletnov's work and other research in the field of antigravity.
These are amazing statements! Indeed, until 2001, the European Space Agency ESA had never before shown interest in "odious" ideas for the creation of anti-gravity engines. But, apparently, the contagious example of American colleagues from NASA with their fundamental project Breakthrough Propulsion Physics in Cleveland, as well as a number of recent publications in leading scientific journals, made this organization look at this area seriously. In the summer of 2001, a special group of theoretical physicists was formed at ESA to study, analyze and assess the prospects of the most well-known schemes of anti-gravity engines at that time, consisting of the Portuguese Orfeu Bertolami and the Austrian Martin Taimar. Over the course of a year, these researchers studied over a dozen gravity control schemes and concluded in their report,that all of them do not yet deserve serious financial costs.
However, they said that while anti-gravity is still unattainable at this time, there are already several real-world experiments that promise its attainability in the future. One of them involves the launch of a spacecraft to investigate the strange gravitational effects recorded by the Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 deep-space probes. Another series of experiments - aboard the International Space Station ISS - could test whether antimatter really moves under the influence of gravity differently than ordinary matter. Finally, European scientists are also suggesting that the ESA study more closely superconductors and superfluids to see if the rotation of these materials is actually capable of generating "gravitational-magnetic" fields. However, Bertolami and Taimar immediately notethat even if we learn to control gravity, it will not give us the ability to launch spaceships. Like, if the ship can suddenly be made lighter, then any fuel emitted by the nozzles will also be lighter, and therefore will not be able to give the ship a more significant acceleration. Another argument of scientists is that in order to launch a spacecraft on a low-orbit trajectory around the Earth, for example, it must be accelerated to a speed of 8.9 km / s, but even if the satellite is completely shielded from gravity, its speed will still have to be increased to 7.5 km / s - just to keep the device in earth orbit. Another argument of scientists is that in order to launch a spacecraft on a low-orbit trajectory around the Earth, for example, it must be accelerated to a speed of 8.9 km / s, but even if the satellite is completely shielded from gravity, its speed will still have to be increased to 7.5 km / s - just to keep the device in earth orbit. Another argument of scientists is that in order to launch a spacecraft on a low-orbit trajectory around the Earth, for example, it must be accelerated to a speed of 8.9 km / s, but even if the satellite is completely shielded from gravity, its speed will still have to be increased to 7.5 km / s - just to keep the device in earth orbit.
On the other hand, Orpheu and Taimar note, gravity control would be extremely useful here on Earth. It is already well known that ceramics and organic crystals made under microgravity conditions exhibit extremely interesting properties. Zero gravity alloys can be much stronger than conventional alloys, since they are free from defects and inhomogeneities caused by the action of gravity on molten metals. Microgravity will also make it possible to organize work with objects hanging directly in space, thus avoiding containers contaminating delicate pharmaceutical reactions. Finally, certain superconductors can only be grown in the absence of gravity. The implementation of such a wide range of technological tasks in space involves absolutely gigantic costs,but the development of antigravity would make it possible to do all these things directly on Earth. Well, and even about what an anti-gravity engine for transport means, everyone is well aware of science fiction.
As for the difficulties of using anti-gravity engines in astronautics, I would like to note the following. Firstly, such an apparatus does not necessarily have to contain jet engines (this is an attribute of modern astronautics). Secondly, the statements of the representatives of "official" science do not correspond to the state of affairs in "secret" (elite) science. As an example, I would like to recall the dark secret of Antarctica - an attack on an American squadron off the coast of the icy continent of unknown aircraft. They moved with incredible speed, and the result of their fire on American ships was quite material - the squadron with heavy losses barely escaped. Interestingly, on what principle of motion were these devices based, instantly changing the trajectory of flight? Of course, “real” scientists will say that “this cannot be, becausewhich cannot be …”However, in this question it is necessary to read between the lines. All reputable scientific publications are under the control of the same people. And such an unusual concept as an “anti-gravity engine” can become not only a means of moving over ultra-long cosmic distances, but also a formidable weapon that strengthens the power of the one who possesses it. Who knows, maybe the spaceships of the future have already been created or are close to being created? But such information will be veiled for a while, and the facts will be silent. Who knows, maybe the spaceships of the future have already been created or are close to being created? But such information will be veiled for a while, and the facts will be silent. Who knows, maybe the spaceships of the future have already been created or are close to being created? But such information will be veiled for a while, and the facts will be silent.
Promotional video: