Let's see what's wrong with the theory of relativity. The foundation of the special and general theory of relativity consists of only two postulates:
- The universe is homogeneous.
- The speed of light is constant.
But before moving on to such terms, let's turn to the history of genius. The whole world knows that Albert Einstein is a Nobel laureate and few doubt that he received this prize for the creation of special and general relativity.
French mathematician and physicist Jules Henri Poincaré:
and Dutch physicist Hendrik Anton Lorenz:
for several years they worked together on the creation of the general theory of relativity. It was Poincaré who put forward the postulate of the homogeneity of the universe and the postulate of the speed of light. Lorenz derived famous formulas.
Promotional video:
A German physicist of Jewish origin, working in the patent office, had access to scientific works and decided to call the new theory by his name. He even retained the name of Lorentz in his theories of relativity. The basic mathematical formulas in his theory are called the Lorentz transformation, but Einstein does not specify what relation he himself has to these formulas.
Plagiarism, or in other words, the theft of Einstein and the scandal that erupted around this theory did not allow the Nobel committee to issue him the prize. The solution was found very simple - he was awarded the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the second law of the photoelectric effect. However, the photoelectric effect itself was discovered by the Russian physicist Alexander Grigorievich Stoletov.
Thus, the image of a genius of all times and peoples was created. Now almost anyone is sure that Albert Einstein received the Nobel Prize for his great special and general theory of relativity, but now is the time to move on to the postulates themselves. What is wrong with these ingenious advanced ideas, which with the help of the Einstein trademark reveal the secrets of the universe to all mankind?
The speed of light, it is also the maximum speed of movement of matter in the universe, is constant, is constant and equal to 300,000 km per second. Without this, the Lorentz transformation conditions turn into nonsense, since at a speed of movement with a speed greater than 300,000 km per second, according to these equations, even the mass of a photon becomes infinite.
By the way, even during the life of Einstein, it was reported that the speed of light is not constant. The so-called etheric wind of light waves was experimentally registered by the American physicist Dayton Miller. Back in the thirties, he proved the inconsistency of the Michelson-Morley experiments, which allegedly confirmed the constancy of the speed of light.
Miller wrote a letter to Einstein. In one of his letters, he reported on the results of his 24-year work, confirming the presence of the etheric wind. However, this information was simply ignored. After the death of Miller, the greatest physicist of the time, his work was never published anywhere else.
In 2000, the following experiment was carried out by Ludjin Wang, Ph. D. at the Princeton Research Institute. Light pulses were passed through a container specially treated with cerium gas. The speed of the light pulses turned out to be 300 times higher than the permissible speed from the Lorentz transformations. That is, it reached 90 million km per second.
In the same year in Italy, another group of physicists in their experiments with microwaves received a speed of their propagation 25% faster. Almost 400 km per second than the permissible speed according to Albert Einstein. From the Lorentz transformations it follows that if the speed of light or other material object exceeds the speed of 300 km per second by at least 1 mm per second, the mass will become infinite.
In other words, in the above experiments, the mass of the photon and microwaves must be greater than the mass of any black hole. Despite this, all over the world they continue to study in schools, institutes and universities, the theory of Albert Einstein, as a reflection of objective reality.
Now let's consider the second postulate of the universe. Astronomers and astrophysicists know the fact that during a total solar eclipse it is possible to observe objects that our Sun covers with itself.
Based on the positions of a homogeneous space, this is simply impossible, since electromagnetic waves in a homogeneous space must propagate in a straight line. The explanation for this phenomenon was given as follows: a massive space object, which is the Sun, affects the rectilinear propagation of light waves, bending their trajectory, as a result of which they are unable to observe what is behind it. If we assume that space is homogeneous, its properties and qualities are unchanged, then such an observation becomes impossible.
Here are some other studies that leave no stone unturned on the foundation of space homogeneity. Astrophysicists George Nodland and John Ralston published unique data in a scientific journal in 1997. After analyzing radio waves from 160 distant galaxies, they concluded that the emissions rotate as they move through space in a faint pattern that resembles a corkscrew.
According to observation from Earth, the axis of rotation runs in one direction, towards the constellation Sextans, and in the other direction - towards the constellation Acuilla. In fact, this is experimental confirmation that the universe has an up and down.
Here is the alignment. Do you think it happened by chance that all mankind was imposed on false ideas about the nature of the universe?
