Trying to explain the appearance of the Universe without the participation of any Higher Forces, scientists in the middle of the 20th century created a theory according to which it appeared as a result of the so-called Big Bang from a singular (special) point. The size of this point can be imagined by reading the statement of a senior researcher at the State Astronomical Institute named after Sternberg V. Surdin: "The early Universe was so small that even an atom of a proton in comparison with it could seem like the Moon." And the point from which it emerged was even smaller.
And in this tiny little thing, at this point, all the substance of the future Universe (the Subtle World and the physical) was concentrated.
What happened before the Big Bang and why it happened, the theory is silent about this.
True, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences I. Tkachev openly admits: “What was at the very beginning, we, of course, do not know. It could be some kind of quantum fluctuation and something else. But, most likely, it was something small in the spatial dimension and it contained little energy."
It becomes interesting, from what, in this case, and due to what energy our Universe arose, which still continues to expand at light speed, and matter (from this "something small") continues to scatter in all directions.
Moreover, if in the first second of expansion the speed of expansion of matter would differ from the real value by only 10-18 fractions of its value in one direction or another, then, as the famous English physicist Paul Davis writes in his book "Superpower": "The universe is either has long ago collapsed into the initial state of a "material point" under the influence of gravitational forces, or the substance in it has completely dispersed. " This means that the force that caused the Big Bang was calculated with incredible accuracy. I wonder who?
It is worth mentioning once again about the very first in time - the "inflationary" stage of the expansion of the Universe, which lasted about 10-35 seconds, starting from the time the world clock "started working". During this time, the "embryo" of the Universe, which appeared from a singular point (practically, out of nothing), managed to increase its size by 10100 times (Landa A. D. "Physics of elementary particles and information cosmology").
From the standpoint of the Big Bang theory, elementary particles (in fact, they are not elementary, but the most complex formations) have arisen by themselves and in the optimal structural and functional version. Moreover, it happened in a tiny fraction of a second. So, for the appearance of hadrons, leptons and photons it took only 10-10 seconds. According to the calculations of physicists, about the same time, protons, neutrons, electrons were formed and all particles function in harmony and harmoniously. As in a fairy tale: "Stand in front of me, like a leaf in front of the grass"!
Promotional video:
Fabulous wonders do not end there. According to the Big Bang theory, the temperature of particles at a singular point is estimated at a fantastic value from 1028 to 1032 K, and the density of matter at the moment of the birth of the Universe, according to Academician Ya. B. Zeldovich was supposed to reach 1094 g / cm3.
For comparison, the highest temperatures in the interiors of stars are estimated at about 108K, and the highest densities of matter in the interiors of neutron stars reach 1015 g / cm3.
True, in October 2010, a superheavy neutron star was discovered for the first time, the size of which "does not exceed the size of a small city, but the substance is 10-15 times more dense than the density of an atomic nucleus." Since the density of the atomic nucleus is 10 14 g / cm3, the density of the superheavy star turned out to be equal to 1.5 x 1015 g / cm3. Incomparable to the density required for the birth of the universe.
According to the assumption of one of the adepts of the Big Bang theory, Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences I. S. Shklovsky, at a time when the age of the Universe was calculated in insignificant fractions of a second, it "was a" drop "of supernuclear density, which for some reason came into an unstable state and exploded."
Did not explode, did not explode, and then took it and exploded! And this was done without any outside influence, since there was nothing else besides the “drop”.
And in general it is not clear why the substance in this drop did not annihilate. After all, any elementary particles are always born in pairs with their antipodes, for example, an electron and a positron (anti-electron), but, having opposite charges and masses of the same name, are attracted to each other by electric and gravitational forces and mutually annihilate immediately after their birth.
The universe, with a crazy density (1094 g / cm3) concentrated in a "drop", should have contained an equal amount of matter and antimatter, which in such a small volume could not avoid a fatal encounter.
In addition, there is a certain paradox in the concept of the newborn Universe as a “drop”.
If the Universe was once a drop, then it is not infinite and eternal. If the density of this “drop” was supernuclear, but not infinite, the amount of matter in the world is also not infinite. If matter is not infinite, then it is not eternal. And if it is not eternal, then this means that matter had a beginning. If it had a beginning, it means that it was created by some immaterial force.
In a word, it is no coincidence that an increasing number of scientists are rejecting the Big Bang theory. So the astrophysicist L. M. Mukhin compares the Big Bang theory to the sword of Damocles hanging over cosmology. Nobel laureate H. Alven calls this theory "an insult to common sense." And the doctor of physical and mathematical sciences S. G. Fedosin in his article “Problems of fundamental physics and possible ways of their solution”, writes: “We have every right to say that the Big Bang theory claims to be the biggest myth in the history of physics. The problems and dead ends of theoretical thought generated by this theory are such that the only cardinal way to get rid of them is to abandon the theory itself."
Most likely, the adherents of the Big Bang theory stand with their chest on its defense, because there is nowhere to retreat, "Moscow is behind!" In other words, it is necessary either to defend the notorious theory, or to recognize the creation of the Universe by a certain Higher Mind according to a previously thought out program, coordinated to the smallest detail.
It was to this conclusion that in the middle of the last century some scientists came, who proclaimed the anthropic principle: the Universe, even before its birth, was programmed for the appearance of matter, living matter and intelligent beings in it.
In "Revelations to the People of the New Age", which the Creator gives to people through Academician L. I. Maslova, it is said: "In the beginning there was a Thought!.. Scientists, carried away by the idea of knowing the cause of the Big Bang, would have to understand that the cause or the BEGINNING was not an explosion, but an impulse of the CREATOR's energy!"
Academician G. I. Shipov, the creator of the theory of physical vacuum and torsion fields, writes: “At the highest level of reality, the decisive role is played by the“primary Consciousness”acting as an active principle - God and not amenable to analytical description. … And without any exaggeration, Absolute“Nothing”can be given the status of the Creator or the Creator, because everything begins with Him … And it is Nothing that creates not matter, but plans-designs.
In accordance with the anthropic principle, the birth of the Universe, according to the new hypothesis, also originated from a special point, but unlike the Big Bang theory, there was nothing physical in it: neither matter nor energy. Nothing, except for the ideal laws of the future Universe inherent in it ("plans-designs" of God or "impulse of the Creator's energy").
Scientists call this point a white cosmic hole. Back in the 60s of the last century, the famous Russian astrophysicist, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences N. A. Kozyrev suggested (and not without reason) that there are other Universes in parallel with our Universe, and that communication between them is carried out using tunnels, which are black and white cosmic holes. Through black holes, matter leaves our Universe into a parallel world, and energy flows from them through white holes. The orthodox scientific world considered this assumption to be the delusion of an adventurer. Today the attitude to Kozyrev's brilliant suggestion is different.
Perhaps some of us are more familiar with the name of a black hole than a white one. In any case, it is worth getting acquainted with these amazing phenomena of the Cosmos, which allow us to understand the process of birth of the physical Universe.
Since black holes are more familiar to science than white ones, let's get acquainted first with black cosmic holes. Having understood them, we will be able to understand how our Universe was born from a white hole.