A lot of people, and even entire organizations in many countries of the world are trying to find signs in the Universe of the existence of intelligent Extraterrestrial civilizations. These attempts have so far not been crowned with success. Meanwhile….
In 1929, an unusual radio transmission was caught at 75 meters. Someone, who identified himself as NIKOMO and introduced himself as a messenger of an alien civilization, read a memorandum for two hours in different languages, which is now called the message of KOH. The transfer took only one day. This was partly mentioned in Brad Steiger's book "Encounter with an Alien" (1977) and the Soviet television program "UFO - Unannounced Visit" in 1990.
Interestingly, a similar situation was repeated. On November 27, 1977, a television broadcast was disrupted in an area of 120 kilometers southwest of London. The image from the screens disappeared, and an unknown voice said that he was a representative of an extraterrestrial civilization, that earthly civilization was on the wrong path, earthlings needed to destroy all the instruments of evil, there was very little time left for this, and if people did not take the necessary action, they would have to leave the borders Galaxies.
London television experts who investigated the case argued that, generally speaking, they had no idea what kind of jokers might be able to implement it. Such an action requires very bulky and expensive equipment. Information about the incident was broadcast by the Voice of America radio station and Soviet radio on November 28, 1977 in the evening International Panorama. It was indicated that in connection with him, a representative of the British police assured the audience that the "alien" would soon appear before the earthlings in the dock. However, these assurances remained an empty phrase.
Third message to humanity
(Given in 1929 from the birth of Christ) The Coalition Observer Detachment, hereinafter referred to as KOH, addresses the intelligent inhabitants of the Earth, the race that calls itself Humanity. The present appeal of KOH to earthlings is the third, control one.
The first appeal was conveyed by KON in 576 from (mb to - we publish according to the publication in the "Siberian newspaper" No. 40 for 1990) of the Nativity of Christ to the inhabitants of the city of Apuradhapura, the largest city on Earth at that time.
Promotional video:
The second message was transmitted by KOH in 711 AD to the inhabitants of the city of Tkaacetcoatl, the largest city on the American mainland at that time.
The present address of the KOH to earthlings is basically identical to the first two in content, composed in the main languages of the Earth today: Chinese, English, Russian and Spanish. The text of the appeal has been corrected taking into account the current level of knowledge and the errors of the inhabitants of the Earth. The purpose of the appeal is to offer to hold in some future negotiations between representatives of Humanity and representatives of the Coalition on the subject of Humanity's entry into the Coalition.
Since negotiations will be possible only after Humanity has fulfilled certain preconditions, these conditions are given below, preceded for their correct understanding, both by brief information of a cosmogonic nature and by a comparative characteristic of the way of thinking of Humanity.
COG Message, Chapter 1
By now, Mankind has formed an idea of the Universe, as a whole, more correct than during the first and second revolutions. Indeed, the Earth is not flat and is not at the center of the universe.
Indeed, the Earth, as one of the planets, revolves around the Sun. Indeed, the Sun is not located in the center of the Universe, but is one of the stars that make up the Galaxy.
Indeed, the last of the transformations of energy that support the activity of the stars and, accordingly, the Sun and enable the existence of life on Earth and similar planets, is a thermonuclear reaction.
Indeed, the intelligent race of earthlings is not the only one in the universe.
Otherwise, most of your cosmogonic guesses are wrong.
The belief of your scientists in the existence of some, even if not yet discovered by them, unshakable laws of the Universe and in the constancy of world constants is a delusion. So, the gravitational constant changes noticeably within your solar system, not to mention larger scales, which led to significant errors in your determination of the size of the Galaxy and the distances to other galaxies and caused the appearance of erroneous theories of a closed Universe, and this year the theory of a scattering The universe.
The idea of the universal three-dimensionality of space, on which your cosmogonic ideas are primarily based, is also mistaken. The world is chaotic, there is nothing immutable in it, including dimensions. The dimension of space in the Universe fluctuates, smoothly changes over a very wide range. The best condition for the emergence of organic life is the dimensionality of space, equal to Pi (3.14159 …). Significant deviations from this value have a detrimental effect on living nature. Currently, the vicinity of the solar system has a dimension of + 3.00017 …, and the proximity of this number to an integer of 3 misled you.
In the vicinity of your cluster of galaxies, a gravitational cyclone is drifting with a dimension of -3.15 in the center … which can touch your Galaxy with its edge, destroying organic life on all planets on which no protection measures will be taken.
In particular, this circumstance makes it necessary for you to join the Coalition of Mankind in a short time, at the latest 65,000 years after the filing of this appeal - from 1929 from the Nativity of Christ, so that the Coalition could help Mankind prepare for a cyclone.
There are currently about 220,000 sentient races in your galaxy who have already joined the coalition, and about 1,000 sentient races considering joining, including you.
KOH asks you not to take the message about the gravity cyclone as an attempt to influence your answer.
You are mistaken in deciding the question of the origin of the solar system and life on Earth. The solar system arose from a dust cloud seeded by the construction team of the Coalition in the Universe, which meets two basic requirements for the conditions for the development and emergence of organic life:
- in an area far enough from other stars, - having a dimension of space close to + Pi.
You are mistaken in assimilating an intelligent race to a living individual, presenting in some future decrepitude and death of Mankind inevitable. In the evolutionary process, new species of living beings descend from some of the old species, and it should be your concern for new species of intelligent races on Earth to descend from yours. It is this consideration that should determine the strategy for the development of an intelligent race. Meanwhile, according to the observations of KON, Humanity is not at all guided by such or a similar strategy, leaving its development to chance and directing all its efforts to satisfy short-term needs.
You should not think that your delusions are accidental, transient. They are inevitable and stable due to the specifics of your thinking, a brief analysis of which is devoted to the next chapter.
COG message, chapter 2
The thinking of living matter and the very existence and development of living matter have a common basis. Both that, and another is the opposite flow of entropy. In thinking, this countercurrent is expressed in the search for consistency. Your thinking is also characterized by a search for consistency, but this is where the similarity between your thinking and the thinking characteristic of the overwhelming majority of intelligent races that make up the Coalition ends.
This circumstance forces many members of the KON to doubt the legitimacy of referring to you as an intelligent race. The basis of your logic is the concept of "yes" - "no", as if they are real and repeatedly manifested in a stepwise analysis of any complex issue. Moreover, the number of steps in the analysis is finite and most often very small, even when you are investigating a rather serious problem. The search for an answer is reduced to choosing one of 2 where 2 is the number of steps, possible solutions, while the most correct solution most often lies between them.
Your mathematicians will understand the following analogy: the solution to the problem that appears after solving private polls like "yes" - "no" is similar to choosing one of the vertices of an N-dimensional cube, while the space of possible solutions is, in the first approximation, all points of the N-dimensional space. If you do not specify, then the real dimension of the solution space is most often determined by you incorrectly and very rarely is in fact an integer.
Our attitude towards you as an intelligent race is complicated by the following considerations. As far as we can judge, any scientific or legal law, the meaning of a discovery or invention, the essence of any of your thoughts can be expressed by you in a phrase containing at most 100 words from a dictionary of 50,000 words, including mathematical and other conventions. The total number of all kinds of phrases from such a dictionary is a very modest value, equal to 50,000 to the power of 100. If we leave only the phrases that have linguistic (diagnostic) consistency, then their number will be reduced to 50,000 to the power of 50.5. If we now discard phrases in which words are grammatically correctly connected, but their content does not even have the appearance of meaning, then the number of outwardly meaningful phrases will be reduced to 50,000 to the power of 25. The elimination of false from true statements is,according to the most overestimated estimates, a list of no more than 3.9 * 10 to the power of 37 statements that can be expressed by you and would correspond to reality.
Meanwhile, we know representatives of the animal world on various planets, capable of giving no less a variety of unconditioned reactions, quite adequate to reality, to various combinations of external stimuli, which, nevertheless, cannot be called reasonable.
Apparently, it would be more correct to consider Humanity not as an intelligent, but as a potentially intelligent race, since the limited thinking is still not innate in you.
By nature, the human brain is endowed with a thinking apparatus, no less perfect than the thinking organs of representatives of many intelligent races in the Universe. But the development of your thinking from the very beginning went on an absolutely wrong path.
At the beginning of the formation of the thinking process, the ability to think lies in the potential for a diverse response to the same informational impact.
On the graph, hereinafter referred to as the logical foundation, the force or perceptibility of the reaction to the information impact is laid down vertically, horizontally to the right - the acceptability, pleasantness of this reaction, and to the left of 0 - its unacceptability, nuisance. Like everything in nature that has not yet been processed by the activity of the mind counteracting entropy, this graph is chaotic, the bursts of the curve on it are explained by purely physiological threshold effects, self-education of the mind consists not only in building a complex system of logical thinking, but also in processing and improving the foundation on which this system is based. As the example of numerous intelligent races shows, the restructuring of the logical foundation according to the given scheme most meets the requirements of successful knowledge of nature.
It should be noted that we know of several intelligent races in the Universe that have a rectilinear structure of a logical foundation with branches extending to infinity. They make up their own Association of Races, they are not included in the coalition, since we could not find a common language with them. The fundamental difference between their thinking and ours lies in the fact that the area of the figure describing the logical foundation is finite for us, but in their thinking it is infinite. We even find it difficult to imagine how they perceive being, and we cannot understand what keeps them alive under the violent blows that go into the unlimited infinity of positive and negative informational influences.
The raw logical foundation of a person has two noticeable splashes to the right and left of zero and several small ones. His research shows that a person did not and does not have any obstacles to adjust his logical foundation according to the scheme generally accepted in the Universe. Meanwhile, the human mind from the very beginning developed fundamentally erroneously, was guided by these outbursts and now has its own kind of logical foundation. These high bursts to the left and to the right of zero are what you call "no" and "yes" and without which, in principle, you cannot imagine a phenomenon. Meanwhile, only the force of habit speaks in you. Purposeful splitting of the logical foundation into the concepts of "no" and "yes" is the biggest obstacle on the way to your knowledge of being. Moreover, the theoretical developments of logical thinking undertaken by you,instead of correcting the error, they only deepen it. Theoretical logical systems operate only with the refined concepts of "yes" and "no", excluding other variants of logical reactions. These developments are a step backward even in comparison with the logical foundation of human thinking, presented in the previous diagram, since the area of the figure describing the logical foundation, instead of the finite one, becomes equal to zero.
Using your mathematical language, we can say that your logic is based on a discrete logical foundation instead of a continuous one, and the most primitive function with only two values is taken as the basis. This suggests the inevitable conclusion that if your method of perceiving being can be called thinking, then this system of thinking is the most primitive of all possible.
Discretization of logic forces you to extend the principle of discretization to all things. So, the natural series of numbers, which, in essence, is a possible, but very artificial mathematical trick that has very little in common with real nature, has become for you the basis of those basics of mathematics with which the vast majority of representatives of Mankind are only familiar. You strive to calculate everything and at the same time you are unable to accurately convey, for example, information about the strength of the wind, if you do not express it numerically in points or pressure per square meter or mile, and these three numbers express the same wind strength, will not cause you the same reaction until you do some additional calculations and make sure that they really indicate the same thing.
Arithmetic counting led you to the appearance of puzzles caused not by the reality of the world, but by the primitiveness of your thinking. Meanwhile, you waste energy trying to solve them and harmonize with the picture of the world presented to you, as real mysteries of nature. For example, the arrangement of rational and irrational numbers on the real axis.
Discretization of logic forces you to split the whole perceived into separate facts, phenomena, concepts and categories, drawing artificial boundaries between them.
Discretization of logic and the principle of counting induce you to consider the number of features of an object as finite and give names to each of them. This gives rise to a very dubious opportunity to separate some features from others - a technique you call abstraction. Movement along the steps of abstraction to more and more general signs is considered by you to be the only correct way of knowing the truth, while this movement is a path leading away from the truth, into darkness. It is no coincidence that all your abstract constructions, called philosophical systems, are mutually contradictory, although they are based on the same logic. Step by step, plunging into darkness along the steps of abstraction, step by step losing touch with the real world, philosophical systems gradually lose their orientation and reach the point that at the dead end of this movement,to the meaningless question of the primacy of matter or spirit, give diametrically opposite answers. Logic based on "yes" - "no" forces you to always and everywhere draw boundaries between various complexes of attributes of objects, and due to the weakness of this logic, entropy leads the way in the process of drawing boundaries, and they are drawn very chaotically, illogical even from the point of view your logic, which is especially convincingly emphasized by their unequal arrangement in the words of different human languages. Your way of communicating is based on the drawing of these chaotic boundaries, which you consider to be one of the highest achievements of the human mind. The primitiveness of language as a way of exchanging information is shown by us already in counting the number of possible meaningful and correct phrases.based on "yes" - "no", it forces you to always and everywhere draw boundaries between various complexes of attributes of objects, and because of the weakness of this logic, entropy leads the way in the process of drawing boundaries, and they are drawn very chaotically, illogical even from the point of view of your logic, which is especially convincingly emphasized by their unequal arrangement in the words of different human languages. Your way of communicating is based on the drawing of these chaotic boundaries, which you consider to be one of the highest achievements of the human mind. The primitiveness of language as a way of exchanging information is shown by us already in counting the number of possible meaningful and correct phrases.based on "yes" - "no", it forces you to always and everywhere draw boundaries between various complexes of attributes of objects, and because of the weakness of this logic, entropy leads the way in the process of drawing boundaries, and they are drawn very chaotically, illogical even from the point of view of your logic, which is especially convincingly emphasized by their unequal arrangement in the words of different human languages. Your way of communicating is based on the drawing of these chaotic boundaries, which you consider to be one of the highest achievements of the human mind. The primitiveness of language as a way of exchanging information is shown by us already in counting the number of possible meaningful and correct phrases. Moreover, due to the weakness of this logic, entropy leads the way in the process of drawing boundaries, and they are drawn very chaotically, illogically even from the point of view of your logic, which is especially convincingly emphasized by their unequal arrangement in the words of different human languages. Your way of communicating is based on the drawing of these chaotic boundaries, which you consider to be one of the highest achievements of the human mind. The primitiveness of language as a way of exchanging information is shown by us already in counting the number of possible meaningful and correct phrases. Moreover, due to the weakness of this logic, entropy leads the way in the process of drawing boundaries, and they are drawn very chaotically, illogically even from the point of view of your logic, which is especially convincingly emphasized by their unequal arrangement in the words of different human languages. Your way of communicating is based on the drawing of these chaotic boundaries, which you consider to be one of the highest achievements of the human mind. The primitiveness of language as a way of exchanging information is shown by us already in counting the number of possible meaningful and correct phrases.considered by you to be one of the highest achievements of the human mind. The primitiveness of language as a way of exchanging information is shown by us already in counting the number of possible meaningful and correct phrases.considered by you to be one of the highest achievements of the human mind. The primitiveness of language as a way of exchanging information is shown by us already in counting the number of possible meaningful and correct phrases.
Language, as the main carrier of information, itself, in turn, affects your thinking, forcibly forcing it to more clearly adhere to the principle of discreteness. Therefore, in particular, your ethics and aesthetics contain many paired concepts opposed as logical thesis and antithesis. Your public and personal morality is guided by rules that polarize the concepts of "good" - "evil", "life" - "death", "gain" - "loss", "recognition" - "non-recognition", "love" - "hate" and stuff like that. Even your own observation that the meaning of these diametric concepts is different for different peoples does not help you, and even for one people it changes over time. And now, considering yourself a highly civilized Humanity, you in the jury determine the guilt or innocence of the defendant according to the principle "yes" - "no",what may still be permissible for deciding the fate of one person, but absolutely cannot be acceptable for deciding the fate of peoples. But even there, the same principle "yes" - "no" prevails during national referendums or voting in parliaments. Moreover, discrete logic allows you to trust the fate of nations and Humanity to several separate people. In international politics, such polar concepts are for you the concepts of "state of the world" and "state of war", and a sharp transition from one to the other, inherent only in your logic and contrary to nature, you implement with truly insane determination. The recent world war and, obviously, the impending new world war testify that the sharp development of technical civilization also did not make you wiser. However, as for your historical development,it is with great difficulty that we can make predictions precisely because of this sharp discreteness and almost instantaneous transitions of your social devices and foreign policy states from one to another. For several thousand years, KOH has been observing almost continuous wars waged by you among yourself, and in the natural course of historical processes, your wars could have subsided only after 12,000 years, but KOH cannot even argue that these wars will not end in the next 100 years old. Only the last consideration allows us to consider the present conversion not hopeless, for it is natural that an agreement between Mankind and the Coalition can be reached only after the elimination of the warlike habits of Mankind.
COG message, chapter 3
KON is forced to be skeptical about Humanity also for two reasons, generated, however, by the same primitive logic, namely: the attitude towards technical civilization and the fear of the death of the individual.
The development of technology in itself is undoubtedly beneficial and calls on the KOH to treat Mankind favorably as an intelligent race. But the fetishization of technology and even more so the assignment to it of such a role that it becomes the main characteristic of your civilization, alarms us.
The history of mankind has developed chaotically. When separate areas of the Earth did not have a direct communication link, Mankind, in fact, set up several experiments to create various types of civilizations. Some of them were approved by the KOH. Unfortunately, different civilizations could not coexist peacefully when, in the process of development and spread, opportunities for direct contacts between them appeared. As a rule, a more coarse and primitive, and because of this, a more cruel civilization destroyed a more developed and humane one, in order, in turn, to be destroyed by an even cruder one.
At present, the most primitive of all, the machine civilization, dominates the Earth. It has embraced all of Humanity, keeps it under its control and will not allow a new civilization to arise in the future, unless it destroys itself or if Humanity does not take control of the development of a machine civilization into its own hands and gradually transforms it into another kind of civilization, much more necessary an intelligent race. KON hopes that the impetus for such a restructuring can be a real appeal and all possible assistance that KON can provide to Humanity, if this assistance is required and Humanity expresses a corresponding desire. It is necessary to stipulate that local civilizations, the centers of which were the city of Apuradhapur at the time of the first appeal and the city of Tkaatzetcoatl at the time of our second appeal,much more corresponded to the needs of mankind than the modern machine civilization, and as one of the options for its assistance, KOH can offer Mankind the most detailed description of these civilizations for taking them as possible models. One of the most important signs for the systematization of a race as reasonable is that each of its representatives prioritizes the activity of the collectivized mind. Accordingly, a person as a rational being should put the development of the mind of Mankind above all.that each of its representatives prioritizes the activities of the collectivized mind. Accordingly, a person as a rational being should put the development of the mind of Mankind above all.that each of its representatives prioritizes the activities of the collectivized mind. Accordingly, a person as a rational being should put the development of the mind of Mankind above all.
Human functions are reduced to perceiving information from the previous generation of people, distorting it by their own random guesses and transmitting the distorted information to the next generation. Chaotic fluctuations in the movement of thought in a reasonable society are necessary so that after historical elimination there will certainly be zigzags in the movement of thought, corresponding to the zigzags of changes in the objective picture of being. The latter has an unpredictable direction, while the spectrum of thinking of any individual throughout his life remains constant. It follows that the change of generations is necessary for intelligent beings, and in particular for people, not only as living beings for the preservation and development of reason. Therefore, the hopes of many representatives of Humanity are fundamentally destructive,that contact with intelligent alien races will help them solve the problem of immortality. On the other hand, we cannot deny humanity the appropriate help, no matter how destructive it may be, since every intelligent race has the right to independently decide its own fate.
COG message, chapter 4
KON does not stay away from contacts with Humanity and its individual representatives to discuss any issues and to provide positive assistance in any problems of a private nature. But the main purpose of this appeal is to warn about the danger threatening Mankind and to offer Mankind to join the Coalition. The Charter of the Coalition and a description of its structure and activities can be transferred to Humanity for familiarization without any additional conditions at its first request, promulgated by the government of any of the four largest states or the Secretariat of the League of Nations.
If Humanity is inclined to think about joining the Coalition, it will first have to do the work on restructuring the logical foundation of its thinking according to the scheme of the thinking base generally accepted in the Coalition. This requirement is dictated not only by the fact that the flawed type of thinking inherent in Mankind would cause a progressive inferiority complex in Mankind, who joined the Coalition, but above all by the fact that, due to fundamentally different types of thinking, the races of the Coalition and Mankind would not be able to exchange the necessary information, unless only at the most superficial level, an example of which is involuntarily true conversion. Humanity would be useless for the Coalition, as well as the Coalition for Humanity. Without the restructuring of the logical foundation of our thinking by Humanity, we are powerless to even help you to protect yourself from a cyclone. It seems to us that Humanity will spend from 60 to 70 thousand years to work on restructuring the logical foundation, which, in view of the danger threatening Humanity, is a critical period. Therefore, this work should be started now.
The KON undertakes to transfer the primary course of continuous logic and detailed instructions on the gradual education in the next generations of the skills of continuous-logical thinking at the first demand of Mankind, but not before the different peoples of Mankind stop senseless strife and agree with the concentration of efforts in this long process of restructuring of thinking, for acquainting one of the warring nations with the principles of continuous logical thinking would be analogous to giving him an absolute weapon and in the end would lead to the death of Mankind. The present, third, appeal of the KOH to Humanity is the last. Failure to respond within 50 years will be regarded as evidence that Humanity refuses to join the Coalition.
Coalition Authorized
Coalition Observer Detachment.