So, we will try to understand the general direction of the country's development, its fate, the main test of time, which this time falls to the people. Let us recall the years 1915-1916, their analogue for the cycle of Uranus, which is equal to 84 years, falls in 1998-1999. In textbooks they are characterized by "ministerial leapfrog", the complete loss of authority of Nicholas II, criticism of his actions as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the country. During this period, there is a collapse of the entire national economy, a sharp impoverishment of the entire population. Even the employees and officers of the tsarist army turn into beggars, humiliated and insulted outcasts. Unfortunately, Nikolai has an addiction to alcohol, which largely prevents him from coping with his duties. In full measure, all this can be attributed to the rule of Yeltsin.
On the eve of the second elections in 1996, newspapers published information about his past life as a ruler of one of the Balkan countries, who ruined the country and the people, and did not care about their interests. This is fully confirmed by his stars. However, even if all the newspapers wrote about it, everything would remain the same. Too strong secret financial support was provided to him from those who later began to determine the rules of the game (Velichko F. Gerasimova T. The path to success). They compared and compared Boris Yeltsin with another Boris, the hero of the Time of Troubles - Godunov, who loved to build, first of all, fortifications. He was married to the daughter of Malyuta Skuratov. He was suspected of the murder of Tsarevich Dmitry. Boris Godunov died suddenly in the midst of the struggle against False Dmitry. His young son Fedor was proclaimed tsar,who was soon killed in 1605 during an uprising.
All attempts at economic reform are futile. It is foolish to expect prosperity on the trailing end of the negative spiral. Although during this period, at the end of the Uranus cycle, the country already had an alternative way out of the protracted crisis. Since the cycle of Jupiter is 12 years, the most optimal period of stay in power is naturally determined at 6 years. It is this period that makes it possible to determine the ability of the ruler to rule. In this case, Yeltsin's election would fall in 1998, at the time of his lowest rating, and the country could avoid the horrors of the last two years of Yeltsin's rule.
At the head of the country was the power, thanks to the inaction or wrong decisions of which the country, like on the eve of the revolutions of 1917, fell sharply into the abyss. It was a terrible ending to the era of decay, corruption, lawlessness and poverty of the people. Yeltsin's karmic potential possesses great destructive power, this is precisely where his main mission was reflected - it was necessary to destroy the old, obsolete. But it is impossible to destroy all the time, it is more important than ever after the general collapse to create.
This personality lacked the potential for creation. And here it was necessary to involve others. The most amazing thing is that there was always a strong alternative next to him in the difficult crisis years, which made it possible to save the situation. In 1996 it was Chernomyrdin, in 1998 Primakov closed his chest. Time itself pushes these individuals to the forefront. But as soon as the situation began to change for the better, and as soon as this personality gained authority and popularity, Boris Yeltsin, worried about his power, pushed them in, removed them and again tried to destroy everything. Fate presented him with the main test of limitation of power, which he could not overcome.
Both in the past and in the current incarnation, Yeltsin was a tough ruler. The degree of his inner democracy is demonstrated by his methods of working with those who were dissatisfied with his rule and had the courage to declare it - Yu. Skuratov, I. Rodionov and many others. Fate more than once demanded that he share his power with those who tried to help him. Only three months before the end of his term, Yeltsin resigned from power. An important role in this was played by one of the characteristics of Putin, who sympathizes with the weak, old, and disadvantaged. This rare quality of the president was the best guarantee for the former ruler of Russia, whom many demanded to be prosecuted for his atrocities.
Analyzing the fate of the people, their attitude to the ruler - an analogue of the last tsar from the Romanov dynasty, it is more correct to consider this ruler as another terrible test for the people. The people were required to slip through the fate of the revolutions of 1905 and 1917 - again to pass the fatal test of fate in 1905 and 1917.
The fate of the 1905 revolution, which fell in 1989, the people, using the powerful backlog of the empire of Leonidas, overcame with anguish and shouts. Since February 1989, there have been massive strikes, people stormed shops, trying to buy ration cards for sugar and vodka, miners constantly went on strike. For the first time at the May Congress of People's Deputies in the same 1989, delegates pulled out each other's microphone, Academician Sakharov spoke several times.
Promotional video:
Now the people had to show maximum patience and pass the old exam - an examination for the lawlessness of power in accordance with and by analogy with the horrors of the rule of the last seventeenth year, since here it is not the power that serves the people, not the case of the ruler for the people, but the opposite case, when the people are only a means to achieve and satisfy the ambition and lust for power of the ruler.
The case when the people serve only as a kind of throne, on which the ruler will sit as it suits him. It is a throne that the ruler pays little attention to. What the people say, what they write in the newspapers does not interest him at all. For all those ancient and modern times that this person ruled, she, firstly, was already accustomed to the fact that the people were dissatisfied with such a rule, and secondly, she perfectly knows how to retain power, the main of which was the method of restraints and balances, the rest it doesn't matter to her.
Having received the maximum power, Yeltsin was unable to carry out reforms, power was used only to retain itself. The country was quickly plunging into chaos, corruption, debt and poverty. High mortality rates have far exceeded fertility rates. Having started the struggle against the privileges of the old government, the new government at this time received maximum powers and huge financial resources, which were directed to their own enrichment and demonstration of their appearance. At this time, in addition to the construction of residences, expensive repairs to the Kremlin began.
Yeltsin left office with a minimum rating of 2%, having embittered his rapidly and sharply impoverished people against himself to the extreme. Intuition prompted him to leave on the last day of the last 1999, voluntarily giving way to Putin, who arrived in time from the northern capital. His faithful wife, Naina Yeltsina, also supported this undertaking, and he himself felt that if he did not leave, he would still not be there.
Like the last tsar from the Romanov dynasty, who abdicated in March 1917, he too had to abdicate, otherwise such powerful factors as time and health would remove him from his post. He clearly understood that it was better to make a beautiful gesture, ask everyone for forgiveness and leave himself, without waiting for the sad outcome. The country has re-entered the era of "wild" capitalism. The economy of a huge country, rich in natural resources, found itself in the weak hands of power.
We often say: the past determines the future. Let's see how the country's past could have influenced at the end of the third spiral of power. Comparison with the previous spiral of the Romanov dynasty clearly shows the explosion of popular indignation and, as a result, the revolution of 1917. Comparing the current process of completing the third spiral at the end of the 20th century with the completion of the first and second spirals of power, one can predict a certain symbiosis of the terrible Time of Troubles and the period of bloody revolutions and counter-revolutions of the early 20th century.
Thus, the well-worn track that developed historically in Russia suggested three options for getting out of this situation. The first way out is by analogy with 1917, the second is a repetition of the scenario of the Time of Troubles, when the country was freed from foreign interference thanks to the patriotism of the best representatives of the people, and the third option is the summation of the first two options.
During the difficult period of the 1998 default, Yevgeny Primakov provided invaluable assistance to the country and people. This time he was the savior of the fatherland from economic dependence. Together with his team and, first of all, Georgy Boos, Yevgeny Primakov carefully and thoughtfully tried to lead the country out of the crisis situation. His words that we are all in the same boat, his talent and ability to navigate this boat saved Russia from the storm of a new revolution. It was no easier for him than for Pozharsky during the siege of Moscow in 1612.
Strong karmic potential helped the calm and wise Primakov to cope with the task of saving the country from the strongest economic dependence, from further decay and corruption. Most of all, according to Primakov himself, he was helped by Georgy Boos, full of health and energy. What is not an analogue to Kuzma Minin, a meat merchant who put all his savings on the cause of saving the Fatherland?
Demanding and waiting at that time for an upturn or a sharp leap in the economy is like demanding prosperity in 1917 or 1612. Yevgeny Primakov brilliantly coped with his main task of saving the boat of the Russian statehood. After Primakov's resignation, the country continues to move according to the 1917 scenario, the further process of the premier's leapfrog continues. Remember the "ministerial leapfrog" of Nicholas II. Only in this way, and in no other way, are the "shackles of the past" that dictate exactly this course of events in the country. Surprisingly, during the default in August 1998, the newspapers wrote about Boris Yeltsin's excellent mood.
“Boris Nikolayevich, who a few days ago announced that there would be no devaluation, looked during his visit to the Northern Fleet like the commander of a bombed-out regiment who, with a smile, collects a chamomile bouquet among the corpses of his own soldiers …“I rarely have a good mood throughout the year, however, today the mood is excellent”- these quotes from news agencies confirmed that the guarantor of the Constitution is not quite himself … Meanwhile, the“ruler of the world”will still have to make some decisions in the near future. The Duma is ready to discuss the issue of a vote of no confidence in the government”(MK. 1998. August 22).
This only testifies to the fact that Boris Nikolayevich completely coped with his main karmic task - to destroy everything to the ground. The people returned to the trials of the seventeenth year again. Such is the fate of the country, such is the result of the rule of Boris Yeltsin, on whom great hopes were originally pinned. But after all, during this period there should not be another ruler, since time itself, its next cycle pushes an analogue of its ruler of 1917 into the leaders of the country. Only in this way, and not otherwise!
That is why during his reign, the country received not so much freedom and democracy - these good wishes, as pseudo-freedom and pseudo-democracy. He will leave this mortal world on April 23, 2007 at 3:45 pm from cardiovascular failure; earlier, in 1996, after the difficult presidential elections in Russia, he will withstand coronary bypass surgery. Analyzing the fate of Yeltsin, several stages in the evolution of this ancient experienced courtier can be distinguished. This is Boris Godunov, his family suffered greatly during the Troubles, his daughter was abused and sent to a monastery.
The next step in Yeltsin's evolution is the ruler of the Balkan country. The main thing, of course, is to understand the starting point in its evolution. Considering the successful work, love and skill of Yeltsin for construction, he was one of those ancient people who loved and knew how to build well. Considering his family, the special desire for power of his daughter Tatiana, her nationwide rejection, one can draw an analogy with one of the ancient rulers - Herod, who loved to build and built the largest temple.
Due to excessive reliance on power, this king killed babies in the time of Jesus, because he was afraid of losing the throne and power, and at the request of his daughter, he offered her the head of John the Baptist. The found bust of Herod gives an absolute external resemblance to the first president of Russia, which confirms this version, and his atrocities, of course, in subsequent lives (Boris Godunov) had to be reflected more than once on his entire family.
Dexterously juggling power, Yeltsin could afford a lot, in past lives he was not in such alterations, but he did not forget about the necessary correct appointments of ministers (Chernomyrdin, Kasyanov, Primakov and many others). This saved the country from collapse, because it is important to appoint those who are tolerated by time itself and who are able to competently respond to the requirements of the time. Unlike Gorbachev, he understood this, felt it, because intuition and potential allowed Yeltsin, like a dexterous tightrope walker, to keep walking along the razor's edge.
Gorbachev himself nominated Yeltsin for the post of secretary of the Moscow party organization, although Nikolai Ryzhkov directly warned him about the power claims of that and a possible confrontation that happened. “He will stop at nothing! It will trample everything,”Ryzhkov uselessly advised Gorbachev, who at first tried in every way to help him. Only later would Gorbachev accuse Yeltsin of rampant claims to power.
Yeltsin did not forget about the people, did not drive him to death by starvation, supplying him even in the most difficult years with bread and cheap corn chicken legs (Bush's legs). In terms of his potential, Yeltsin is an order of magnitude stronger than Mikhail Gorbachev, although the people scolded both of them with the very last words. On the opposite side of the globe, on the contrary, the people were dying of laughter. The entire audience simply fell off their chairs when the empty counters of Soviet stores were broadcast and the American President Ronald Reagan was telling another anecdote about the Russians.
Unlike Reagan and Bush, who had clear goals and plans in their heads that they were seeking, neither Gorbachev nor Yeltsin had a clear plan and were completely at a loss. “The information does not reach me. I don't know what's going on,”Gorbachev complained and scolded each and every one. Yeltsin himself later admitted that he did not know where, in which direction and how to go. The people understood this, scolded their leaders, but there were no mass shootings and killings. The people did not smash the palaces, as it was in 1917. This time the people withstood all the fatal tests of fate in the form of restructuring and a fundamental breakdown of the entire society.
So, at the end of the Uranus cycle by 2000-2001, by analogy with the fate of the revolutions of 1917, the country had to plunge into the chaos and devastation that was in 1917. This is exactly what happened. If it were not for Gorbachev or Yeltsin, similar persons would have been in their place. This is precisely the fate, the harsh fateful predestination, the destiny, the fate of the people who overthrew their ruler in 1917. That is why fate and time once again put the people before a similar fatal, truly fatal test.
It was the fate of the people, its main test, that brought similar rulers to the highest post of power, since the fate of the people determines the ruler, who at the moment can most effectively implement, realize the fate of Russia. The people only in full compliance with the laws of power receive the ruler they deserve in the course of their development. Since the people receive the ruler they deserve, then they should not judge him, because this is the reward or punishment that the people deserve, or rather, earned in the course of their historical evolution.
Olga Helga