Tatiana Moskalkova, Ombudsman for Human Rights in Russia, recently announced this, a process that suggests that media coverage of biometrics and the electronic concentration camp seems to have found its audience. People are beginning to realize the dangers of submitting biometric data and applying isotopic tracing. Recently it just became known that Sberbank began to fraudulently remove biometric data by paying for utilities through certain types of SMS. A person receives an SMS in the presence of a bank operator, sends a response and does not even notice the line of consent to the collection and processing of his biometric data.
Below I would like to quote an excerpt from the annual report of the Ombudsman at the end of last year: “In total, in 2018, I received 2,766 appeals on freedom of conscience and religion, of which 46 were collective ones. In 2017, there were about three times less such appeals - 810. At the same time, almost 95% of complaints are related to the introduction of electronic identification. The surge of such appeals resulted in “intensive introduction of high technologies in Russian society in 2018.” - end of quote.
What does this mean? People understood the danger of MIR cards, TIN, SNILS and other electronic forms of service in government agencies. Particularly noteworthy is the fact that there is no or almost no personal factor in people's complaints - the very essence of complaints is not directed at queues or personal inconveniences, but at the very form of service - through the assignment of personal numbers and an electronic form instead of the usual paper form.