Germany:
Poland, July 12:
Hungary, July 12:
Promotional video:
Italy, July 11-12:
Slovakia, July 11-12:
As is clearly evident from these shots, Europe has met with a very serious cold snap, which the “academics” do not even know how to explain.
Suppose that the Gulf Stream is cooling down and therefore cold cyclones from the Atlantic are coming to Europe. However, Spain, Italy and Greece are not exactly Europe, and almost Africa and the Gulf Stream are there to the light of the day - there is enough warm breeze from the Sahara. In addition, it snows in July in the same way in the USA, which does not touch this Gulf Stream either with its left or right side.
The second popular explanation today is the so-called circumpolar vortices, which pull the air upward at the poles and prevent the cold atmosphere from spreading to the equator. The theory is very logical and even works to a certain extent. But there is a problem: snow in southern Brazil and in Melbourne, which is nonsense for this time of year:
Thus, the cold snap also affected the Southern Hemisphere, while everything is Ok with the polar eddies over Antarctica. This raises a logical question: why is the summer so cold? This question is serious and not at all theoretical, because from his answer it will be possible to assume what will follow next.
Since theories about the activity of the Sun, about the movement of the ocean and the atmosphere do not give answers to questions, the only thing that can still move is the mantle of the planet, that is, magma of different densities. Perhaps what exactly is the reason?
According to modern geological theories, the mantle and core are liquid, therefore, a centrifugal force acts on the mantle, as the planet rotates, which, as it were, pushes it towards the equator:
In light of this obvious fact, which follows from simple physical experience, the surface of the lithosphere in the equatorial region is closest to the mantle, and the surface of the lithosphere in the region of the poles is farthest from the mantle. As a result, a number of geologists with alternative views on “academic geology” have long and persistently argued that the equator is warm not because the sun's rays fall on the African heads at a right angle, but because there is a mantle underfoot that emits heat. At the same time, penguins have just tens of kilometers of ice rock under their paws with small disseminations of mantle plumes. That is why it is cold in Antarctica.
Now let's imagine a situation that something has changed in the core and it starts rotating a little faster, or some local vortices have appeared there. Accordingly, the speed of rotation of the mantle will also change, which (all or locally, above the eddies) will either lag slightly behind the lithosphere or be ahead of it. Roughly speaking, the lithosphere will make one revolution in 24 hours, and the mantle will make one revolution in 23 hours or 25 hours.
The first thing that will follow from this is that the mantle flows will begin, like waves, to be impaled on the surface of Mohorovichich, which, as it were, lines the lithosphere from the inside and delimits it from the mantle:
As a result, volcanic eruptions and earthquakes on the surface will become more frequent, which we observe.
And the second consequence will be the deformation of the mantle, which either approaches even closer to the equator, outflowing from the middle latitudes (in the case of acceleration of the rotation of the mantle), or takes on a more rounded shape (in the case of slowing down of rotation) and again moves somewhat deeper from the middle latitudes (and the equator), directing the released volume to the poles. As a result, the ice will begin to melt at the poles (which we observe), at the equator it will become a little colder, and the middle latitudes will plunge into the ice age - which, again, we are observing.
The so-called "academic science" considers such theories to be bullshit, drawing some of their own pictures of the inner structure of the planet, and some famous Russian geologists in May of this year even made a courageous attempt to look into the core of the Earth with their own eyes:
However, so far, unfortunately, there is no report in the scientific press about this bold experiment and the structure of the Earth, which they write about in books on geology, is nothing more than a theory taken from the ceiling. In fact, no one knows what is happening there, and, as smart people assume, there should be a cavity inside the core, in theory.
This is a simple law of physics: twist a spoon in a glass of tea - and you can see a funnel in the center there. But if the system is closed, as, for example, a rubber ball filled with water, the funnel will turn into a cavity. And what is happening in this cavity, no one even imagines, just like no one imagines, and what happens even at a depth of 15-20 kilometers.
Hence, our hypothesis, according to which the mantle should be blamed for the cooling, is also nothing more than a hypothesis. Nevertheless, today this hypothesis is the only one that somehow explains what is happening with the lithosphere and climate, so it is quite possible that it is true.