If you are interested in world history and your own history, then you probably have questions for it. Why did things happen this way and not another? Who was guided by what? And finally, my favorite question from Professor Preobrazhensky: "Excuse me, who stood on whom?"
I am sure that everyone has a lack of understanding of the logic of what kind of events. It's just that most people think that since this is the official version, then I don't know something, well, okay. Whoever is more corrosive buys a ten-page book of a certified author with regalia. There they explain to him in a popular way - for this reason and for this reason. Sometimes 100,500 sources in different languages are added at the end.
Even if it doesn't agree, the skeptic nods - the question is closed. In discussions, he cheerfully quotes what he read, showing the depth of knowledge. Almost no one can admit that doubts remain, otherwise, first you need to admit that you are a fool and did not understand a whole huge monograph that a scientist chewed for you five hundred pages. This is already a psychology and the problem of movement contrary to the strength of authorities and generally accepted opinion.
Today is not about that. Now we will look at the pictures and if you like them, you can easily spend more than one evening behind them, rotating back and forth. And there you look and read something else.
Google has a service that calculates the frequency of mentioning linguistic phrases or just words in the books of its digitized library. Now I don't remember exactly, I might even be an order of magnitude mistaken, but something like 5 million pieces. The sample is small, but representative. There is no need to draw distant conclusions, but you can think about it.
So, in order to understand how it works, let's start with the well-known and understandable. For example: "Computer":
Promotional video:
We took all the spelling options so as not to suffer later. Capital, small, mixed. It is clearly seen that both in Russian and in English, the use of this word begins around 1950. You can look more precisely, but this is not needed now.
There is some kind of incomprehensible bounce around 1800 in Russian. What nonsense?
Indeed - nonsense. Either they made a mistake when making the entries, or where else. Congratulations, by the way, to the Pedagogika publishing house on the journey of her books into the past by a time machine. But, in general, the picture is clear - when they began to use, then they began to print.
Now let's take something not so obvious. For example, Ukrainian language: "Ukrainian language":
Everything is also true. The language is young, hatched at the beginning of the century, when Austria-Hungary began its subversive work. It is interesting that in English you can see the periods when advertising of Ukrainians stops. These were the war years - we were allies. The years of perestroika - so as not to irritate the country and allow Gorbachev to calmly finish what he started. Renewed in the 90s to consolidate the division of one people into two.
Before going further, I want to note that Ukraine, the Ukrainian nation, the Ukrainian language are a clear example for those who do not believe that it is possible to make a forgery of history that everyone will believe. The new generation in Ukraine, already now, is confident that they are part of an ancient nation, for today's Russian youth, Ukraine is an independent country with its own language and with some obscure and uninteresting disputes about the past, and in 20 years EVERYONE will calm down to consider that it was so since ancient times.
A couple more examples, and you can continue on your own, in any direction that interests you.
What did we learn in school? That until science opened the eyes of the people, everyone was devout and prayed forty times a day! The church ran everything and burned witches, sorcerers and Copernicus.
"Christ":
Some kind of trouble comes with the mention of Christ, in Russian and in general only since the 19th century. The fact that in English there is a splash on the 17th is normal. History is forged, not erased.
Maybe the main character in Russia was written and named differently.
"Christ":
No, all the appearances of the Son of God begin around the 19th century, and in the Latin alphabet (lower graph), and in general, almost in the 20th. Maybe they renamed it from drinking?
"Bible":
Strangely, the Bible itself appears in Russia only after the 19th century, and in English at the same time begins to occupy a significant place in the book business.
It turned out that religion cannot serve as a permanent guide. Or maybe the books weren't printed at all until the 19th century. Or typed in hieroglyphs?
What to compare with? What is always there and does not disappear anywhere and therefore should be mentioned throughout the ages?
"The sun":
In Russian, the sun is often used. Dies out with the advent of the Bible of its characters. It's funny in English! Before the Bible (according to our charts, of course) the sun with a capital letter, that is, with respect, after with a small one.
The absence of literature in Russian before 1700-1750 can be explained in any way. And Peter burned everything with the transition to the European calendar, and in general we were backward, or maybe we weren't at all. Come up with it yourself. I'll show you a picture for now.
Remember I talked about the struggle of the Jewish (Christian, Jewish, Muslim) god Yahweh (Jehovah, Elohim, El) with the pagan Baal in whom many people believed. So many.
Baal:
Doesn't it seem strange to you that before the mention of the Bible and Christ in the literature, Baal somehow had too much space in the books? Do we remember history? Baal was generally forgotten even before Christianity, Zeus and Jupiter had to defeat him. And here it is !!
What about Islam? Take the Spaniards, who fought the Muslims day and night there, hanging hamons and pork muzzles outside the window to protest. They have to throw out all their emotions in letters! Or mention or ignore!
Allah:
Excuse me, Muslim brothers, you have everything the same as Christians. The entry of Allah into human civilization only since the 19th century.
Don't you think everything is a little strange? We must now take the ancestor - Judaism. For one thing, the Jews themselves will have to be disturbed, because, in almost all languages, they are designated the same with faith.
"Juif, Juive, Israelle, Jewish":
See how interesting the French are. Mentioned a little earlier and without leaps. The British have exactly two leaps since the beginning of the 18th century, apparently, with the advent of Christianity and from the beginning of the 20th, probably due to the increased influence in society.
Well, of course, it is interesting to note how much the influence of this nation has increased, in just 200 years. Jewish brothers - my congratulations!
What did I want to say with all this? I think you noticed, on the example of the Sun and Baal, the sunset of which began exactly with the arrival of the Abrahamic trinity. Something went wrong!
Do these graphs prove anything? No, they cannot provide sufficient proof. Additional - perhaps.
The problem is they are easy to dismiss. And the sample is unclear and the representativeness is small and linguistically it is impossible to draw conclusions from one example of a word. There are a bunch of synonyms, meaning changes, spelling rules, cultural and other variations.
And most importantly, it is not yet clear what to prove? Well, they will find in a year "the library of Ivan the Terrible", which will be from head to toe in all languages of the world in Jesus. Then they will be digitized and such graphs will disappear. But the question is far from language. There are thousands of strange evidences around us that history has been completely replaced, not later than 200-250 years ago.
In fact, a lot about it. Too lazy to list all the notes! Subscribe to the channel and read.
I hope the immersion in linguistics was not in vain and you yourself will try to find something interesting:
books.google.com/ngrams
